DRII
G.O.A.T.
you and Bealtesfan are definitely sisters!Why stop at age 31 though? Or was Nadal the main focus of your post?
you and Bealtesfan are definitely sisters!Why stop at age 31 though? Or was Nadal the main focus of your post?
I've already said I'll update it as I go. This is not an anti-Fed thread - no one is denying his three slams at age 35 & 36
Yeah, but two of them have turned 31. So atleast there can be comparison b/w 2 (if not 3). And that is why OP says TBA in front of Djokovic's name. Beyond 31, there is only Roger. So makes no comparison.
Seriously? Is it that difficult to understand?
Yes, but I don't see how being so good that you can win one slam 10 times is counted as a negative on your resume when you have more than proven yoruself on all surfaces. I would 100% agree if say, he had failed to win a Wimby title or won 16 RG titles - he would be great but have huge holes in his resume (ala Pete) but a slam is a slam - expecially if you've won them all. Most players would dream about being able to 'pad' their resume with a slam win - they are not that easy. Fed, Rafa, Pete & Djoker are just that good that they make it look that way.
Why? Im male btwyou and Bealtesfan are definitely sisters!
Helps that AO wasn't as prestigious in the past as it's now.
Rafa has an opportunity to add to this on Sunday, taking his slam tally to 17 at age 32. Fed did not win any slams at 32. Djoker, being 31 this year has two opportunities left at Wimby and AO.
From 2007 to 2016 he always made the semi.You missed US Open.I think he can do very well there.Djokovic is very consistent at US Open - from 2010 to 2016 he reached the final on all occasions except 2014.So I think by the time US Open comes he could do well
You missed US Open.I think he can do very well there.Djokovic is very consistent at US Open - from 2010 to 2016 he reached the final on all occasions except 2014.So I think by the time US Open comes he could do well
Original post updated following the US Open. Here are the numbers at age 31:
Fed: 17
Rafa: 16
Djoker: 14
At age 31, Fed won 1 slam, Rafa 2 and Djoker 2
Age 32 looks like this
Fed: 17 (2013)
Rafa: 17 (2018)
Djoker: 14 - plus any slams he wins in 2019
Close. Especially if Djokovic picks up a couple at least next year as I think we all expect.
Djokovic has actually only 5 majors outside HC’s , I’m sure Nadal will love another Clay major even if it’s like Madrid type of clay , I think you should praise Nadal more for having more RG’s than Djokovic has AO & USO combinedWorth noting - slams won outside their favoured slam/where they have been most successful:
Federer - 12 slams outside of Wimbledon
Djokovic. - 7 outside of AO.
Nadal - 6 outside of RG.
AO is two weeks away. If Djoker scores a three-slam year, all ATG's will be on 17 slams at age 32.
Djokovic has actually only 5 majors outside HC’s , I’m sure Nadal will love another Clay major even if it’s like Madrid type of clay , I think you should praise Nadal more for having more RG’s than Djokovic has AO & USO combined
What I mean by age in this thread is the year that they turned that age:
Age 19:
Rafa 1
Fed 0
Djoker 0
Age 20:
Rafa 2
Fed 0
Djoker 0
Age 21:
Rafa 3
Djoker 1
Fed 0
Age 22:
Rafa 5
Djoker 1
Fed 1
Age 23:
Rafa 6
Fed 4
Djoker 1
Age 24:
Rafa 9
Fed 6
Djoker 4
Age 25:
Rafa 10
Fed 9
Djoker 5
Age 26:
Fed 12
Rafa 11
Djoker 6
Age 27:
Fed 13
Rafa 13
Djoker 7
Age 28:
Fed 15
Rafa 14
Djoker 10
Age 29:
Fed 16
Rafa 14
Djoker 12
Age 30:
Fed 16
Rafa 14
Djoker 12
Age 31:
Fed 17
Rafa 16
Djoker 14
Age 32:
Fed 17 (2013)
Rafa 17 (2018)
Djoker ?? (2019)
Age 33:
Fed 17 (2014)
Rafa ?? (2019)
Djoker ?? (2020)
Age 34:
Fed 17 (2015)
Rafa ?? (2020)
Djoker ?? (2021)
Age 35:
Fed 17 (2016)
Rafa ?? (2021)
Djoker ?? (2022)
Age 36:
Fed 19 (2017)
Rafa ?? (2022)
Djoker ?? (2023)
Age 37:
Fed 20 (2018)
Rafa ?? (2023)
Djoker ?? (2024)
I'll update as we go
Last Updated: 31/12/2018
The bit in bold is incorrect. Federer won his first Wimbledon when he was still 21. He turned 22 a month later.
First sentence bruh
"What I mean by age in this thread is the year that they turned that age"
Strange way of looking at it.
If you turn 21 on Dec 31st, then despite playing tennis all year as a 20 year old, it counts according to this as the year he turned 21?
Yes in that particular case it is.
But Federer was 21+11/12 years old which is closer to 22 than it is to 21. So I get OPs reasoning for the Big 3.
AO is two weeks away. If Djoker scores a three-slam year, all ATG's will be on 17 slams at age 32.
I don't think Nadal will be highly competitive outside the French this year. He got lucky with Wimbledon and USO.
Age 22:
Rafa 5
Djoker 1
Fed 1
Age 27:
Fed 13
Rafa 13
Djoker 7
Age 31:
Fed 17
Rafa 16
Djoker 14
I know it's unrealistic, but I'm just imagining the tension if Nadal won RG and Novak won the other 3! 17, 18, 20! Or more realistically, Novak wins AO and WIM, Nadal wins RG and USO. 16, 19, 20. Maybe a dark horse in there takes one away for 16, 18, 20.It is pretty exciting going into a season where the slam race is in reverse order of likelyhood of winning slams this year:
Djoker (the form player of the ATG3 and favourite for three of the four slams): 14
Rafa (favourite for at least one slam, will be highly competitive in the other three): 17
Fed (not favourite to win a slam but very dangerous still): 20
I know it's unrealistic, but I'm just imagining the tension if Nadal won RG and Novak won the other 3! 17, 18, 20! Or more realistically, Novak wins AO and WIM, Nadal wins RG and USO. 16, 19, 20. Maybe a dark horse in there takes one away for 16, 18, 20.
In any case, I'm rooting for the 1st possibility - 17, 18, 20 would lead to so much excitement in the 2020 season! Oh, this season is going to be so exciting, just to see where we end up!
What surprises me most is the size of the gaps over the years. At one point, Rafa had 4 more slams than either Djokovic or Federer at that point in their lives. Afterward, Federer took the lead, and now Rafa's caught up to Federer!
On top of that, even after being behind both of his rivals by 6 slams at the age of 27, Djokovic managed to lower that gap to 2 and 3, respectively, with a decent shot of making it even smaller by year's end!
My, this race is turning out to be exciting.
Agreed! Djoker was charging back in 2015 - 2016. He's now picking up momentum again. The swings and round abouts of the race are incredible. If Djoker hadn't fallen off his perch in 2016 it could have easily been something like 17,16,15. But his dip allowed Fedal to put an extra three each on the scoreboard. If Rafa had held the break in the 5th set at AO 2017 and won it it would be 19,18 right now.
I'm loving 20,17,14 going into the new season though - it is balanced so delicately. Fed feeling the two charging up behind him and Djoker putting pressure on him at AO & Wimby which reduces his chances of increasing his lead. So much pressure on Rafa at RG to keep the slams ticking over and with Djoker back in form less opportunity at AO, Wimby & USO. And Djoker, the most inform player of the three but with all of the work to do. Great to see that the ATG3 rivarly is climaxing in a way that it deserved to.
Just accept itSince Nadal has been playing Fed for the past 14 years, how can it possibly be "weak?" Never mind about Djoker, another ATG, who Fed had to play in 3 slam finals we when the age differential was 34/28 and 35/29.
If Roger's era was weak, then so was Nadal's.
What most people miss though is Rafa actually had a huge lead until age 25, after which Fed catches up and takes the lead to date. T
What I think will happen is this; - Nadl will be the first to retire (by age). He matured very early and therefore he will be the first to go. Fedr and Novk matured later and have been playing on the higher level later into their careers. Fedr is already a proof of my theory. My prediction is that Nadl will retire before he turns 35. Novk will play into his late 30's just like Fedr except if his NEW AGE BS and Pepe influence him to become a new Sai Baba.
Slams won at 28-31:
Djokovic 7, Nadal 3, Federer 2
This year?Give me your predictions for the slam count at the end of this year by age (32) - I'm going to go:
Rafa 18
Fed 17
Djoker 17
This year?
Rafa 18
Fed 17
Djokovic 16 + whatever he gets next year.
Yes I meant this year. I actually made a mistake with my post (post # 90) because Rafa was 32 last year which means that he and Fed are locked in on 17, only Djoker can advance his tally.
So my prediction is all three on 17 at the end of the year they turned 32 and for me that sums up the ATG 3
lol - made two slam semis by luck. You could argue that with a little luck he would have made the AO semi, the USO semi and been the Wimby champion
Dude, he made Wimbledom quarters 1st time in 7 years and USO he got burned by Thiem after previous year having arguably easiest draw all time and before that losing to Pouille.
He another puff draw at AO. You think ITF don't manipulate draws to garner higher attendance and viewership???
Federer played in the strongest, most competitive era from 28-31. Djokovic and Nadal are being given slam finals for free these days.