wferdinand
New User
A friend of mine have a mind-breaking opinion: He had Yonex EZone DR 98 285g and EZone DR 100 300g, and his experience was how hit more frame with DR 98 compared to DR 100. No, this is not a joke, but I know how this is ********. Independently from this thing I compared my (old) Head G XT Instinct MP with my (new) Wilson Pro Staff 97 (v11) and with my friends Head G XT Radical MPA and I see the difference compared these racquets stringbed size.
The thing I starting this thread because I don't have faith about a 97 or 98 sqin headsize racquet giving difference compared a 100 sqin headsize racquet. I think how this is a more complicated question. For example my Instincts head is not significantly wider than my PS 97's, but I remember how for example a Pure Aero have more wide racquet head which can helps topspin. An another aspect, how I think a same 16/19 string pattern is how narrow or wide mainly in sweetspot section. My friends Radical MPA, or EZone DR 98 is significantly narrower stringing than my Instinct MP or my PS 97. A wide stringing besides of more spin friendly I think can more comfortable because load from incoming ball suffering less string and this fact giving more elasticity.
I playing with this Pro Staffs since last November after two and a half years of using Instinct MP. These racquets are differents: 15 gramms, 3 sqin, different mold, different manufacturer, but despite similar: 16/19 is same and same wide, racquet head is also same wide, RA is 66 in all two racquets, and in swingweight only have 5 unit difference, these things giving how I can feel own this Pro Staff from first minute, and nothing reminder to me how I switched to a smaller headsize racquet.
I waiting your opinions about racquetsize comparsion in this range.
The thing I starting this thread because I don't have faith about a 97 or 98 sqin headsize racquet giving difference compared a 100 sqin headsize racquet. I think how this is a more complicated question. For example my Instincts head is not significantly wider than my PS 97's, but I remember how for example a Pure Aero have more wide racquet head which can helps topspin. An another aspect, how I think a same 16/19 string pattern is how narrow or wide mainly in sweetspot section. My friends Radical MPA, or EZone DR 98 is significantly narrower stringing than my Instinct MP or my PS 97. A wide stringing besides of more spin friendly I think can more comfortable because load from incoming ball suffering less string and this fact giving more elasticity.
I playing with this Pro Staffs since last November after two and a half years of using Instinct MP. These racquets are differents: 15 gramms, 3 sqin, different mold, different manufacturer, but despite similar: 16/19 is same and same wide, racquet head is also same wide, RA is 66 in all two racquets, and in swingweight only have 5 unit difference, these things giving how I can feel own this Pro Staff from first minute, and nothing reminder to me how I switched to a smaller headsize racquet.
I waiting your opinions about racquetsize comparsion in this range.