Federer's blacked out frame

ENJOY TENNIS

New User
Fed's movement is back again, still misfiring here and there, but it lokks promissing, a couple more weeks, ATP will see Fed's ressurgency to be a # 1 next year again. It'll take a little time for him to figure out the best way to use the new racquet, Fed Del played really well and our FED lost, it's ok, the guy deserved too, but FED ain't done my friends.

The worst blind man is the one who does not want to see........
 

Devilito

Legend
Delbo played well. It's not that he beat Fed in the 1st round. He's made it to the semis beating quality players. He hits huge and those are the type of players that trouble Fed. Remember earlier this year Nadal lost to Zabelloswho plus getting Darcised at Wimbledon. The way Delbo played today he could have beaten a lot of other players
 

The Meat

Hall of Fame
Delbo played well. It's not that he beat Fed in the 1st round. He's made it to the semis beating quality players. He hits huge and those are the type of players that trouble Fed. Remember earlier this year Nadal lost to Zabelloswho plus getting Darcised at Wimbledon. The way Delbo played today he could have beaten a lot of other players

Loses to Fognini in straight sets tomorrow, follows the trend from Wimbledon upsets. :)
 
I watched most of the match and it seemed to me that Roger was having a few adjustment issues with the new frame but his biggest problem today appeared to be a very motivated and solid opponent who was playing very well and some unusually (for Federer) sloppy footwork late in the second set. He did launch a few forehands and was clearly having some problems controlling the depth on his volleys but, overall, I think with a few tweaks here and there he can easily adjust. One thing that did, at least on TV, look improved/different was the height on his serve. It may have just been the angle of the camera but he hit a couple top/slice heaters up the "t" that looked like they just exploded off of the court.
 

stronzzi70

Professional
Delbonis Who??? Come on people. Let's encourage Roger to do what he has to do. Retire. Just that. I am a Federer fan, but it is enough. Keep loosing to unknown people is not good to Roger image and legacy. It is time to retire. Not for the geniatily of Roger, but for what Roger represent. Look at F1 Michael Schumacher, look for Michael Jordan. It is time. Congratulations Roger for all You done for tennis and for the spectator. You bring a gold era to tennis, but it is time. You can dispute one slam or other sometime and win, but forget the number one and forget playing all ATP tournaments. Just choose play one or other major. It is better for You and for your legacy. IMHO.

Maybe is not the same Roger, bu still can play for 2 or 3 more years....your comments is very simple about Roger, that´s mean if he lose some match he is done,,,come on.....Do you know something about tennis?
 

ENJOY TENNIS

New User
Maybe is not the same Roger, bu still can play for 2 or 3 more years....your comments is very simple about Roger, that´s mean if he lose some match he is done,,,come on.....Do you know something about tennis?

Do You??? I am a Federer fan, but, I've been follow up his trajectory and IMHO it is time to his retirement. My opinion and surely many other people who likes this game. If You want to see Federer to been crashed for everybody, support him to stay playing and trying crazing things like play with this kind of racquet. He certainly has the game to be top 10, but he said he wants to be number 1. Holding number 1???? Unlikely........
 

stronzzi70

Professional
Do You??? I am a Federer fan, but, I've been follow up his trajectory and IMHO it is time to his retirement. My opinion and surely many other people who likes this game. If You want to see Federer to been crashed for everybody, support him to stay playing and trying crazing things like play with this kind of racquet. He certainly has the game to be top 10, but he said he wants to be number 1. Holding number 1???? Unlikely........

Maybe not # 1 again, but for sure 2 more grand slams, plus still inside top # 3....this is my hope for Roger.........
 

JoelDali

Talk Tennis Guru
I believe in Rogi and the cosmic mystical powers of the Basalt Crystals that transform his game into something so beautiful and pure. Kudos to Wilson for leaving the Basalt in the test frames.
 

SwankPeRFection

Hall of Fame
I believe in Rogi and the cosmic mystical powers of the Basalt Crystals that transform his game into something so beautiful and pure. Kudos to Wilson for leaving the Basalt in the test frames.

I don't think Wilson had any in there because I don't remember seeing anything miraculous in terms of shotmaking with the new stick.
 

bert96

Rookie
take a look at this pic, looks like a prestige imo!?

img6191014fm7dn6b.jpg
 

jimbo333

Hall of Fame
Looks like it could be a H22......

Yeah I agree, which is a Wilson copy of the PT630 only with the 16x19 string pattern, basically very similar to what Murray is using.

So Federer is going to effectively start using Murray's racket:shock:

A huge error in my opinion. If you look back at all the great players in modern times, after using basically the same racket for the majority of their career, as soon as they changed rackets they never again won a Grand Slam tiltle. There are exceptions, but I think if Federer does change rackets permanently it would be a mistake in my opinion.
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
My guess is that Fed is using the racquet to prolong a career threatened by back injury.

It definitely looks boxish rather than round beamed. So perhaps its from 85 to 90 to 95?
 

JoelDali

Talk Tennis Guru
I don't think Wilson had any in there because I don't remember seeing anything miraculous in terms of shotmaking with the new stick.

I'm pretty sure I could see the Basalt underneath the black paint. But maybe what I was really seeing is the Karophite black.
 

Jeepers

Professional
Has Federer been playing with different frames? I could of sworn the original blacked out racket he was seen practicing with has a much more rounded blade-like frame
 

SwankPeRFection

Hall of Fame
take a look at this pic, looks like a prestige imo!?

img6191014fm7dn6b.jpg

Only problem (and there's not a good view of it here because his hand is in the way) is that the Head racquets don't have a wide enough throat where you can put your finger in them and spin the racquet around like Fed used to do with his 90. Even the PS95 on the market doesn't have this. The other pics of this black stick we've seen shows that the throat does have a wider turn in it to allow for this. I couldn't find any current Heads that showed this wide throat in any pics of current models. Does the H22 non-public design have this?
 

ENJOY TENNIS

New User
Only problem (and there's not a good view of it here because his hand is in the way) is that the Head racquets don't have a wide enough throat where you can put your finger in them and spin the racquet around like Fed used to do with his 90. Even the PS95 on the market doesn't have this. The other pics of this black stick we've seen shows that the throat does have a wider turn in it to allow for this. I couldn't find any current Heads that showed this wide throat in any pics of current models. Does the H22 non-public design have this?

It is not a HEAD mould, but has the HEAD design on it, like many other racquets (Pro Kennex, Donnay, Blades, etc.....). They are all derivative from HEAD design with little modifications. Think at Pro Staff design. If You create one racquet with some little modifications and change the brand, after all it is a derivative from Pro Staff, understand the thought?
 

ART ART

Semi-Pro
Has Federer been playing with different frames? I could of sworn the original blacked out racket he was seen practicing with has a much more rounded blade-like frame

Yes, he's been playing with different frames, since Wimbledon.

And trying other specs on those frames. Even with different types off strings...

And the journey is not over... It is supposed to end till the end off the month, according to his team, let's see what appens.
 

RJYU

Rookie
Yes, he's been playing with different frames, since Wimbledon.

And trying other specs on those frames. Even with different types off strings...

And the journey is not over... It is supposed to end till the end off the month, according to his team, let's see what appens.


Art Art, how come you feel the need to make people believe you know what's going on when you really don't?

People know my real name, and people know the real names of others on this board who have connections in this industry. Give us your connection to the industry so we can decide if you have any clue with what is actually going on.
 

yonexRx32

Professional
Yes, he's been playing with different frames, since Wimbledon.

And trying other specs on those frames. Even with different types off strings...

And the journey is not over... It is supposed to end till the end off the month, according to his team, let's see what appens.

It may be that's what he did, but it looks like he picked the wrong stick. He should talk to Stepanek who seems to have improved since he switched rackets.
 
Last edited:

yonexRx32

Professional

A pretty naive article from the best writer of the online tennis magazine. He seems to imply that the rackets you purchase in store and the ones used by Nadal or other players are one and the same thing. Except they aren't. The mold may look similar but the layup is different. The author claiming that he played with Nadal's racket is equivalent to the average Yamaha owner claiming he rides Valentino Rossi's MotoGP bike.
 
Last edited:

RJYU

Rookie
For everyone's information. As with any equipment change in any sport, you need to only change one variable at a time. So, if you are testing new frames, you keep your same specs and strings. If you are testing new specs, you keep the same racquet and strings. If you are testing new strings, you keep the same racquet and specs.

You need to feel the difference due to one variable. If you change multiple things at the same time, you won't be sure what the difference in results is caused by.
 

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
For everyone's information. As with any equipment change in any sport, you need to only change one variable at a time. So, if you are testing new frames, you keep your same specs and strings...

You need to feel the difference due to one variable. If you change multiple things at the same time, you won't be sure what the difference in results is caused by.
Thanks for putting it so eloquently.

A few people here need to think their posts through a bit more in terms of how the change likely went down and how the process was managed.
 

Nostradamus

Bionic Poster
For everyone's information. As with any equipment change in any sport, you need to only change one variable at a time. So, if you are testing new frames, you keep your same specs and strings. If you are testing new specs, you keep the same racquet and strings. If you are testing new strings, you keep the same racquet and specs.

You need to feel the difference due to one variable. If you change multiple things at the same time, you won't be sure what the difference in results is caused by.

Agree. but this is a huge change for Roger. Not sure if the stiffness is exactly same as his old PS90 ?
 

kimbahpnam

Hall of Fame
Yeah I agree, which is a Wilson copy of the PT630 only with the 16x19 string pattern, basically very similar to what Murray is using.

So Federer is going to effectively start using Murray's racket:shock:

A huge error in my opinion. If you look back at all the great players in modern times, after using basically the same racket for the majority of their career, as soon as they changed rackets they never again won a Grand Slam tiltle. There are exceptions, but I think if Federer does change rackets permanently it would be a mistake in my opinion.

If fed doesn't win another major it's not because he switched racquets
 

hersito

Rookie
For everyone's information. As with any equipment change in any sport, you need to only change one variable at a time. So, if you are testing new frames, you keep your same specs and strings. If you are testing new specs, you keep the same racquet and strings. If you are testing new strings, you keep the same racquet and specs.

You need to feel the difference due to one variable. If you change multiple things at the same time, you won't be sure what the difference in results is caused by.

So he is basically playing with a pro staff 98...
 
Yeah I agree, which is a Wilson copy of the PT630 only with the 16x19 string pattern, basically very similar to what Murray is using.

So Federer is going to effectively start using Murray's racket:shock:

A huge error in my opinion. If you look back at all the great players in modern times, after using basically the same racket for the majority of their career, as soon as they changed rackets they never again won a Grand Slam tiltle. There are exceptions, but I think if Federer does change rackets permanently it would be a mistake in my opinion.

yes, like that idiot Djokovic when he switched from Wilson to HEAD, destroyed his career.

and that fool Agassi, I mean, why would you switch from Prince to Donnay, and then to HEAD? just went downhill from there

oh, wait..
 

RJYU

Rookie
So he is basically playing with a pro staff 98...

I don't have a clue how you come to that assumption from my post.

My post was purely a response to Art Art who stated that Roger was testing different frames, specs, and strings all at the same time. I was attempting to inform people that this is not the way to go about testing.
 
Last edited:

tistrapukcipeht

Professional
For everyone's information. As with any equipment change in any sport, you need to only change one variable at a time. So, if you are testing new frames, you keep your same specs and strings. If you are testing new specs, you keep the same racquet and strings. If you are testing new strings, you keep the same racquet and specs.

You need to feel the difference due to one variable. If you change multiple things at the same time, you won't be sure what the difference in results is caused by.

You are wasting your time talking to them, these guys here change equipment more than you change your shirts, they just don't get it. There are some of those who even think they know what Fed should be playing with, if you can believe it. They know more than Fed himself- and that's because they are 4.0's.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
yes, like that idiot Djokovic when he switched from Wilson to HEAD, destroyed his career.

and that fool Agassi, I mean, why would you switch from Prince to Donnay, and then to HEAD? just went downhill from there

oh, wait..
Yes, because neither Djokovic nor Agassi would have made it as a pro had they not switched racquets. :???:

Oh, and why did Djokovic switch from Head to Wilson to Head, and why did Agassi switch from Prince to Donnay to Head? (Hint: It's not because Head makes better racquets than anyone else.)
 

TimothyO

Hall of Fame
For everyone's information. As with any equipment change in any sport, you need to only change one variable at a time. So, if you are testing new frames, you keep your same specs and strings. If you are testing new specs, you keep the same racquet and strings. If you are testing new strings, you keep the same racquet and specs.

You need to feel the difference due to one variable. If you change multiple things at the same time, you won't be sure what the difference in results is caused by.

I agree that it's best to change one variable at a time when testing. But I can't imagine his team sent him on court in Germany having changed only one variable of his set up (ie the frame head size itself).

Certainly he tested different frames at first, then tested different weights and SWs and balances and then tested different tensions behind the scenes in a controlled manner. Any one test would have addressed a given topic (eg SW or main tension) but after these many different tests the frame he took on court in Germany was different from what he had been using in multiple ways. He would have observed changes to isolated variables during the testing process and eventually settled on a new frame/string system which probaby encompassed multiple changes (eg I can't imagine his tension didn't change.)
 
Yes, because neither Djokovic nor Agassi would have made it as a pro had they not switched racquets. :???:

Oh, and why did Djokovic switch from Head to Wilson to Head, and why did Agassi switch from Prince to Donnay to Head? (Hint: It's not because Head makes better racquets than anyone else.)

but that's missing the point, BP.

the comment was made that no recent pro had been successful following a racquet switch

well, there's two without even trying..

the reasons were never a part of the discussion in this instance
 

Cup8489

G.O.A.T.
I don't have a clue how you come to that assumption from my post.

My post was purely a response to Art Art who stated that Roger was testing different frames, specs, and strings all at the same time. I was attempting to inform people that this is not the way to go about testing.

As always, your presence in discussing this with us, even if you're not at liberty to discuss it very far, is great. It's so cool that we can even interact with a member of P1; I for one am grateful you post at all.
 

JoelDali

Talk Tennis Guru
With the right strings and balance as spec'd out by Annacone, this racquet could potentially win The Wimbledon.
 

MauRod

Rookie
He's playing with several prototypes by Wilson, he's not usin' only the 98, but also the 93 and 95, EVEN DURING THE MATCHES...
 

ENJOY TENNIS

New User
I agree that it's best to change one variable at a time when testing. But I can't imagine his team sent him on court in Germany having changed only one variable of his set up (ie the frame head size itself).

Certainly he tested different frames at first, then tested different weights and SWs and balances and then tested different tensions behind the scenes in a controlled manner. Any one test would have addressed a given topic (eg SW or main tension) but after these many different tests the frame he took on court in Germany was different from what he had been using in multiple ways. He would have observed changes to isolated variables during the testing process and eventually settled on a new frame/string system which probaby encompassed multiple changes (eg I can't imagine his tension didn't change.)

I agree. And even so just the racquet change is more than one variable because frame design, torsional stability, frame width, swingweight, etc..... One variable a time??? It is not that simple.......
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
I agree that it's best to change one variable at a time when testing. But I can't imagine his team sent him on court in Germany having changed only one variable of his set up (ie the frame head size itself).

Certainly he tested different frames at first, then tested different weights and SWs and balances and then tested different tensions behind the scenes in a controlled manner. Any one test would have addressed a given topic (eg SW or main tension) but after these many different tests the frame he took on court in Germany was different from what he had been using in multiple ways. He would have observed changes to isolated variables during the testing process and eventually settled on a new frame/string system which probaby encompassed multiple changes (eg I can't imagine his tension didn't change.)

You are replying to the guy who customizes his frames. You know that right?
 
Top