tennis_pro
Bionic Poster
You mean like Federer on clay until he was in his mid 30s?At least he’ll show up and put up a fight
How will you sing after Nadal "retires" from the grass season which is already rumoured.
You mean like Federer on clay until he was in his mid 30s?At least he’ll show up and put up a fight
He could've made the QF if he had beaten Del Potro which he likely should've. And Federer looked injured against Del Potro so who knows? Maybe Thiem would've made the SF.i think that is his best slam outside of RG. I would doubt he would win it, but a SF would be nice. Either way, he has a great chance to win RG in the future.
no because why would anyone want to fail so much?I bet someone will create a thread like this: Nadal to win 25 slams![]()
People thought he would win a set and then realised how ****ing good Nadal is on this court despite Thiem throwing everything at him for an hour. As for folding like a deck chair, you must have missed Delpo the other day.No he'll never amount to anything because he's mentally weak and has no variety, as evidenced today.
Nobody expected him to win today, but people expected him to win at least one set and give Rafa a run for his money.
He folded like a deck chair after going 0-30 down at 5-4. After that, the outcome was inevitable.
As for lack of variety, his second serve out wide was abysmal, the obvious thing to do was to change it up or take the pace off his first serve- he did neither.
Nadal's sister always reminds me of the late, great singer Tom Petty
Huh??? Are you stupid or something or just stupid? LOL!!!Such as? Fed's only worthwhile records are just his weeks at number 1 and his 20 GS titles. I think you should check the facts.
I abandoned it at the beginning of this year. After several complaints it felt like I would be truly annoying if I just ignored them all.What we have seen happening in tennis over the last 20 years or so proves categorically that past results and patterns have no bearing on future successes. And that's applicable to any aspect of life.
What's next? As far as Slam counts go, it remains very interesting. For the rest of the field, there's still some soul-searching to do. Federer and Nadal continue to hold up the old Big 4 fort, splitting the past 6 Slams between them!
And by the way, good to see you using a conventional font nowadays![]()
his finger had no feeling.... I think RAFA will have to take off the rest of the year to get that injury better...... See you Next year RAFASo happy for Rafa, he scared me with the finger moment in the last set. Vamooooos!
Because it's ttw and people predict things based on who the last Gs winner was. Remember the 2015 threads: Djokovic will win 20 slams?no because why would anyone want to fail so much?
I'm sick of hearing this. Thiem is #7 of the world right now, period. No number 2 on clay or whatever. Cut the crap. Let him win a clay m1000 before calling him that. Pretty sure Zedbot will gain in on him soon anyway so he won't be seeing a lot of RG finals in his career.Lol, you need to watch more clay court tennis. Thiem is #2 in the field.
yes and I mocked that concept several times at the timeBecause it's ttw and people predict things based on who the last Gs winner was. Remember the 2015 threads: Djokovic will win 20 slams?
Steve ... get over it or take some anti-depressants man! When Federer won Wimbledon last year beating a bunch of worthless players, you didn't say a f*ucking thing about the next generation being cra*p. yet Nadal wins a slam and you write a half-page essay about it?
By the way, I'm in full agreement with your point though![]()
People thought he would win a set and then realised how ****ing good Nadal is on this court despite Thiem throwing everything at him for an hour. As for folding like a deck chair, you must have missed Delpo the other day.
If you judge everything on matches against Nadal at the French Open, you must think everyone is useless!
Calling BS what you don’t or can’t understand is a known form of self defense against reality.
Zedbot was miles away in the QF's, he will always be out-moved by Thiem on this court. As for the #7 thing... cut the crap, bro.I'm sick of hearing this. Thiem is #7 of the world right now, period. No number 2 on clay or whatever. Cut the crap. Let him win a clay m1000 before calling him that. Pretty sure Zedbot will gain in on him soon anyway so he won't be seeing a lot of RG finals in his career.
Nadal may have blown his full load in the clay season as he tends to do. And won't be ready to go hard until US Open. Although it will be likely a bigger task this time around. Nadal isn't known for defending Slams successfully off clay.Federer is no lock at Wimbledon.
Whereas Nadal looks extremely strong out there - solid, and consistent with little dips. he may surprise at Wimbledon with a run, and will be strong at the usopen. someone will have to outplay him there..who? Delpo? Shapovalov?
Federer still can blow hot and cold, and is much more vulnerable...
Nadal's defense alone will beat most guys on tour these days even on the faster surfaces.
You've done it there man. I can't respond to that!That's true but outside of the french open he's never reached a slam QF or won a single Masters 1000 despite three of them being on his favourite suface lmfao.
Nobody is denying Nadal's greatness on clay but Outside of clay thiem is a top 50 player at best.
Let's see them play on wet clay and blue clay instead of sunny, bouncy clay.Well guys i missed the whole match because of real life. Doesn't sound like i missed anything, i'll watch the highlights at some point.
I think Thiem does deserve criticism, he may be nicknamed the prince of clay but what use is that title if he's unable to do any better against Nadal at the French than Bolelli, Haase, Marterer or Schwartzman.
They've had three matches at RG now and Thiem has won a combined 23 games without even reaching 5 games in a set. These are not good contests.
Oh please don't.
Can't stomach that lingering oaf getting up for Fed again after bending over for Rafa.
If they do meet at Wimb, I want Fed to clean his clock.
I don't find that unfortunate, stories like that are dime a dozen in tennis.
That's actually ridiculous. If u exclude what nadal has done OFF clay, he'll still have the same amount of slams as the great Bjorn Borg. And if u exclude what he's done ON clay, he'll still have the same amount of slams as other past tennis legends such as Boris Becker and Stefan edberg. He's surely gotta be at least a top 2/3 player of all time by now even if he decides to retire at this very moment.Just think about it. Borg has 11 majors. Djokovic 12. Nadal has 11 French Open’s alone.
don't point at my avatar it's rude!At least he’ll show up and put up a fight
BUT he reached the final!!!Well guys i missed the whole match because of real life. Doesn't sound like i missed anything, i'll watch the highlights at some point.
I think Thiem does deserve criticism, he may be nicknamed the prince of clay but what use is that title if he's unable to do any better against Nadal at the French than Bolelli, Haase, Marterer or Schwartzman.
They've had three matches at RG now and Thiem has won a combined 23 games without even reaching 5 games in a set. These are not good contests.
BUT he reached the final!!!
That is something new. His first ever GS final. Its a BIG deal!! And good experience.
Nadal had cramps in his hand and could barely play, yet managed to win the set 6-2 lmfao how do people still rate Thiem
I think Thiem and Nadal did as they both ignored him in their speeches.lol ken roswell rubbing salt in the wounds did anyone notice?
I think Thiem and Nadal did as they both ignored him in their speeches.![]()
And if Fed had won Wimbledon 2008, it might have been 21-17 ... As Rafa said after that match, he had won some close ones also against Roger. Can't have them all - let's just be happy & amazed at what they both achieved.So happy for today's victory but that Ao loss still hurts after so much time... It would've been 19-18 now.
That is what Thiem has been doing all tournament and Nadal was camped out wide for return so Thiem went down the tee. He actually played a decent match and altered his serving in the 2nd to get his first percentage up. This was a big, big improvement from last year when he was out of the match early in the 2nd.Thiem didn’t even really try any new tactics. I mean even the weekend warriors on this message board are saying to take the serve out wide.
This is pretty much it. Thiem is at his speed peak this year. He may add a bit to his serve game and stamina, but don't see that getting him over the line against this Nadal. Would have been interesting if the conditions were even heavier.Federer still remains the closest who took took rafa into the 5th set in a rg final...(i.e. breaker in the 4th set).
Rafa may not be as fast as 2005 but his game is much more refined on clay. he has it all.
can thiem improve his net game, court sense, drop shots etc...seems like a really tall order...don't think he can beat this rafa...he will have to wait for nadal's level to come down...
Rosewall's comment actually denigrated Nadal's win at the same time.Ridiculous, disrespectful idiot. Thiem played ridiculous tennis in the first set and still lost it. Dipped a bit after but still alright. Its like anyone else in this tournament would've done anything is it?
What about the future Nadals? A lot of kids are emulating Nadal's style coming up, and they're building their game for clay. Who knows what we'll see in the next few generations? Maybe the future Nadal will come right from Nadal's own tennis academy.Nadal has likely broken clay court tennis forever for those who care about titles and stats, he has knocked the ball way out of the park. When he retires, even the future Gugas or Musters, which will be mighty giants on their own, will look like flashes in a pan. Winning just a measly 3-4 RG's? Meh.
lol ken roswell rubbing salt in the wounds did anyone notice?
LOL. I'd love to see him laying it down on Fraud at a couple trophy ceremonies. You guys would have a fit.And Rosewall, French Open champion from 1953 and 1968 who was called upon to present the trophy, could not help but criticise Thiem’s performance.
“Like everybody we would like to have seen a few more sets but that’s what happens in tennis,” Rosewall said on court.
“Rafa was a little bit too good and Dominic was a bit disappointing with his own game.”
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/ten...sappointing-French-Open-champion-Ken-Rosewall
@tennisaddict : that's an accurate assessment. Why would Rosewall be bitter ?
Rumoured by who? You?You mean like Federer on clay until he was in his mid 30s?
How will you sing after Nadal "retires" from the grass season which is already rumoured.
LOL. I'd love to see him laying it down on Fraud at a couple trophy ceremonies. You guys would have a fit.![]()
So happy for today's victory but that Ao loss still hurts after so much time... It would've been 19-18 now.
Its done and I got rained on a bit at the end unlike Dull.I hope you have an exceptional mowing session.