I noticed Federer's indoor carpet record last few years is pretty mediocre
for his standard.
We're talking about 'last few years'. He dominated tour like no one ever did.
Plus we all know he tries to win every thing.
For an average player, he has pretty good record. 2 finals in Swiss indoor
and 1 final at master's. But we're talking about Federer of last few years.
As far as I know, he never won a title on carpet(correct me if I'm wrong).
I understand indoor seasons became non-factor these days.
He had some foot injury in last years masters final. But in 2 finals of Swiss
indoor, I think we can safely assume he pretty much wanted to win but
failed to do so. And recently he pretty much skips indoor carpet seasons.
This makes me wonder what makes him relatively vulnerable on real fast carpet court ?
Wimbledon is fast but he didn't do well until its courts got
really slow in 2003. Is he really a slow court players in 90's standard just like
many other current top players who are dominating the tour ?
for his standard.
We're talking about 'last few years'. He dominated tour like no one ever did.
Plus we all know he tries to win every thing.
For an average player, he has pretty good record. 2 finals in Swiss indoor
and 1 final at master's. But we're talking about Federer of last few years.
As far as I know, he never won a title on carpet(correct me if I'm wrong).
I understand indoor seasons became non-factor these days.
He had some foot injury in last years masters final. But in 2 finals of Swiss
indoor, I think we can safely assume he pretty much wanted to win but
failed to do so. And recently he pretty much skips indoor carpet seasons.
This makes me wonder what makes him relatively vulnerable on real fast carpet court ?
Wimbledon is fast but he didn't do well until its courts got
really slow in 2003. Is he really a slow court players in 90's standard just like
many other current top players who are dominating the tour ?