Huh. So if Fed wins a slam without facing Nadal that is Fed’s fault?
He beat the guy who beat Nadal, or more often he will have beaten the guy who beat the guy who beat the guy who beat Nadal.
Using Nadal’s early round losses as a stick to beat Federer with will never wash with sane poasters
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.If Novak wins, he is the GOAT in terms of tennis achievements, or better to say the BOAT, the Best of All Time. He would have double career grand slam, double non calendar grand slam, all masters, probably the most number of masters in the end, leading H2H with Fed and Rafa, etc. Number of GS is irrelevant in this case. Novak is the BOAT. Period. If Rafa wins he is still in the race with 18 GS since due to less diverse achievements than Novak he can't be considered the GOAT or BOAT. At the moment, Fed is really GOAT since GOAT is something of a legend and that does not only include success at tournaments, in which Fed leads, that's also aura or halo the person carries. Some may say Fed is also pushed by media, etc. - yes, but he has all the right for that. So, it will be really hard to replace Fed as the GOAT as that is the synonym for tennis. But both Novak and Rafa have the chance to be BOATs in case if they win RG 2019 (Novak) or have more than 20 GSs (Rafa).
No excuses = said the one who ignores 75% of the Grand Slam matches between Federer and Nadal. Plus, Wimbledon 2008 is widely regarded as the greatest match, while the AO 2017 is only regarded as the best by a minority. Even the AO 2009 final is regarded by many as better than the AO 2017.
I agree with your analysis, Subway. The AO 2009 final had a higher level of tennis (both players at their prime and Nadal being faster than ever and reaching impossible balls). The AO 2017 had maybe more historical significance due to their close distance in Slams and the fact that it could be their last Slam final.Just my 2 cents: 2017 had a closer 5th set, so I can see why people felt it was a "better match". But the overall quality of tennis, and level of the 2009 final was quite extraordinary. It just lacked the climax of a closer deciding set.
I agree with your analysis, Subway. The AO 2009 final had a higher level of tennis (both players at their prime and Nadal being faster than ever and reaching impossible balls). The AO 2017 had maybe more historical significance due to their close distance in Slams and the fact that it could be their last Slam final.
I agree with your analysis, Subway. The AO 2009 final had a higher level of tennis (both players at their prime and Nadal being faster than ever and reaching impossible balls). The AO 2017 had maybe more historical significance due to their close distance in Slams and the fact that it could be their last Slam final.
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.
Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.
No GOATs. However if Djokovic somehow manages to win RG, W and the US open I will give him that status. Real Grand Slam.
TOTAL NONSENSE!Your premise that RG is the toughest slam is wrong and destroys the arguement
Lets pretend for a second it was a real tennis slam on equal footing to the US Open, Wimbledon, and Australian Open
Of the four Wimbledon still has the fewest winners since the start of the open era while having the largest field since the start of the open era (French and Australian being often skipped by players due to those tournaments' inferiority in all regards)
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.
Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.
It's not that clay isnt an as important surface as the others - it is, it's the fact that 7 of the slam matches between Nadal and Djokovic have come on clay and only 8 on the other surfaces combined. Not only that but 7 matches at Nadal's best slam and only 2 at Djokovic's. Thus the slam H2H is tilted in Nadal's favour.
You've said before there can be no GOAt because 2 hard court slams favour HC players, by the same logic, vastly more meetings at RG compared to the AO favors Nadal.
Also it's a double edged sword because Djokovic has beaten Nadal in all slams, Nadal has not beaten Djokovic at the AO
Really there is no BOAT and there is no GOAT because nothing can be 100% fair to all players. All I would say is that Fed, Nadal and Djokovic are all of a similar level and all have points in their favour and it's down to opinion on who is actually the overall best player
@Sport is a Nadal fan....he's biased.
Novak is already far better than Nadal. 4 slams in a row 5 Yec better slam distribution number of weeks as number 1. His 2015 season is one of the best in the open era. He's won every masters 1000 and has beaten Nadal in every GS WtF masters 1000.
I know that, thing is I dont believe there is a GOAT. Novak is better than Nadal in some ways and Nadal is better in some ways, but the slam H2H is obviously tilted in Nadal's favour due to the amount of meetings at RG compared to any other slam, it quite clearly gives him an advantage. If it was the same amount at every slam, who knows
It doesn't give Nadal an advantage. It just proves his lack of consistency. He couldn't make it to Novak losing to Gonzalez Tsonga Murray Ferrer Berdych Verdasco Rosol Darcis Kyrgios Brown Muller Blake Youznhy Fognini Pouille...
Nadal is better on clay. That's about it.
It gives him an advantage in the H2H. Play someone on your best tournament much more than at their best best, you are bound to come out with more wins. It's simple.
Hes also been defeated at his best by Djokovic in straight sets at his best slam, which he's never done to Djokovic at the AO (or Wimbledon or US open. In fact in his Wimbledon win he still only took one completed set vs Djokocic, meaning he won more completed sets in his 2018 loss)
this surge of moral revisionists is truly scaryI'm sorry but this is a very unobjective post. It is based on a premise that is fundamentally mistaken: that GOAT hasn't yet been decided. But only a member of the sickening brigade of haters of Bull would make such a ridiculous claim. Any objective observer knows that Bull marked himself out as GOAT by dominating Roland Garros 1877 and that he has simply extended his lead in every tournament since, long since closing off this "debate." That's why you never hear of it in the media anymore.
The greatest match is either the Wimbledon 08 final or the AO 12 final. Anyone who says otherwise is in the minority.No excuses = said the one who ignores 75% of the Grand Slam matches between Federer and Nadal. Plus, Wimbledon 2008 is widely regarded as the greatest match, while the AO 2017 is only regarded as the best by a minority. Even the AO 2009 final is regarded by many as better than the AO 2017.
@Sport he's absolutely right. At 26-27 years old your are in your prime and peak.
Nadal lost in the first round in his absolute peak year in the most prestigious tournament.
The greatest match is either the Wimbledon 08 final or the AO 12 final. Anyone who says otherwise is in the minority.
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.
Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.
Nadal is the BOAT: Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams over Federer and Djokovic. Nadal leads the H2H in Grand Slams 9-3 over Federer (including 4-3 outside clay) and 9-5 over Djokovic (including 2-1 at the US Open). That is, Nadal has won 75% of his Grand Slam matches against Federer, and 60% of his Grand Slam matches against Djokovic. That's brutal domination.
Djokovic is the second in the BOAT list: Djokovic has no argument to be the BOAT, since he has a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greater rival (Nadal). No BOAT can have a losing H2H in Grand Slams against his greatest rival. The "only on clay" excuse is ridiculous. Clay is a tennis surface, and Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.
Given their style of play, Nole may last a bit longer than Rafa. But 'tis folly or unwarranted optimism to expect either to hold up more than just a few more years.Only one thing will definitely define GOAT: time.
In the year 2026 we will be likely sure on who is the GOAT.
(I do not precict earlier than 2026 because maybe Djokovic keeps being in good form at age 37/38 like Federer).