Yea, I don't have any control over that.
Of course you do. As you've written yourself many times, you learn how to do it correctly and then you practice it until it becomes second nature.
It would be one thing if your opponent was serving 130mph and you didn't have the reflexes to react. Fair enough. But you're getting relatively easy feeds; you have more than enough time to adjust.
I wouldn't even know how to explain that to the coach.
Your coach is standing right there [unless that's not your coach in which case you can just show him this video].
At 3.5, all I can do is turn early, and get to ball, and plant before swinging. Good enough.
Certain things are too late in life, and learning how to run is too late for me.
I didn't ask you to learn how to run differently. Your running is fine. I did ask you to change your footwork so you end up in a different position. Instead of ending your run with an open stance, end it with a neutral one, which requires one more step with your right foot. If you slowed things down enough, you'd easily be able to do this.
So, to make it easier, eliminate the running so you can perfect the turning of the feet. Then you can do simple drop feeds with no running to complicate things.
However, you show a marked bias against such simplifications, preferring to try and do everything at once, failing, and then proclaiming it's impossible.
Thanks, but the video was garbage.
Why? He was fed fake balls that were slow and right next to him.
This has zero resemblance to real tennis, where one must SPRINT to the short ball.
The description of the video was "Putting away
sitters...." Sitters. Not drop shots out of easy reach. Therefore, the video perfectly demonstrates this.
You're putting the cart before the horse, wanting to know how to deal with an advanced situation before learning the more basic scenarios.
He was fed easy balls, yes. Even better would be if he started with a drop feed to make it even easier. Why did they make the video this way instead of showing a red alert full sprint? Because they were trying to teach a basic concept, not an advanced one.
I played doubles recently against two 5.0s. Even at that fast [for me] pace, I got a couple of short sitters where I used the concepts demonstrated in the video.
That is when his form will break down, he will forget to turn, run straight towards the ball, racket at his side (since arms are pumping)
It's like getting a test in school that has nothing to do whatsoever with what the teacher taught in class. LOL.
No: it's like getting a test that deals with the simplest examples of the concept being taught. If I can't solve those problems, I certainly won't be able to solve the tough ones. You want to skip to the tough ones; I'm advising you to master the simple ones first.