As long as he stays reasonably healthy he will win atleast 1 major every year for awhile IMO. So I would see him breaking the record in 2013 at the latest, although probably sooner that that. Of course while Tiger could wins majors in his 40s he would like to get it done before his 40s begin just in case. Nicklaus himself I believe own only 1 major past 40. While golf has longevity the majors are still mostly always won by guys in their 20s and 30s.
Nice of you to "plan." But, have you considered how ridiculous your plan sounds?
And can we stop with the tennis-golf comparison? Every time Federer wins a Slam, some weirdo compares him with Woods and most weirdos conclude that Woods is greater by providing some stupid non-reasons. The comparison is idiotic: In golf, you don't even run.
Nice of you to "plan." But, have you considered how ridiculous your plan sounds?
And can we stop with the tennis-golf comparison? Every time Federer wins a Slam, some weirdo compares him with Woods and most weirdos conclude that Woods is greater by providing some stupid non-reasons. The comparison is idiotic: In golf, you don't even run.
My point, is that in any pro sport, the best have to rise to be the cream of the crop. No matter what the parameters are, it's an equally impressive achievement when you can clearly establish yourself as being one of the best!