Giovanni the Giant: 6"8 guy with one handed backhand is making having a breakout year!

NedStark

Professional
Yeah whatever to the serve seen a dime a dozen latest being Opelka, gimme the one handed backhand please.
This guy is going to make Opelka and even Hurkacz his bitches when it comes to the serve very soon. I mean, dude *routinely* hits 145-147 mph serves.

I see him as the second coming of Richard Krajicek (who was the biggest righty server in the 1990s).
 

tennis24x7

Hall of Fame
This guy is going to make Opelka and even Hurkacz his bitches when it comes to the serve very soon. I mean, dude *routinely* hits 145-147 mph serves.

I see him as the second coming of Richard Krajicek (who was the biggest righty server in the 1990s).
What matters is whether he can hit the spots with the serve? we will see. Most huge servers can't and then it is game over.
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
his stats vs Bergs in qualies at Queens (between this event, Stuttgart and Lyon he seems to be consistently serving around these numbers in every match)
averaged 135 on 1st serve, 125 on 2nd serve

The Shelton match should be interesting. It's on Court 5, wonder if there's a lot of room behind the baseline on that court to return all these bombs.
 
Last edited:

The Green Mile

Bionic Poster
Whatever his accuracy is in terms of spot serving (I haven't seen enough of him to really judge), his speeds are just insane lol, like I've seen some players average 125 on 2nd serve, but never with this kind of consistency, on a match to match basis. It puts it into perspective when you realize just how many times players miss their first serve (which is often on average slower than his 2nd serve) and he manages to keep his DF count in the single digits.

And I don't buy the "most huge servers can't hit spots" quote at all. IMO, the majority of the most notorious big servers had good to excellent placement. A shame tennis doesn't really track this sort of thing consistently.

You can't bring up serve speed in a post, without somebody bringing up placement in a reply, it's like a TW rule at this point. We get it XD We just wanna mull over the insane numbers in awe nevertheless
 
Last edited:

metsman

Talk Tennis Guru
Haha no.... He won't beat Pete for sure, Pete still matches pretty well against everyone but what about Rod Laver ? I donno... Tennis has evolved a lot that way, back in the day 6'3-6'4 was a true "giant" and today if a guy 6'8 can move like this then I donno how guys 5'7 will become GOAT candidates in this era, they cannot.

To be fair to Rod Laver if Diego Schwartzmann can be ranked 8 in the world then Rod should be ranked in the top 5 given his talent, but then can he beat peak Big 3 or peak Pete ? I donno think he can... See Pete himself was 6'1 which is the height of Federer and Nadal.... he is not outdated in anyway, he and Agassi can win tonnes of majors in this era too if they get all the benefits that current sportsmen have, after all Alcaraz is still ranked super high, isn't he ?

But then evolution is happening before our eyes, Pete is not affected, Lendl is not affected, they were tall men, but Rod Laver? Ken Rosewall? Sorry to say but they are outdated... but at least they can draw comfort from the fact that it took like 60-70 years after their prime to actually get outdated ...
Yet 5'10" Alcaraz is going to win 15 slams against the evolved 6'6" giants?
 

Razer

G.O.A.T.
Yet 5'10" Alcaraz is going to win 15 slams against the evolved 6'6" giants?

I dont think Alcaraz will win 15 but he might win 10-11 and that is still a lot.... That still doesn't prove Laver can win today, he is even 3-4 inches shorter than Alcaraz.... I guess the 6'6 giants would win over Laver now...
 

Wander

Hall of Fame
Whatever his accuracy is in terms of spot serving (I haven't seen enough of him to really judge), his speeds are just insane lol, like I've seen some players average 125 on 2nd serve, but never with this kind of consistency, on a match to match basis. It puts it into perspective when you realize just how many times players miss their first serve (which is often on average slower than his 2nd serve) and he manages to keep his DF count in the single digits.

And I don't buy the "most huge servers can't hit spots" quote at all. IMO, the majority of the most notorious big servers had good to excellent placement. A shame tennis doesn't really track this sort of thing consistently.

You can't bring up serve speed in a post, without somebody bringing up placement in a reply, it's like a TW rule at this point. We get it XD We just wanna mull over the insane numbers in awe nevertheless
This Tennisabstract article https://www.tennisabstract.com/blog/2024/02/27/alex-de-minaurs-adequate-inaccuracy/ also suggests that statistically pure speed of serve is more important than anything else. Placement is also important, but there is a balance that needs to be struck between speed, accuracy and first serve percentage, as we all know. The statistics also suggest that tall players find it easier to be accurate while serving bombs, as you had gathered yourself just by observing.

The least accurate top players are the ones shorter than average, like De Minaur and even Alcaraz. They have seemingly concluded that hitting as hard as they can with a bit less precision is currently their best bet to keep up with the taller guys.
 

The Green Mile

Bionic Poster
The guy averaged 128 mph on 2nd serve against Ben , only 6 mph below his 1st serve average. That is probably the highest I've ever seen a 2nd serve average. Seems to be hitting at least a 147 mph serve every damn match as well lol

Only 5 DFs as well.

Never seen anything like this tbh
 

Shaolin

G.O.A.T.
The guy averaged 128 mph on 2nd serve against Ben , only 6 mph below his 1st serve average. That is probably the highest I've ever seen a 2nd serve average. Seems to be hitting at least a 147 mph serve every damn match as well lol

Only 5 DFs as well.

Never seen anything like this tbh

Thats unreal. This guy is gonna be a problem.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
The win over Shelton is particularly amusing because Shelton often goes into his matches with a certain serve gravitas. It doesn't always pan out, obviously, but the potential is there for Shelton on a given day to really bother someone with his serve. And today he meets a player who essentially says, "oh, that's cute."
 
Basically, when we all theorized about how eventually you’ll get apologize with a big move well and the problems that it’s going to cause… this could be that guy
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
He seems like he maybe have an Isner-like career. Some tennis viewers sort of crap on Isner for being "just a serve" but he really did have a great career and achieved a lot, even if it was because of one dominant shot. GBM seems to have better movement than Isner. Again, we have a small data set for GMP so it's probably too early to tell, but there's real potential starting to emerge.

His friend and compatriot Fils "arrived" first, but GMP might have the bigger upside. Fils is good, but what does he do THAT much better than a majority of other players? But, for the last time, it's very early in their careers so it's all speculation.
 

middleballs

Professional
He seems like he maybe have an Isner-like career. Some tennis viewers sort of crap on Isner for being "just a serve" but he really did have a great career and achieved a lot, even if it was because of one dominant shot. GBM seems to have better movement than Isner. Again, we have a small data set for GMP so it's probably too early to tell, but there's real potential starting to emerge.

His friend and compatriot Fils "arrived" first, but GMP might have the bigger upside. Fils is good, but what does he do THAT much better than a majority of other players? But, for the last time, it's very early in their careers so it's all speculation.
This is where it gets interesting. As you point out, the sample size is fairly small at this stage, but from little I’ve seen, his movement is surprisingly good. He also seems to have a pretty nice touch and volley, won a vast majority of his net points in the last match.
 

buscemi

Legend
He seems like he maybe have an Isner-like career. Some tennis viewers sort of crap on Isner for being "just a serve" but he really did have a great career and achieved a lot, even if it was because of one dominant shot. GBM seems to have better movement than Isner. Again, we have a small data set for GMP so it's probably too early to tell, but there's real potential starting to emerge.

His friend and compatriot Fils "arrived" first, but GMP might have the bigger upside. Fils is good, but what does he do THAT much better than a majority of other players? But, for the last time, it's very early in their careers so it's all speculation.
I would say he has the potential to be better at the net as well. He has better touch, but he still makes too many errors. If her can clean those up, he's going to be tough to break.
 

NedStark

Professional
The win over Shelton is particularly amusing because Shelton often goes into his matches with a certain serve gravitas. It doesn't always pan out, obviously, but the potential is there for Shelton on a given day to really bother someone with his serve. And today he meets a player who essentially says, "oh, that's cute."
I fully expect that outcome because Perricard clearly outmatches Shelton when it comes to the serve, while Shelton is not exactly a good returner. In the end, Shelton had 0 break chances.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
I fully expect that outcome because Perricard clearly outmatches Shelton when it comes to the serve, while Shelton is not exactly a good returner. In the end, Shelton had 0 break chances.
Not even one? I didn't know that. Not that it never happens, but still sort of nuts. Must be a great feeling on GPM's end.
 

Knife

Professional
What kind of French name is Giovanni?
... and Mpetshi? :unsure: He is one of the more entertaining servebots giants I must say, really dig that ping-pong like backhand he has, wrist of steel. Also some unexpected good touch when needed, great to watch...
 

NedStark

Professional
WC for qualy?
What? When was the cutoff date? He’s been well inside the top 100 since before RG!
Don't know how he didn't make Wimbledon main draw. DISGRACEFUL
Yeah, he will have to play qualifying unless he gets the last WC. IMO he will have to make Queens final to get that slot.

I don’t know why Wimbledon decided to have cut-off date just before ATP Lyon this year. Last year, the cut-off date was after ATP Lyon.
 

InsuranceMan

Hall of Fame
Yeah, he had to play qualifying unless he gets the last WC. IMO he will have to make Queens final to get that slot.

I don’t know why Wimbledon decided to have cut-off date just before ATP Lyon this year. Last year, the cut-off date was after ATP Lyon.
Thanks for the info. That’s a shame, hope he makes some noise at Queen’s.
 

ey039524

Hall of Fame
He has way more potential than Shelton, other than being right handed. I didn't watch the whole match, but in the highlights, he was hitting multiple passing shots from his backhand. He can volley, he can move forward, hit passing winners moving corner to corner. He's going to be better than most of all the upcoming kids. Scary potential.
 

middleballs

Professional
Yeah, he will have to play qualifying unless he gets the last WC. IMO he will have to make Queens final to get that slot.

I don’t know why Wimbledon decided to have cut-off date just before ATP Lyon this year. Last year, the cut-off date was after ATP Lyon.
Thanks for the info! That’s just plain weird. Firstly, that cut-off date seems very harsh and, secondly, changing it like that from one year to another just doesn’t make sense.
 
Top