Federer Wim 2009 final vs Djokovic Wim 2011 final?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RS
  • Start date Start date

Who wins this matchup?


  • Total voters
    63
Federer barely beat his pigeon that day. Got outplayed in a lot of respects
 
Good thing peak Djokovic came along at RG '11 to save poor RF's legacy!
I wish Federer had beaten Tsonga at Wimbledon that year. Only slam they didn’t play each other at.
 
Yeah or a tight 4. I mean this is the kind of match that comes down to a BP here and there, multiple TBs.

but it is definitely closer to a toss-up than it is Federer clearly. In fact toss-up is probably the right choice.
Well that Federer doesn't lose TBs easily. If I'd have to choose a player to win me 3 TBs to win a match, it would definitely a relatively young Federer.
 
Well, he came up against Fed the very next year in the same court they were supposed to meet in 2011 and in same round also.
But more importantly, the 38-year-old version of him pushed the long-standing world #1 to the limit! They call him the Legacy-Destroyer™! :D
 
Yeah or a tight 4. I mean this is the kind of match that comes down to a BP here and there, multiple TBs.

but it is definitely closer to a toss-up than it is Federer clearly. In fact toss-up is probably the right choice.
How would you have 2009 Roddick vs 2011 Nadal?
 
How would you have 2009 Roddick vs 2011 Nadal?
Will have to think about that one. I don't have a strong lean either way, Roddick served better and had good power/instinctual aggressiveness, but Nadal would definitely find it easier in rallies than he did vs. 2011 Djokovic especially on the BH wing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RS
I want to pick Djokovic but he let go in the 3rd set. If he doesn’t I think he edges this one in 5.

Going to vote tossup.
 
Djokovic by a clear margin. Even with the matchup advantage Fed does not have enough to make up for substantially worse returning and baselining. Any pre 09 version would make a much better comparison.
 
Djokovic by a clear margin. Even with the matchup advantage Fed does not have enough to make up for substantially worse returning and baselining. Any pre 09 version would make a much better comparison.
How would you see 2011 Djokovic vs 2012 Federer going?
 
Hm... I'll go with Federer. Don't think Nole was ready to play Federer on grass at that point.

He was quite good against Nadal but the serve/slice combo seemed to throw him for a loop in 2012.

You might be right but 2012 was under the roof, which certainly helped Federer. And Djokovic wasn’t playing as confidently then as in 2011. So I think this hypothetical would be close.
 
Federer barely beat his pigeon that day. Got outplayed in a lot of respects
tbf Roddick was really clutch to make it a close match. The stats are very solidly in Fed’s favor but Roddick raised his game in many important intervals to make it run the distance. Well, all except one, that is.
 
Will have to think about that one. I don't have a strong lean either way, Roddick served better and had good power/instinctual aggressiveness, but Nadal would definitely find it easier in rallies than he did vs. 2011 Djokovic especially on the BH wing.
I didn't find Nadal impressive in that Wimb final.
 
Will have to think about that one. I don't have a strong lean either way, Roddick served better and had good power/instinctual aggressiveness, but Nadal would definitely find it easier in rallies than he did vs. 2011 Djokovic especially on the BH wing.
I think that’s a close matchup as well. 2007/2008/2010 Nadal wins in 4/5 though :D
 
Will have to think about that one. I don't have a strong lean either way, Roddick served better and had good power/instinctual aggressiveness, but Nadal would definitely find it easier in rallies than he did vs. 2011 Djokovic especially on the BH wing.
You've really been drinking the TTW Roddick kool aid haven't you? I'm honestly sick and tired of people pretending 2011 Nadal was some bum just to discredit Djokovic and downplay the magnitude of what he achieved that season against what was, make no mistake about it, a prime Nadal. I don't care how well he served, there's absolutely no way 2009 Roddick's half assed ground game is holding up against that version of Nadal over 5 sets.
 
You've really been drinking the TTW Roddick kool aid haven't you? I'm honestly sick and tired of people pretending 2011 Nadal was some bum just to discredit Djokovic and downplay the magnitude of what he achieved that season against what was, make no mistake about it, a prime Nadal. I don't care how well he served, there's absolutely no way 2009 Roddick's half assed ground game is holding up against that version of Nadal over 5 sets.

Says the Djokovic propagandist...
 
Not saying this is happening in this thread but I think it’s kind of funny how the same people dissing Fed’s 2009 Wimbledon form tend to be the ones lifting up his 2008 run on some pedestal when he was possibly (though not definitely) worse in many respects.

That being said, this specific matchup could go to Novak.
 
You might be right but 2012 was under the roof, which certainly helped Federer. And Djokovic wasn’t playing as confidently then as in 2011. So I think this hypothetical would be close.
True, I didn't factor that in. Honestly 2012 is a great example of a match on a knife's edge. Djoko flubs an overhead, Federer saves some BPs expertly, off you go. It just seemed to me like '12 was Djokovic unsure how to deal with Federer's grass game. I am a big proponent of match experience making a large difference. This is my fundamental issue with hypotheticals.
I didn't find Nadal impressive in that Wimb final.
Sure, but he was playing a guy who had owned him for the previous 4 months, gave him no out balls from the baseline, and had a better serve/return complex. What exactly was he supposed to do vs. '11 Djokovic ripping laser BHs? Djokovic can completely outplay Nadal in a way no one in tennis history can.
You've really been drinking the TTW Roddick kool aid haven't you? I'm honestly sick and tired of people pretending 2011 Nadal was some bum just to discredit Djokovic and downplay the magnitude of what he achieved that season against what was, make no mistake about it, a prime Nadal. I don't care how well he served, there's absolutely no way 2009 Roddick's half assed ground game is holding up against that version of Nadal over 5 sets.
Then again, Mike is right. he was lacklustre in intensity and served poorly so let's not act like '11 Nadal was really playing great. He was clearly better, taking opponents out of the equation, in '07/08/10.

Long story short I don't really have a clue.
 
Back
Top