Janne
Semi-Pro
I’m in the market for a couple new suits and a pair of shoes, but my lady friend isn’t quite keen on the idea of me spending as much money as I would ideally want on the items. As it is, I’m afraid there are quite a lot of cohabitees out there who won’t hesitate to use your soft spot for quality shoes against you as soon as you protest against the need to replace that perfectly functional sofa group or spending money on something that both partners can enjoy. Lines such as “you sure don’t seem to hesitate spending money on ridiculously expensive shoes” often require more convincing arguments than weakly mumbling something about hidden, earmarked money that you’ve been saving up. And however you twist and turn it you can always, when you least expect it, get slapped with a “… that you caress like a true perv on weekends instead of spending time doing something productive” as a finale that puts an end to your shopping dreams.
I’ve tried using the argument that with proper care, they can last me a good 20 years but that doesn’t seem to bite well, and I’m usually hit with the question of WHY you would even want to wear the SAME shoes for 20 years. It seems that women usually follow the device “the more clothes in as short a period, the better”. As a rule of thumb, of course.
I’m at a loss for how to defend myself. I still have one ace up my sleeve, though: the environmental aspect. I’ve learned that women are suckers for the environment, so motivating my purchases with the fact that high quality items are usually less damaging to the environment than cheap, mass-produced items might yield positive results. However, as an economist, I’ve been taught that we humans often operate by going through a process of cost-benefit-analysis when faced with a decision, and I’m not entirely sure she will give a rats *** about the environment this time. Maybe if the items cost a tenner, but alas...
For the people of this forum who live with a thrifty partner, how do you get them to agree on your little splashes of selfish spending?
I’ve tried using the argument that with proper care, they can last me a good 20 years but that doesn’t seem to bite well, and I’m usually hit with the question of WHY you would even want to wear the SAME shoes for 20 years. It seems that women usually follow the device “the more clothes in as short a period, the better”. As a rule of thumb, of course.
I’m at a loss for how to defend myself. I still have one ace up my sleeve, though: the environmental aspect. I’ve learned that women are suckers for the environment, so motivating my purchases with the fact that high quality items are usually less damaging to the environment than cheap, mass-produced items might yield positive results. However, as an economist, I’ve been taught that we humans often operate by going through a process of cost-benefit-analysis when faced with a decision, and I’m not entirely sure she will give a rats *** about the environment this time. Maybe if the items cost a tenner, but alas...
For the people of this forum who live with a thrifty partner, how do you get them to agree on your little splashes of selfish spending?