French Open will decide GOAT

Huh. So if Fed wins a slam without facing Nadal that is Fed’s fault?
He beat the guy who beat Nadal, or more often he will have beaten the guy who beat the guy who beat the guy who beat Nadal.
Using Nadal’s early round losses as a stick to beat Federer with will never wash with sane poasters

@Sport he's absolutely right. At 26-27 years old your are in your prime and peak.

Nadal lost in the first round in his absolute peak year in the most prestigious tournament.

 
Last edited:
If Novak wins, he is the GOAT in terms of tennis achievements, or better to say the BOAT, the Best of All Time. He would have double career grand slam, double non calendar grand slam, all masters, probably the most number of masters in the end, leading H2H with Fed and Rafa, etc. Number of GS is irrelevant in this case. Novak is the BOAT. Period. If Rafa wins he is still in the race with 18 GS since due to less diverse achievements than Novak he can't be considered the GOAT or BOAT. At the moment, Fed is really GOAT since GOAT is something of a legend and that does not only include success at tournaments, in which Fed leads, that's also aura or halo the person carries. Some may say Fed is also pushed by media, etc. - yes, but he has all the right for that. So, it will be really hard to replace Fed as the GOAT as that is the synonym for tennis. But both Novak and Rafa have the chance to be BOATs in case if they win RG 2019 (Novak) or have more than 20 GSs (Rafa).
 
If Novak wins, he is the GOAT in terms of tennis achievements, or better to say the BOAT, the Best of All Time. He would have double career grand slam, double non calendar grand slam, all masters, probably the most number of masters in the end, leading H2H with Fed and Rafa, etc. Number of GS is irrelevant in this case. Novak is the BOAT. Period. If Rafa wins he is still in the race with 18 GS since due to less diverse achievements than Novak he can't be considered the GOAT or BOAT. At the moment, Fed is really GOAT since GOAT is something of a legend and that does not only include success at tournaments, in which Fed leads, that's also aura or halo the person carries. Some may say Fed is also pushed by media, etc. - yes, but he has all the right for that. So, it will be really hard to replace Fed as the GOAT as that is the synonym for tennis. But both Novak and Rafa have the chance to be BOATs in case if they win RG 2019 (Novak) or have more than 20 GSs (Rafa).
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.

Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.
 
Last edited:
No excuses = said the one who ignores 75% of the Grand Slam matches between Federer and Nadal. Plus, Wimbledon 2008 is widely regarded as the greatest match, while the AO 2017 is only regarded as the best by a minority. Even the AO 2009 final is regarded by many as better than the AO 2017.

Just my 2 cents: 2017 had a closer 5th set, so I can see why people felt it was a "better match". But the overall quality of tennis, and level of the 2009 final was quite extraordinary. It just lacked the climax of a closer deciding set.
 
Just my 2 cents: 2017 had a closer 5th set, so I can see why people felt it was a "better match". But the overall quality of tennis, and level of the 2009 final was quite extraordinary. It just lacked the climax of a closer deciding set.
I agree with your analysis, Subway. The AO 2009 final had a higher level of tennis (both players at their prime and Nadal being faster than ever and reaching impossible balls). The AO 2017 had maybe more historical significance due to their close distance in Slams and the fact that it could be their last Slam final.
 
I agree with your analysis, Subway. The AO 2009 final had a higher level of tennis (both players at their prime and Nadal being faster than ever and reaching impossible balls). The AO 2017 had maybe more historical significance due to their close distance in Slams and the fact that it could be their last Slam final.

Fed is the better player by far with Novak second. Nadal is only in the discussion due to his clay achievement. Nadal is just terrible indoors never winning a YEC.

Nadal has never dominated the game the way Fed and Novak have losing too many times to random players.
https://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/11/ro...06-2015-john-mcenroe-rafael-nadal-grand-slams

@Sport deliberately ignores what happened in the last australian open. Nadal was at his best and got thrashed. It can't be ignored that Novak has been able to beat Nadal in every tournament that matters (AO FO Wim US WTF all MS1000)

 
Last edited:
I agree with your analysis, Subway. The AO 2009 final had a higher level of tennis (both players at their prime and Nadal being faster than ever and reaching impossible balls). The AO 2017 had maybe more historical significance due to their close distance in Slams and the fact that it could be their last Slam final.

Fed was unlucky in the AO 2009 and was the better tennis player. He only lost because "Nadal was reaching impossible balls".
 
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.

Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.

I have got a question to @Sport

If Novak wins the FO this year (which looks unlikely now regarding his current form) would you rate Novak above Nadal in the goat debate and various achievements?
 
No GOATs. However if Djokovic somehow manages to win RG, W and the US open I will give him that status. Real Grand Slam.
 
No GOATs. However if Djokovic somehow manages to win RG, W and the US open I will give him that status. Real Grand Slam.

Djokovic can manage it mentally, but his childish, infantile 'revolted brat' behavior at non Major events (not playing to win) after outcome at WTF18 finals deprives himself of being physically fit, and prevents him from adopting his playing style to particular surface in competitive matches for making it happen. It is truly sad to witness the idiotic gamble he is performing with chance he has now with NCYGS and beyond.

No sane person needs a 'guru' in order to know that this conduct is not the way to preserve 'inner child' in one's self. Whether Djokovic knows it also, we'll find out soon.
 
What if Fognini wins RG will he be the goat :unsure:?

giphy.gif
 
Your premise that RG is the toughest slam is wrong and destroys the arguement

Lets pretend for a second it was a real tennis slam on equal footing to the US Open, Wimbledon, and Australian Open

Of the four Wimbledon still has the fewest winners since the start of the open era while having the largest field since the start of the open era (French and Australian being often skipped by players due to those tournaments' inferiority in all regards)
TOTAL NONSENSE!
 
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.

Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.

It's not that clay isnt an as important surface as the others - it is, it's the fact that 7 of the slam matches between Nadal and Djokovic have come on clay and only 8 on the other surfaces combined. Not only that but 7 matches at Nadal's best slam and only 2 at Djokovic's. Thus the slam H2H is tilted in Nadal's favour.

You've said before there can be no GOAt because 2 hard court slams favour HC players, by the same logic, vastly more meetings at RG compared to the AO favors Nadal.

Also it's a double edged sword because Djokovic has beaten Nadal in all slams, Nadal has not beaten Djokovic at the AO

Really there is no BOAT and there is no GOAT because nothing can be 100% fair to all players. All I would say is that Fed, Nadal and Djokovic are all of a similar level and all have points in their favour and it's down to opinion on who is actually the overall best player
 
Right, the OP has picked Nadal's pet event to decide the GOAT... well that's very unbiased! Lol

Nadal having 12 RG titles wont make him the GOAT of anything other than clay which he already is. Why would 12 even significantly be better than 11?

There is no GOAT, but if there were it will be decided when someone reaches at least ties Feds slam count which both Nadal and Djokovic could do. Fed winning RG for 21 just extends his claim and gives double career slam, Djokovic having 16 slams gives him double career slam but hes still trailing Fed and Nadal on slams. Really Nadal has least to gain out of this, AO would at least give him double career slam
 
It's not that clay isnt an as important surface as the others - it is, it's the fact that 7 of the slam matches between Nadal and Djokovic have come on clay and only 8 on the other surfaces combined. Not only that but 7 matches at Nadal's best slam and only 2 at Djokovic's. Thus the slam H2H is tilted in Nadal's favour.

You've said before there can be no GOAt because 2 hard court slams favour HC players, by the same logic, vastly more meetings at RG compared to the AO favors Nadal.

Also it's a double edged sword because Djokovic has beaten Nadal in all slams, Nadal has not beaten Djokovic at the AO

Really there is no BOAT and there is no GOAT because nothing can be 100% fair to all players. All I would say is that Fed, Nadal and Djokovic are all of a similar level and all have points in their favour and it's down to opinion on who is actually the overall best player

@Sport is a Nadal fan....he's biased.

Novak is already far better than Nadal. 4 slams in a row 5 Yec better slam distribution number of weeks as number 1. His 2015 season is one of the best in the open era. He's won every masters 1000 and has beaten Nadal in every GS WtF masters 1000.
 
@Sport is a Nadal fan....he's biased.

Novak is already far better than Nadal. 4 slams in a row 5 Yec better slam distribution number of weeks as number 1. His 2015 season is one of the best in the open era. He's won every masters 1000 and has beaten Nadal in every GS WtF masters 1000.

I know that, thing is I dont believe there is a GOAT. Novak is better than Nadal in some ways and Nadal is better in some ways, but the slam H2H is obviously tilted in Nadal's favour due to the amount of meetings at RG compared to any other slam, it quite clearly gives him an advantage. If it was the same amount at every slam, who knows
 
I know that, thing is I dont believe there is a GOAT. Novak is better than Nadal in some ways and Nadal is better in some ways, but the slam H2H is obviously tilted in Nadal's favour due to the amount of meetings at RG compared to any other slam, it quite clearly gives him an advantage. If it was the same amount at every slam, who knows

It doesn't give Nadal an advantage. It just proves his lack of consistency. He couldn't make it to Novak losing to Gonzalez Tsonga Murray Ferrer Berdych Verdasco Rosol Darcis Kyrgios Brown Muller Blake Youznhy Fognini Pouille...

Nadal is better on clay. That's about it.

Novak and Fed are better on clay than Nadal on anything else but clay.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't give Nadal an advantage. It just proves his lack of consistency. He couldn't make it to Novak losing to Gonzalez Tsonga Murray Ferrer Berdych Verdasco Rosol Darcis Kyrgios Brown Muller Blake Youznhy Fognini Pouille...

Nadal is better on clay. That's about it.

It gives him an advantage in the H2H. Play someone on your best tournament much more than at their best best, you are bound to come out with more wins. It's simple.

Hes also been defeated at his best by Djokovic in straight sets at his best slam, which he's never done to Djokovic at the AO (or Wimbledon or US open. In fact in his Wimbledon win he still only took one completed set vs Djokocic, meaning he won more completed sets in his 2018 loss)
 
It gives him an advantage in the H2H. Play someone on your best tournament much more than at their best best, you are bound to come out with more wins. It's simple.

Hes also been defeated at his best by Djokovic in straight sets at his best slam, which he's never done to Djokovic at the AO (or Wimbledon or US open. In fact in his Wimbledon win he still only took one completed set vs Djokocic, meaning he won more completed sets in his 2018 loss)

Greatest clay court player ever ou greatest lefty but not GOAT. No more no less.
 
I'm sorry but this is a very unobjective post. It is based on a premise that is fundamentally mistaken: that GOAT hasn't yet been decided. But only a member of the sickening brigade of haters of Bull would make such a ridiculous claim. Any objective observer knows that Bull marked himself out as GOAT by dominating Roland Garros 1877 and that he has simply extended his lead in every tournament since, long since closing off this "debate." That's why you never hear of it in the media anymore.
this surge of moral revisionists is truly scary :unsure:

cowsaur_by_krigios-d6m8gnp.jpg
 
Wouldnt Fed gain the most by winning it this year? He would not only go 4 up on Nadal and 6 up on Djokovic while keeping both of them at bay as they get older. This would almost certainly keep his GOAT status forever.

This however, is unlikely, so if Nadal wins, even though it is #12 at RG, it puts him in great position to tie or pass Fed before his age really catches him.

Djokovic winning really does help him gain momentum with getting to 4 within Fed, two career slams, and two slams away from a chance of a calender slam. Within a year he could potentially catch Fed.

But with all this being said, this one tournament out of 53 slams does not make or break someone's GOAT legacy.
 
No excuses = said the one who ignores 75% of the Grand Slam matches between Federer and Nadal. Plus, Wimbledon 2008 is widely regarded as the greatest match, while the AO 2017 is only regarded as the best by a minority. Even the AO 2009 final is regarded by many as better than the AO 2017.
The greatest match is either the Wimbledon 08 final or the AO 12 final. Anyone who says otherwise is in the minority.
 
@Sport he's absolutely right. At 26-27 years old your are in your prime and peak.

Nadal lost in the first round in his absolute peak year in the most prestigious tournament.


It’s funny how VamosNation completely wishes this loss away as if it were nothing.

A first round loss to a midget in a year when he won 74 matches and 10 titles, defeating players ranked in the top 10 twenty-four times (by far his most ever) at 26-27 years of age.

Meanwhile, both Vamos people and Djokovic nuts harp on Federer’s losses to Millman, etc., when he’s an old man and at least made it out of the first round.

Additionally, Djoko army wants Fed to be at his peak in a season in which he lost to Seppi in the 3rd round of a slam.
 
The greatest match is either the Wimbledon 08 final or the AO 12 final. Anyone who says otherwise is in the minority.

All depends what you enjoy in tennis.

If you like clay court tennis being played on a hard court AO 2012 is the greatest match ever.

Wimbledon 2008: Fed was far from playing his best. He had an average year in 2008 losing to james blake in the olympics:-D:-D
 
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.

Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.

Seems you misinterpreted this. Are you talking to me? What I said is the following: If Novak wins RG this year, he is better than Nadal. Kapeesh Robert de Niro? In that case Novak has, I will repeat, double career grand slam, two times non-calendar grand slam, all masters and he has 16 GSs. Nadal has 17 GSs but doesn't have anything what Novak has. Hence Novak is the BOAT. Fed is GOAT because of the number of GSs and not only that, Fed is synonym for tennis and will stay that way after careers of big three are finished. I hope we can meet somewhere in the middle in our opinions. Btw, if Nadal wins RG 2019 it will not make him GOAT or BOAT. He simply can't be BOAT. He doesn't even have WTF not to mention consecutive four GSs, etc.
 
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.

Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.

Djokovic beat top ranked Nadal outside clay 5 times (WI11, UO11, AO12, WI18, AO19)
Nadal beat top ranked Djokovic outside clay 1 time (UO13)
 
Only one thing will definitely define GOAT: time.

In the year 2026 we will be likely sure on who is the GOAT.

(I do not precict earlier than 2026 because maybe Djokovic keeps being in good form at age 37/38 like Federer).
Given their style of play, Nole may last a bit longer than Rafa. But 'tis folly or unwarranted optimism to expect either to hold up more than just a few more years.
 
Back
Top