Mine has the non weighted trapdoor with those specs I quoted.I can't find a pro that is 315 or less!
Same feeling here...I now own both. I prefer the solid feel of the Pro, and how it moves through the air. The Tour feels more flexible in the hoop, well mine feel more flexible all around to the Pro.
The Tour has a bit more easy spin. The grommets are different from the Pro, so that's one of the things likely influencing the spin as the string pattern appears similar.
I would argue the pro has a bit better control, likely due to the stiffer hoop.
That said, I can and often swap them during practice and get similar results.
I am currently trying to train myself to use the Pro mostly because the feel is so good and it is rather accurate.
Same feeling here...
And I don't know if its the 20 beam of the Pro but I find it more manouvrable than the Tour despite the higher swingweight
Yes I started with the Tour because on paper the Pro was not supposed to suit my intermediate level. I've never thought I would be for me cause everybody comments how demanding it is...
Then when I tried it I love the more stable feel and headlight balance for serve. And for some reason by weak 2HBH becomes great with this frame...
I use hyper G soft 115 or Hyper G 110 though to lower the swingweight... around 325 with is still manageable... the 315 SW of the Tour is a non sense. Especially since the 32cm balance doesn't allow for a lot of lead on the hoop....
You mean the listed sw on the tour is wrong? I have read it is already in the 320s which would be great for me. I use 1.25 gauge strings.
Am hoping to just need a little lead if any at 12 and then a leather grip to get mine how I want it.
Yes, they fit no problemLooks like my Tour is shipping out. I am thinking to mod it lightly - leather grip in handle for some tailweight and stability and a gram or 2 at 12 if the unstrung SW is not already at 295. I am hoping with the thicker beam it should be more stable and not need much else.
@dr325i do you know if the 2021 graphene 360+ GT grommets will fit on the new auxetic version?
I'm probably switching to the Tour and/or Pro, from my Yonex'es, with a possible outlier in the Pure Strike VS (can't demo that one).
I've owned the first gen Tour, and first and second gen Pro before, so I had a pretty good idea before testing them again yesterday.
First of all, the Pro has an epic feel, and I love everything about it. But with the demo setup, I have an acknowledge I lack the brute force this racket requires to constantly apply pressure. When I managed, it was glorious though. The Tour also impressed me as well. Not as sweet as the Pro, but a very nice feel, esp for a modern (Head) racket, and I got much easier depth and net clearance. Tried them alongside the Auxetic Radical MP (second outing) which felt hollow and tinny, in comparison.
I'll probably get both, with the Tour being the main squeeze for matches.
330 grams on the nose. Just weighed it. That’s with a beefed up syntec pro og.330 with og???
I'll take it!
amazing330 grams on the nose. Just weighed it. That’s with a beefed up syntec pro og.
Hey guys! A new Gravity Tour owner here. Due to problems with tennis elbow I ditched the Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd gen + poly strings.
I use Velocity @ 55lbs multi at the moment (full bed), but I miss the power and spin, which was easily accessible on the Pure Strike.
I am thinking about trying a hybrid with Velocity mains and poly cross (at lower tension). Or try Triax.
Does anyone have similar experience and found a solution with multi or hybrid setup?
I'm a big fan of Black Knight/Ghostwire or Firewire Boost...poly/poly hybrids...or you can go even softer and just do a full bed of Ghostwire...soft string.Hey guys! A new Gravity Tour owner here. Due to problems with tennis elbow I ditched the Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd gen + poly strings.
I use Velocity @ 55lbs multi at the moment (full bed), but I miss the power and spin, which was easily accessible on the Pure Strike.
I am thinking about trying a hybrid with Velocity mains and poly cross (at lower tension). Or try Triax.
Does anyone have similar experience and found a solution with multi or hybrid setup?
The Auxetic Tour is a pure plushness. Extremely comfortable frame. To me, it feels more plush than the Auxetic Gravity Pro I tested
Hey guys! A new Gravity Tour owner here. Due to problems with tennis elbow I ditched the Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd gen + poly strings.
I use Velocity @ 55lbs multi at the moment (full bed), but I miss the power and spin, which was easily accessible on the Pure Strike.
I am thinking about trying a hybrid with Velocity mains and poly cross (at lower tension). Or try Triax.
Does anyone have similar experience and found a solution with multi or hybrid setup?
So now that you have the pro and tour in the bag. Have you ever hit the MP?I finally got mine from Germany and I was able to easily match it up dead on to my Gravity Pro - 310/296SW/318 balance which is a little underspec at 310 grams but plays like a dream.
Anyway I will be playing these frames at the exact same weight/SW and balance, plus same string job and tension. As close as possible. Just bouncing the ball off the Tour, I already got the impressions that this frame will be very plush. It will be fun to go back and forth between these 2 for a while and see if one sticks out to me as a favorite.
Probably won’t any time soon. I can say that I just hit in 40 degree weather and the Tour is indeed very plush. Not as connected to the ball as the pro but the feel is fantastic. Both the pro and tour are awesome with the tour being the softer option to go for.So now that you have the pro and tour in the bag. Have you ever hit the MP?
so i own the pro. and its a really nice frame. but at the end of the day. its an 18x20. theres always that bit of pop and spin that is gonna be missing. the mp is my personal fave over the pro. the mp bridges the gap from the tweeners to the grav.Probably won’t any time soon. I can say that I just hit in 40 degree weather and the Tour is indeed very plush. Not as connected to the ball as the pro but the feel is fantastic. Both the pro and tour are awesome with the tour being the softer option to go for.
The layup is made specifically for the Gravity tour. The MP has a similar layup but not the same.@dr325i inwas able to hit with it today and the feel is indeed soft and plush. Awesome layup. Just curious if you know the story behind the layup (is it used in other head/pro stock frames) and also what made head decide to change the Tour version up?
I hope it makes it to the U.S. I think people who want a soft, classic feel would like it a lot. No real drop off in power from the pro so far that I can tell.
The layup is made specifically for the Gravity tour. The MP has a similar layup but not the same.
I am using the TGT341.2, the pro stock version of the retail and living the feel and ability to customize them to my exact spec.
The only complaint I have is that the bumper is too short and one side of all of my frames, just below the bumper ending is pretty much completely scraped off…
If you end up liking them (after the honeymoon period), I suggest to stock up on them![]()
If you end up liking them (after the honeymoon period), I suggest to stock up on them![]()
All good things disappear or change at some pointAre you saying the Tour might disappear at some point?
Nah, you should be good for the Aux 2.0Should the Gravity MP fans stock up as well?
I have matches with my G Tours where I absolutely love them and am convinced it should be my main frame, then weird ones where I seem to shank every other ball and just don't play my best with them.
Whereas with my PK Q Tours I hardly ever mishit it and just have 100% confidence with every swing. You'd think with the generous head size and shape of the Gravities it'd be the other way round.
Where did you even locate an Auxetic GT? You may have mentioned, but I missed it. If I could find one in L4, I'd probably grab it.Tour has started to grow on me with the warmer weather lately. I can feel the ball a lot better when it's not super hard and barely bouncing. The feel of the Tour is superb and it seems to pack a pretty good punch for the lower flex. Trying to think of a better feeling Head frame that has been released recently. I guess the PT 2.0, PC 2.0 and maybe the new Prestiges are there, but I have not hit with them.
But that said, those are all pretty demanding frames and the Gravity is the easier frame to use by a pretty good amount. So in terms of a 100 sqi, modern frame, I think the Gravities are the best option out there when it comes to maximum feel. The Tour really magnifies this. Feels as good as the Head Pro Stocks I have owned.
I wish they offered 300 and 315 in an 18x20. I feel like 325g is too much frame for me at this point, but the 2019 q+ tour pro 325 I demoed was an amazing experience. The frame swung lighter and played bigger than its specs would indicate.I have matches with my G Tours where I absolutely love them and am convinced it should be my main frame, then weird ones where I seem to shank every other ball and just don't play my best with them.
Whereas with my PK Q Tours I hardly ever mishit it and just have 100% confidence with every swing. You'd think with the generous head size and shape of the Gravities it'd be the other way round.
Nice you use a green Q tour? How is the feel on that frame compared to the Gravity Tour? I have the Q+5X Pro in my bag next to my gravities. Really nice, modern feel to it. Probably the best feeling tweener frame I have ever used. I think the Q Tours are more classic in feel?
Where did you even locate an Auxetic GT? You may have mentioned, but I missed it. If I could find one in L4, I'd probably grab it.
I wish they offered 300 and 315 in an 18x20. I feel like 325g is too much frame for me at this point, but the 2019 q+ tour pro 325 I demoed was an amazing experience. The frame swung lighter and played bigger than its specs would indicate.
Human nature wins this one. The GT is a forbidden gem for us in the U.S., so it's clearly the best because we can't have it. My younger son owns two GTs (one of each previous version), and anytime I hit with them I question why I don't switch. Oh yeah, I remember. They're not available in the U.S.Alright, three weeks playing with both, the Auxetic Gravity Tour and the Auxetic Gravity Pro strung with Alu Power Rough 50/48 and I am somehow still puzzled about which one suits me "better"... As mentioned a few weeks ago, the Tour came 310g unstrung, which was excellent for me... The strung Specs (with OG and dampener) are: W: 335g, B: 32.8 cm, SW 332. The Tour was spot on: W: 340g (315g unstrung), B: 32.4 cm, SW: 332. I added a second OG on the Tour and I got the identical specs, but removed it to compare the two as they are. It took me surprisingly half an hour to find the sweet spot, which is more towards the tip for both frames. I started the hitting sessions and the match during Week 1 with the Pro and then, switched to Tour. I did it the other way around during Week 2. I probably played my best tennis with the Pro, but only the the first 30 mins having a clear strategy and my body being still at 100%. However, things got more complicated after 45 mins or so when I started not hitting the sweet spot, playing shorter balls, having issues with maneuverability etc. Switching to the Tour was super easy and started to find my ball depth again, consistency etc. When I started the session / match with the Tour during Week 2, I needed probably 10-15 mins to adjust to the lively response of the stringbed compared to the Pro. Switching to the Pro was easy and felt that I am benefitting a lot just playing flat with this frame. Then again, the troubles start after the 30-45 mins. Overall, the Pro is amazing if you have a linear flat stroke AND are in a very good shape. I think 10 years ago, I would have switched to it without even thinking; it has a nice raw feel to it and it's heaven if you play aggressively throughout the whole match. On the other hand, the Tour is more versatile, also when it come to playing a heavy-spin ball, probably because of the lively response of the stringbed. It is the winner if you vary your shots and play in a more creative way. Both played great at the net while the Pro was "ssslightly" better with target serves. As I said, 10 years ago, when I was playing 6 times a week in Australia, I would have chosen the Pro. But the Tour is the winner for me today, as it give me more free power (not that much though), without sacrificing the precision. And it is the easier one to use while defending. I am still puzzled, since I feel that the Pro is the "better" frame in terms of response, feel, and touch... But it requires you to play very aggressively and to be in an excellent shape to win a long rally. So, the Tour it is for me, considering that I am only playing twice / three times a week nowadays and I am definitely not an offspring anymore! During week 3, I was playing with the GT and the Artengo TR960 CT 18x20 (LeMonf). I felt that both frame almost feel the same, play somewhat the same, but the GT is more forgiving, has more power, and is better on my forehand while the Tengo is marginally better for my OHBH. So, also here: advantage GT!! But for fairness, I musst have the Tengo strung with the same fresh strings (currently strung with a 6 weeks' old Hawk Touch 48/46) and adjust its specs to have these quasi identical to the GT in terms of W, SW & balance. More to come in the next weeks, but I doubt that this will dethrone the GT. We'll see...
i guess i can be your friend xdAnybody in the EU looking to add a new friend in the US?
Tour has a little more punch to it. Still takes some effort to hit out but probably a little less than the gp. You can weight it a little lighter too. The stock swingweight is pretty low though, I think the target was 285 and mine is 286. So I added 3 grams of lead at 12 under the bumper and 5 grams under buttcap.I own the GP and find Im flagging after a couple of sets. I think its more of a doubles racket as the ball comes to you. I bought a Tour version today as I was torn between the two in my initial purchase.
I'm going to string them with an identical multi at the same tension. Should be interesting to see how it plays.
The GP a tweener, really!? It should definitely be tough to handle if you are not used to 340-350g strung frames IMO. If you are coming from the Blade, you may only add 3 to 5 grams to the GT to get the SW around 330. Or just go with a 1.30 gauge strings (the string pattern is more open than the Blade) to bump that SW slightly up.My back up racket is currently the Blade 18x20. After using the GP for a couple of sets it feels like a tweener racket.
Im hoping the Tour will be a good substitute but Im worried about the weight. If I have to lead it , then It will be similar to its big brother.
It appears the Tour is circa 10g too light and the Pro is slightly too heavy. I guess Head will nail it in the next iteration.