Gimelstob's Practicing W/Sampras

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Donald Young better get ready for some pain.

from cnnsi:

First, Martina Hingis made a successful comeback. Then, John McEnroe followed her lead and became the first Hall of Fame inductee to return to the ATP Tour and win a tournament with his doubles victory in San Jose last month.

Could the most successful male tennis player in history be next?

When my phone rang last week, there was a familiar voice on the other end. That old sarcastic, condescending tone instantly revealed the identity of the great Pete Sampras. After catching up, he invited me to come and practice with him.

Pistol Pete and I have been frequent practice partners over the years, especially while he was contemplating retirement after his career-closing win at the 2002 U.S. Open. So my surprise wasn't with Sampras wanting to hit balls with me, but his desire to play at all.

In talking to Sampras during that ambiguous period, when he was assessing his desire to continue his career, I assumed he would take some time away from the game to decompress if he didn't feel he could maintain his level of commitment and excellence. Sampras earned the perfect ending to his spectacular career, winning his last event and finishing at the top of his sport -- a rare feat in any profession.

Sampras has spent most of his retirement honing his golf game, whittling his handicap down close to scratch, and helping his beautiful actress wife, Bridgette Wilson, raise their two young sons, Christian and Ryan. Sampras was never the type of player who enjoyed practicing for the sheer fun of running around and hitting tennis balls. He practiced with a purpose and out of necessity to maintain his skills as the best player in the world.

Knowing this, I wasn't surprised to hear that Sampras didn't hit much during his retirement. But even I was amazed when he told me during our first practice that it was only the fourth time he hit at all during his 3 1/2 years of retirement.

As soon as I showed up at Sampras' sprawling Beverly Hills mansion, I knew few things had changed. Contrary to public perception, Sampras is not the shy, reticent champion he is depicted as. A certain amount of confidence and self-assurance is needed in order to become the best in the world at what you do, and Sampras is no exception. I think that's why he always enjoyed practicing with me: I'm a big target, both literally and figuratively.

Never one to shy away from a confrontation, Sampras always took great pleasure in pointing out the obvious disparities in our career accomplishments. This fact was never more evident than when he walked me through his trophy room on the way to his private tennis court. If the old adage holds true that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder," I must admit, catching a glimpse of those seven Wimbledon trophies side-by-side was one of the most beautiful things I have even seen.

During our frequent water breaks, we would chat and I would pester Sampras with questions. I have always been naturally inquisitive, but even more so when I'm around the tennis elite. I think it's normal to be intrigued by greatness, to wonder what sets the truly great apart or how they view certain situations. That has often been my feeling when I've been around Sampras, Andre Agassi or Jim Courier, the three most successful players that I have had the good fortune of spending time with on and off court.

Sampras informed me that he committed to play an exhibition event in Houston in a few weeks and a significant portion of the World Team Tennis schedule for the Newport Beach franchise. He was relaxed and in good spirits and we practiced over two days for about an hour and 15 minutes each. We started off rallying up the middle and then moved on to some competitive baseline games where one person feeds the ball and then the point is "live" with both players trying to win the rally.

I instantly felt like I was taking part in an experiment proving the value of natural talent and instincts. Sampras' timing and skill were still impressive, especially considering how infrequently he has played. Tennis is a sport that puts a huge premium on repetition, timing and balance -- that's what separates the greats from the rest. Sampras was, and always will be, one of the greats.

Here's a newsflash: He's still awesome, not so much in consistency, but in his shot-making ability. His cross-court forehand was automatic. His timing on his backhand was off -- as is to be expected, since it was always his weakest shot -- and he was definitely a step slower (which, incidentally, still leaves him a step faster than me). But his serve was as fluent as ever and his volleys were crisp.

I always thought Sampras was the hardest volleyer I ever played against, and I instantly remembered why when he came to the net. What amazed me the most about our workout was that everything still seemed as effortless and explosive as ever, almost like he took some old tools out of the shed, polished them off and they were right there again.

Unfortunately for the tennis world, Sampras has no interest in competing on tour ever again. His participation will be limited to exhibitions and special events, even though I'm fully convinced he could still challenge the best in the game.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/justin_gimelstob/03/07/sampras.practice/index.html
 
Now, the question of the decade is what racquet he used. :)

The picture shown is a stock photo in which he used the 6.0 85. I do not think that is the picture of the practice ssession.
 
Pete's played about as much as me in the last 3.5 years.

Justin G. knows what he's talking about.

I'm looking forward to seeing Sampras hit again.
 
Pete isn't going to be playing Donald Young. That was not a statement from the tournament, it was a suggestion by the author of that particular article.
 
Moose Malloy said:
Knowing this, I wasn't surprised to hear that Sampras didn't hit much during his retirement. But even I was amazed when he told me during our first practice that it was only the fourth time he hit at all during his 3 1/2 years of retirement.
As soon as I showed up at Sampras' sprawling Beverly Hills mansion, I knew few things had changed. Contrary to public perception, Sampras is not the shy, reticent champion he is depicted as. A certain amount of confidence and self-assurance is needed in order to become the best in the world at what you do, and Sampras is no exception. I think that's why he always enjoyed practicing with me: I'm a big target, both literally and figuratively.

Never one to shy away from a confrontation, Sampras always took great pleasure in pointing out the obvious disparities in our career accomplishments. This fact was never more evident than when he walked me through his trophy room on the way to his private tennis court. If the old adage holds true that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder," I must admit, catching a glimpse of those seven Wimbledon trophies side-by-side was one of the most beautiful things I have even seen.

During our frequent water breaks, we would chat and I would pester Sampras with questions. I have always been naturally inquisitive, but even more so when I'm around the tennis elite. I think it's normal to be intrigued by greatness, to wonder what sets the truly great apart or how they view certain situations. That has often been my feeling when I've been around Sampras, Andre Agassi or Jim Courier, the three most successful players that I have had the good fortune of spending time with on and off court.

Sampras informed me that he committed to play an exhibition event in Houston in a few weeks and a significant portion of the World Team Tennis schedule for the Newport Beach franchise. He was relaxed and in good spirits and we practiced over two days for about an hour and 15 minutes each. We started off rallying up the middle and then moved on to some competitive baseline games where one person feeds the ball and then the point is "live" with both players trying to win the rally.

I instantly felt like I was taking part in an experiment proving the value of natural talent and instincts. Sampras' timing and skill were still impressive, especially considering how infrequently he has played. Tennis is a sport that puts a huge premium on repetition, timing and balance -- that's what separates the greats from the rest. Sampras was, and always will be, one of the greats.

Here's a newsflash: He's still awesome, not so much in consistency, but in his shot-making ability. His cross-court forehand was automatic. His timing on his backhand was off -- as is to be expected, since it was always his weakest shot -- and he was definitely a step slower (which, incidentally, still leaves him a step faster than me). But his serve was as fluent as ever and his volleys were crisp.

I always thought Sampras was the hardest volleyer I ever played against, and I instantly remembered why when he came to the net. What amazed me the most about our workout was that everything still seemed as effortless and explosive as ever, almost like he took some old tools out of the shed, polished them off and they were right there again.

Unfortunately for the tennis world, Sampras has no interest in competing on tour ever again. His participation will be limited to exhibitions and special events, even though I'm fully convinced he could still challenge the best in the game.
Federer, Nadal, Safin, Hewitt, Roddick: all toast. :mrgreen:
 
Oof. As Gimelstob proves my speculation on the previous thread to be dead wrong... I had expected even a tennis great to lose a lot when he doesn't practice for three and a half years, but apparently Gimelstob says that he's still in world-beating shape.
 
Unless, of course, the ALL POWERFUL NIKE MACHINE is forcing Justin to lie (and since he's under contract to them too, he has to comply). Dun dun DUUUUUN!!!!
 
Fee said:
Unless, of course, the ALL POWERFUL NIKE MACHINE is forcing Justin to lie (and since he's under contract to them too, he has to comply). Dun dun DUUUUUN!!!!

Hmmm....but is Sampras even still under contract with Nike? He hasn't even stepped out onto a court in almost 4 years, which is not the case with McEnroe and Courier, so I can't see Nike still paying him to endorse their tennis shoes and clothes. I mean Nike has been dropping even top active players like Agassi, Hewitt, Ginepri, etc., so I don't know why they would elect to keep someone who has been retired for so long and had previously made clear he didn't intend to play competitive tennis ever again. :confused:
 
Maybe they kept him in a different way, in the way adidas has 'kept' Steffi. Kind of a lifetime deal.

And maybe they upped the ante last week.;)

Dun Dun Duuuun!
 
Pete seemed to be prominently displaying the nike logo the last time he played a celebrity golf thingy, so I wouldn't be surprised if he shows up in Houston wearing nike from head to toe.

But, Justin is kind of blunt (as I found out trying to argue with him after Mac's first doubles match in San Jose), so I would take his column at face value.

If everyone could be a dear, and click on the link to the actual column, I'd appreciate it (pump up Justin's hit count, :) ).

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/justin_gimelstob/03/07/sampras.practice/index.html
 
loubapache said:
Now, the question of the decade is what racquet he used. :)

The picture shown is a stock photo in which he used the 6.0 85. I do not think that is the picture of the practice ssession.

I think he can still use 6.0 85 original for exhibitions and WTT...
 
I asked him if Mac doing so well was going to be an excuse for the doubles haters to start harping about how weak the game was, etc, etc, etc (which did happen, including here on this board).
 
And this is what truly separates the greats - talent. Sampras, McEnroe, Hingis etc can come back after years of not playing and still seem as if they never left.

Hingis always followed tennis and played actively on the WTT. Ditto for McEnroe. But the fact that Sampras can go 3.5 years without basically picking up a racket and then play like this is why he is the greatest ever.
 
Sampras's master plan is to return to the tour for only one tournament and play federer in the wimbledon final to try and end his 3 year reign :mrgreen:
 
Ugggh. I cant stand the though of Samps practicing with Gimelstob. Its like Jordan practicing with Bryant Reeves or Greg Ostertag for a comeback. Just say no Pete.
 
Shaolin said:
Ugggh. I cant stand the though of Samps practicing with Gimelstob. Its like Jordan practicing with Bryant Reeves or Greg Ostertag for a comeback. Just say no Pete.

Ya man.....Gimel will be trying to convince Samps to do the dive unecessarily flop around volley drill......it's a real attention getter.
 
NoBadMojo said:
Ya man.....Gimel will be trying to convince Samps to do the dive unecessarily flop around volley drill......it's a real attention getter.

since he's long and floppy, he's gotta make up for that lack of quickness somehow.
 
Don't know, might be because Justin lives relatively nearby and he was home for a week before IW. Maybe Pete just likes him.

{and the two weekends before that, he'd been playing qualies at SJ and Memphis, so...} ;)
 
Fee said:
Don't know, might be because Justin lives relatively nearby and he was home for a week before IW. Maybe Pete just likes him.

{and the two weekends before that, he'd been playing qualies at SJ and Memphis, so...} ;)

Fee,
Not sure if you got my drift, but I was insinuating that Justin rarely gets to the semis or finals of tournaments, and thus, should be free most weekends to hit with Pete. ;) But you're right, he may be busy on weekends trying to qualify for main draws.
 
Greekness said:
Imagine this....

Round 1 - Wimbledon (1)R.Federer v (WC)P.Sampras.


Dream come true!!

Hey, if Ivanisevic can win Wimby as a wild card, certainly 7-time champ Sampras has a good shot at it. :D

Do you think the AELTC would give Pete a wild card? ;) LOL j/k
 
They will def give him a wild card, anyways he is a member of the all england club. I think something is happining....


Petes comming back...
 
Not a good first round opponent for anyone to have, but Federer is probably the only guy that would actually look forward to it.

Too bad for Sampras his backhand is not working. He could hold serve but I doubt he'd break very often. He'd still do better than Ivo Karlovic. He'd probably be stuck outside the top 10 and I doubt he'd like that very much, so I have no hopes of him returning to the tour.
 
BreakPoint said:
Fee,
Not sure if you got my drift, but I was insinuating that Justin rarely gets to the semis or finals of tournaments, and thus, should be free most weekends to hit with Pete. ;) But you're right, he may be busy on weekends trying to qualify for main draws.

Yes, I knew exactly what you were saying and I chose to turn it around (hence the wink in my post to let you know I was on to you).

I know that Justin only plays on weekends at the Challenger level, but I also know that he played 8 matches in 6 days in two different states at the beginning of February, so he doesn't have a whole lot of spare time on his hands.

Now, does anyone on this board really think that Pete will ever play in the Men's Single draw at Wimbledon again? Seriously, think about who are we talking about here. Sampras would never set foot on the tour if he didn't think he could beat everyone and he is not going to be able to get into that kind of condition again (blood disorder + approaching 35). Sorry to kill the fantasy, but it is not going to happen.
 
I'll be interested to see Sampras back on the Court in whatever capacity he chooses.

Very interesting read. Thanks for sharing.
 
Going back to the Nike thing I thought that Sampras was a life ambassador for Nike - similar to Jordan, although he has a different relationship with them with his own Jumpman stuff, and Armstrong etc
 
jings said:
Going back to the Nike thing I thought that Sampras was a life ambassador for Nike - similar to Jordan, although he has a different relationship with them with his own Jumpman stuff, and Armstrong etc

Yeah, I thought so too. But there was that rocky contract renewal period when Pete wore a US flag patch over his swooshes. 2001 was it?
Wonder if the Pete/Nike relationship is kosher-cetic again.
 
Oh, and I wonder if Pete will train hard and pull a Boris. Like get sliiiightly injured and withdraw at the eleventh hour.
Class guy, but also a perfectionist.
They never televise the River Oaks thing, but maybe this is the year.
 
loubapache said:
Now, the question of the decade is what racquet he used. :)

JG thinks it was the same old Wilson that he's always used, but he's not sure and he forgot to ask Pete about it (yes, I actually asked him. Y'all owe me!).
 
I don't think it's out of line at all for Pete to come back to the tour. I know Pete says "don't call it a comeback" with his exo and wtt sign up, but come on...he has A LOT of pride you know and he's stepping back on court. Things and thoughts have to be floating around in his head with all these "who's greater" comparisons about him and Federer. I think once he starts playing and if he does well, the drive and motivation will come back whether he wants it to or not. He just might decide to challenge himself once again...
 
Slice - there was that flag episode, at the Aussie Open?, but it passed harmlessly enough. I recall he was renegotiating the contract and technically the sponsorship lapsed briefly and he called them on it so to speak. He then signed the long term deal. As to a no show, well if he's really injured he shouldn't play, it's going to be hard enough as it is - but can't see him junking the tournament if he just doesn't feel like turning up.
 
BaseLineBash said:
I don't think it's out of line at all for Pete to come back to the tour. I know Pete says "don't call it a comeback" with his exo and wtt sign up, but come on...he has A LOT of pride you know and he's stepping back on court. Things and thoughts have to be floating around in his head with all these "who's greater" comparisons about him and Federer. I think once he starts playing and if he does well, the drive and motivation will come back whether he wants it to or not. He just might decide to challenge himself once again...
I agree. Why else would he even contemplate making a return to tennis if, in the back of his mind, there wasn't the slightest thought of returning to the ATP tour again? If he's bored, then why not get inolved in something tennis-related, other than playing...like commentating? Why does he have to play exhibitions?
Over the last year or two he has constantly name-checked Federer in interviews, he knows full-well his 14 Grand Slams are under threat and it's only been 31/2 years since his retirement (this is nothing like the dsiaterous return for Borg back in 1991 after 10 years away)
I think this exhibition/WTT issue is a complete smokescreen: he's gonna see how well he performs at a lower-tier level, realise he still has the magic and then step up and SMOKE Federer at Wimbledon 2007.
holla.gif



And that's an OFFICIAL prediction!
 
Fee said:
JG thinks it was the same old Wilson that he's always used, but he's not sure and he forgot to ask Pete about it (yes, I actually asked him. Y'all owe me!).
Thanks, Fee.

Now ask JG to call Pete and let's know for sure. :)
 
I don't think there's any need for Sampras to come back on tour. I think the Fed thing is media driven.

However, playing against the likes of Chang and Courier and Krajicek on the champions is an exciting prospect, considering they are all in their early to mid 30s and still are relatively lean and fit, I think that is hopeful now.

I would love to see Sampras at the Royal Albert Hall in December either this year or next year.
 
Pete is going to be 35 in August. Like hell he's thinking about coming back to the ATP tour. Senior tour, maybe. ATP tour, no.
 
Back
Top