Good interview w/Mike Agassi about Gilbert,Roddick, Federer

Kevin Patrick

Hall of Fame
This isn't the complete interview but some of what I found interesting(it seems like Gilbert could be quite tiresome after a while)

Tennis Week: I want to ask you about Brad Gilbert in light of Roddick’s recent dismissal of him. What are Brad’s strengths and weaknesses as a coach?

Mike Agassi: Brad is a constant talker, you know. If you can sit and listen to him continuously, after a while, he repeats himself. If you can take it, he’s OK. But if you cannot take it, then it’s annoying. Myself, I had such a little problem with Brad. He used to work with Andre’s serve. He would tell Andre to serve 115 miles an hour to the T then next serve, the second serve, would be 92 miles an hour wide to the backhand. From 115 you go to 92, I would say try to between five to nine mile differences in the serves. Brad is a good talker. He always had answers. He once told me: "Everybody is two or three inches taller than Andre, that’s why they serve that big." I said: "Then here is a racquet two inches longer and it’s gonna give Andre a longer reach.". And his answer was: "Yeah, he’s gonna have a better serve, but he’s gonna lose seven and a half percent of his forehand and nine and a half percent on his backhand." And once you listen to someone and believe in him, then you believe in him. That’s the way it works.

Tennis Week: Roddick’s still number two in the world, so it's not like he's had a dramatic drop in results, but if you could coach Roddick what would you tell him?

Mike Agassi: If you talk to him, let me tell you what you say to him: forget about the 150 mile an hour serve, forget about the 140 mile an hour serve. Serve 130 mile an hour first serve on the corners and serve a 122, 123, 124 mile an hour second serve hitting the corners and I’ll bet you if he served 130 mile an hour first serve a lot more are going to go in, but he can place it better. People are acing each other with 115, 120 mile an hour serve so you need to use your placement and not just go for the fast serve all the time.

Tennis Week: Do you see anyone out there who can challenge Roger Federer, long-term, for No. 1?

Mike Agassi: There is a (player) who needs to be able to serve and volley, not necessarily serve and volley together, but they need to serve and be able to come in and put away the volley during the point. For instance, if someone out there had the game Sampras used to have, he had the first and second serve almost the same speed and he placed them so well in both corners. And his first volley was very effective, so if someone had that game they could do it (challenge Federer). But the way it goes, everybody knows he’s gonna lose before they play Federer so it’s like they give up before they go play the guy. He only loses when he doesn’t play his best and the other guy plays over his head.

Tennis Week: The last time you and I spoke you said Federer was proving something you always said: that a champion doesn’t need a coach to be successful. Do you believe Federer can continue to dominate the game without a coach?

Mike Agassi: Can I ask you a question?

Tennis Week: Sure.

Mike Agassi: What is your job?

Tennis Week: Journalist.

Mike Agassi: Do you need a coach to do your journalist job?

Tennis Week: No, but I get a lot of unwanted coaching at home anyway.

Mike Agassi: Let me say one thing: if a person does not have a coach then he needs to have enough time to study the tapes himself. You follow me? He has to study his game and other people’s games. When I learned tennis, I didn’t learn tennis because someone told me how to hit the ball. I watched and I took one point from this player, one point from that player and one point from the other player and I put that together and I made a package gift for Andre. You follow me?

Tennis Week: Yes, you took the best quality from each player you saw and passed it on to Andre.

Mike Agassi: I taught Andre to take the ball on the rise because I saw Boris Becker once do that. I taught Andre to hit swing volleys because I once saw Lendl do that. He did that once in a year or two years, it was very rare, but he did do that. I saw players hit the inside out forehand and I did that with Andre. Play inside the court, I did that with Andre. Go to the ball and pick up the ball on the rise, I did that with Andre. Get on the guy’s serve with a short back swing on your return, I did that with Andre. Once in a while, players will do something that they don’t know they just did. They don’t realize it. And if you’re outside the court and you can study the game and see that and you can work on it the kid becomes a hell of a player.

Tennis Week: Do you see any player out there whose style reminds you of Andre? You know, who can take the ball early, take command from the baseline, punish returns?

Mike Agassi: Rios was like that. He reminds me of Andre and in one way he was something better than Andre: you couldn’t read his contact point and direction of the ball. Do you know the beauty of a mirror? If you throw light at a mirror at five degrees, then the light comes back five degrees the other side, correct? Now if the ball comes at your hand and if you meet the ball with an angle on the racquet then they cannot read your shot and where the ball is coming. Do you know what I’m talking about? Do you understand?

Tennis Week: Yeah, I understand what you’re saying. You’re saying the angle of the racquet face can be deceptive to the opponent and make it tougher to read the shot?

Mike Agassi: Yes, you can change the angle of the racquet head, some players. But if Roddick hits the ball crosscourt, before he hits, you know he’s hitting crosscourt. If you have the same swing and you meet the ball with the angle, then the guy crosscourt cannot read if you’re going to his backhand or forehand.

Tennis Week: Yeah, but that takes incredible timing and technique to do that.

Mike Agassi: Yeah, listen the guys who can do it are making a hell of a lot of money. You wanna do that? Go work on it. That’s what you have to work on it. My practice was the ball machine. I couldn’t give him 5,000 balls like that. I would put the ball machine on serve and ask Andre to change the direction on his return without telegraphing where the ball was going.

Tennis Week: How many balls would Andre hit a every day when he was growing up, training with you in the backyard?

Mike Agassi: I had somewhere around 60 garbage cans and there were around 300 balls in each garbage can and he would go through many of those garbage cans each day. Maybe 3,000 to sometimes 5,000 balls he used to hit.

Tennis Week: When did you know "My son is going to be something special. He’s going to be one of the best in the world?"

Mike Agassi: When he was two or three years old. When he was three and a half years old he gave a hell of an exhibition with Bobby Riggs. Then when he was four or five years old, he was playing with Jimmy Connors, Roscoe Tanner, Brian Gottfried, Vitas Gerulaitis, Panatta. You name it, he probably played with them. All those pros, when they used to come through Las Vegas, they’d say "Where is Andre? Where is Andre?"

Tennis Week: If you were coaching Venus and Serena what would you do? I believe in Serena's game; what would you do to help her get back to the top?

Mike Agassi: I would love to have them both over my house. Let me ask you a question: why is the depth of men's tennis so great? The guy who is 112 in the world can beat the guy who is number 3 in the world, right?

Tennis Week: Right. Federer's losses were all to guys outside the top 10 this year.

Mike Agassi: Why? Because they always practice against men and they hit the championship ball the men hit and therefore they are used to the pace of the top 10 men and they can return their ball. I was talking with Serena's father and I said: "the reason your daughters are losing is because they are practicing with men." With the men, they hit the big shot that would be the winner against the women, but the men return it. You hit the big serve and the man returns, hit bigger and the men still returns it. You try to hit bigger and bigger until the ball goes out. Then you lose your serve and you lose your confidence. You hit crosscourt big ball and the man is going to return it, you hit another big ball and the man returns it again and the third ball you try to hit even bigger and it goes out. Why? Because you are muscling it. That's the way your game goes down. Their game has gone down. They hit, once in a while, great balls, but their game has gone down a bit. The Russian girls compete against each other and you see Russian girls win three of the four Grand Slams this year. They are absolutely not half of the talent of Serena Williams and Venus Williams. Serena Williams and Venus Williams don't have their confidence on their shots anymore.

Tennis Week: But doesn't that confidence come from success on the court? Winning matches gives you confidence, right? So what's the solution?

Mike Agassi: Stop practicing with the men. Serena and Venus, stop practicing with the men. Most of our American girls think if they practice with the men, he's a better player, then I'll get better. In some ways, yes, you get better playing with the better player. But you have to hit the ball — not just the big ball, but other shots (angles) — to see if the women can return it or not. I would like to see them play one women, Serena or Venus, against too good players on the other side in practice. Practice against two of them and if you can make the point against two good women then you can make the point against any of these girls in the world. I have told Andre and Brad Gilbert a hundred times: play one against two to improve your volley, but no, Brad Gilbert goes there and hits against Andre. I said: "Brad, if you were good enough to play against Andre, you would go on the tour and make more money." He always had answers. He hit one ball, he talks 10 minutes. He hit one ball, he talks 10 minutes. Then in two hours, Andre has only hit 30 balls.

more at:

http://www.sportsmediainc.com/tenni...howarticle&newsid=11893&bannerregion=
 
Re: Good interview w/Mike Agassi about Gilbert,Roddick, Fede

Kevin Patrick said:
Mike Agassi: Rios was like that. He reminds me of Andre and in one way he was something better than Andre: you couldn’t read his contact point and direction of the ball. Do you know the beauty of a mirror? If you throw light at a mirror at five degrees, then the light comes back five degrees the other side, correct? Now if the ball comes at your hand and if you meet the ball with an angle on the racquet then they cannot read your shot and where the ball is coming. Do you know what I’m talking about? Do you understand?

I don't know much about Mike Agassi before. It seems he is very knowledgable and objective. It is refreshing for him to say he sees Rios is a better version of Andre. I always thought of that.
 
Mike Agassi knows his shtuff, it's obvious. He's a little egomaniacal, but the "let me ask you a question" thing is funny.
 
Guy really knows what hes talking about. That "can I ask you a question" stuff is annoying though. If I was doing the interview I would have to tell him to STFU.
 
Re: Good interview w/Mike Agassi about Gilbert,Roddick, Fede

The tennis guy said:
I don't know much about Mike Agassi before. It seems he is very knowledgable and objective. It is refreshing for him to say he sees Rios is a better version of Andre. I always thought of that.

I like Rios' game but its hard to see how he was better than Andre in any way.

0 grandslams for Rios versus 8 for Andre.

Rios 6 weeks at number 1, Andre 101 weeks.


Rios when his game was on could beat anybody, but so could Andre and a host of other players.
 
Thanks for this interview.

The stuff about Gilbert talking too much ... could be a cause of being fired both by Agassi and by ARod ...
 
Kevin Patrick said:
Just read on tennisreporters.net that the Gilbert-Roddick split may have been about money

Well, many of these splits ARE about money. I think that Fed's split from Lundgren was about the money too .... like why should I pay him money when I can manage without him?

I think that one of the main reasons Safin has problems with coaches is the money he is willing to pay.
 
Re: Good interview w/Mike Agassi about Gilbert,Roddick, Fede

Trey said:
The tennis guy said:
I don't know much about Mike Agassi before. It seems he is very knowledgable and objective. It is refreshing for him to say he sees Rios is a better version of Andre. I always thought of that.

I like Rios' game but its hard to see how he was better than Andre in any way.

0 grandslams for Rios versus 8 for Andre.

Rios 6 weeks at number 1, Andre 101 weeks.


Rios when his game was on could beat anybody, but so could Andre and a host of other players.

No one is talking about achievement. Mike Agassi wasn't talking about achievement. He is talking about technique. I guess you are NOT a technique person. Many people in tennis world said so back then. It is just refreshing for Andre's father to be able to see it.
 
Re: Good interview w/Mike Agassi about Gilbert,Roddick, Fede

The tennis guy said:
No one is talking about achievement. Mike Agassi wasn't talking about achievement. He is talking about technique. I guess you are NOT a technique person. Many people in tennis world said so back then. It is just refreshing for Andre's father to be able to see it.

Actually if you read what he said he did not say that Rios' overall technique was better than Andre's he said Rios' game reminds him of Andres and in ONE aspect of his game is better- Namely you couldn't read his contact point and direction of his ball. This says nothing about the remainder of his game or technique.

You are the one who than inferred that he claimed that Rios was a better version of Andre.

I think if you asked Mike Agassi if Rios had overall better technique or that he considered Rios a better version of Andre he would probably not agree.
 
agassi learned to hit the ball on the rise cuz they saw becker do it ? i never heard that one before.

also the extra long racquet idea would wreak havoc on agassis game i think esp. on the return of serve unless he choked up on the racquet or something for groundstrokes
 
Re: Good interview w/Mike Agassi about Gilbert,Roddick, Fede

Trey said:
The tennis guy said:
No one is talking about achievement. Mike Agassi wasn't talking about achievement. He is talking about technique. I guess you are NOT a technique person. Many people in tennis world said so back then. It is just refreshing for Andre's father to be able to see it.

Actually if you read what he said he did not say that Rios' overall technique was better than Andre's he said Rios' game reminds him of Andres and in ONE aspect of his game is better- Namely you couldn't read his contact point and direction of his ball. This says nothing about the remainder of his game or technique.

You are the one who than inferred that he claimed that Rios was a better version of Andre.

I think if you asked Mike Agassi if Rios had overall better technique or that he considered Rios a better version of Andre he would probably not agree.

Mike is basically comparing what they are able to do with the ball.
Obviously he's saying Rios is able to disguise the shot better than Andre Agassi while taking the ball as early as Andre. So he's imply Rios was more advanced version of Andre.
Also, how you hit the ball is related to technique. So in a sense, it does relate to comparison of their technique.

But these don't necessarily mean if Andre is better player or if Rios has a better technique. Rios was able to incorporate a lot of wrist to direct / disguise his shot. But he didn't have hearts of Agassi.
 
Re: Good interview w/Mike Agassi about Gilbert,Roddick, Fede

Kevin Patrick said:
Mike Agassi: I taught Andre to take the ball on the rise because I saw Boris Becker once do that.

Bull.

Becker YOB is 1967.
Agassi YOB is 1970.
When exactly did Agassi started taking the ball early?

Kevin Patrick said:
Mike Agassi:
[snip]
I was talking with Serena's father and I said: "the reason your daughters are losing is because they are practicing with men." With the men, they hit the big shot that would be the winner against the women, but the men return it. You hit the big serve and the man returns, hit bigger and the men still returns it. You try to hit bigger and bigger until the ball goes out. Then you lose your serve and you lose your confidence. You hit crosscourt big ball and the man is going to return it, you hit another big ball and the man returns it again and the third ball you try to hit even bigger and it goes out. Why? Because you are muscling it. That's the way your game goes down. Their game has gone down. They hit, once in a while, great balls, but their game has gone down a bit. The Russian girls compete against each other and you see Russian girls win three of the four Grand Slams this year. They are absolutely not half of the talent of Serena Williams and Venus Williams. Serena Williams and Venus Williams don't have their confidence on their shots anymore.
[snip]

Double BULL.
When Serena and Venus WERE practicing they made WTA boring because the
only competition for one Williams was other Williams.
You hit with better players => you become a better player.

Mike Agassi is full of sh*t

Regards, Predrag
 
Gee what a shock. After reading Nick B's promos I thought he was the whole reason AA was a great player. Then I hear Brad Gilbert say basically he made Andre the player he was. Now I realize it was Mike Agassi. Who would have thunk it was the father who worked with him from the time he was an infant?
 
i thought that was a little weird as far as the becker\ taking the ball on the rise thing. agassi turned pro in '86, a year after becker won wimby at 17. somethin' doesn't add up there, mikey. lemme ask you a question...
 
Pete Sampras tells an interesting story about Mike Agassi in one of his interviews. Seems he and Andre were competing in a junior tournament somewhere in SoCal. Andre placed second in the tournamnet and brought the trophy to his dad. Mr. Agassi walked over to a garbage and can threw it in. Mike Agassi also packed Andre off to NB's academy when he was 14?

ESPN had a program on Andre Agassi. Seems he hated being at NB's academy, something about wanting to be at home. Agassi played one of the best juniors in the state of Florida at a tournament. Agassi beat the crap out of him. Agassi wore a pair of blue jeans (full length) in the finals. Agassi used to show up at tournaments with eye shadow on, just to get a rise out of Nick (which he did).

It would appear that Mike Agassi wasn't quite the all-around dad that he portrays himself to be. Looks like Andre Agassi sacrificed quite a bit to get to be where he is today and not all by his choice.
 
Brettolius said:
i thought that was a little weird as far as the becker\ taking the ball on the rise thing. agassi turned pro in '86, a year after becker won wimby at 17. somethin' doesn't add up there, mikey. lemme ask you a question...

You certainly have a point:-)

However, Becker was being known in pro circles since he was 14 or so and started beating pros in challengers or thereabouts. Thus, who knows?

Not sure what interest Mike would have to mention Becker in this context, if it weren't true.
 
An interviewer once asked Andre where his father was from. Andre replied "He is from hell."

Mike (not his real name, I think it is Emmanuel?) emigrated to the US from Iran and he is of Armenian descent. His family had some sort of lumber business in Iran. ( I think the family name is "Agassian" but they changed it at some point.) He was a boxer (Lightweight?) for the Iranian Olympic team and fought some Golden Gloves matches as a young man in the Chicago area. (Boxing was much bigger in the US in 1940's and 1950's then it is now.) Andre tells an anecdote about his dad. Mike was supposed to fight a guy who was comparable in ability and at the last moment the guy was replaced by a pro who had 80 some victories. At the last moment, Mike decided he didn't want to take a beating and climbed out locker room window. That was the end of his boxing career. He moved to Vegas and worked in the casinos. He was something like a maitre 'd, head of staff, etc. He took up tennis and became a teaching pro at some point. And absolutely grilled his kids with regard to tennis (ie., Andre's older brother, his sister (Rita?), etc.) Andre's sister was married to Pancho Gonzales, the last of his six wives. (There must have been about a thirty year age difference and he reportedly beat the hell out of her.) So, Mike raised his kids like a tennis drill sergeant. I imagine some of them ended up hating tennis. But Andre prevailed, and has made a few bucks since.

My former girlfriend played juniors as a kid in Nevada and stayed at the Agassi house when Andre was about 12. She said he was sort of a brat, but no wonder he had an attitude given the circumstances. She mentioned the court Mike had built in the backyard and that Andre hit the ball as hard as he could even as a yute.

Anyway, all's well that ends well. Andre seems like a pretty happy camper these days. So, I guess it was all worth it.

I caught the Becker comment, too. Didn't make sense to me either. I don't think Becker was the first guy to take the ball on the rise.
 
Rabbit said:
Pete Sampras tells an interesting story about Mike Agassi in one of his interviews. Seems he and Andre were competing in a junior tournament somewhere in SoCal. Andre placed second in the tournamnet and brought the trophy to his dad. Mr. Agassi walked over to a garbage and can threw it in. Mike Agassi also packed Andre off to NB's academy when he was 14?

ESPN had a program on Andre Agassi. Seems he hated being at NB's academy, something about wanting to be at home. Agassi played one of the best juniors in the state of Florida at a tournament. Agassi beat the crap out of him. Agassi wore a pair of blue jeans (full length) in the finals. Agassi used to show up at tournaments with eye shadow on, just to get a rise out of Nick (which he did).

It would appear that Mike Agassi wasn't quite the all-around dad that he portrays himself to be. Looks like Andre Agassi sacrificed quite a bit to get to be where he is today and not all by his choice.

That's well known story to public. Mike claims different. Mike said that Agassi was playing Jim Courier, and everything that Agassi hit was out, and everything Couier hit was in. So after a set or something like that, Mike told Agassi to stop and go home. I guess the umpire or offical came cleared issues and Agassi kept on playing. Agassi lost and didn't want to stay for trophy ceremony, but Mike told Agassi that it wasn't right thing to do. When Agassi got the trophy, he said he didn't want the thing. So Mike Agassi told him to throw it away....I guess Agassi did't have hearts to do it, and asked Mike to do it...So Mike went and throw it away.

Every story has two sides to it...

Mike did send Andre to Nick B's academy when he was 14. In Nick B's book , Nikc B says that Mike told him Andre was fooling around, not practicing...I thikn Andre and Mike were on pretty bad terms at then...
 
i think both jun's and rabbit's stories are true, or at least based on different incidents rather than two sides of the same incident.

mike agassi was destined for one of two stations in life: maitre'd/casino host in Vegas in the seedy '70's, or used car salesman someplace in northern New Jersey. Can't you just see him on TV screaming, "LEMME ASK YOU A QUESTION, YOU THINK YOU"RE GONNA BEAT THESE DEALS? COME ON DOWN TO THE 1977 ANNUAL CLEARANCE EVENT!!"
 
Back
Top