origmarm
Hall of Fame
I reckon most young males after puberty could beat Serena/venus in arm wrestling contests.
You know thinking about Serena, I really don't know about this....
I reckon most young males after puberty could beat Serena/venus in arm wrestling contests.
The fact is, you made those statements, regardless of what their context was. and the reason i bring up mysogony is not because you have accused it, I only bring it up to say that I dont think most of the male posters on here hate women. Its not in response to anything you've said. And I dont really believe that men are better in science/math, i just think that society believes this and little girls are brought up thinking it, so they make themselves bad at science and math. the difference in tennis and anylitical subjects is that tennis involves a physical element that, to me, trumps the talent element. no "oh here we go agains" i'm not fighting with you or attacking you. I'm agreeing to disagree, since we are obviously at an impass. Now its time for me to go to work. Lord knows what this thread will look like when I get off.
I'm not talking of any male teen here, but a well-conditioned, experienced male junior. And, no she wouldn't.
She now smokes well-conditioned, experienced male seniors.
If I was a man playing like Sharapova I would seek a job at Burger King.
Diadora, I think these stats are closer than reality. I think FloJo's 100 and 200 times were probably YARDS. The times you have for men are METERS. The world records for 100 YDs is less than 10 secs. That would make the difference even more.
C'mon dude, in such a case you could be a coach (at least).
Hello have you ever seen zaldrunas ilgaskuas (sp) he plays for the caviliers and just about any woman in the wnba would run circles around him on a court.
Link to this?
You will find no sport on earth at which women can beat top junior boys (teenagers). Not one.
I've seen this experiment in soccer and hockey in particular. In those two in particular there is a physical component that the women can't match. In addition, and particularly related to tennis, the boys are much better athletes, cover more ground and hit/strike/shoot much harder.
Okay *that* was truly funny! (I had to wipe off my keyboard after that one....)A coach - with her head and 30-word vocabulary?
Okay, fine - maybe a commentator for ESPN.
You will find no sport on earth at which women can beat top junior boys (teenagers). Not one.
I've seen this experiment in soccer and hockey in particular. In those two in particular there is a physical component that the women can't match. In addition, and particularly related to tennis, the boys are much better athletes, cover more ground and hit/strike/shoot much harder.
That's the question. I think top 14's could beat the number one woman's player.
!6's and 18's boys would be handing out bagels to Serena and Venus.
Okay *that* was truly funny! (I had to wipe off my keyboard after that one....)
- KK
Run circles why because he is tall and stiff? Wow what a profound argument. The question is can a woman even score on Big Z? He will probably block almost every shot and if the ball is in his hands in the paint can any woman stop him? The man will probably put up Wilt numbers if he ever played in the WNBA. Big Z isn't a PG. I don't expect him to outdribble a shorter and mobile player, male or female.
Can a top women player beat a top men player both in their primes? NO. Can a top women player beat a top men player not in his prime but not far removed from his prime (10 years). 5 times out of 100 at best. Sampras will probably destroy the WTA tour. McEnroe will be probably be at the top or #1 in the WTA even at his age. Can a top women player beat a man far removed from his prime? Yes it has already happened. Can a top women beat a man if the man has to play with handicap rules in place? Sure.
Notice all of the yes and sures a handicap must be placed on the man may it be age or rules. That is what makes this whole man vs. woman argument quite redundant. The only argument that should matter is a top man vs. top woman. There is nothing sexist in saying that women have a disadvantage to men when all other things are equal (i.e. training and etc) in a sport like tennis. You are only sexist if you say Sharapova or JHH would lose to some guy plucked off the street playing tennis for the first or even second time. Those girls will destroy them. But take the top 5 women in the world and compare them to the top 100 men and you will be hard pressed to find one matchup that a man or woman can confidently say that the woman would win that match.
This will come as no surprise to anyone who knows anything about tennis. It's not only a question of power differences, but also disparities in general strength and particularly movement. Men move more quickly and can do more with the ball when on the run or stretched and with less exertion. The variety and quantity of spin is also a big factor. McEnroe today, could beat all of the women currently playing. The men and women's game is very different.Brad Gilbert commented this morning about watching Maria Sharapova playing the top junior boys at the tennis academy last winter. He seemed to indicate they were beating her pretty regularly. I know people on this board have indicated that the level of play on the women's tour is somewhere between college Division 1 and Division 2. If you assume the top juniors at the academies are Division 1 level talent, this would seem to be true.
If I was a man playing like Sharapova I would seek a job at Burger King.
You using the word "crucified" to describe people disagreeing with you says a lot. Why not compare it to the holocaust?well if my opinion is different then it is a differing opinion. And now I'm being crucified because I don't share you alls opinion. O.K back to my last comment
In my opinion, when she was number 2, Hingis was the most talented player on either tour. Of course, a top national 16 yo would still have beaten her, but her court sense and racket skills were amazing.Nope when a girl trains like the boys and has the talent to back it up, it will happen. Tennis talent is not exclusive to the men.
In my opinion, when she was number 2, Hingis was the most talented player on either tour. Of course, a top national 16 yo would still have beaten her, but her court sense and racket skills were amazing.
The way you're framing your argument Sondra is cowardly. You're setting it up so that you can never be proven wrong. If a woman doesn't dominate the ATP, it simply means your vision of a woman being trained the same way as a man hasn't happened yet, not that your theory holds no water.
You're wrong. A 16yo beating a top female has happened. Ryan Sweeting example posted above being one. But I'm sure the examples are numerous. People have cited all sorts of real life examples that HAVE actually happened whereas you're relying on speculation.The way I'm setting up the argument is cowardly.... arghh I'm so sick of the poster on this board, you don't think before you post
Here let me write this out for you. You can't be proven wrong either, you know how
Because once again you are setting up a hypothetical situation between Hingis and a top national 16 year old that has never happen
There is only one thing that I disagree with because it is inaccurate in this statement and that is about Z and the WNBA. And the answer to your question is yes, a female player in the wnba would be able to score on him. His height serves no purpose in stopping them because most wnba players are quite tall themselves and that argument doesn't hold weight because most men in the NBA who are shorter have much success in scoring on him. The reason I use him as and example is because he is so bad for a pro that any women in the WNBA could score on him.
And for the other part I don't agree, like I've stated plenty of times before you are taking a hypothetically situation that has never happened between two players that at the moment don't exist ( a women who is technically as sound and talented and trained in the same manner as her male counterpart)
I feel if there were exempt the strength factor, both equal or better skill wise she would not only have a chance at beating him but would succeed.
Without the handicaps or age gaps