Great Sports Illustrated Article on the AO Final

cknobman

Legend
Gotta appreciate and give credit to SI and John Wertheim on this outstanding article giving credit where credit is due and not falling into the same dog and pony show every other media outlet has.

Wawrinka outplays Nadal in strange, awkward Australian Open final

Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/tennis/news/20140126/stanislas-wawrinka-rafael-nadal-australian-open-final/#ixzz2rd1S9Zsu

MELBOURNE, Australia -- Three quick thoughts after Stanislas Wawrinka upset Rafael Nadal, 6-3, 6-2, 3-6, 6-3 on Sunday to win the Australian Open -- in the strangest, most awkward match you will ever see.

• Let's start by congratulating Wawrinka. Some players meet the moment in their first Grand Slam final. Others do not. But it's rare that a player faces the biggest match of his career and flat-out zones. For an hour Sunday, Wawrinka was clearly the better player. This was rogue tennis. He bullied Nadal from the baseline. He controlled long rallies. He sizzled the ball off both wings. He returned brilliantly. At one juncture, he won 12 straight points.
Serving at 0-2 in the second set, Nadal injured his back. After a six-minute medical timeout, he was scarcely mobile. This became a different match. To his credit, Nadal played on, understanding what was at stake, never mind that the outcome appeared settled. But then Wawrinka lost focus and Nadal took the third set. Wawrinka, though, steadied, returned from his "walkabout," as the Aussies would call it, and closed out the match 6-3 in the fourth set.
Given the awkward and bizarre circumstances, this could feel a little cheapened -- as evidenced by Wawrinka's fairly muted celebration -- but it shouldn't. Wawrinka earned this. A new confidence man, Wawrinka beat Novak Djokovic in a terrific quarterfinal match. He outlasted Tomas Berdych in the semifinals. Sunday, he played almost extravagant tennis for an hour. He became the first man in 20 years to beat the top two seeds at a major. Give the man the trophy. He earned it.

• Nadal was the overwhelming favorite to win this match. He beat Roger Federer with a breathtaking display on Friday night. He was playing in his 19th Grand Slam final, while Wawrinka was playing in his first. Wawrinka hadn't so much as won a set from Nadal in their previous 12 meetings.
And the evening could not have gone worse. He began the match tentative and nervous, uncorking errors and serving abysmally. (Where was that the other night? Federer surely wondered.) Then he tweaked his back and wasn't just in visible pain, but virtually incapacitated for several games. After returning to the court following a medical timeout, he was booed by the crowd (which appeared to rattle him further). He recovered -- and clawed back good will from the fans -- but, even after winning the third set, Nadal was clearly compromised.
He missed last year's Australian Open with an injury. He leaves this year's with another. With a chance to win his 14th Grand Slam -- which would have tied him with Pete Sampras and inched him closer to the record of another Swiss player -- Nadal was stoned. He'll be back for the French Open, which he's all but owned since 2005, but he'll likely look back on this as one that got away.
 

TennisCJC

Legend
To summarize:

1. Stan is the man
2. Nadal's MTO record earned him some well deserved boos from a very knowledgeable Aussie Open crowd. But, he lost to a better player on that day.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
Gotta appreciate and give credit to SI and John Wertheim on this outstanding article giving credit where credit is due and not falling into the same dog and pony show every other media outlet has.

Wawrinka outplays Nadal in strange, awkward Australian Open final

Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/tennis/news/20140126/stanislas-wawrinka-rafael-nadal-australian-open-final/#ixzz2rd1S9Zsu

Agree - credit where credit is due.
 

user92626

G.O.A.T.
To summarize:

1. Stan is the man
2. Nadal's MTO record earned him some well deserved boos from a very knowledgeable Aussie Open crowd. But, he lost to a better player on that day.

And this is all the insight and wisdom readers could get from a high esteem publication? Talk about easy fame and money.
 

AngieB

Banned
It should really be underscored how well Stan started the match in his first grand slam final. He came out with a definite game plan and executed well.

Whatever is said about Nadal's health during the finals, I can't say loudly enough that Stan's win wasn't a fluke by any means because two rounds earlier he took out Djokovic who was in the midst of a winning streak.

It is so rare that a male player defeats the top two players in the world to win a grand slam tournament.

This win will give Stan much more confidence approaching the big four in later rounds of grand slam events. If Stan plays similarly the rest of the year, it could be a great grand slam season.

AngieB
 

Backbored

Hall of Fame
To summarize:

1. Stan is the man
2. Nadal's MTO record earned him some well deserved boos from a very knowledgeable Aussie Open crowd. But, he lost to a better player on that day.

Because they were spot on, when they jeered Tomic off the court.
 

piteng

New User
Yes
and let's not forget in Grand Slams, endurance/ fitness is part of the game for winning formula.

If you play all out to win one match then better make sure you can play the next one- case in point monfils.

So while Stan the man 5 setted with Djoker, Nadal cruised and yet still was "hobbled"

Stan won fair square- congrats stanely manly
 

cknobman

Legend
Nadal was not hobbled.

Check this vid of a ralley in the fourth set and tell me if you can see a single hint of injury. The rally was so brutal and the slide Nadal made to get a backhand at the end would not be possible on an injured back. Then look at Nadals immediate recovery with no signs of pain.

http://youtu.be/0QfZRleH7q0
 
Top