Gluten Free Like #1 Joker

[SystemicAnomaly]

We should think hard about consuming the cow's milk since; 1. NO OTHER animal species drinks the milk of another species and 2. NO OTHER species drinks milk after a very young age...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zuah-Afw4Rw

Have also seen adult felines drinking cow's milk from a saucer (even tho' many cats are lactose intolerant).

 

[BMC9670]

Do You Drink Milk? Some serious facts!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QIQGoGyNF0

Facts? Science? I just see a guy talking on YouTube.

 

[BMC9670]

We should think hard about consuming the cow's milk since; 1. NO OTHER animal species drinks the milk of another species and 2. NO OTHER species drinks milk after a very young age. Now the science not financed by the dairy industry is making it clear.

And no other species has built a rocket and gone to the moon. Humans do a lot of things that other species do not.

 

[Povl Carstensen]

But you are not supposed to eat a rocket.

 

[maggmaster]

Human populations that have had domesticated cattle for more than 5,000 years have few deleterious effects from drinking milk. There are populations in Africa and Asia that still do have high incidences of lactose intolerance. The chemical breakdown of milk is fairly simple and it is fine for human consumption in reasonable, dietary amounts.

 

[Povl Carstensen]

I just think there is area for the discussion about whether something you are not intolerant to, is nescessarily good/optimal for you. That you tolerate something does not automatically mean it is good for you, imo. Dairy products and grain comes into mind, along with for instance Djokovic' and Comebacks stories.
Ofcourse here, the experiences can be individual and different too.

 

[Povl Carstensen]

Human populations that have had domesticated cattle for more than 5,000 years have few deleterious effects from drinking milk. There are populations in Africa and Asia that still do have high incidences of lactose intolerance. The chemical breakdown of milk is fairly simple and it is fine for human consumption in reasonable, dietary amounts.

In Finland there is a high incident of lactose intolerance. I am half finnish. I am not diagnosed as lactose intolerant, but still milk seems to have an adverse effect on my digestion.

 

[Gut4Tennis]

And no other species has built a rocket and gone to the moon. Humans do a lot of things that other species do not.

Human populations that have had domesticated cattle for more than 5,000 years have few deleterious effects from drinking milk. There are populations in Africa and Asia that still do have high incidences of lactose intolerance. The chemical breakdown of milk is fairly simple and it is fine for human consumption in reasonable, dietary amounts.

Don't worry guys, you can have extra Pus, blood, RBGH, naturally occurring hormones that cause cancer, and more since I'll pass. Lucky you

enjoy the sexy girl talking to ya
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS9hh-Npc50

I respectfully agree to disagree with you on milk & grain consumption

 

[RanchDressing]

I recently got diagnosed with gluten and other food sensitivities (along side more serious GI diseases).

About a year ago I was talking about how stupid gluten free diets are to a co-worker. Now I have to follow one. Ironic.

Just listen to what your body says. Eliminate foods that don't work for you. Keep ones that do.
Trust me being on a gluten free diet isn't fun. It's horrible.

 

[Ash_Smith]

enjoy the sexy girl talking to ya
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS9hh-Npc50

I respectfully agree to disagree with you on milk & grain consumption

Disagreement is fine, but you cannot seriously put Freelee the banana muppet up there as "evidence"!

In respect of balance I give you http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x23ztgz#user_search=1

 

[BMC9670]

Don't worry guys, you can have extra Pus, blood, RBGH, naturally occurring hormones that cause cancer, and more since I'll pass. Lucky you

enjoy the sexy girl talking to ya
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS9hh-Npc50

I respectfully agree to disagree with you on milk & grain consumption

I noticed that in several of your posts, you literally quote the description of the YouTube videos you reference. No real research and no real original thought to boot. :???:

 

[maggmaster]

That video was a joke, real science is published in journals and lacks the ridiculous voice overs and unnecessary eye candy. TED talks at least attempts to be professional.

 

[Gut4Tennis]

Rupert Sheldrake - The Science Delusion BANNED TED TALK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKHUaNAxsTg

While TED is positioned as trendy and cool, it's actually just another vehicle of idea suppression that has joined with other dark forces which are attempting to keep humankind ignorant of the reality of consciousness, free will, spirituality and the fact that our cosmos is far more than physical "stuff." TED gladly features scientists who unveil technologies that will be used to enslave humanity, but the organization doesn't want you to hear about advances in understanding that can set you free.

 

[Gut4Tennis]

Other areas of investigation banned by TED

It turns out that TED isn't only a proponent of GMOs, and whatever corporate-sponsored status quo science is currently being spouted -- it's also wholly aligned against a wide range of topics it considers "pseudoscience."

These so-called "pseudoscience" topics include:

• Consciousness, free will and the non-material "mind"

• "The fusion of science and spirituality" -- as if higher spiritual awareness is somehow not a valid pathway for the discovery of truth.

• Nearly all neuroscience.

• The placebo effect, something that has been experimentally proven to exist through tens of thousands of clinical trials.

• Any and all "healing," including Reiki or hands-on healing, healing touch, etc.

Yep, according to TED, these are all pure hokum and bunk. There is no placebo effect, they insist, even though it has been experimentally proven to be the strongest across-the-board form of medicine available today. The reason they cannot acknowledge the existence of the placebo effect is because it is contingent upon the interaction between the body and the mind. Because TEDx and its cabal of closed-minded junk scientists cannot admit to the existence of a non-material mind, they also cannot admit to the existence of the placebo effect even though their own experiments prove its existence beyond any rational doubt.

In fact, the placebo effect is so widely documented that in order to discard it, you would have to throw out all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies altogether. Is TED saying that all such studies are bunk because, taken as a whole, they show the placebo effect to be statistically significant in its effectiveness?

See, this is how TED destroys its own argument (and credibility). If the placebo effect doesn't exist, then virtually all modern clinical trials must be deemed invalid, and that means TED doesn't believe in any real science at all.

 

[BMC9670]

While TED is positioned as trendy and cool, it's actually just another vehicle of idea suppression that has joined with other dark forces which are attempting to keep humankind ignorant of the reality of consciousness, free will, spirituality and the fact that our cosmos is far more than physical "stuff." TED gladly features scientists who unveil technologies that will be used to enslave humanity, but the organization doesn't want you to hear about advances in understanding that can set you free.

I think you might identify with the Spiritual YouTubiness of this guy:

http://youtu.be/1kDso5ElFRg

And more topical for this thread:

http://youtu.be/Kvdf6e8birI

 

[SystemicAnomaly]

^ Entertaining stuff, BMC.


.

 

[moonballs]

Oh and if you truly believe that "gluten free" is the reason for Novaks transformation I would like to sell you some property on the moon. Low low price, full development rights....

I don't buy the PED theory you are insinuating. Why not? Because if he were using PEDS, he would not have waited till 2011 to do it. He had got the means all along. On the other hand his breathing problem fits some sort of allergy. Glutten intolerance can't be easily tested so he had to try it to find out it was the cause.

 

[SystemicAnomaly]

^ Don't know if MM was really insinuating PED use. Aside from eliminating gluten, there were a number of other factors that contributed to Novak's rise in performance since 2010. **** is one:

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/novak-djokovic-pressurized-****-space-egg-helped-climb/story?id=14406674

Once of the first differences that I noticed in Novak's game was a change in his serve mechanics. He fixed his elbow position for his trophy phase and eliminated a minor hitch in his motion. As a result, his consistency improved and his serving stats reflected this -- particularly his 2nd serve. He made improvements to his forehand execution as well. Improved his fitness level and learned how to play smarter.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/887659-novak-djokovic-how-he-has-improved-since-2010


Edit: seems that C V A C was censored in my first paragraph!!!

 

[Povl Carstensen]

I don't buy the PED theory you are insinuating. Why not? Because if he were using PEDS, he would not have waited till 2011 to do it. He had got the means all along. On the other hand his breathing problem fits some sort of allergy. Glutten intolerance can't be easily tested so he had to try it to find out it was the cause.

I do not see him publishing a book about if he did not feel it helped him. I have read it and it seems sincere.

 

[sundaypunch]

This subject is a little like religion (or lack of). You make a choice and take your chances based on what makes sense and works for you. Trying to convince others that your approach is best is usually a waste of time.

I have done plenty of research and have been off and on with a gluten free diet. I definitely feel better when I eliminate gluten. I have no desire to tell anyone else that it would be best for them.

 

[Gut4Tennis]

This subject is a little like religion (or lack of). You make a choice and take your chances based on what makes sense and works for you. Trying to convince others that your approach is best is usually a waste of time.

I have done plenty of research and have been off and on with a gluten free diet. I definitely feel better when I eliminate gluten. I have no desire to tell anyone else that it would be best for them.

The real reason for "Gluten intolerance"

Monsanto's recommended wheat harvest protocol in the United States is to drench the wheat fields with Roundup several days before harvest. This makes sure the plants are dead and dry, and easier for the machines to handle which improves yield.

So chances are you are not intolerant to "gluten", you are instead intolerant to having your food drenched with roundup right before it is harvested. THAT explains a lot, for example -

Many people who get sick from "gluten" have been tested for gluten intolerance only to be turned away as "crazy" because the tests revealed nothing, and therefore the fact that wheat based products make them sick must all be in their heads. But what about the fact that the wheat is loaded with roundup and never washed of it before being processed? Many people who can't feel good after a roundup cocktail will think it is the wheat doing it, rather than yet another of Monsanto's agricultural recommendations.

Monsanto's own Pre harvest staging guide clearly states that you should nail your wheat crop with roundup THREE TO FIVE DAYS before harvest, when the wheat is matured and has 30 percent moisture. GET THIS: Monsanto says to spray POISON ON THE CROP RIGHT BEFORE HARVEST. Is that not freaking GREAT?

20 years ago I used to be able to eat all the bread I wanted. But for the past 15 years I had to watch it because if I ate too much I would get a headache that lasted for days. But come to think of it, since being out of America I have not had to worry about this. Coincidence? Probably not.

Of course, Snopes went out of their way on this topic saying OH, having people state that 99 percent of farmers do this is false, and therefore the entire concept is false. But this again proves Snopes to be a lying rag as many already know, because all it would take is for 25 percent of the farmers out there to do this and when the grain all goes into the same big elevator all of it will be tainted, especially for people who just have no place for round up in their diet. Figure the odds of Snopes being honest at that level.

I was initially tipped off on this topic by a post on The Healthy Home Economist titled The Real Reason for Toxic Wheat - (its not the gluten) and now I am all the more confident that there is not and never has been a single thing wrong with my health, other than an unawareness of corporate profiteering and a total lack of people in power giving a damn. They probably get their food from the Amish or some other similar protected source.

MONSANTO- Preharvest Staging Guide
http://roundup.ca/_uploads/documents/MON-Preharvest Staging Guide.pdf

 

[comeback]

In an article about hip therapy posted by Heninfan; Mike Bryan of the Bryan twins states he is also gluten free.
“Eating right has been big, and going gluten-free has also been a help to me”, explains Bryan, adding that the change in his diet has helped him to reduce inflammation in his body, related to a recently discovered gluten sensitivity.
entire article here
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertgl...beat-the-odds/

 

[Gut4Tennis]

In an article about hip therapy posted by Heninfan; Mike Bryan of the Bryan twins states he is also gluten free.
“Eating right has been big, and going gluten-free has also been a help to me”, explains Bryan, adding that the change in his diet has helped him to reduce inflammation in his body, related to a recently discovered gluten sensitivity.
entire article here
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertgl...beat-the-odds/

indeed. another nail in the coffin for grains and gluten

 

[SystemicAnomaly]

^ This is still not proof that gluten itself has negative effects for the general population. It is an indicator that those with a gluten sensitivity are, for some reason, sensitive to many products containing gluten.

Apparently, gluten sensitivity is much more prevalent in the US and certain other parts of the world than it is in many parts of Europe. It could be the Roundup, as you suggest, or it could be something else. Read on...

http://www.motherearthnews.com/real-food/gluten-intolerant-zm0z13aszmar.aspx#axzz3OUmftbGR

 

[gregor.b]

Yay, more Gluten for me.

While you're at it, lay off the bacon, Cotes du Rhone, steaks . . .

And cheese and beer and salami.

 

[Gut4Tennis]

And cheese and beer and salami.

I eat everything, just less and less gluten

gotta have my ledos pizza baby