Federer stands out

[ULTIMATERODDICKFAN]

Ok, here is what i think. By now, we must all know that the Nadal-Djokovic rivalry is more evenly matched than Roger vs Rafa. So here is my theory in this situation. LOL, this might be stupid, but here... We were wrong by comparing Federer-Nadal rivalry to Sampras-Agassi. What truly is comparable with the rivalry of Sampras-Agassi is Djokovic-Nadal. Nadal vs Djokovic were the patterns set after Borg-McEnroe, Sampras-Agassi, Edberg-Becker, Lendle-Wilander, etc.. There are a pair of players to called Big Rivalry with each generation. But this generation is were blessed because not only we have Nadal-Djokovic who are like Sampras-Agassi back in the day, we have a guy like Federer, Federer stands out.

 

[ULTIMATERODDICKFAN]

I am in no way disrespecting federer, I was just saying that not only that this generation blessed with rivalry like Sampras-Agassi in the 90s, which is Nadal-Djokovic but also we were blessed with Roger Federer

 

[FlashFlare11]

Federer is not of this generation. He was part of the last generation, along with Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Davydenko, Haas, Blake, Ferrero, etc. Nadal was very good at a very young age, which is why he is somewhat a part of both. He is now playing with a contemporary rival against a field that is mostly similar to him in age. Djokovic-Nadal is the rivalry of today.

Besides, I think it's a bit peculiar to have a rivalry between two players who are 5 years apart. Djokovic and Nadal are just about the same age, which makes it more even.

 

[ZeroSkid]

Beat him every once in a while? More like totally crushes him every once in a while. Let's not forget the score of their last match before the AO? 6-3 6-0. Not even Djokovic has done that to Nadal yet.

Nobody gives a damn about a world tour finals match lol, not to mention both rafa and nole had nothing left in the tank

 

[hoodjem]

Too many here are "prisoners of the moment."

Right now, Djokovic looks like the greatest thing since pre-sliced bread.

I wonder where he'll rank in 10 years. Maybe really high, because that gives him plenty of time to win many more slams. But maybe not.

We cannot know today.

 

[Seany]

Nadal could of just as easily won the australian open, Nadal has never been destroyed in a grand-slam by djokovic, they were all close matches

Close? You must have been watching different USO and W matches to me.

 

[FlashFlare11]

Nobody gives a damn about a world tour finals match lol, not to mention both rafa and nole had nothing left in the tank

Nobody except all the greatest players of their eras (Sampras, Borg, Lendl, Becker, Agassi, McEnroe, Vilas, Natase) and the tour itself, which promotes it as the biggest event on tour. But, of course, since Nadal has never won it, it's not a real event. It doesn't take a tennis expert to clearly see that Monte-Carlo is the true test for any champion.

In all seriousness, it should be held against Nadal and Djokovic that they can't play tennis after September. Federer had better seasons in his prime, playing more matches in a year than those two ever have and still won the tour finals.

 

[devila]

federer needed to tell djoker how "brutal" the 2007 us open final was for djoker even though the late bloomer djoker was too physically weak to serve strong flat serves to win on set points and to maintain the lead in the 2nd set. federer doesn't deserve sympathy after he said djoker had no right to recover from his severe breathing and heat-related health problems, then federina weeped his egomaniac eyes out
because he missed another pete sampras slam record due to nadal's so-called one dimensional game, in the same tournament.

 

[nereis]

I agree, Djokovic and Nadal have played more matches against each other than Federer and Nadal.

They are of the same generation and both trained in Spain during their formative years.

Federer and Nadal is more like Connors and Lendl, or Lendl and Becker; the older champion against the young challenger to the throne.

 

[fed_rulz]

Nobody gives a damn about a world tour finals match lol, not to mention both rafa and nole had nothing left in the tank

LOL, Nadal took a 6 wk break before the WTF and ended up with nothing in his tank after ONE RR match (the one prior to meeting Federer)? Nadal seems to get tired out of taking too much rest.

 

[devila]

Nobody except all the greatest players of their eras (Sampras, Borg, Lendl, Becker, Agassi, McEnroe, Vilas, Natase) and the tour itself, which promotes it as the biggest event on tour. But, of course, since Nadal has never won it, it's not a real event. It doesn't take a tennis expert to clearly see that Monte-Carlo is the true test for any champion.

In all seriousness, it should be held against Nadal and Djokovic that they can't play tennis after September. Federer had better seasons in his prime, playing more matches in a year than those two ever have and still won the tour finals.

federer failed to play much davis cup, AND we all know he would never have 14 slams if he had won DAVIS CUP AS NOLE AND RAFA DID.
for 5 years, FEDERER WAS PLAYING coward RODDICK, NOT NOLE AND RAFA.

 

[FlashFlare11]

federer failed to play much davis cup, AND we all know he would never have 14 slams if he had won DAVIS CUP AS NOLE AND RAFA DID.
for 5 years, FEDERER WAS PLAYING coward RODDICK, NOT NOLE AND RAFA.

Where does that logic come from? Now Nadal and Djokovic can't catch Federer because Davis Cup is making them tired?

Every player has their priorities. If Djokovic and Nadal decide to play Davis Cup and put their health at risk for the slams, they should be held up to it. It can't, however, be used as an excuse.

Nadal was playing tour-level events in 2003. He played against the same players Federer did. And so what if he was playing Roddick or any of the other players in that time period? If Nadal never beats Djokovic again, are we going to be calling Nadal a coward too? If they were so weak, then why didn't Rafa rack up as many slams?

 

[Towser83]

federer failed to play much davis cup, AND we all know he would never have 14 slams if he had won DAVIS CUP AS NOLE AND RAFA DID.
for 5 years, FEDERER WAS PLAYING coward RODDICK, NOT NOLE AND RAFA.

No we don't know that Federer wouldn't have won 14 slams if he played Davis Cup. But yeah I guess it's Federer's fault he's the only world class Swiss player (Warwinka is not bad either ok) and Spain have loads. Federer rather win the important events anyway, like the slams.

Who did Nadal beat that Federer didn't? Only Federer, and he's a guy who only won cos he beat cowards right? And he's played Nole more times in slams than Nadal has, won just as many times and won last year when Nadal couldn't even beat him. So please get a clue inside your head.

 

[fed_rulz]

federer failed to play much davis cup, AND we all know he would never have 14 slams if he had won DAVIS CUP AS NOLE AND RAFA DID.
for 5 years, FEDERER WAS PLAYING coward RODDICK, NOT NOLE AND RAFA.

you already got pwned on the Davis Cup thingie; just to refresh your memory:

i must have missed federina talking about his exhaustion in his rare inconvenient davis cup appearance. he deduced that losing to djoker was less painful than losing in davis cup. it must be why he got lucky in slams...he never suffered with uncomfortable davis cup and charity exhibitions. pobre goat.

hey moron, please do a fact-check before you post drivel. Federer has played more DC matches than many of the other past greats:

Federer: 41-12

Retired:
Agassi : 30-6
Sampras: 19-9
Connors: 10-3
Borg: 45-11
Edberg: 47-23
Becker: 54-12

Active:
Nadal: 20-5
Djoker: 21-9
Roddick: 33-12

 

[Limpinhitter]

Too many here are "prisoners of the moment."

Always has been, always will be.

Right now, Djokovic looks like the greatest thing since pre-sliced bread.

I wonder where he'll rank in 10 years. Maybe really high, because that gives him plenty of time to win many more slams. But maybe not.

We cannot know today.

Who thought 17 year old Wimbledon champ, Boris Becker, would only win 6 majors, or that Pete Sampras would win 7 Wimbledons and 14 majors in the same era as Becker, Agassi, Courier and Chang?

 

[rommil]

Djokovic is currently on a seven match streak against Nadal. Nadal has had a five match streak against Djokovic (the same as his best streak against Federer). The H2H is currently 16-14 in Nadal's favour. 10 of Nadal's victories were in straight sets. 9 of Djokovic's victories were in straight sets. Nadal has gone just over a year without a victory over Djokovic. In the past Djokovic has gone a year without a victory over Nadal.
.

So how do you explain Nadal's inability to win a match from the last 7 times they met considering Nadal has had a history of a winning streak over Novak?

 

[devila]

nole says he is anticipating and serving better. in 2007, he choked badly at the us open because he served moonballs while doing weak returns on federer shots and he thought federer was his hero.

 

[zapvor]

Federer is not of this generation. He was part of the last generation, along with Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Davydenko, Haas, Blake, Ferrero, etc. Nadal was very good at a very young age, which is why he is somewhat a part of both. He is now playing with a contemporary rival against a field that is mostly similar to him in age. Djokovic-Nadal is the rivalry of today.

Besides, I think it's a bit peculiar to have a rivalry between two players who are 5 years apart. Djokovic and Nadal are just about the same age, which makes it more even.

i think this is a distinction most people forget. fed is 30. the big 3 besides him are all really from a later generation. 5 years is quite a bit in tennis. just think if fed was 26 in 2012 he would be dominating everyone.

 

[devila]

Where does that logic come from? Now Nadal and Djokovic can't catch Federer because Davis Cup is making them tired?

Every player has their priorities. If Djokovic and Nadal decide to play Davis Cup and put their health at risk for the slams, they should be held up to it. It can't, however, be used as an excuse.

Nadal was playing tour-level events in 2003. He played against the same players Federer did. And so what if he was playing Roddick or any of the other players in that time period? If Nadal never beats Djokovic again, are we going to be calling Nadal a coward too? If they were so weak, then why didn't Rafa rack up as many slams?

rogi couldn't beat a down and out hewitt in an australia davis cup semi, so he had to be rested for slams after the year 2003. he would've lost wimbledon 2004, 2007 and 2009 if he was busy in davis cup and exhibitions like hewitt and roddick were.
we all know wawrinka helped him in olympic doubles, not singles. LOLOL
poor fed cried after losing his 14th chance of winning a presumed gift slam.
i bet the nadal injury and gift draws at the french open and wimbledon stopped fed tears.

 

[devila]

i think this is a distinction most people forget. fed is 30. the big 3 besides him are all really from a later generation. 5 years is quite a bit in tennis. just think if fed was 26 in 2012 he would be dominating everyone.

fed was humiliated twice by canas in 2007 indian wells and miami, and nalbandian ripped him in madrid. was federer old at age 25?

in 2006, fed choked on 2 match points on clay. he also lost to volandri in rome, BUT you call him dominant.
only a dazed nadal gave a much older fed the hamburg and madrid clay matches.

the usual loser roddick choked on 4 set points at wimbledon, no one could get a more easy draw with choker roddick around.

 

[FlashFlare11]

rogi couldn't beat a down and out hewitt in an australia davis cup semi, so he had to be rested for slams after the year 2003. he would've lost wimbledon 2004, 2007 and 2009 if he was busy in davis cup and exhibitions like hewitt and roddick were.
we all know wawrinka helped him in olympic doubles, not singles. LOLOL
poor fed cried after losing his 14th chance of winning a presumed gift slam.
i bet the nadal injury and gift draws at the french open and wimbledon stopped fed tears.

Gift draws? You mean the draw that included Del Potro in the semis at RG? The same DelPo that crushed Nadal in the USO that same year 6-2 6-2 6-2? The same RG draw that put Soderling in the finals and Wimbledon draw that put him in the 4th round? The same Soderling who beat Nadal at RG and took him to 5 sets at Wimbledon?

Do you know how Davis Cup works? You play both singles and doubles. Spain and Serbia can win Davis Cup without Nadal and Djokovic, respectively. Switzerland can't. Is that Roger's fault?

Fortunately, you're part of a small group of people who think Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Davydenko, Haas, Ferrero, etc. were weak opponents. Everyone will remember Roger for 16 slams, not the people he played against.

 

[Towser83]

rogi couldn't beat a down and out hewitt in an australia davis cup semi, so he had to be rested for slams after the year 2003. he would've lost wimbledon 2004, 2007 and 2009 if he was busy in davis cup and exhibitions like hewitt and roddick were.
we all know wawrinka helped him in olympic doubles, not singles. LOLOL
poor fed cried after losing his 14th chance of winning a presumed gift slam.
i bet the nadal injury and gift draws at the french open and wimbledon stopped fed tears.

2003 was the first year he won a slam. And you're talking about someone who has never had a problem lasting the season, his win loss records for 04-07 are some of the best in the history of tennis. He's been far better at lasting a season than Nadal or Djokovic LOLOLOLOLOL

fed was humiliated twice by canas in 2007 indian wells and miami, and nalbandian ripped him in madrid. was federer old at age 25?

in 2006, fed choked on 2 match points on clay. he also lost to volandri in rome, BUT you call him dominant.
only a dazed nadal gave a much older fed the hamburg and madrid clay matches.

the usual loser roddick choked on 4 set points at wimbledon, no one could get a more easy draw with choker roddick around.

Hmmm, so you can't ever lose a match? How about Nadal humilated by Youzhny 6-1 6-0 in 2008, or beaten by Mayer and Dodig last year? Or Bagdatis, Roddick and Lujubicic in 2010? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Oh and he got his butt kicked even worse by Nalbandian in 2007! just 7 games in 2 matches haha. Also why was he dazed in Hamburg against useless Federer? He nearly lost the next Hamburg final too but played the sneaky medical time out and managed to escape a beating on clay in his best year against a subpar Fed. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Man you don't have one sensible thought in your head.

 

[FlashFlare11]

fed was humiliated twice by canas in 2007 indian wells and miami, and nalbandian ripped him in madrid. was federer old at age 25?

in 2006, fed choked on 2 match points on clay. he also lost to volandri in rome, BUT you call him dominant.
only a dazed nadal gave a much older fed the hamburg and madrid clay matches.

the usual loser roddick choked on 4 set points at wimbledon, no one could get a more easy draw with choker roddick around.

Federer's record in 2006: 92-5. Let me know when Nadal or Djokovic can play even close to 90 matches in a year.

 

[ULTIMATERODDICKFAN]

Federer's record in 2006: 92-5. Let me know when Nadal or Djokovic can play even close to 90 matches in a year.

hahahah i second this, I dont think djokovic can play past 85 matches mark, but I may be wrong with the way novak is playing so far

 

[Sentinel]

The real rivalry in 2011 was Nole-Fed, not Nadal-Nole which was totally one-sided.

 

[devila]

fed fanatics prove me right. they list davydenko, hewitt, roddick as prime slam competitors. Poor fed had to play a lot... there are no points rewarded for losing a 2 set and break lead in davis cup, and olympic matches versus james "fed apologist" blake.

oh yes, the constantly injured nalbandian.
nalbandian, a guy who beat federer in a 5 set match in 2007 masters cup in which fed claimed he stopped himself from quitting after injuring himself LOL, only played davis cup because his slam winning days were over.

good to uplift fed fans' spirits.
nadal and the "goat fed" losing 12 matches against the "robotic" loser djoker.
it was a huge shock!! NOT.

desperate fed fanatics are grasping at anything that would make their 5-set hero federer look great with opponents who can't win more than 3 mickey mouse titles per year (del potro, tsonga).

 

[zapvor]

Gift draws? You mean the draw that included Del Potro in the semis at RG? The same DelPo that crushed Nadal in the USO that same year 6-2 6-2 6-2? The same RG draw that put Soderling in the finals and Wimbledon draw that put him in the 4th round? The same Soderling who beat Nadal at RG and took him to 5 sets at Wimbledon?

Do you know how Davis Cup works? You play both singles and doubles. Spain and Serbia can win Davis Cup without Nadal and Djokovic, respectively. Switzerland can't. Is that Roger's fault?

Fortunately, you're part of a small group of people who think Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Davydenko, Haas, Ferrero, etc. were weak opponents. Everyone will remember Roger for 16 slams, not the people he played against.

2003 was the first year he won a slam. And you're talking about someone who has never had a problem lasting the season, his win loss records for 04-07 are some of the best in the history of tennis. He's been far better at lasting a season than Nadal or Djokovic LOLOLOLOLOL



Hmmm, so you can't ever lose a match? How about Nadal humilated by Youzhny 6-1 6-0 in 2008, or beaten by Mayer and Dodig last year? Or Bagdatis, Roddick and Lujubicic in 2010? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Oh and he got his butt kicked even worse by Nalbandian in 2007! just 7 games in 2 matches haha. Also why was he dazed in Hamburg against useless Federer? He nearly lost the next Hamburg final too but played the sneaky medical time out and managed to escape a beating on clay in his best year against a subpar Fed. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Man you don't have one sensible thought in your head.

Federer's record in 2006: 92-5. Let me know when Nadal or Djokovic can play even close to 90 matches in a year.

yep that devil guy is beyond delusional.......

 

[ULTIMATERODDICKFAN]

fed fanatics prove me right. they list davydenko, hewitt, roddick as prime slam competitors. Poor fed had to play a lot... there are no points rewarded for losing a 2 set and break lead in davis cup, and olympic matches versus james "fed apologist" blake.

Devila, I dont know why you are dissing davydenko, nalbandian, hewitt, safin, roddick, blake etc..I mean I understand your view about how crappy they play now, but they are pretty good back in the day, you should watch some of the old matches. You really can't blame them so much considering federer was a mutant from 2003-2007

 

[Polvorin]

Nobody gives a damn about a world tour finals match lol, not to mention both rafa and nole had nothing left in the tank

Apparently you give a damn. I guess you didn't like seeing Rafa get bageled by 30 year old and five years past his prime Fed

 

[Polvorin]

Federer stands out because he is the bridge between the old and the new in tennis. He plays a single handed backhand...uses racket with a 90sq" headsize...plays aggressive, attacking, all-court tennis, and he does it all so well he can still compete with the new generation and the new school of tennis that revolves around slowing court speeds, string technology, and an ever increasing benefit to passive, neutralizing, grinding tennis. After Federer is done, it is likely that there will never be another one who plays like him unless something is done about current trends.

 

[zagor]

Too many here are "prisoners of the moment."

Right now, Djokovic looks like the greatest thing since pre-sliced bread.

I wonder where he'll rank in 10 years. Maybe really high, because that gives him plenty of time to win many more slams. But maybe not.

We cannot know today.

You're the one to talk Mr. Historian:

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=411046

And this was even before he even won AO(he still had to beat Nadal in the final).

 

[ChanceEncounter]

fed fanatics prove me right. they list davydenko, hewitt, roddick as prime slam competitors. Poor fed had to play a lot... there are no points rewarded for losing a 2 set and break lead in davis cup, and olympic matches versus james "fed apologist" blake.

oh yes, the constantly injured nalbandian.
nalbandian, a guy who beat federer in a 5 set match in 2007 masters cup in which fed claimed he stopped himself from quitting after injuring himself LOL, only played davis cup because his slam winning days were over.

good to uplift fed fans' spirits.
nadal and the "goat fed" losing 12 matches against the "robotic" loser djoker.
it was a huge shock!! NOT.

desperate fed fanatics are grasping at anything that would make their 5-set hero federer look great with opponents who can't win more than 3 mickey mouse titles per year (del potro, tsonga).

Are you on drugs?

 

[kaleidoskope]

Are you on drugs?

I certainly hope so...
And I hope he gives me some cause he sure seems delusionally happy...

I really can't understand (and not quite stand) people that need to put the others down in order to feel good. It's like the only way a Nadal fan can be happy is by diminishing Federer's achievements, or for a Federer fan to kick Djokovic's victories and so on and so on...

What the Freackin' Flyin' Fack??? If you're a Novak supporter why can't you just enjoy that he's playing the best tennis for today's game? I mean the guy is number 1 in the world, tons of points ahead of all the others, just won his 3rd major in a Row (won 4 of the last 5), what more do you want? Rafa made all the finals of the last 4 majors, won 1, is number 2 clearly ahead of the other 2, looks newly motivated (he's a fighter, from what I saw in the AO final) and even if he stopped playing today, he'd still go as one of the greatest guys to play the game, whether you like the way he plays the game or not. Same for Novak. Period. And don't even get me started on Roger. Anyone who denies his place in tennis history as one of the best ever has a seriously biased point of view, to say the least.

All those "what if peak this met peak that" discussions are at best childish. At best! Every great player out there has agreed to say that the game evolves and only gets harder and harder. There is no "weak era", there is no "weak competition". There is only a group of magnificent sportsmen that keep pushing the boundaries a bit further every year. Just enjoy it. Better yet, go out and play it, try to emulate it, have fun. Geez...

The other day I was on youtube watching a Lendl/Wilander match from RG in the 80s. Man that was slow. There were moments that the guys were walking to the ball, literally. And yet I remember enjoying the hell out of it, every single moment!

Sorry about the thread hijacking and the rant...but I get really annoyed by the constant useless discussion threads some user keep starting. Then again, maybe I just need to learn how to use the "ignore" button

 

[Povl Carstensen]

Federer's record in 2006: 92-5. Let me know when Nadal or Djokovic can play even close to 90 matches in a year.

Pretty dominant. What do you get out of posting dribble Devila?

 

[matchmaker]

Too many here are "prisoners of the moment."

Right now, Djokovic looks like the greatest thing since pre-sliced bread.

I wonder where he'll rank in 10 years. Maybe really high, because that gives him plenty of time to win many more slams. But maybe not.

We cannot know today.

I couldn't agree more!

 

[shazbot]

fed fanatics prove me right. they list davydenko, hewitt, roddick as prime slam competitors. Poor fed had to play a lot... there are no points rewarded for losing a 2 set and break lead in davis cup, and olympic matches versus james "fed apologist" blake.

oh yes, the constantly injured nalbandian.
nalbandian, a guy who beat federer in a 5 set match in 2007 masters cup in which fed claimed he stopped himself from quitting after injuring himself LOL, only played davis cup because his slam winning days were over.

good to uplift fed fans' spirits.
nadal and the "goat fed" losing 12 matches against the "robotic" loser djoker.
it was a huge shock!! NOT.

desperate fed fanatics are grasping at anything that would make their 5-set hero federer look great with opponents who can't win more than 3 mickey mouse titles per year (del potro, tsonga).

This guy is decent at trolling. 6/10

 

[FlashFlare11]

This guy is decent at trolling. 6/10

I think it's safe to say that the trolls in this thread (Devila, ZeroSkid) were thoroughly owned. Hence their inability to provide a decent or upstanding retort.

 

[devila]

maybe in your world, you need federer to be better than every player in history. this is not exclusively the federer forum. too bad. only fed fanatics are interested in nonfed fanboy posts. sad.

 

[FlashFlare11]

maybe in your world, you need federer to be better than every player in history. this is not exclusively the federer forum. too bad. only fed fanatics are interested in nonfed fanboy posts. sad.

No one said it was. But when you start saying ridiculous things like Roddick was a weak opponent, Federer would have 14 slams if he played Davis Cup, Djokovic and Nadal are always tired when they lose to Federer, etc., you better be ready to defend yourself and your statements.

 

[mcr619619]

Federer was too good on his era (hewitt,safin,nalby etc) ....that his era's players worn out too soon.he beat them too many times except for nalby.

federer isn't exactly at nadal's era..5 yrs apart are large enough in tennis, i really don't consider them the greatest rivalry as nadal really won almost all the important matches..joker and nadal really

 

[helloworld]

Always has been, always will be.

Who thought 17 year old Wimbledon champ, Boris Becker, would only win 6 majors, or that Pete Sampras would win 7 Wimbledons and 14 majors in the same era as Becker, Agassi, Courier and Chang?

Becker was unfortunate because he had to compete with multiple all-time greats. He had many chances to win more slams, but fell short to Sampras many times. It was his own fault that he was unable to overcome the best players during his time.

 

[Towser83]

maybe in your world, you need federer to be better than every player in history. this is not exclusively the federer forum. too bad. only fed fanatics are interested in nonfed fanboy posts. sad.

Yeah but all you spout is fed hate, you're as biased as the biggest ******* only against him. and you talk rubbish like saying he didn't have to play novak when he played him more times than Nadal has in slams, nalbandian beating him when David not only beat but totally destroyed Nadal in the same tournaments and bringing up losses that everyone has. it isn't even clever tolling, it's just mindless gibberish. That's the best your mind can come up with. that's so sad its tragic pal.

 

[devila]

Yeah but all you spout is fed hate, you're as biased as the biggest ******* only against him. and you talk rubbish like saying he didn't have to play novak when he played him more times than Nadal has in slams, nalbandian beating him when David not only beat but totally destroyed Nadal in the same tournaments and bringing up losses that everyone has. it isn't even clever tolling, it's just mindless gibberish. That's the best your mind can come up with. that's so sad its tragic pal.

you're witty as always. usually, wasting time reading a post from a troll like you
is boring, but you and your ilk proved that watching old fed matches wasn't a requirement to be a federer gloryhunting troll.
what's funny is i've been here long enough to know that a roddick fan created the word "****". if fed had no roddick around, there would be fewer arrogant f'kin *******s here. LOLOLOLOL

 

[FlashFlare11]

you're witty as always. usually, wasting time reading a post from a troll like you
is boring, but you and your ilk proved that watching old fed matches wasn't a requirement to be a federer gloryhunting troll.
what's funny is i've been here long enough to know that a roddick fan created the word "****". if fed had no roddick around, there would be fewer arrogant f'kin *******s here. LOLOLOLOL

Wow, I can't believe you called him a troll. You of all people! He is actually a very reasonable poster. You must be very confused.

There's no point in trying to have a tennis conversation with you, since Federer could go and beat current Nadal and Djokovic in a slam to win, you'd still find something wrong with it. Are you a professional tennis player (can you even play tennis)? If not, then where did you get the expertise to call a former World No. 1 and a US Open champion weak?

 

[timnz]

World Tour Finals

Nobody gives a damn about a world tour finals match lol

Only all of the players in the top 100 care about it. Interviews with top players confirm they think it is very important. It was regarded as a defacto major in the late 70's/Early 80's and has continued as the 5th most important event on the calendar.

 

[Towser83]

you're witty as always. usually, wasting time reading a post from a troll like you
is boring, but you and your ilk proved that watching old fed matches wasn't a requirement to be a federer gloryhunting troll.
what's funny is i've been here long enough to know that a roddick fan created the word "****". if fed had no roddick around, there would be fewer arrogant f'kin *******s here. LOLOLOLOL

hahaha calling me a troll is the most troll like post I've ever seen. Sadly you're not even an intelligent troll and make no attempt to even counter people when they own your ***, simply because you post like your mental age is below double digits.

Keep posting and keep on getting owned. It's just too easy.

 

[Towser83]

Wow, I can't believe you called him a troll. You of all people! He is actually a very reasonable poster. You must be very confused.

There's no point in trying to have a tennis conversation with you, since Federer could go and beat current Nadal and Djokovic in a slam to win, you'd still find something wrong with it. Are you a professional tennis player (can you even play tennis)? If not, then where did you get the expertise to call a former World No. 1 and a US Open champion weak?

Thanks dude. Devila is not even worth trying to talk to but it is funny how if you corner him, he doesn't have the intelligence to counter what you said, he just rants some fed hating gibberish as usual. Or totally misunderstands the word troll and it's meaning. I mean if he called me a ******* it would be untrue, but at least an exaggeration of the truth instead of something totally different. Example, you see a sparrow and say "look there's an albatross!" you're very wrong but at least they're both birds. On the other hand, you see a sparrow and say "look, there's a sherman tank!" - in this situation you are wayyyyyyyyyy off!

Of course I'm saying this to you, devila wouldn't be able to understand any of this.

 

[kaleidoskope]

Thanks dude. Devila is not even worth trying to talk to but it is funny how if you corner him, he doesn't have the intelligence to counter what you said, he just rants some fed hating gibberish as usual. Or totally misunderstands the word troll and it's meaning. I mean if he called me a ******* it would be untrue, but at least an exaggeration of the truth instead of something totally different. Example, you see a sparrow and say "look there's an albatross!" you're very wrong but at least they're both birds. On the other hand, you see a sparrow and say "look, there's a sherman tank!" - in this situation you are wayyyyyyyyyy off!

Of course I'm saying this to you, devila wouldn't be able to understand any of this.

Hahahhahahhahhahahahaahahahhahahhahhahhahah

 

[FlashFlare11]

Thanks dude. Devila is not even worth trying to talk to but it is funny how if you corner him, he doesn't have the intelligence to counter what you said, he just rants some fed hating gibberish as usual. Or totally misunderstands the word troll and it's meaning. I mean if he called me a ******* it would be untrue, but at least an exaggeration of the truth instead of something totally different. Example, you see a sparrow and say "look there's an albatross!" you're very wrong but at least they're both birds. On the other hand, you see a sparrow and say "look, there's a sherman tank!" - in this situation you are wayyyyyyyyyy off!

Of course I'm saying this to you, devila wouldn't be able to understand any of this.

Hahahahahaha I love this post! No problem dude!

 

[RF20Lennon]

fed was humiliated twice by canas in 2007 indian wells and miami, and nalbandian ripped him in madrid. was federer old at age 25?

in 2006, fed choked on 2 match points on clay. he also lost to volandri in rome, BUT you call him dominant.
only a dazed nadal gave a much older fed the hamburg and madrid clay matches.

the usual loser roddick choked on 4 set points at wimbledon, no one could get a more easy draw with choker roddick around.

nadal lost to freaking ivan dodig after leading 5-3 so if i were you id shut up and every player loses once in a while to lesser seed its not that big of a deal.