Feedback? Wilson nCode nBlade 98 vs kBlade 93 mid...

GoSurfBoy

Semi-Pro
Played around last weekend with 2 demos; both Blades 93 and 98. Perhaps it was the all-poly job on the 98, but the 93 shone, strung with Alu Rough and a multi cross.

Very sweet, good punch, great control.

The 98 was a disappointment. I sort of expected a bigger version of the 93, but... Which is why TW's video review was somewhat - reading between the lines, I think - along the lines of my impression.

So my question; How does the previous nCode nBlade - which was a much softer frame, compare or fit in between the 2 newer K versions?

The two 98's went from a 58 stiffness on the nBlade, to a 67! on the kBlade. HUGE dif'... And the 93 is like 62 - but 'felt' softer than that.

So looking for someone who's hit all 3 and can give sort of an overview.

Thanks

PS - couldn't find a TW-review on the nBlade 98 version. Anyone know of a link that I missed??
 
Last edited:
Wilson nBlade nCode Racquets


Price: 179.99





The nBlade racquets from Wilson bring a fresh look to the Wilson player's racquet line up. Compared to the nSix-One range, the nBlade racquets offer tighter, more control oriented string patterns, and a lighter, more maneuverable weight. A high level of comfort and a solid feel is retained in these racquets thanks to Wilson's nFoam technology. nFoam is a dense nCoded foam which is injected into the core of the racquet to absorb frame vibrations and provide a solid feel. Both nBlade racquets feature Wilson's X-Loop frame geometry - a combination of both flat and rounded beam design which is inverted where the hoop meets the yoke. The result has both racquets featuring a rounded beam design in the hoop and a flat beam design in the shaft. The nBlade comes in a standard length Midplus and a longer, 27.3 inch Oversize version.

Midplus
Even though the strung weight of the nBlade Midplus is only a tad over 11 ounces, the design and playing characteristics of this racquet has it catering more to players with full, aggressive swings, who may traditionally look at heavier racquets. From the baseline, we found this racquet to respond well to aggressive hitting. Fast swings resulted in a pleasingly solid feel, good access to spin and enough control for aggressive targeting. Players with one-handed backhands noted good stability when driving topspin groundstrokes. At net the nBlade Midplus offers a solid feel and plenty of control. We found good feedback both when going for touch volleys and when guiding volleys deep to the open court. On serve we were impressed with the level of spin we could generate. The response of the racquet is very predictable allowing the player a good sense for pace and depth. This well rounded racquet is a solid choice for 4.0+ level players.

Oversize
Rarely does Wilson venture into the oversize player's racquet category, but when they do, they get it right. The nBlade Oversize offers a well rounded performance complete with comfort, control and slightly more pop than one would find from a Midplus player's racquet. As with the nBlade Midplus, the emphasis here is still on control, but the larger headsize - with its longer main strings - offers a bigger sweetspot and a livelier feel. Players should also find a bit more pop from the longer frame length. At 27.3 inches in length, the nBlade Oversize provides a touch more leverage than found with the standard length Midplus. Our playtesters found plenty of pace on their groundstrokes with this one. We found easy access to both topspin and slice, and the racquet offers enough maneuverability for fast swing speeds. We especially liked the response from the nBlade Oversize when stepping inside the court to rip a winner or hit aggressive approach shots. When at net, the nBlade Oversize feels maneuverable and comfortable. Overheads can be dispatched with plenty of pace and there's enough pop to help bail out the volleyer when caught deep. This one should appeal to players from the 3.5 level up, seeking a control oriented oversize racquet.



Midplus Specs
Head Size:
98 sq. in. / 632 sq. cm.
Length: 27 inches / 69 cm
Strung Weight: 11.1oz / 315g
Balance: 2pts Head Light
Swingweight: 340
Stiffness: 58
Beam Width: 21 mm Flat Beam
Composition: 20% nCoded Hyper Carbon / 80% nCoded graphite / nFoam-filled core
Power Level: Low
Swing Speed: Fast
Grip Type: TruGrip
String Pattern:
18 Mains / 20 Crosses
Mains skip: 8T,10T,8H,10H
One Piece
No shared holes
String Tension: 50-60 pounds

Oversize Specs
Head Size:
106 sq. in. / 684 sq. cm.
Length: 27.3 inches / 69 cm
Strung Weight: 11.1oz / 315g
Balance: 3.2pts Head Light
Swingweight: 335
Stiffness: 60
Beam Width: 22mm Flat Beam
Composition: nCoded High Modlus Graphite / nFoam-filled core
Power Level: Low
Swing Speed: Fast
Grip Type: True Grip
String Pattern:
18 Mains / 19 Crosses
Mains skip: 9T,9H
One Piece
No shared holes
String Tension: 50-60 pounds
 
Played around last weekend with 2 demos; both Blades 93 and 98. Perhaps it was the all-poly job on the 98, but the 93 shone, strung with Alu Rough and a multi cross.

Very sweet, good punch, great control.

The 98 was a disappointment. I sort of expected a bigger version of the 93, but... Which is why TW's video review was somewhat - reading between the lines, I think - along the lines of my impression.

So my question; How does the previous nCode nBlade - which was a much softer frame, compare or fit in between the 2 newer K versions?

The two 98's went from a 58 stiffness on the nBlade, to a 67! on the kBlade. HUGE dif'... And the 93 is like 62 - but 'felt' softer than that.

So looking for someone who's hit all 3 and can give sort of an overview.

Thanks

PS - couldn't find a TW-review on the nBlade 98 version. Anyone know of a link that I missed??

I've hit with all 3 - though it's been at least 3 years since I've hit with the nBlade.

Compared to the kBlade 98, the nBlade 98 is indeed softer and has a heftier swing weight. The k is quicker through the air, and as you've noted, a bit stiffer.

For me, the nBlade seemed like more of a baseliner's stick, while the k moved more in the direction of the 6.1 series which seemed to provide a better (though not ideal) platform for volleys with a little more punch. I didn't do so, but customizing the Blade 98 closer to 12 ounces might do it some good. Stock it wasn't bad, but just not enough heft for me. I enjoyed the 93 the most. It has more weight and a better balance than the others. IMO, it's a much better all-court stick and great with gut and softer synthetics (multis) due to it's low power. I had one for a while and ultimately sold it in preference for the K90 and KPS88 - though sometimes I wish I still had it for comparison's sake.

And some info you didn't ask for... :-)

If you read the TW threads, you'll see some polarized views of the Blade 93. A majority of die-hard Prestige fans didn't seem to like it much, while some did. It makes sense... the Prestige is the original and the Blade is Wilson's attempt at market share. A smaller group did like the blade 93 more - and I'm in that camp. It brings something different to the table than either the prestige or 6.1 line. I think it depends on what you're after. I prefer the stiffness of the blade. It's not real stiff, but stiffer than the Prestige - and I like that crispness and decisiveness up at net. Though admittedly it's not as plush or comfortable from the baseline. And I also think it would benefit from a tad more swing weight.

As a comparison, I know some others who play with the K90 and KPS88 like myself, but if forced to play with something else, would go with a Dunlop 200 or a Prestige Mid/MidPlus rather than a blade or the 6.1 95's. I on the other hand would rather play with a 6.1 95 18x20 or Blade 93 over competitor sticks.

Hope this helps!
 
tarkowski...

Yea.... Thanks... I was really kind of diggin' the blade 93, and have a bunch of Heads laying around - so I can see where Wilson was trying to go. I just thought the k98 was a big falloff of either anything you or I mentioned.

I DO like the older Heads, and have a few laying around. I wasn't at all impressed with the BLX nor the Youtek line.

It comes down to this; I'd like to try a 98 nBlade, and if I wanted a couple, at least it's realistic to find. A Head PT630 or Pres' 600 or whatever? How hard will that be to find enough of! lol

Can you rerthink the k93 vs. the n98? Any similarities - or just a lot different?

Thanks
 
tarkowski...

Yea.... Thanks... I was really kind of diggin' the blade 93, and have a bunch of Heads laying around - so I can see where Wilson was trying to go. I just thought the k98 was a big falloff of either anything you or I mentioned.

I DO like the older Heads, and have a few laying around. I wasn't at all impressed with the BLX nor the Youtek line.

It comes down to this; I'd like to try a 98 nBlade, and if I wanted a couple, at least it's realistic to find. A Head PT630 or Pres' 600 or whatever? How hard will that be to find enough of! lol

Can you rerthink the k93 vs. the n98? Any similarities - or just a lot different?

Thanks

Sure thing Surf,

I feel that they are quite a bit different. The nBlade has that plush, flexible feel. If one were to add some weight, I believe it would come off more as a Dunlop 200 than a Wilson... if that makes sense.

The KBlade Tour is much more head-light, so in spite of it's increased heft, swings easier than the nBlade 98. It's also crisper... and has that more precise response. I could see someone gravitating to one or the other. If you really liked the 93, I'll go out on a limb and say I don't think you'll like the nBlade 98 nearly as much. Too different.
 
Back
Top