Federer's little pidgeon boy...

M

my_forehand

Professional
Who is this commentator?

Worst comments ever...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14CHXCe5SVA&feature=channel

"When he wasn't confident he'd go for broke but now he's confident so he can control the ball" - 2:50

"You can just see from the trajectory of the ball that it's dipping so much, poor blind judge" - 3:28

"Okay, why don't you run again, let's see if you can get that one, one more, you can do it" - 4:17

"Roger said 'I've had enough of this point, time to finish this point.'" - 5:14

"Takes the most cheek IsO forehand to win the point." - 7:11



I mean not only are his comments stupid - his accent, voice, and the way he puts emphasis on words completes him.

You don't know everything and you're not funny, nor are you cute.

On a side note, GGL's game looks nice.
 
aphex

aphex

Banned
my_forehand said:
Who is this commentator?

Worst comments ever...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14CHXCe5SVA&feature=channel

"When he wasn't confident he'd go for broke but now he's confident so he can control the ball" - 2:50

"You can just see from the trajectory of the ball that it's dipping so much, poor blind judge" - 3:28

"Okay, why don't you run again, let's see if you can get that one, one more, you can do it" - 4:17

"Roger said 'I've had enough of this point, time to finish this point.'" - 5:14

"Takes the most cheek IsO forehand to win the point." - 7:11



I mean not only are his comments stupid - his accent, voice, and the way he puts emphasis on words completes him.

You don't know everything and you're not funny, nor are you cute.

On a side note, GGL's game looks nice.
Click to expand...
the first comment you quoted is actually quite right in general..
the rest is rubbish..

nice highlights though...very clear image
 
paulorenzo

paulorenzo

Hall of Fame
my_forehand said:
"You can just see from the trajectory of the ball that it's dipping so much, poor blind judge" - 3:28
Click to expand...
the commentator sounded as if he actually said this:

"You can just see from the trajectory of the ball, right here, that the ball is dipping so much, i think that fooled the line judge" - 3:28

it fits better into the context of what happened and tennis terminology.

none the less, the commentator does seem a little unprofessional, with all the gawking. even more so if the commentator actually is rusedski.
 
Last edited:
illkhiboy

illkhiboy

Hall of Fame
The second line is,
"You can just see from the trajectory of the ball that it's dipping so much, fooled the line judge" - 3:28
which makes perfect sense as does the first sentence.

I have no issue with the third line either...Federer was toying with Lopez, and Greg just commented on it..

Watching the highlights, it seems like Lopez is in Federer's fun house. Federer is dictating play, slicing and dicing him, and even when Federer doesn't quite hit that perfect angle he is aiiming for and thereby allowing Lopez to get a good position, Roger can scramble back into the point. So Greg's fourth comment when taken in context sounds completely fine.
 
P_Agony

P_Agony

Banned
illkhiboy said:
The second line is,
"You can just see from the trajectory of the ball that it's dipping so much, fooled the line judge" - 3:28
which makes perfect sense as does the first sentence.

I have no issue with the third line either...Federer was toying with Lopez, and Greg just commented on it..

Watching the highlights, it seems like Lopez is in Federer's fun house. Federer is dictating play, slicing and dicing him, and even when Federer doesn't quite hit that perfect angle he is aiiming for and thereby allowing Lopez to get a good position, Roger can scramble back into the point. So Greg's fourth comment when taken in context sounds completely fine.
Click to expand...
Federer was great at that match, and he actually wanted to rally a lot in the match, something that's very unlike him. His strokes really clicked that day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top