Then you're blind :lol:. Maybe hate is a strong word, but you obviously dislike the guy.
You quote things like me saying that Nadal isn't invincible on fast indoor HC to aggressive players with lots of weapons, and how I don't think a match that lasted 1.5 hours where many service games for both players went to deuce is a blow out. Or that I think that Verdasco, after losing 8 straight, will finally one day beat Nadal on a fast court which favors attacking tennis instead of almost exclusive error-focing defense that Nadal played both at AO and in Rome. These views supposedly constitute my hate for Nadal.
So for me to qualify as a Nadal haterI should have said roughly this:
0) Nadal is the most honest, entertaining, and interesting interviewee. He's never lied in his entire life.
1) Nadal owns every player regardless of the surface. In fact, they should give him the trophy without even playing.
2) Nadal lost to Ferrero but it doesn't count because Nadal is a beast.
3) Simon cannot give Nadal a taste of his own medicine because Nadal's medicine is special. Vamos!
4) Nadal wasn't even sweating at the end of his Soderling match. But wait, why did he say this:
RAFAEL NADAL said:
No, I think the match was really tough. Not the result, but, yes, the match. Yeah, the beginning I was winning 4-1, but at the same time I can be losing 4-1, no?
Just to summarize:
Rafael Nadal said:
...match was really tough...
IvanAndreevich said:
...I wouldn't call that crushing...
Pirao said:
...Nadal whooped Soderling...
There are 2 possibitlies. Either I am wrong, Nadal is really wrong, and you are right. The other possibility is that Nadal and I are right, and you are wrong. Connect the dots :-?