Grand Slam Prize Money is out of control

3fees

G.O.A.T.
Women at Grand Slam Events are being paid more money then the men in these events,,women play best 2 out of 3,,men best 3 out of 5 and get the same prize money,,this is absurd,,, Heres what Gilles Simon said about this recently. Why has other ATP members on the Player Council not defended the mens circuit ?

Simon, Citing Court Time, Says Women Should Not Receive Equal Prize Money

"WIMBLEDON, England — Gilles Simon, a Frenchman seeded 13th and freshly elected to the ATP Player Council, told French reporters on Monday that he was opposed to women receiving equal prize money as men.

“I think that men’s tennis is really ahead of women’s tennis at this stage,” he told the radio station France Info after winning his first-round match. “Once more, the men spent surely twice as much time on court as the women at the French Open. We often talk about salary equality. I don’t think it’s something that works in sport. I think we are the only sport that has parity with the women in terms of prize money. Meanwhile, men’s tennis remains more attractive than women’s tennis at this moment.”

In 2007, Wimbledon became the last of the four Grand Slam tournaments to award equal prize money to the women. The United States Open was the first in 1973.

But the men’s and women’s tours operate independently, and there are still disparities in the prize money that women earn at their own top-tier tour events compared with the men’s top-tier events.

In an interview with the French sports newspaper L’Equipe that appeared on Monday, Simon also said that he was upset that the men’s tour had agreed to make the tournament in Rome a joint event with the women without consulting him and some other men’s players directly.


“The year before, the women, for their final, they had 20 spectators,” he said. “And so, in that case, you save them, but when you want a practice court, there aren’t any left.”

Simon, looking ahead to his term on the ATP Players Council, made other suggestions during the L’Equipe interview that had nothing to do with women’s tennis. He wants to reduce the number of Masters 1000 tournaments that the leading men are required to play from eight out of nine to six out of nine. He also wants to cut the participatory requirements for Masters 500 tournaments.

But those won’t be the proposals that will attract the most attention.

“Am I going to incur the wrath of feminist organizations? I don’t care,” said Simon, pointing to the fact that women contest matches over best-of-three sets at the Grand Slam tournaments while the men play best-of-five set matches. "

Under Equal pay for equal work women should play best of 5 set or get paid less for less work.

Cheers
3fees :)
 

sureshs

Bionic Poster
The fool should understand that it is not his money, and equal prize money is a statement about injustice in the past and a testimony to the struggle of women to even be allowed to play sporst. It is not about the money, it is about the principle. His sense of "truth" is the typical petulant whining of males who suddenly believe in equality only when it affects them, even indirectly, and become champions of equal rights. Then when it comes to something important to someone else, they go into a state of indifference.
 
I don't know how far further Simon may go with this, but at least he seems to be outspoken about the issue, I wonder if any other players will follow suit
 

mike84

Professional
The fool should understand that it is not his money, and equal prize money is a statement about injustice in the past and a testimony to the struggle of women to even be allowed to play sporst. It is not about the money, it is about the principle. His sense of "truth" is the typical petulant whining of males who suddenly believe in equality only when it affects them, even indirectly, and become champions of equal rights. Then when it comes to something important to someone else, they go into a state of indifference.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

face palm.
 
Fed would get his ar$e kicked by Mirka if he agreed w/Simon.

But I think the main solution should be to get more prize money into the hands of players. The promoters in tennis seem like slime compared to a lot of other sports. I can't recall where, maybe it was what Tipsaravic mentioned recently, but tennis events only dole out I think <12% of total income for the event as prize money where as other sports have a much higher take. I think boosting that and then maybe giving men more due to the longer matches would be acceptable to everyone if it meant more money overall.

I think tennis is awesome but you can't eke out a living if you are outside of the top 75 it seems. The league min for the NFL is $340k or so and there are about 32 teams with rosters of about 52 players so basically if you are the 1,664th best player in this sport, u make real money. The team sports have massive bargaining power and are at another level but I think the players unions in tennis should try to band together more if possible to get the promoters/organizers to kick out more money.
 
Top