I believe they are good friends, Domi even looked happier than Diego hahahaReally?? Did you see how gracious he was in defeat? Joking around with Diego?
Exactly. I've seen and talked to Thiem many times at IW, he's one of the nicest guys on tour. Always gracious and a sweetheart to everyone, at least at Indian Wells.Really?? Did you see how gracious he was in defeat? Joking around with Diego?
In his defense, in the Open Era, no player On the men’s side has won their first slam and then won the next one in the calendar.
Closest player to do it was Andy Murray (USO 12-AO 13 final), I think.
Yeah I don't know how come most people forget about Connors, I actually mentioned same thing some time earlier.True. Connors did win the first two (in fact, first three) slams he played after winning his first, i.e. the 1974 AO, W and USO. However, he skipped the 1974 FO, so technically didn't win the next one in the calendar after his first.
Also, OP: you're very wrong in your assertion.
In his defense, in the Open Era, no player On the men’s side has won their first slam and then won the next one in the calendar.
+1Thiem is too humble lmao
Connors, and other, were banned from the FO because they chose to play WTT instead of the European clay court seasonYeah I don't know how come most people forget about Connors, I actually mentioned same thing some time earlier.
I think Connors was banned, so technically he did won his first three slam. I read it somewhere that Connors moved to court also to seek relief from ban.
I mean did Federer and Nadal have any problems battling it out during clay season, playing at RG, then playing again at the Wimby finals after two weeks in between three straight years? Federer even played Halle two of those years.Not having this at all. Thiem is a gentleman and throughout was displaying brilliant sportsmanship. He arguably nicest guy on tour.
It was a tournament too far. Now he can enjoy US Open win finally.
I mean sure we hold lower standards for Thiem but what does it say that we don't expect the crown prince to challenge for his supposedly best event just because he barely won a 250 level event 4 weeks ago?
He confused him with Zverev. First time he watches tennis.Thiem arrogant? Lol no
Thiem was right here
'They're not going to starve': Dominic Thiem will not chip in for struggling tennis players
The world No 3 has said he would rather donate ‘to those that really need it’ and accused some lower-ranked players of lacking professionalismwww.theguardian.com
This!At least he's not a coward like Nadal who skipped the US Open.
COWARD?!?! So let’s see here Nadal is in his mid 30s, and he prioritized one tournament over another for longevity’s sake... yes Covid played a role as well but ultimately, his focus was always on the French cause he has better chances of succeeding. We all know this. And for that he’s a coward?!?! How hateful...At least he's not a coward like Nadal who skipped the US Open.
Gives him a huge and unfair advanatage at RG. Don't buy the injury issue, so Coward. Already a covid hypocrite so that was just a joke and undercut tennis. Just admit the only reason for not playing both or do as he did and be a coward who uses covid to cover his actions.COWARD?!?! So let’s see here Nadal is in his mid 30s, and he prioritized one tournament over another for longevity’s sake... yes Covid played a role as well but ultimately, his focus was always on the French cause he has better chances of succeeding. We all know this. And for that he’s a coward?!?! How hateful...
You sir, are off your meds.Gives him a huge and unfair advanatage at RG. Don't buy the injury issue, so Coward. Already a covid hypocrite so that was just a joke and undercut tennis. Just admit the only reason for not playing both or do as he did and be a coward who uses covid to cover his actions.
And really the thing is that this loss isn't even a remote surprise for those who rate Thiem properly. It's no surprise that a dogged competitor like Schwartzman who moves well and is consistent can take him out. He's just not anything special that you should pencil him in against any type of quality player.
Before this I heard that Thiem was gassed in the RG final last year and the reason he never did that well in slams is because he overplayed and was tired. What's the excuse there?Lol at the hate dripping through this.
Thiem was dead on his feet, yet took Diego to the edge.
And for all talks of Federer Nadal clay to grass Transition,
News flash: This isn't a regular season.
Thiem and almost about everyone's practice blocks are f88ked up,so is his fitness regime.
He was dying on court in the USO F. And didn't practice on Clay and didn't train for about 10 days after that.
If any hater like you actually ever watched Thiem, they would know that he plays 2-3 tournaments in succession before slams and yet is barely tired ever.
If you can't see that this is an abnormal situation then you are blind.
And oh, good luck to your favorite's record.
Didn't think there could be yet more proof that mury is the real goat, but you came through.In his defense, in the Open Era, no player On the men’s side has won their first slam and then won the next one in the calendar.
Closest player to do it was Andy Murray (USO 12-AO 13 final), I think.
MuryGOAT is not something that should be proved through meaningless statistics. MuryGOAT should be accepted as a fact of life.Didn't think there could be yet more proof that mury is the real goat, but you came through.
Thanks.
At least he's not a coward like Nadal who skipped the US Open.