tennis24x7
Hall of Fame
Yeah whatever to the serve seen a dime a dozen latest being Opelka, gimme the one handed backhand please.This guy is a physical beast and has one of the best serves I've ever seen.
Yeah whatever to the serve seen a dime a dozen latest being Opelka, gimme the one handed backhand please.This guy is a physical beast and has one of the best serves I've ever seen.
This guy is going to make Opelka and even Hurkacz his bitches when it comes to the serve very soon. I mean, dude *routinely* hits 145-147 mph serves.Yeah whatever to the serve seen a dime a dozen latest being Opelka, gimme the one handed backhand please.
What matters is whether he can hit the spots with the serve? we will see. Most huge servers can't and then it is game over.This guy is going to make Opelka and even Hurkacz his bitches when it comes to the serve very soon. I mean, dude *routinely* hits 145-147 mph serves.
I see him as the second coming of Richard Krajicek (who was the biggest righty server in the 1990s).
Yeah, you’re right.What matters is whether he can hit the spots with the serve? we will see. Most huge servers can't and then it is game over.
Opelka hasn’t been on tour for a minuteIf Zverev is the 3rd best server on tour behind Kyrgios and Opelka then it must mean that Tennis is in danger...
I think you have mistaken him for Hurkacz ???
Will be drawn to play against one of Tiafoe/Murray/Fritz/Shelton. Any of those would be a fun match.Qualified for Queens
Agreed. Accurately serving your spots CONSISTENTLY, especially on 30-30, 30-40, 40-40, BPs is way more important than serve speedWhat matters is whether he can hit the spots with the serve? we will see. Most huge servers can't and then it is game over.
What kind of French name is Giovanni?
Yet 5'10" Alcaraz is going to win 15 slams against the evolved 6'6" giants?Haha no.... He won't beat Pete for sure, Pete still matches pretty well against everyone but what about Rod Laver ? I donno... Tennis has evolved a lot that way, back in the day 6'3-6'4 was a true "giant" and today if a guy 6'8 can move like this then I donno how guys 5'7 will become GOAT candidates in this era, they cannot.
To be fair to Rod Laver if Diego Schwartzmann can be ranked 8 in the world then Rod should be ranked in the top 5 given his talent, but then can he beat peak Big 3 or peak Pete ? I donno think he can... See Pete himself was 6'1 which is the height of Federer and Nadal.... he is not outdated in anyway, he and Agassi can win tonnes of majors in this era too if they get all the benefits that current sportsmen have, after all Alcaraz is still ranked super high, isn't he ?
But then evolution is happening before our eyes, Pete is not affected, Lendl is not affected, they were tall men, but Rod Laver? Ken Rosewall? Sorry to say but they are outdated... but at least they can draw comfort from the fact that it took like 60-70 years after their prime to actually get outdated ...
Yet 5'10" Alcaraz is going to win 15 slams against the evolved 6'6" giants?
This Tennisabstract article https://www.tennisabstract.com/blog/2024/02/27/alex-de-minaurs-adequate-inaccuracy/ also suggests that statistically pure speed of serve is more important than anything else. Placement is also important, but there is a balance that needs to be struck between speed, accuracy and first serve percentage, as we all know. The statistics also suggest that tall players find it easier to be accurate while serving bombs, as you had gathered yourself just by observing.Whatever his accuracy is in terms of spot serving (I haven't seen enough of him to really judge), his speeds are just insane lol, like I've seen some players average 125 on 2nd serve, but never with this kind of consistency, on a match to match basis. It puts it into perspective when you realize just how many times players miss their first serve (which is often on average slower than his 2nd serve) and he manages to keep his DF count in the single digits.
And I don't buy the "most huge servers can't hit spots" quote at all. IMO, the majority of the most notorious big servers had good to excellent placement. A shame tennis doesn't really track this sort of thing consistently.
You can't bring up serve speed in a post, without somebody bringing up placement in a reply, it's like a TW rule at this point. We get it XD We just wanna mull over the insane numbers in awe nevertheless
90% points won on first serve and won 16/19 (84%) net points, with no break points faced in a 6-3, 7-6 win. That's how you get it done on grass.He has arrived on grass! Gets Shelton's scalp!
The guy averaged 128 mph on 2nd serve against Ben , only 6 mph below his 1st serve average. That is probably the highest I've ever seen a 2nd serve average. Seems to be hitting at least a 147 mph serve every damn match as well lol
Only 5 DFs as well.
Never seen anything like this tbh
I think he'll definitely play spoiler often throughout his career.Thats unreal. This guy is gonna be a problem.
This is where it gets interesting. As you point out, the sample size is fairly small at this stage, but from little I’ve seen, his movement is surprisingly good. He also seems to have a pretty nice touch and volley, won a vast majority of his net points in the last match.He seems like he maybe have an Isner-like career. Some tennis viewers sort of crap on Isner for being "just a serve" but he really did have a great career and achieved a lot, even if it was because of one dominant shot. GBM seems to have better movement than Isner. Again, we have a small data set for GMP so it's probably too early to tell, but there's real potential starting to emerge.
His friend and compatriot Fils "arrived" first, but GMP might have the bigger upside. Fils is good, but what does he do THAT much better than a majority of other players? But, for the last time, it's very early in their careers so it's all speculation.
I would say he has the potential to be better at the net as well. He has better touch, but he still makes too many errors. If her can clean those up, he's going to be tough to break.He seems like he maybe have an Isner-like career. Some tennis viewers sort of crap on Isner for being "just a serve" but he really did have a great career and achieved a lot, even if it was because of one dominant shot. GBM seems to have better movement than Isner. Again, we have a small data set for GMP so it's probably too early to tell, but there's real potential starting to emerge.
His friend and compatriot Fils "arrived" first, but GMP might have the bigger upside. Fils is good, but what does he do THAT much better than a majority of other players? But, for the last time, it's very early in their careers so it's all speculation.
I fully expect that outcome because Perricard clearly outmatches Shelton when it comes to the serve, while Shelton is not exactly a good returner. In the end, Shelton had 0 break chances.The win over Shelton is particularly amusing because Shelton often goes into his matches with a certain serve gravitas. It doesn't always pan out, obviously, but the potential is there for Shelton on a given day to really bother someone with his serve. And today he meets a player who essentially says, "oh, that's cute."
Not even one? I didn't know that. Not that it never happens, but still sort of nuts. Must be a great feeling on GPM's end.I fully expect that outcome because Perricard clearly outmatches Shelton when it comes to the serve, while Shelton is not exactly a good returner. In the end, Shelton had 0 break chances.
... and Mpetshi? He is one of the more entertaining servebots giants I must say, really dig that ping-pong like backhand he has, wrist of steel. Also some unexpected good touch when needed, great to watch...What kind of French name is Giovanni?
What? When was the cutoff date? He’s been well inside the top 100 since before RG!Don't know how he didn't make Wimbledon main draw. DISGRACEFUL
Don't know how he didn't make Wimbledon main draw. DISGRACEFUL
I tried to google it but there is no info.What? When was the cutoff date? He’s been well inside the top 100 since before RG!
WC for qualy?
What? When was the cutoff date? He’s been well inside the top 100 since before RG!
Yeah, he will have to play qualifying unless he gets the last WC. IMO he will have to make Queens final to get that slot.Don't know how he didn't make Wimbledon main draw. DISGRACEFUL
Thanks for the info. That’s a shame, hope he makes some noise at Queen’s.Yeah, he had to play qualifying unless he gets the last WC. IMO he will have to make Queens final to get that slot.
I don’t know why Wimbledon decided to have cut-off date just before ATP Lyon this year. Last year, the cut-off date was after ATP Lyon.
Thanks for the info! That’s just plain weird. Firstly, that cut-off date seems very harsh and, secondly, changing it like that from one year to another just doesn’t make sense.Yeah, he will have to play qualifying unless he gets the last WC. IMO he will have to make Queens final to get that slot.
I don’t know why Wimbledon decided to have cut-off date just before ATP Lyon this year. Last year, the cut-off date was after ATP Lyon.
Thanks for the update, looking forward!Davidovich Fokina withdraws, and Giovanni gets in as a lucky loser. He'll face Seb Korda in the first round. Should be a good one.