Federer's opinion of the World Tour Finals

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by timnz, Jan 14, 2011.

  1. timnz

    timnz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,823
    "Although facing the possibility of losing at Melbourne Park, the first time he would not hold a grand slam since 2003, Federer was unfazed and said life wasn't all about the majors.

    "It is what it is. It's not easy to win slams. That means I've done something quite extraordinary for many seasons," he said.

    "The season's not over after that. Maybe you're not holding a slam, but you still have three more chances to win a grand slam.

    "At the end of the day it's not only about grand slams, like what people make it out... The World Tour Finals is equally important; other tournaments are very important. I don't just purely gear up for the slams."

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70E0A420110115

    I am not sure I agree with him totally. But I do think they are significantly ahead of the Masters 1000 events. They are probably at 1500 points about right (as opposed to 2000 points for a Major).
     
    #1
  2. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,491
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    You have to admit that WTF is cool in one way - that's the fact that you can play all top seeds.

    This year, Federer defeated #1, #3, #4, #5. In no other tournament you can do that while being a top-ranked player.
     
    #2
  3. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    19,010
    Location:
    Toronto
    Federer wouldn't say that had he lost at the WTF! Trully trying to lead the journalists another way still!
     
    #3
  4. aceX

    aceX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,947
    Location:
    In position
    Well he has 5 titles and 1 final so it seems like he does try to win it.
     
    #4
  5. Murrayfan31

    Murrayfan31 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,317
    Fed is trolling. :D
     
    #5
  6. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    40,236
    Location:
    Infinite loop
    absolutely. he knew that TW needed something to fight over.
     
    #6
  7. nadalbestclass

    nadalbestclass Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,488
    Location:
    I'm a girl!
    LOL. Trying to push us back into that argument.
     
    #7
  8. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,116
    Federer doesn't really mean EQUALLY important I think. He never said so.. Fed should just do what he's doing and people should stfu. The guy's won 16 Slams, is still playing entertaining tennis and is being freaking competitive at the top of our sport. What more can you ask from him.
     
    #8
  9. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    973
    The Masters Cup is in some cases harder to win than a Slam cause there is no way you're gonna avoid the top players. Still, it's definately a big title but there are 4 Slams only and nothing more.
     
    #9
  10. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,600
    Fed says silly things sometimes.
     
    #10
  11. aceX

    aceX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,947
    Location:
    In position
    I bet davydenko thinks its a big title
     
    #11
  12. Bryan Swartz

    Bryan Swartz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,790
    Actually that is exactly what he said. His words were that the WTF is equally important to the Slams.

    I would personally rank it below a Slam, but just below, and that's only because of tradition: 20 years from now, probably fully equal. Definitely a lot closer to a Slam in importance than to a MS.

    If you take the ranking points approach, the WTF is exactly halfway between the two.

    I think it's hard to argue with anyone who is at least willing to say it's more important than a Master's Event, less than a Slam. No need to parse beyond that.
     
    #12
  13. aceX

    aceX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,947
    Location:
    In position

    I reckon Federer is planting the seed. Years ago Aussie open wasn't important. Now people think it is. Borg didn't even go there!!

    I can see it happening with WTF. "All the top players are there" "No easy draws" etc
     
    #13
  14. The-Champ

    The-Champ Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    6,517
    Location:
    Sweden
    When Nadal finally wins the WTF, I can imagine Federer saying : "you know, it's not only about the majors and the WTF, you know it's really Cincy, Miami and tournaments like Basel that we professionals try to make an impact at".
     
    #14
  15. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    "other tournaments are very important". Really?

    This wasn't his tune at the end of the clay court season and before RG in 2010.
     
    #15
  16. Messarger

    Messarger Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,828
    'Yeah, all the four majors and the WTF are important but so are, you know, Cincinati, Paris, and Miami. These are the tournaments where the balls play, you know, really fast so having good stamina alone and a forehand wont get you far. I mean, Rafa has been playing great when the courts are slower but he has still yet to win these events, you know, even though he is a great player. Then you also have the Gerry Webber Open which is the most prestigous grass court event beside Wimbledon. It's a shame Rafa doesnt play there. I mean, i am confident of playing well against him there, but he plays at Queens instead. So yeah, i feel the faster surfaces need more recognition. They provide the tour with variety."
     
    #16

Share This Page