Forehand advice needed

That is not what the lag is. Lag is the delay in time between the initiation of the forward swing with hip rotation and contact with the ball. That delay is important because that is where angular momentum gathers and increases racquet head speed. What you are calling lag is the racquet drop where the racquet head drops back and down, the first part of what Macci calls "the flip" - the rapid rotation of the arm back and forth. The racquet drop increases the lag, but, it is not itself the lag.

It is true that not all ATP players employ a significant racquet drop. Jeremy Chardy and Gilles Simone are examples. But, the best forehands, like Federer and Nadal, have the biggest racquet drop and the biggest lag, and there is no reason why recreational players can't do it with a little time and effort.

I don't agree that this is in addition to the fundamentals of a forehand. This is all part of the fundamentals of the modern forehand. I also don't agree that the OP has more basic things to concentrate on. I set out my observations and solutions in post #9.
Disagree with you here. donnybrook has it right by how most use it imo....racket head lags the hitting hand until contact when racket head whips through. And if we disagree, this is what imo op needs to work

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Just get a really heavy racket, loose up the wrist during forward swing and try to whip the ball as fast as you can. When you are pulling the racket and accelerates forward toward the ball, you should find the racket resistance more if you accelerate faster. Again remember to loose up the wrist. That's the motion OP needs for the forehand.
 
You guys kill me. I would love to see the reaction of Nadal, Fed if they read all this super technical mumbo jumbo crap.
 
You guys kill me. I would love to see the reaction of Nadal, Fed if they read all this super technical mumbo jumbo crap.
Wait 10 years until they open their own academies and they will be spouting it with the best of us.

Sent from my BLU STUDIO 5.5 C using Tapatalk
 
You guys kill me. I would love to see the reaction of Nadal, Fed if they read all this super technical mumbo jumbo crap.
Do you mean people here are giving advice without knowing much about tennis technique or do you deny tennis technique altogether? Nadal and Federer have perfect strokes and they have learnt them not born with them. So what's wrong with focusing on technique to develop good strokes? That's how I improve every day.
 
The stroke looks improvised. What I mean by that is it's clear you have not had any coaching. As far as the advice about lag excetera, to be perfectly honest with you that is the last thing I would be concerned about. I don't mean any disrespect to anyone who suggested that you should be lagging but i will tell you that there are thousands of people with beautiful forehands who never heard the words lag or core rotation out of their coaches mouth.
Again I would just advise you to really learn the fundamentals of the forehand and take it step by step because an improvised forehand could work up to a certain point as you know but you'll never develop a really good forehand unless you go back to step number one and learn the basic fundamentals. I'm not going to list what the fundamentals are because things are made much clearer and simpler on video compared to a forum.
Racquet lag is a hugely overrated part of the forehand on these boards.

Yes, it's essential if you want a ATP style forehand, but it's not a make or break component of the stroke itself. Trunk, core, and shoulder rotation are the most important aspects of the forehand, and OP is hardly doing any of these things.

Trying to incorporate racquet lag on a forehand that is fundamentally lacking is like putting spoiler on a Toyota Corolla and trying to pass it off as a sports car.
 
Poster's 7,9, and 12 seem to agree there is a torso rotation problem, LACK of.
It could be no preloading, it could be just a stiff hip and lower back, but it's noticable and takes away from power.
You stated he lacked a basic forehand understanding of the forehand stroke. All 3 of the guys who responded, including a fourth, me, said his 2hbh is just fine, and he should basically mirror it on his forehands.
OP has no unit turn, like he DOES on his 2hbh. Early or late, there is no shoulder turn thru the stroke.
Except it really isn't. If you look closely, many of his backhands save for a few genuinely fluid ones are armed despite the apparent turn in his body. You can tell because his backhand forward swing seems to be consistently ahead of his apparent uncoiling, and, if not, turning in perfect sync with his core. His backhand is merely better fundamentally than his FH, but that doesn't mean it is fine (if we are comparing it to ideal technique).

My understanding of both FHs and BHs is that the majority of the power generated on these strokes are mostly from the violent uncoiling of the body (legs, hips / torso, shoulders), with only a minority (by this I do not mean minimal--just less than 50%) of the power being generated by an active arm. If the racquet is consistently leading or is moving exactly in sync with his hips / shoulders with no lag whatsoever, he's either muscling his arms forward first, causing his hips / shoulders to follow suit, or I am terribly mistaken and he is actually using his core as he should but has got some funky version of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.
 
my $0.02... most folks (including yourself) pointed out the obvious technical flaws.. footwork, arming the ball on forehand, etc...

in general the guys pace and depth are too much for you at this stage of your development.

It's always good to occasionally play with guys how hit much bigger than you, to see where your development will eventually take you, but trying to practice against someone like that while your fundamentals are lacking, will hurt you (ie. you starting compensating with bad technique, then continued to reinforce it).

when I do baseline games with my students, one of the things I emphasize, is that a point will not count, unless I'm satisfied they are using good technique (eg. reinforcing dinky strokes is auto loss off point, etc...). To help equalize, the game, I'll say that hitting long does not count against you, as long as you use good technique (eg. get under, drive from back foot using entire body, swing low to high, finish with weight on opposite foot, etc...). As soon as their technique breaks down, I stop, and hand feed balls, make sure they are making the proper swing path...

If i were the instructor I'd have slowed down the pace as soon as your technique started breaking down (ie. the biggest obvious issue I see is your double-hug-forehand - ie. left arm and right arm cross - indicating your arming the ball vs. swinging with your body).

Tip for the "double-hug-forehand"... swing a basebat with one hand a few times and see how your *NEED* your entire body to swing it... personally i'm a fan of the etcheberry swing trainer, but that's not necessary.
Ah, the cleavage forehand. It's as if there's a coach somewhere constantly telling the player to get his / her elbows to touch.

I agree that the 5.0+ in the video may be too much for OP to practice, because playig with someone who is too good (and isn't a coach) ironically ruins the chance to develop correct technique because the learner will more often than not be learning to react to the ball coming at them and working with the incoming pace than being more proactive with the ball and learning to generate their own power. Such players will meet a pusher and wonder why none of their groundstrokes are passing the net, or why they are always framing the ball, or why they are hitting it far too wide or not wide enough, then come back here complaining about pushers not playing real tennis.

It's a beautiful cycle :D
 
It's OP back again, interesting to see the discussion. My #1 goal is to develop good form. IMO that would happen in stages. Could you please break it down into 2 categories.

1. Simple (foundational techniques) for improvement. Provide 1-2 suggestions here
2. Advanced techniques - likewise 1-2 suggestions here

Note that I am aware of the stroke fundamentals. Just trying to carve a path from [a] my current form (huge area of improvement) to really good form in [c] sequence of 2 stages. Thanks!
 
Ah, the cleavage forehand. It's as if there's a coach somewhere constantly telling the player to get his / her elbows to touch.

I agree that the 5.0+ in the video may be too much for OP to practice, because playig with someone who is too good (and isn't a coach) ironically ruins the chance to develop correct technique because the learner will more often than not be learning to react to the ball coming at them and working with the incoming pace than being more proactive with the ball and learning to generate their own power. Such players will meet a pusher and wonder why none of their groundstrokes are passing the net, or why they are always framing the ball, or why they are hitting it far too wide or not wide enough, then come back here complaining about pushers not playing real tennis.

It's a beautiful cycle :D
ROFL "cleavage forehand". I'm totally stealing that!
 
Disagree with you here. donnybrook has it right by how most use it imo....racket head lags the hitting hand until contact when racket head whips through. And if we disagree, this is what imo op needs to work

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

You are right that most use the term lag to describe the racquet drop. That doesn't mean it is the correct or best use of the term. In any event, I think it is a misuse the term because the lag (the delay in time between the initiation of the forward swing and ball contact caused by the kinetic chain), is a very important aspect of modern forehand technique. The racquet drop is the final element of the lag in the chain of events beginning with hip rotation and ending with contact.
 
You are right that most use the term lag to describe the racquet drop. That doesn't mean it is the correct or best use of the term. In any event, I think it is a misuse the term because the lag (the delay in time between the initiation of the forward swing and ball contact caused by the kinetic chain), is a very important aspect of modern forehand technique. The racquet drop is the final element of the lag in the chain of events beginning with hip rotation and ending with contact.

It's funny that the term lag is used differently in golf and tennis. In tennis it does seem to be commonly used as you are using it. In golf it is used the describe the angle between the forearm and shaft. Holding lag is a core golf concept. It's why the pros can hit the ball so far with an apparently effortless swing.
 
Donnybrook, I appreciate your feedback thus far. I am trying to be a student of the game here with a very open mind. Please suggest specifically how i get the fundamentals right based on where I am? Should I focus on core/most important things first before the advanced stuff? Do provide the specifics.
 
It's OP back again, interesting to see the discussion. My #1 goal is to develop good form. IMO that would happen in stages. Could you please break it down into 2 categories.

1. Simple (foundational techniques) for improvement. Provide 1-2 suggestions here
2. Advanced techniques - likewise 1-2 suggestions here

Note that I am aware of the stroke fundamentals. Just trying to carve a path from [a] my current form (huge area of improvement) to really good form in [c] sequence of 2 stages. Thanks!

You can lead a horse to water . . .
 
It's OP back again, interesting to see the discussion. My #1 goal is to develop good form. IMO that would happen in stages. Could you please break it down into 2 categories.

1. Simple (foundational techniques) for improvement. Provide 1-2 suggestions here
2. Advanced techniques - likewise 1-2 suggestions here

Note that I am aware of the stroke fundamentals. Just trying to carve a path from [a] my current form (huge area of improvement) to really good form in [c] sequence of 2 stages. Thanks!

Good idea. You need to go out and practice and focus on one or two things. You have received a lot of criticism here, but I think your FH is pretty good. As you note, what you lack is the ability to really thump the ball.

For point 1, the simple fix, I would say you need to loosen up your arm a lot and get the butt of the racquet facing the ball when you start the forward swing. Then make sure you hit the ball with your chest facing the net.

For point 2, the advanced, you need to get your hips rotating. They literally do not move now. As a result, your feet do not move either. If you watch any top pro, when they hit with an open stance, their front foot generally comes off the ground through or after impact. With a neutral or closed stance, generally the back foot comes around. I'm not sure in your case if you are putting too much weight on your front foot, which blocks your hip rotation, or if you lock your hips and that keeps your feet grounded.
 
Last edited:
Okay, and just to clarify one final time. The lack of torso rotation is not a cause of anything but a symptom of not hitting the forehand correctly. All of these things that people point to are consequences and results of lack of fundamentals. The hip isn't coming through because hes not hitting the ball correctly not the other way around. Practice the fundamentals and that torso will take care of itself without ever thinking about it.

Wait, since when is turning your shoulders not a fundamental part of the stroke? This makes no sense at all. It's like you're saying, don't worry about swinging low to high, practice the fundamentals and that will happen naturally!!
 
Racquet lag is a hugely overrated part of the forehand on these boards.

Yes, it's essential if you want a ATP style forehand, but it's not a make or break component of the stroke itself. Trunk, core, and shoulder rotation are the most important aspects of the forehand, and OP is hardly doing any of these things.

Trying to incorporate racquet lag on a forehand that is fundamentally lacking is like putting spoiler on a Toyota Corolla and trying to pass it off as a sports car.
I've heard this several times now on this thread., that OP needs to start with the fundamentals before worrying about anything else, like lag or coil/uncoil...

I disagree. Folks he has the fundamentals. He needs refinement and thinking about higher level technique to move from an armed late forehand to high level modern forehand.

OP--i would focus on videos that drill on lag and coil/uncoil. I never liked the pull the buttcap type ones, but search through and try to find something that resonates with you. Look for videos that teach to loosen the grip (unlock) and using a more fluid swing, leading with the hand and snapping racket head through at contact. I would practice using soft feeds or against the wall or machine where you're not under pressure. Agree with others that you will ingrain suboptimal form in survival mode vs better players. Video as much as you can and analyze vs highlevel strokes.
Except it really isn't. If you look closely, many of his backhands save for a few genuinely fluid ones are armed despite the apparent turn in his body. You can tell because his backhand forward swing seems to be consistently ahead of his apparent uncoiling, and, if not, turning in perfect sync with his core. His backhand is merely better fundamentally than his FH, but that doesn't mean it is fine (if we are comparing it to ideal technique).

My understanding of both FHs and BHs is that the majority of the power generated on these strokes are mostly from the violent uncoiling of the body (legs, hips / torso, shoulders), with only a minority (by this I do not mean minimal--just less than 50%) of the power being generated by an active arm. If the racquet is consistently leading or is moving exactly in sync with his hips / shoulders with no lag whatsoever, he's either muscling his arms forward first, causing his hips / shoulders to follow suit, or I am terribly mistaken and he is actually using his core as he should but has got some funky version of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.


Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Since the beginning of tennis. The shoulder turn happens as a result of hitting the ball correctly. You don't "teach" the shoulder turn. Well, some well intentioned but confused people do, and that's why everyone here believes it needs to be taught. I could show you video of my students with forehands most of you would identify as a "modern" forehand and yet not once during my teachings have a ever mentioned bio kinetics, shoulder turn, torso rotation, lag or any of the other descriptions that popped up a few years ago.

Tell someone who can hit a forehand correctly to not open up the hips and they will look silly and struggle not to square up the hips because you are stopping the natural momentum that automatically opens up the hips when you hit a ball in front of you instead of to the side. There is no reason to tell them to open up the hips. It's counterproductive to try and coach like this.

Well that's just BS. You're taking some personal anecdote and acting like it's law, and repeating it in this thread. Here's another one for you. Our teams coach always focused on feeling the "coiling" sensation, and the players on that team were better than the VAST majority of people on this board ever have/will be. Not to mention the coach is much more successful.
 
You can't let go of this idea of fundamentals please tell me what fundamentals he's lacking
With all do respect if he's "arming" it as you say and needs to "refine" the fundamentals, as you say then he does not have the fundamentals.


Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Yep. All of it.

Unfortunately there are lots of confused coaches.

Yeah and it's obviously the D1 coach that is confused...not some dude on TT. Makes sense. If turning your shoulders isn't a fundamental part of a forehand what IS? Holding the racquet? Hitting the ball?
 
With all do respect if he's "arming" it as you say and needs to "refine" the fundamentals, as you say then he does not have the fundamentals.
Refinement means going beyond the fundamentals. If you are including higher-level technique like lag and coil/uncoil as fundamental then sure he needs to learn his fundamentals! But I believe most understand fundamentals to be much more basic elements of tennis. What does ready position look like. What side of the body is a forehand hit. How should I grip the racket. What is a low to high swing path. What is topspin. What is slice? What is a backswing. What is follow through. He understands all these elements and is using them... he has the fundamentals. Now it's a matter of refinement meaning going beyond the fundamentals.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Donnybrook, I appreciate your feedback thus far. I am trying to be a student of the game here with a very open mind. Please suggest specifically how i get the fundamentals right based on where I am? Should I focus on core/most important things first before the advanced stuff? Do provide the specifics.

He's already told you multiple times. You have to hit the FH correctly. Simple.
 
There are confused coaches at IMG Academy. They likely have to justify the insane prices they charge so they come up with absolute nonsense to teach.

I won't respond to you anymore. You've shown yourself to be a complete jerk.

Ummm, I won't respond to you anymore because you're being a jerk now. Boohoo.

So far all I've gotten from him is that high level coaches everywhere are confused, except him of course. And that shoulder turn is not a fundamental of the forehand. What IS a fundamental part of the forehand?? We don't know. Apparently it involves holding the racquet and hitting the ball though.
 
So far all I've gotten from him is that high level coaches everywhere are confused, except him of course. And that shoulder turn is not a fundamental of the forehand. What IS a fundamental part of the forehand?? We don't know. Apparently it involves holding the racquet and hitting the ball though.

No, the fundamental is you have to hit the FH correctly. The rest is too complicated and you have to read a 200 pg book from the 70s to get the real truth.
 
The stroke looks improvised. What I mean by that is it's clear you have not had any coaching. As far as the advice about lag excetera, to be perfectly honest with you that is the last thing I would be concerned about. I don't mean any disrespect to anyone who suggested that you should be lagging but i will tell you that there are thousands of people with beautiful forehands who never heard the words lag or core rotation out of their coaches mouth.
Again I would just advise you to really learn the fundamentals of the forehand and take it step by step because an improvised forehand could work up to a certain point as you know but you'll never develop a really good forehand unless you go back to step number one and learn the basic fundamentals. I'm not going to list what the fundamentals are because things are made much clearer and simpler on video compared to a forum.

I really, really disagree with you comments about lag or core rotation being stressed by coaches.

Vic Braden is a pretty famous coach and he taught using legs and core rotation in the 1970s. He was a former pro player. He actually built a device that would hold a tennis racket and strap to a players thighs. He coached a junior team and had them hit balls using leg lift and core rotation with this device - no hands on the racket.

Paul Annacone stresses core rotation to drive the arms during commentary of ATP and WTA matches.

The "serve doctor" coach at IMG academy has a video stressing core rotation and uses "cylinder" drills on FH and serve for that matter.

Rick Macci has a video talking about the "flip" in the FH transition from backswing to forward motion. The "flip" can be viewed as creating lag. Rick Macci also has talked about how Venus Williams FH goes off because she gets her arm out of sync with her body.

The coach that runs the Lock and Roll Tennis instruction site talks about letting the core rotation lead the arm forward. This is "lag".

These are just a few examples and there are many, many more. It is possible to learn a good FH without coaching these principles but rare.
 
I really, really disagree with you comments about lag or core rotation being stressed by coaches.

Vic Braden is a pretty famous coach and he taught using legs and core rotation in the 1970s. He was a former pro player. He actually built a device that would hold a tennis racket and strap to a players thighs. He coached a junior team and had them hit balls using leg lift and core rotation with this device - no hands on the racket.

Paul Annacone stresses core rotation to drive the arms during commentary of ATP and WTA matches.

The "serve doctor" coach at IMG academy has a video stressing core rotation and uses "cylinder" drills on FH and serve for that matter.

Rick Macci has a video talking about the "flip" in the FH transition from backswing to forward motion. The "flip" can be viewed as creating lag. Rick Macci also has talked about how Venus Williams FH goes off because she gets her arm out of sync with her body.

The coach that runs the Lock and Roll Tennis instruction site talks about letting the core rotation lead the arm forward. This is "lag".

These are just a few examples and there are many, many more. It is possible to learn a good FH without coaching these principles but rare.

Don't you know? They are all confused coaches.

ETA: These coaches speak gibberish, bordering on Swahili.
 
Last edited:
Yes, Some of these people have to justify the high prices. Some are fooled into thinking they are giving useful advice and most are probably well meaning but that doesn't change things for me. I've been to IMG for a coaching clinic and I was not alone in my opinion that much of the time was filled with fluff and gibberish that confuses people instead of helps them.
Look I get it. I'm a PSIA certified ski instructor. I know all about instructors talking like mad with crazy jargon that is way beyond the beginner student. Hip angles, edge release, quiet upper body, flexion/extension...you name it. It gets ridiculous. You have to know your audience and understand how a student learns.

However this guy is not in that situation, he is not a beginner. He needs to start absorbing higher level concepts and look and work on tutorials explaining these advanced concepts. He has come here specifically asking for input therefore he is seeking written and/or video demonstrations of what he needs to do. He has taken the time to video himself and then posted it to this forum.

Yes there is tons of information out there, it can be information overload. He will need to sift through which tutorials and which terminology clicks with him and make sense with him. That is the beauty of the internet you can pick what works for you and discard what does not. What you will notice if you look at the internet, is that people are basically using different terminology to describe the exact same thing. This is nothing to be afraid of just teachers trying to find ways to get concepts to click with their students.

Maybe he will read your post that says hit the ball out front and things will naturally fall into place and he will have lag and torso rotation. I would be skeptical of that, but I don't discount that as a possibility. I think looking at many different approaches and really understanding what needs to happen will help.
 
Yes, Some of these people have to justify the high prices. Some are fooled into thinking they are giving useful advice and most are probably well meaning but that doesn't change things for me. I've been to IMG for a coaching clinic and I was not alone in my opinion that much of the time was filled with fluff and gibberish that confuses people instead of helps them.

Ok, some of the guys I cited played on the ATP tour, coached ATP players and all have coached high level players but you know better. I think synchronizing core rotation into a FH swing is basic and fundamental stuff. There might be other ways to express it or work it into a beginners game without saying the words "core rotation" or "create lag", but the OP is of a high enough level that he should be able to understand and learn these basic principles.
 
Look I get it. I'm a PSIA certified ski instructor. I know all about instructors talking like mad with crazy jargon that is way beyond the beginner student. Hip angles, edge release, quiet upper body, flexion/extension...you name it. It gets ridiculous. You have to know your audience and understand how a student learns.

However this guy is not in that situation, he is not a beginner. He needs to start absorbing higher level concepts and look and work on tutorials explaining these advanced concepts. He has come here specifically asking for input therefore he is seeking written and/or video demonstrations of what he needs to do. He has taken the time to video himself and then posted it to this forum.

Yes there is tons of information out there, it can be information overload. He will need to sift through which tutorials and which terminology clicks with him and make sense with him. That is the beauty of the internet you can pick what works for you and discard what does not. What you will notice if you look at the internet, is that people are basically using different terminology to describe the exact same thing. This is nothing to be afraid of just teachers trying to find ways to get concepts to click with their students.

Maybe he will read your post that says hit the ball out front and things will naturally fall into place and he will have lag and torso rotation. I would be skeptical of that, but I don't discount that as a possibility. I think looking at many different approaches and really understanding what needs to happen will help.

I agree, the terminology can be a bit overbearing and I am not going to comment on OP ability... There is a ton of different lessons all with particularities and you have to get the advice that works for you. From my personal experience, my game only got better when I started to focus on hitting the ball in front of me and the body rotation is a natural thing that accompanies the flow, it is not something I think about. But well, this is just my anecdote, so I won't try to defend it by myself.
 
coupergear, thanks for taking the initiative and posting the video. It is very helpful, much appreciated :) Worth more than a million words..

I will have to un-learn the locked wrist habit acquired over 7+ years and develop a loose wrist. I understand the problem and solution much better now. Key is execution! Thanks again.
 
coupergear, thanks for taking the initiative and posting the video. It is very helpful, much appreciated :) Worth more than a million words..

I will have to un-learn the locked wrist habit acquired over 7+ years and develop a loose wrist. I understand the problem and solution much better now. Key is execution! Thanks again.
Thanks. I meant to mention...your current contact point with wrist locked is basically straight out to your side...where my racket was pointing at camera in "locked" shadow swing...hence everyone noting it being late/too far back.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Got it thanks. This is the kind of high quality feedback I was looking for on the forum - very relevant, targeted, easy to understand and precise!
 
It's funny that the term lag is used differently in golf and tennis. In tennis it does seem to be commonly used as you are using it. In golf it is used the describe the angle between the forearm and shaft. Holding lag is a core golf concept. It's why the pros can hit the ball so far with an apparently effortless swing.
I can't speak for how others use it, but when I use racket lag as a term is along the lines of "lag to drag" on the Fh, although I teach the same lag to drag on the serve....just in a different plane. Imo, my use is more akin to the golf use. On the serve, it's how you get the L position Chas speaks of..
 
Well that's just BS. You're taking some personal anecdote and acting like it's law, and repeating it in this thread. Here's another one for you. Our teams coach always focused on feeling the "coiling" sensation, and the players on that team were better than the VAST majority of people on this board ever have/will be. Not to mention the coach is much more successful.
Not that I totally agree with him, but JY really stresses the shoulders as a main issues from what I've read from him. Imo he over does it a bit, but good shoulder turn is important and is taught if it doesn't happen naturally. Most athletes that throw well will use the shoulders pretty well too without much coaching on that.
 
Ok OP problem solved. Watch this clip.



Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
Well done mate. Can I add one thing? At the beginning of the forward swing the wrist shouldn't be in an extended(bent back) position (that's WTA forehand ) but rather in a neutral position and it should go backwards/extend because of the sudden forward swing of the arm ( ideally created by torso rotation ).
 
Well done mate. Can I add one thing? At the beginning of the forward swing the wrist shouldn't be in an extended(bent back) position (that's WTA forehand ) but rather in a neutral position and it should go backwards/extend because of the sudden forward swing of the arm ( ideally created by torso rotation ).
Disagree mate. The wta vs atp is about back swing. The women do a big windup with the racket back high behind them. Men much more compact unit turn and backswing all out on the front plane of body. Look at nadal he cocks his wrist into an L even during unit turn.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Look at nadal he cocks his wrist into an L even during unit turn.
Yes he does but my point is just at the moment of forward swing initiation the wrist becomes neutral whereas in the WTA forehand it stays in the laidback, extended position and that's why you don't see that lag/flip of ATP forehand. I'll post videos later when I have time.
 
the problem with the example in this video is nobody actually hits a ball like he does in the beginning. He looks like a robot, who does that? Even beginners don't hit balls like that.
It's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

. In fact many people let their wrists go loosey-goosey in the back. That's far more common than whatever this guy is showing here. You often have to tell players to control their wrists and don't let it drop.
Lol. Figured you wouldnt like it, but what do you know, even you are engaging in tech weenie talk..wrist positioning etc..so maybe it does matter after all! Haha. Yes i was exaggerating a stroke where the wrist is completely locked his isn't actually that bad and he doesn't cross up his arms up like I do in the "locked" demo. he tends to lift the racket high over his head so he can get topspin with a mostly locked wrist.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Yes he does but my point is just at the moment of forward swing initiation the wrist becomes neutral whereas in the WTA forehand it stays in the laidback, extended position and that's why you don't see that lag/flip of ATP forehand. I'll post videos later when I have time.
Fair enough . I didn't find any huge issues with the op's backswing or forward initiation main issue is locked wrist just prior, at moment of contact...and follow through. My own foreward initiation may be more wta-like in the shadow swings. Definitely post some vids.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
OP back again - I spent an hour on the court to work on loose wrist. Incredibly difficult to execute after so many years of semi-locked wrist. Hard to get the swing, timing etc which is reasonable given first attempt.

I think using the wrist effectively is a very advanced technique. Based on where I am (arming the ball), there are probably lower hanging fruits. IMO I will get more immediate mileage if I can get hips to rotate and shoulders to open during the forward swing. I tried those too but it's not very obvious. On some forehands, I could engage them and the stokes felt so good. It was easier to engage on cross court than DTL. However, I can't repeat them at will yet. It was more fluke than rule.

Any tips on how I can engage shoulders and hips? Should I focus on hips first before shoulders? What would be a logical sequence for improving the stroke?
 
OP back again - I spent an hour on the court to work on loose wrist. Incredibly difficult to execute after so many years of semi-locked wrist. Hard to get the swing, timing etc which is reasonable given first attempt.

I think using the wrist effectively is a very advanced technique. Based on where I am (arming the ball), there are probably lower hanging fruits. IMO I will get more immediate mileage if I can get hips to rotate and shoulders to open during the forward swing. I tried those too but it's not very obvious. On some forehands, I could engage them and the stokes felt so good. It was easier to engage on cross court than DTL. However, I can't repeat them at will yet. It was more fluke than rule.

Any tips on how I can engage shoulders and hips? Should I focus on hips first before shoulders? What would be a logical sequence for improving the stroke?
typical of most rec players, you're looking for the magic pill/quick fix. developing proper strokes takes time and lots of practice. there are no short cuts.
 
I am not looking for short cuts. I am looking for progression steps which will provide continuous improvement. More like one step at a time, instead of trying to digest everything and not doing anything well
 
OP back again - I spent an hour on the court to work on loose wrist. Incredibly difficult to execute after so many years of semi-locked wrist. Hard to get the swing, timing etc which is reasonable given first attempt.

I think using the wrist effectively is a very advanced technique. Based on where I am (arming the ball), there are probably lower hanging fruits. IMO I will get more immediate mileage if I can get hips to rotate and shoulders to open during the forward swing. I tried those too but it's not very obvious. On some forehands, I could engage them and the stokes felt so good. It was easier to engage on cross court than DTL. However, I can't repeat them at will yet. It was more fluke than rule.

Any tips on how I can engage shoulders and hips? Should I focus on hips first before shoulders? What would be a logical sequence for improving the stroke?
1 hour? Hate to break it to you boss, but it's more like another 7 years! Seriously, I have a theory that tennis players tend to reach their prime later than in past eras (of teen wonderkids) is that the modern strokes take that long to master--to have full control of them.

So now we get into another familiar topic...do you just resign youself to your level to avoid the painful disruption, or do you work new things and suffer a performance drop that may last a while? Its not fun to lose to people you normally beat! Or the the fear that you'll f up what you already have and never breakthrough to a higher level or even get back to your current one.

Did you do the calisthenics i demoed, pivoting at hips and twisting? Thats a simple progression for getting hips and shoulders turning, it naturally gets you creating the forehand kinetic chain. Its also just a good warmup.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
I found calisthenics helpful. I suspect that during the prep i don't have much coiling, therefore there's not much to un-coil and thus not much shoulder and hip movement. So it would help to load up well.
 
On some forehands, I could engage them and the stokes felt so good. It was easier to engage on cross court than DTL.

With a semi-locked wrist if you turn your hips and shoulders much prior to contact the ball is naturally going to want to go crosscourt...without the wrist lag your contact point is still out to your side, youve just rotated yourehips and shoulders more so now your aiming crosscourt. Point is you need both.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top