BeatlesFan
Bionic Poster
Of course, his haters will claim Moet "stole" the award for him or stuffed the ballot box.
http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/news/atp-awards-page-2015
http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/news/atp-awards-page-2015
Who an earth would be envious about this kind of an award among the fans ı mean ?? Come on ??Of course, his haters will claim Moet "stole" the award for him or stuffed the ballot box.
http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/news/atp-awards-page-2015
Fed doesn't even need to choose, he's done something similar to that 3 times already. He didn't need the weakest year on tour since 2002 to do it either.Sportsmanship award or 3 slams/6 masters/YEC/YE #1/points record. So hard to choose.
Of course, his haters will claim Moet "stole" the award for him or stuffed the ballot box.
http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/news/atp-awards-page-2015
has he ever won 6 masters in a year? Novak had to beat federer, federer, and Murray. Fed had to beat....who? Baghdatis and baby nadal on grass? Educate yourself.Fed doesn't even need to choose, he's done something similar to that 3 times already. He didn't need the weakest year on tour since 2002 to do it either.![]()
Put 2006 Federer into 2015 and his record will be as good as Djoker's.has he ever won 6 masters in a year? Novak had to beat federer, federer, and Murray. Fed had to beat....who? Baghdatis and baby nadal on grass? Educate yourself.
has he ever won 6 masters in a year? Novak had to beat federer, federer, and Murray. Fed had to beat....who? Baghdatis and baby nadal on grass? Educate yourself.
There's no discussion. If federer got to play Baghdatis, philipsoussis, broken Hewitt, old man Agassi ( why is this never brought up when people make fun of Novak for beating old federer), and Fernando Gonzalez for slams, you're not allowed to make fun of anyone else's era. It's as simple as that.Ouch, another classic discussion coming up.![]()
If Marcos Baghdatis makes it to a slam final, you can be sure that you're playing a challengers level field.Put 2006 Federer into 2015 and his record will be as good as Djoker's.
Gotta love that non-existent competition.
If you read( I know this can be hard for some of you) you can see I only lashed out because someone called it Novak.It's OK. Federer is just fine with his awards. It's nice to be respected and liked by your peers year after year. You should be happy with Djokovic's achievements too. No need to lash out at Federer, or is there?
Why don't they call it the Roger Federer award? Just please change it to "popularity" instead of "sportsmanship", because in terms of sportsmanship the coach and the player aren't at all comparable.
Djoker's competition makes Federer's 2006 competition look lively as ever!There's no discussion. If federer got to play Baghdatis, philipsoussis, broken Hewitt, old man Agassi ( why is this never brought up when people make fun of Novak for beating old federer), and Fernando Gonzalez for slams, you're not allowed to make fun of anyone else's era. It's as simple as that.
Sportsmanship award or 3 slams/6 masters/YEC/YE #1/points record. So hard to choose.
If a guy like Cilic can win a major, you can be sure you're playing in the weakest era ever.If Marcos Baghdatis makes it to a slam final, you can be sure that you're playing a challengers level field.
And what about old man Agassi? Federer is better than Agassi. And they were both old. Have you ever called out federer for beating Agassi? I'm sure you haven't because it would hurt your laughable narrative.Djoker's competition makes Federer's 2006 competition look lively as ever!
33 year old Ferrer, a done Berdych and a Murray that loses to a 34 year old weak era beneficiary. Not to mention Nadal loses regularly to freakin' Fogini these days.![]()
I know but you got some people's attention and it resulted into another classic.There's no discussion. If federer got to play Baghdatis, philipsoussis, broken Hewitt, old man Agassi ( why is this never brought up when people make fun of Novak for beating old federer), and Fernando Gonzalez for slams, you're not allowed to make fun of anyone else's era. It's as simple as that.
Remind me, who did cilic beat?If a guy like Cilic can win a major, you can be sure you're playing in the weakest era ever.
A gassed 33 year old Federer that even Roddick on his worst day could beat.Remind me, who did cilic beat?
Agassi is one guy, what about the others? What makes them weak? They certainly weren't old, so what's your excuse?And what about old man Agassi? Federer is better than Agassi. And they were both old. Have you ever called out federer for beating Agassi? I'm sure you haven't because it would hurt your laughable narrative.
Why don't they call it the Roger Federer award? Just please change it to "popularity" instead of "sportsmanship", because in terms of sportsmanship the coach and the player aren't at all comparable.
and who did federer beat in 05 for the U.S. Open? Old man Agassi.A gassed 33 year old Federer that even Roddick on his worst day could beat.![]()
No one compares to Stefan anyway
If you can't see what makes them weak era, theres no hope for you. All you have to do is look at their other accomplishments. Fed couldn't even beat pre prime nadal. Novak tore prime nadal a new one in 2011.Agassi is one guy, what about the others? What makes them weak? They certainly weren't old, so what's your excuse?
Gotta love the weak-era Djoker defenders.
After going through Hewitt who nearly took the guy to 5 sets. How's that for a "weak era"?and who did federer beat in 05 for the U.S. Open? Old man Agassi.
If you can't see what makes 2015 the weakest year since 2002, there's no hope for you.If you can't see what makes them weak era, theres no hope for you. All you have to do is look at their other accomplishments. Fed couldn't even beat pre prime nadal. Novak tore prime nadal a new one in 2011.
so...4 sets? If fed didn't beat a Hewitt that was already broken, it would be kind of sad.After going through Hewitt who nearly took the guy to 5 sets. How's that for a "weak era"?
This is why we all love the holiday season in tennis: funny round-robin indoor exos and marketing gimmicks from Wilson.Of course, his haters will claim Moet "stole" the award for him or stuffed the ballot box.
http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/news/atp-awards-page-2015
If you can't see what makes 2015 the weakest year since 2002, there's no hope for you.
What happened at Wimbledon between 2006-2007? Did Federer beat Nadal's cousin those two times?
4 tight sets, a couple of sets tiebreakers that could have gone either way.So
so...4 sets? If fed didn't beat a Hewitt that was already broken, it would be kind of sad.
That match had 1 tiebreaker.4 tight sets, a couple of sets tiebreakers that could have gone either way.
Put the same Hewitt against 2014 Fed and he'd put him away in 4 sets.
Laughable, as there's nothing even lose: The evidence is right in front of you! It isn't my fault you can't see how horribly weak this year is.1.) when you start repeating what I have said, I know you have lost
When you start citing age as evidence of peak/form I know you've conceded the argument.StannisTheMannis said:2.) if you try to argue 06 and 07 nadal as prime on grass, you must be truly getting desperate. What was he? Like 20?
Serious question, what do you have against Federer? It's obvious he is your least favorite player of the top guys. I don't see any credence in the bolded statement.
His peers think he's a good sportsman. Obviously they like him to think that. So, I'm not sure why people are pissed about this every year.
And Federer won the award a few times before Edberg became his coach anyway. They asked him last year if they should change the name like you suggested, and Federer said no.
You may not like the guy but his peers think differently, which is all that matters at the end of the day.
That match had 1 tiebreaker.Beating 05 Hewitt en route to a slam is like beating ferrer nowadays.