Federer's draw could have been one of the toughest of all time

You paid a great tribute to that era´s greatness with your comment on Edmondson ( AO and W semifinalist as well as AO champion in 19769

Wow! You mean you also know the results of slams that will get played in like 18,000 years time? :shock:

That's pretty impressive tennis knowledge!

Too bad you know zilch about current or past tennis, but I'll be sure to come and ask you next time I have a question about tennis in the year 20,000... :lol:
 
Last edited:
Yes, specially since Robredo had to defeat champs like Rosewall and newcombe, back to back, to earn the title:)

Yea 42-year old Rosewall. It's like a well playing Robredo faced current (and I mean current 2012) Agassi.

LAWL.
 
the lucky loser is playing better than any of his previous three opponents or for that matter any of the first three opponents of djoker/nadal ...

He played very well (being Belgian, I tried to watch all his matches), but it's still phenomenal how some of you always see the difficulties in Federer's draw, and not in Nadal's draw. Nadal has Monaco in the fourth round. On paper, who is the tougher opponent?
 
He played very well (being Belgian, I tried to watch all his matches), but it's still phenomenal how some of you always see the difficulties in Federer's draw, and not in Nadal's draw. Nadal has Monaco in the fourth round. On paper, who is the tougher opponent?

If it's on blue paper, the Rafa might have problems:)
 
Yea 42-year old Rosewall. It's like a well playing Robredo faced current (and I mean current 2012) Agassi.

LAWL.

Since Rosewall never took drugs he fared much better than a 42 yrs AA would...he played 2 GS finals a couple of years before Edmondson beat him in 4 sets at melbourne.
 
Back
Top