Gilles Simon about Novak's injury on AO23

AO13

Hall of Fame
Could it be possible that Simon also faked his injuries? Or is he telling the truth? Many people suggest Djokovic faked his hamstring injury in order to, I don't know, soften the opponents maybe? Get them a little bit careless?


Translation from French:

In his show on Twitch, Gaël Monfils invited Gilles Simon to speak about the controversy surrounding Novak Djokovic's injury at the Australian Open.

As usual, Gillou gave us a very personal analysis of the situation but not meaningless.

Me too, I happened to play injured, I was on crutches the same morning and I managed to reach the 3rd round or the round of 16, because it was quite simply my level! His level is winning Grand Slam tournaments”, explained the Frenchman with a touch of humour.

:unsure:
 
Stop cheating readers, post a source for this claim
She's not cheating readers:

In the battle of young guns at the US Open 2005, Djokovic came out on top to defeat Gael Monfils 7-5,4-6,7-6(5),0-6,7-5. In the match Djokovic took a number of timeouts and later agreed the timeouts helped him. Monfils appealed to the umpire and also said he did not know whether it was fake or real. The contest lasted for over 4 hours.

https://firstsportz.com/top-5-incid...ulously-recovered-from-injury-during-a-match/
 
Stop cheating readers, post a source for this claim
As a Djokovic fan you should have seen the on-court interview Monfils did after one of their matches when he said Djokovic says he's injured but he wins. Tsonga said the same.
 
Last edited:
Andy Murray left kicking himself after falling for Novak Djokovic's injury antics

When Andy Murray went 2-0 up in the third set of the Australian Open, having just thoroughly outplayed Novak Djokovic in the second set tie-break, anybody familiar with the Serb could have written the script.


Eurosport
Published 05/05/2015 at 15:51 GMT

Even Djokovic's strongest admirers will concede that the world number one has a suspicious susceptibility to injury when on the back foot in a match - and as soon as he gets his nose back in front, the mystery ailment invariably clears up.

We've seen it time after time - as has Murray. But the Scot still let it get to him, and 2-0 became 2-2 within the space of a few minutes. Murray had his chances thereafter, but Djokovic had the momentum back and ran away with the match.

This isn't, in case you're wondering, Tramlines's opinion. (Or not just Tramlines's opinion). It's the opinion of Andy Murray himself, who was furious at himself for getting duped in his post-match press conference.

 
Could it be possible that Simon also faked his injuries? Or is he telling the truth? Many people suggest Djokovic faked his hamstring injury in order to, I don't know, soften the opponents maybe? Get them a little bit careless?


Translation from French:

In his show on Twitch, Gaël Monfils invited Gilles Simon to speak about the controversy surrounding Novak Djokovic's injury at the Australian Open.

As usual, Gillou gave us a very personal analysis of the situation but not meaningless.

Me too, I happened to play injured, I was on crutches the same morning and I managed to reach the 3rd round or the round of 16, because it was quite simply my level! His level is winning Grand Slam tournaments”, explained the Frenchman with a touch of humour.

:unsure:

I thought it was Nadal fans something-something that wouldn't stop talking about this?!
 
Italian former world No 9 Fabio Fognini has seemingly accused Rafael Nadal of faking an injury during Wednesday's marathon Wimbledon quarter-final against Taylor Fritz. Nadal came back from a set behind twice and overcame certain retirement to defeat the American 11th seed on Centre Court.



You're not making Djok look any better. You're just making Nadal look like a cheater as well.
 
In tennis acumen for various reasons , not having proper PR being one of them ,Djokovic was always easy target , that's why he got so upset during this AO.
All of sore losers can say whatever they want, most of them are retired, or have broken bodies near retirement . No player took care of his body like Novak does , because he is so careful about what his body tells him
Actually if was Federer The God who started it and gave green light to bullies like Roddick .
That's why it's so satisfying Novak leaving his results in dust.

You sore losers can keep crying and searching who told what
 
That guy is a whataboutism machine.
And you guys are butthurt Nole haters :-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D

f6jlzit00mq8xhzudetc.jpg


1b3ca6a8-6be3-4edd-ac6d-8a8190fee00d.jpg
 
Last edited:
Andy Murray left kicking himself after falling for Novak Djokovic's injury antics

When Andy Murray went 2-0 up in the third set of the Australian Open, having just thoroughly outplayed Novak Djokovic in the second set tie-break, anybody familiar with the Serb could have written the script.


Eurosport
Published 05/05/2015 at 15:51 GMT

Even Djokovic's strongest admirers will concede that the world number one has a suspicious susceptibility to injury when on the back foot in a match - and as soon as he gets his nose back in front, the mystery ailment invariably clears up.

We've seen it time after time - as has Murray. But the Scot still let it get to him, and 2-0 became 2-2 within the space of a few minutes. Murray had his chances thereafter, but Djokovic had the momentum back and ran away with the match.

This isn't, in case you're wondering, Tramlines's opinion. (Or not just Tramlines's opinion). It's the opinion of Andy Murray himself, who was furious at himself for getting duped in his post-match press conference.

The most blatant of the lot. Djokovic was acting like Clint Eastwood in the desert being made to walk without water by Eli Wallach in The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, and then Djokovic wins something like 9 games in a row to bagel Murray in the fourth set to take the title.
 
I can’t imagine Rublev, Paul and Steffy all took novak lightly because of his injury claim. If Novak was really trying to pull the rug out from under his opposition he would have announced this injury right before a big match. Not seven matches ahead
 
I can’t imagine Rublev, Paul and Steffy all took novak lightly because of his injury claim. If Novak was really trying to pull the rug out from under his opposition he would have announced this injury right before a big match. Not seven matches ahead

Who the heck knows why he did it. But it was obviously BS and everyone outside of his hardcore fanbase knows it.
 
Who the heck knows why he did it. But it was obviously BS and everyone outside of his hardcore fanbase knows it.
THIS is the best y'all can come up with nowadays. Who knows why but it was obviously BS lol...

Until there is even a semi-reasonable explanation on why he would fake an injury that:

happened in a 250 event when he was leading the match,
made him decide to skip training on all days off at one of his most important career Slam tournaments,
while he didn't even complain about it in second week in Melbourne when facing stronger players,

the only obvious BS is coming from you and your seething ilk.

But please, do tell us about some more exclusive locker room talk that trumps all of the logic that you prefer to ignore. His hardcore fanbase shall wait.
 
There is a reason why Monfils asked the question.
As a Djokovic fan you should have seen the on-court Monfils did after one of their matches when he said Djokovic says he's injured but he wins. Tsonga said the same.
Andy Murray left kicking himself after falling for Novak Djokovic's injury antics

When Andy Murray went 2-0 up in the third set of the Australian Open, having just thoroughly outplayed Novak Djokovic in the second set tie-break, anybody familiar with the Serb could have written the script.


Eurosport
Published 05/05/2015 at 15:51 GMT

Even Djokovic's strongest admirers will concede that the world number one has a suspicious susceptibility to injury when on the back foot in a match - and as soon as he gets his nose back in front, the mystery ailment invariably clears up.

We've seen it time after time - as has Murray. But the Scot still let it get to him, and 2-0 became 2-2 within the space of a few minutes. Murray had his chances thereafter, but Djokovic had the momentum back and ran away with the match.

This isn't, in case you're wondering, Tramlines's opinion. (Or not just Tramlines's opinion). It's the opinion of Andy Murray himself, who was furious at himself for getting duped in his post-match press conference.


You're going off topic, again, blatantly ignoring the topic and posting something irrelevant to this thread. Is that why you came here, to ruin yet another thread because of your hatred towards Novak?

I pity you, staying here all day, having an urge to defend Nadal on every way. It won't stop Novak winning slams, you know. You don't have anything out of it. You are not Nadal's PR, sister, brother, whatever.
 
She's not cheating readers:

In the battle of young guns at the US Open 2005, Djokovic came out on top to defeat Gael Monfils 7-5,4-6,7-6(5),0-6,7-5. In the match Djokovic took a number of timeouts and later agreed the timeouts helped him. Monfils appealed to the umpire and also said he did not know whether it was fake or real. The contest lasted for over 4 hours.

https://firstsportz.com/top-5-incid...ulously-recovered-from-injury-during-a-match/

That's your source, from a statement 18 years old?
 
THIS is the best y'all can come up with nowadays. Who knows why but it was obviously BS lol...

Until there is even a semi-reasonable explanation on why he would fake an injury that:

happened in a 250 event when he was leading the match,
made him decide to skip training on all days off at one of his most important career Slam tournaments,
while he didn't even complain about it in second week in Melbourne when facing stronger players,

the only obvious BS is coming from you and your seething ilk.

But please, do tell us about some more exclusive locker room talk that trumps all of the logic that you prefer to ignore. His hardcore fanbase shall wait.

There's been plenty of reasonable explanations. You won't accept any of them so I won't bother repeating them. It's like arguing with an anti-vaxxer or a Trump supporter. The evidence is right there and you choose to ignore it. Even definitive proof is just written off as propaganda by bitter losers.
 
I had Enzo Cuaocaud on my Twitch channel last week. He said the same thing. He felt he would've beaten Novak if not for the "injury" ruse.
 
There's been plenty of reasonable explanations. You won't accept any of them so I won't bother repeating them. It's like arguing with an anti-vaxxer or a Trump supporter. The evidence is right there and you choose to ignore it. Even definitive proof is just written off as propaganda by bitter losers.
From "who knows why the heck he did it" to "there has been plenty of reasonable explanations" in a matter of seconds lol...

Are they are as reasonable as just spouting "Trump supporter" and "anti-vaxxer" just to negatively label whoever dares to challenge your level-headed, objective, genius stance?

As reasonable as dead seriously making the most moronic claim that the pandemic halting the ATP season screwed Federer the most of all players?

As reasonable as saying he was planning to outlast not just Nadal but Djokovic as well?

That's what I thought. Squat. Come back when you have something actually smart to say. And no, Couacaud's alleged locker room quote or a random opinion from world number 1783 that you coach don't qualify.

"Bitter losers". Oh the irony of it all.
 
Andy Murray left kicking himself after falling for Novak Djokovic's injury antics

When Andy Murray went 2-0 up in the third set of the Australian Open, having just thoroughly outplayed Novak Djokovic in the second set tie-break, anybody familiar with the Serb could have written the script.


Eurosport
Published 05/05/2015 at 15:51 GMT

Even Djokovic's strongest admirers will concede that the world number one has a suspicious susceptibility to injury when on the back foot in a match - and as soon as he gets his nose back in front, the mystery ailment invariably clears up.

We've seen it time after time - as has Murray. But the Scot still let it get to him, and 2-0 became 2-2 within the space of a few minutes. Murray had his chances thereafter, but Djokovic had the momentum back and ran away with the match.

This isn't, in case you're wondering, Tramlines's opinion. (Or not just Tramlines's opinion). It's the opinion of Andy Murray himself, who was furious at himself for getting duped in his post-match press conference.


Extremely funny that the article goes on to say...

"It was clear that he was cramping. I let that distract me a little bit," he said, gallantly refusing to speculate on the veracity or otherwise of Djokovic's injury.
"That’s what I’m most disappointed about. I’m frustrated at myself to let that bother me.

The rest of the people saying that Djokovic was faking are just people on Twitter, lol.

Dishonest and pathetic.
 
Why is it so hard for some people to admit that the hamstring injury was completely made up and fake?
 
From "who knows why the heck he did it" to "there has been plenty of reasonable explanations" in a matter of seconds lol...

Are they are as reasonable as just spouting "Trump supporter" and "anti-vaxxer" just to negatively label whoever dares to challenge your level-headed, objective, genius stance?

As reasonable as dead seriously making the most moronic claim that the pandemic halting the ATP season screwed Federer the most of all players?

As reasonable as saying he was planning to outlast not just Nadal but Djokovic as well?

That's what I thought. Squat. Come back when you have something actually smart to say. And no, Couacaud's alleged locker room quote or a random opinion from world number 1783 that you coach don't qualify.

"Bitter losers". Oh the irony of it all.

You seem to have read my work. Guessing you're one of the gentlemen who mass-reported my totally civil thread about Venus and other players calling out Djok's injury pantomimes.

All I can say is that's pretty sad. I see a lot of much worse crap said about players I like and have never once reported it. I'm not gonna engage someone who's being insulting and will then run to the mods over any in-kind response
 
Why is hard for you to accept #22?

Lol I accepted it well before you and other Djokovic fans, and easily. I was predicting Djokovic's dominating triumph since before the tournament began. #22 was one of the easiest slams to ever predict and accept
 
Lol I accepted it well before you and other Djokovic fans, and easily. I was predicting Djokovic's dominating triumph since before the tournament began. #22 was one of the easiest slams to ever predict and accept
Yes, but the injury gave Rafa fans some hope...and Djo wins it despite injury...
 
You seem to have read my work. Guessing you're one of the gentlemen who mass-reported my totally civil thread about Venus and other players calling out Djok's injury pantomimes.

All I can say is that's pretty sad. I see a lot of much worse crap said about players I like and have never once reported it. I'm not gonna engage someone who's being insulting and will then run to the mods over any in-kind response
Venus congratulated Djokovic on his Instagram and I'm pretty sure she was just commenting on her own situation.
 
Could it be possible that Simon also faked his injuries? Or is he telling the truth? Many people suggest Djokovic faked his hamstring injury in order to, I don't know, soften the opponents maybe? Get them a little bit careless?


Translation from French:

In his show on Twitch, Gaël Monfils invited Gilles Simon to speak about the controversy surrounding Novak Djokovic's injury at the Australian Open.

As usual, Gillou gave us a very personal analysis of the situation but not meaningless.

Me too, I happened to play injured, I was on crutches the same morning and I managed to reach the 3rd round or the round of 16, because it was quite simply my level! His level is winning Grand Slam tournaments”, explained the Frenchman with a touch of humour.

:unsure:
Bullsh1t. Even in recreational tennis, if you can’t run you are toast.
 
You seem to have read my work. Guessing you're one of the gentlemen who mass-reported my totally civil thread about Venus and other players calling out Djok's injury pantomimes.

All I can say is that's pretty sad. I see a lot of much worse crap said about players I like and have never once reported it. I'm not gonna engage someone who's being insulting and will then run to the mods over any in-kind response
You guess poorly. Unless it is something uncalled for and offensive towards another fellow poster, I am not going to be reporting either. Thread OPs and the whole Big 3 trash talk don't fall in that category.

Insulting lol. You're the one getting an in-kind response for all this toxicity and some cheap shots. But whatever, why don't you call me and others anti-vax, Trump apologists one more time and then suddenly draw a line by refusing to engage with those who are not worth your time or something. I am sure that will delude you into feeling good like you're the bigger man.
 
You guess poorly. Unless it is something uncalled for and offensive towards another fellow poster, I am not going to be reporting either. Thread OPs and the whole Big 3 trash talk don't fall in that category.

Insulting lol. You're the one getting an in-kind response for all this toxicity and some cheap shots. But whatever, why don't you call me and others anti-vax, Trump apologists one more time and then suddenly draw a line by refusing to engage with those who are not worth your time or something. I am sure that will delude you into feeling good like you're the bigger man.

I can discuss potential PED use by my favorite player. Can you? "Bigger man" is a funny term but I'm a lot more objective than most here. Good day mate
 
Back
Top