First hit/review! Pro Staff Six.One 90 BLX :)

Then don't play tennis, because you're going to get significant vibration from any frame.

I used to play at 70lbs on $3 synthetic gut, no elbow issues.

Are you saying people have never mentioned hurting their arm from using a poly string? Yes a racket can duplicate the same problems as a stiff and unforgiving poly string.
 
Can you re-test it after adding 1/2 inch to the frame with wood or rubber ?

Can you re-post it after adding some common sense to your post with intelligence or logic?

Are you saying people have never mentioned hurting their arm from using a poly string? Yes a racket can duplicate the same problems as a stiff and unforgiving poly string.

When people get hurt, I think they put more blame on their equipment (or the lack of it) before they even look at their techniques, fitness, and recovery time. I used poly's before, no issues. I even used 1st generation polyesters when they were first released, none of this "soft poly" crap.
 
Can you re-post it after adding some common sense to your post with intelligence or logic?



When people get hurt, I think they put more blame on their equipment (or the lack of it) before they even look at their techniques, fitness, and recovery time. I used poly's before, no issues. I even used 1st generation polyesters when they were first released, none of this "soft poly" crap.

dude your getting too offensive about it, its just a question... and far as tennis elbow goes, yes i do agree that its not only a racquet's fault... now you havent even seen me play and your deciding that something is off, that shows that you know what your talking about but there can be many different situations which could cause tennis elbow person, racquet, string are most probably the cause of them... and the soft poly you call crap is pretty much the most used strings out there....
 
Yup, the reason why I (and everyone else) wears wristbands is to help maintain my grip on the racquet when I'm playing and sweating so my playing hand stays drier. Otherwise I wouldn't bother with them.

TN89699_Federer.jpg

Fed uses on the right arm, to hide the bandages wrap on his wrist.

Lots of pros do it, to avoid injuries on the wrist.
 
Haha really?! I didn't know that. I just use it to wipe the sweat off of my face. I don't sweat that much, especially on my arms and legs.
I think I need to get a wrist band, better to use it than a shirt to wipe the sweat. I think it can serve both purposes - keep your hand dry and wiping your head.
BTW, nice shoes. I just got the same ones and they match the BLX90. Are you using 2 pairs of socks - black on top of white?
 
dude your getting too offensive about it, its just a question... and far as tennis elbow goes, yes i do agree that its not only a racquet's fault... now you havent even seen me play and your deciding that something is off, that shows that you know what your talking about but there can be many different situations which could cause tennis elbow person, racquet, string are most probably the cause of them... and the soft poly you call crap is pretty much the most used strings out there....

Just because it's widely used, that doesn't mean I'll like it and I should use it too. If it's crap to me then it's crap to me. The supposed benefits of polys is "durability" (it's dead in less than 10hours so it's unusable durability), spin. I don't care about the durability aspect because it dies, and I hybrid with gut in the mains. Cross strings take much less of a beating. Spin, I already generate a lot of spin, and I see no difference with or without polys. Mains or crosses. What I do feel is a stiffer stringbed, and I definitely do not care for it.

I think I need to get a wrist band, better to use it than a shirt to wipe the sweat. I think it can serve both purposes - keep your hand dry and wiping your head.
BTW, nice shoes. I just got the same ones and they match the BLX90. Are you using 2 pairs of socks - black on top of white?

I've been wearing two pairs of socks. They keep the bottom of my feet from developing rock hard calluses and agonizing blisters. As for the black over white thing: haha I'm not going to lie, I saw Mr. Roger Federer on TV with the black/white socks, and I was like "Oh that's pretty".
 
Last edited:
i never said you should use it.... why would i do that... and not every poly is durability, its also comfort more than nat gut for me atleast...
 
i feel like this thread has gone off topic in a lot ways.

Exactly! People keep talking about wristbands, headbands, who sweats where, and now strings. This thread is covering the entire talk tennis forum.

I feel like I should start a new thread to discuss the new PS-BLX90 and how it plays, because this thread has lost its purpose a long time ago.
 
Fed uses on the right arm, to hide the bandages wrap on his wrist.

Lots of pros do it, to avoid injuries on the wrist.

He usually throws his wrist band into the crowd and have never seen his wrist taped up from what i recall
 
Fed uses on the right arm, to hide the bandages wrap on his wrist.

Lots of pros do it, to avoid injuries on the wrist.
Federer doesn't use bandages on his wrist. He always takes off his wristband after a match and tosses it into the crowd and I've never seen bandages under his wristband.
 
As for the black over white thing: haha I'm not going to lie, I saw Mr. Roger Federer on TV with the black/white socks, and I was like "Oh that's pretty".
And they would look like Fed's socks if you rolled them up more evenly :) I got his both US Open '11 outfits but couldn't find the same socks.
I still think BLX90 has a slightly better paint job. In the new Pro Staff they basically used white paint instead of black but still too many colors - you got white, red, black and gold. You'd think Wilson designers were getting high and trying to use as many colors as possible. I wish they would just make all black frame with gold letters.
I think K 90 has a better paint.
 
And they would look like Fed's socks if you rolled them up more evenly :) I got his both US Open '11 outfits but couldn't find the same socks.
I still think BLX90 has a slightly better paint job. In the new Pro Staff they basically used white paint instead of black but still too many colors - you got white, red, black and gold. You'd think Wilson designers were getting high and trying to use as many colors as possible. I wish they would just make all black frame with gold letters.
I think K 90 has a better paint.

K90 had the best paintjob ever. I'm definitely with you with a more retro, classic, and simple design. What bugs me the most about the PS-BLX90 is the glossy paint.

Yeah I usually row them up higher so the white shows less, but i was whatever that day. I'm just wearing regular Nike dri-fit socks. Not really a fan of polos though.
 
Last edited:
K90 had the best paintjob ever. I'm definitely with you with a more retro, classic, and simple design. What bugs me the most about the PS-BLX90 is the glossy paint.

Yeah I usually row them up higher so the white shows less, but i was whatever that day. I'm just wearing regular Nike dri-fit socks. Not really a fan of polos though.

I agree. Before the K90 the Tour 90s had a really simple design. After the K90, it seems like Wilson couldn't keep the standard high with the cosmetics. Maybe they should ask Fed for advice again for the next Tour 90s (if Wilson makes newer iterations).
 
My favorite design is the KPS88 - simple black frame with very minor garnishes. I like the K90 with it's Jungle-look feeling but it's a little busier than the KPS. The BLX lines don't do anything for me.
 
Fed uses on the right arm, to hide the bandages wrap on his wrist.

Lots of pros do it, to avoid injuries on the wrist.

He usually throws his wrist band into the crowd and have never seen his wrist taped up from what i recall

Federer doesn't use bandages on his wrist. He always takes off his wristband after a match and tosses it into the crowd and I've never seen bandages under his wristband.


Ditto...never seen it. Small thing really, but just curious where some of the comments on this forum come from sometimes that are stated so fact-like. Though maybe Fed did at some point and the poster noticed and assumed he and others always do...IDK. Now, I have seen a lot of ankle taping...

s100129_federer.jpg


Doesn't look like Murray does either.

article-2001645-0C7D1DE300000578-630_634x353.jpg
 
Hey Breaky, saw Tsonga with a wristband only on his right hand during his match with Garcia-Lopez yesterday.

Now I have gotten a OCD to observe these things.
 
Sure, you can get tennis elbow from using the wrong technique regardless of the racquet that you're using. But you can also have perfect technique and get tennis elbow if you use the wrong racquet.

There are no wrong racquets, only wrong people
 
Hey Breaky, saw Tsonga with a wristband only on his right hand during his match with Garcia-Lopez yesterday.

Now I have gotten a OCD to observe these things.
Since Tsonga is hitting more one-handed backhands these days, that makes a lot of sense. :)
 
Back on topic:

So basically the new "pro staff six one" (90-95-100) line is a "six one" with box beam instead of round beam? LOL

I don't know why I was thinking Wilson was releasing some new 6.0 line in 90, 95, 100 head sizes... :(
Now that would be nice :)

-firestarter :twisted:
 
Back on topic:

So basically the new "pro staff six one" (90-95-100) line is a "six one" with box beam instead of round beam? LOL

I don't know why I was thinking Wilson was releasing some new 6.0 line in 90, 95, 100 head sizes... :(
Now that would be nice :)

-firestarter :twisted:
That's exactly what they did.

The new ProStaff Six-One BLX line has absolutely nothing to do with the oval beamed, PS 6.1 Classic-based 6.1 line, which will continue with a new different paintjob.

The new ProStaff Six-One BLX line (90, 95 & 100) all have box-beams. The 6.0 line became the "Six-One Tour" line ever since the release of the nCode Six-One Tour 90 back in 2004.
 
That's exactly what they did.

The new ProStaff Six-One BLX line has absolutely nothing to do with the oval beamed, PS 6.1 Classic-based 6.1 line, which will continue with a new different paintjob.

The new ProStaff Six-One BLX line (90, 95 & 100) all have box-beams. The 6.0 line became the "Six-One Tour" line ever since the release of the nCode Six-One Tour 90 back in 2004.
But the current six-one tour 90 is already a box-beam, no? Is there going to be both a six-one tour 90 and a PS six-one 90?
 
Just for kicks and giggles I'll add this post.

Great take on the new frame.

Now for the important item:

When I first started playing, I wore a wristband on my off (right) arm. I too used it just to wipe sweat from my brow -- back then nobody wore baseball caps.

Now, I wear a wristband (5" Volkl) on my left arm. I wear one even when it's cold. I've gotten used to the feel. I've also found that during the hot, humid Southern summers, wearing a wristband does wonders for extending the life of Tournagrip (or any other overgrip).

Where someone wears their wristband is of absolutely no consequence to me. There are lots of other things higher up on my WTF list. BTW, I think Blake wears a wristband on the left wrist.
 
Last edited:
PS90blx may be my new racquet

thanks for the review on this new frame. Everytime I hit flat with my blx90 at about shoulder level, I can literally see the hoop warping. I kept telling my buddy I think the blx90 will snap at some point without any racquet abuse. But yeah, I like the soft feel of blx90 also intrigued by the crispier feel of ps90 you get there and i will try to get my hand on this new 90 asap
 
Back on topic:

So basically the new "pro staff six one" (90-95-100) line is a "six one" with box beam instead of round beam? LOL

I don't know why I was thinking Wilson was releasing some new 6.0 line in 90, 95, 100 head sizes... :(
Now that would be nice :)

-firestarter :twisted:

Think of it this way, back in the days there was the Pro Staff 6.0 85 and 95. The nCode/K Factor/BLX Six.One Tour 90 has always been the successor of the Pro Staff 6.0 85, except in a 90. Now the range is back in the form of 90, 95, 100.

The nCode/K Factor/BLX Six.One 95 has always been the successor of the Pro Staff 6.1 Classic

But the current six-one tour 90 is already a box-beam, no? Is there going to be both a six-one tour 90 and a PS six-one 90?

Six.One Tour 90 = Pro Staff Six.One Tour 90 BLX
Six.One 95 = Six.One 95 BLX

Make sense?

Thanks! I will upload higher quality pictures soon. Those of me hitting were underexposed because it was overcast. The telephoto lens I let my friend use was not a fast lens. And I forgot to up the ISO. Nothing photoshop can't fix.

thanks for the review on this new frame. Everytime I hit flat with my blx90 at about shoulder level, I can literally see the hoop warping. I kept telling my buddy I think the blx90 will snap at some point without any racquet abuse. But yeah, I like the soft feel of blx90 also intrigued by the crispier feel of ps90 you get there and i will try to get my hand on this new 90 asap

The PS-BLX90 still "warps" upon impact. Just not as buttery/creamy feeling as the BLX90. So if people thought the BLX90 was too much of a gummy bear, try the PS-BLX90. But I like the gummy bear sensation of the BLX90 :).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Think of it this way, back in the days there was the Pro Staff 6.0 85 and 95. The nCode/K Factor/BLX Six.One Tour 90 has always been the successor of the Pro Staff 6.0 85, except in a 90. Now the range is back in the form of 90, 95, 100.

The nCode/K Factor/BLX Six.One 95 has always been the successor of the Pro Staff 6.1 Classic

Six.One Tour 90 = Pro Staff Six.One Tour 90 BLX
Six.One 95 = Six.One 95 BLX

Make sense?
Maybe. So, the current BLX 6.1 Tour 90 is replaced by the PS BLX 6.1 Tour 90 (both box beams)? Two new racquets will be added, including the PS BLX 6.1 95 and PS BLX 6.1 100 and they will also have box beams?

The oval beam BLX 6.1 95 remains, unchanged?
 
Maybe. So, the current BLX 6.1 Tour 90 is replaced by the PS BLX 6.1 Tour 90 (both box beams)? Two new racquets will be added, including the PS BLX 6.1 95 and PS BLX 6.1 100 and they will also have box beams?

The oval beam BLX 6.1 95 remains, unchanged?

Box beamed goodness:
BLX 6.1 Tour 90 -> PS-BLX 6.1 Tour 90
*NEW*PS-BLX 6.1 95
*NEW*PS-BLX 6.1 100

Oval crap (haha I kid :)):
BLX 6.1 95 -> 2012 BLX 6.1 95
 
But the current six-one tour 90 is already a box-beam, no? Is there going to be both a six-one tour 90 and a PS six-one 90?
Huh? The new ProStaff Six-One 90 BLX is the replacement for the current BLX Tour 90. You know, the next generation? As in PST 90, nCode 90, K90, BLX 90, and now PS90BLX?

I don't understand why so many people are confused by this? :confused:

All they did was make two larger box beam racquets that are in the same line as the Tour 90 - a 95 and a 100, just like the old days.

Don't forget that the PS 6.0 Original came in many headsizes also, e.g., 110, 125, 85, 95, etc.
 
Is that the monster HH frame? Only a wrong person would play with that.
No, it wasn't. It was 95 sq. in. But is was so light and flexible that it was nearly impossible to hit the ball over the net with. I felt like I was hitting with a wire coat hanger.
 
EDIT: After the explanations, re-reading BP's post #124, it makes perfect sense.
 
Last edited:
SCSL cleared this up better than you, and before you, 4 posts above yours.

Don't care...:rolleyes:
I'm glad it's finally sunk in for you. :)

Wilson has been making box beam and ProStaff frames in various sizes for over 30 years so there's nothing really new here.
 
Last edited:
I'm glad it's finally sunk in for you. :)

Wilson has been making box beam and ProStaff frames in various sizes for over 30 years so there's nothing really new here.
Well, if you'd quit referencing stuff Wilson hasn't produced in several years, their upcoming line-up, with the new additions, would be more clear.
 
Well, if you'd quit referencing stuff Wilson hasn't produced in several years, their upcoming line-up, with the new additions, would be more clear.
You have to reference those old racquets to understand the upcoming line-up and the new additions. That's where all the confusion comes in - from people who don't understand the differences in those old racquets.

The entire Tour 90 line, and now ProStaff BLX line, is based on the PS 6.0 Original line of racquets (85, 95, 110, 125). All of those racquets over the past 30+ years are in the same distinct family of racquets. Nothing has changed. They ALL have box-beams.

The other distinct family of racquets is the 6.1 95 line, all of which are based on the PS 6.1 95 Classic, which first came out over 20 years ago. All the racquets in that line have oval beams and 95 sq. in. heads and are all derived from the PS 6.1 95 Classic. This includes the HPS 6.1 95, nCode 95, K95, BLX 95, and the new 6.1 95 BLX.
 
Thanks for the history on the Wilson lines. I wasn't aware of the distinction but always wondered why the K90 played so differently compared to the K95s.
 
Thanks for the history on the Wilson lines. I wasn't aware of the distinction but always wondered why the K90 played so differently compared to the K95s.
You're quite welcome.

I should add that these two distinct lines of racquets from Wilson have absolutely nothing to do with each other. The two lines play and feel completely different.

The confusion is because with the introduction of the nCode lines in 2004, Wilson changed the name of the "6.0" line to "Six-One" while keeping the other distinct line's name as "6.1" or "Six-One". To make matters worse and to make it even more confusing, they gave both distinct lines the same paintjob. So now the nCode Six-One Tour 90 (from the PS 6.0 Original line) had the same "Six-One" name and same red and white paintjob as the nCode Six-One 95 (from the PS 6.1 Classic line). This sharing of the same "Six-One" name and the same paintjob continued with the K-Factor lines and the BLX lines. Now finally Wilson is separating the names and paintjobs of these two distinct lines again with these new racquets by adding the old name "ProStaff" back to the box-beam 6.0 line and giving it a different paintjob from the 6.1 line. So the new PS Six-One BLX racquets (90, 95, & 100 box beams) will be predominately white while the new Six-One 95 BLX racquets (all 95's and oval beams) will be predominately red. Hopefully, this will alleviate some of the confusion, but they really should have also changed the box-beam ProStaff line's moniker from "Six-One" back to "6.0", but I guess "Six-Oh" or "Six-Zero" doesn't sound too good when spelled out to Wilson.
 
My word that is an atrocious PJ!!!


My local shop just got one PSBLX 90 in for a demo and I may take it out later today or tomorrow. I must say the paint job is very disappointing for me. I would be ok if the color is all matte finished but the red part it's so shinny. Oh well...
 
Last edited:
Let's hope it's more crisp!

I'm intrigued by the new BLX pro staff 90 being "more crisp." That's my biggest knock against the BLX tour 90. I've held onto it since new, it's got a feel I want to love, but my strokes just don't compare to when I'm striking the ball with the K90. I can flatten out the ball (more linear/speed) much more with the K90 all things equal. And can go to a more aggressive spin shot when needed. With the BLX90 it's all spin shots for me and really hard to flatten it out...which comes very naturally with the K90.

I'm hoping this new "crisp" feel is closer to the K90.

Michael
 
I'm intrigued by the new BLX pro staff 90 being "more crisp." That's my biggest knock against the BLX tour 90. I've held onto it since new, it's got a feel I want to love, but my strokes just don't compare to when I'm striking the ball with the K90. I can flatten out the ball (more linear/speed) much more with the K90 all things equal. And can go to a more aggressive spin shot when needed. With the BLX90 it's all spin shots for me and really hard to flatten it out...which comes very naturally with the K90.

I'm hoping this new "crisp" feel is closer to the K90.

Michael

The "crisp" sensation is reminiscent of the K90, definitely not closer to the K90. PS-BLX90 is closer to BLX90 than it is to the K90. PS-BLX90 and BLX90 both hit very soft/gummy bear like. PS-BLX90 is a tad bit crisper relative to the BLX90. It's not "crisp" like the K90.

Hope that helps!
 
Good review! At first I really hated the paintjob of the PS BLX 85, but seeing your pics I actually think it's cool now lol! Nice shoes too :)
 
The "crisp" sensation is reminiscent of the K90, definitely not closer to the K90. PS-BLX90 is closer to BLX90 than it is to the K90. PS-BLX90 and BLX90 both hit very soft/gummy bear like. PS-BLX90 is a tad bit crisper relative to the BLX90. It's not "crisp" like the K90.

Hope that helps!

Hey, I'll take "more crisp" any day and I'm just hoping I can flatten things out with it like the K90. But I won't hold my breath :(
 
Back
Top