Greatest of 3 More Great Classics

Greatest of 3 Classics

  • Federer vs Safin 2005

    Votes: 23 34.3%
  • Nadal vs Verdasco 2009

    Votes: 31 46.3%
  • Djokovic vs Wawrinka 2013

    Votes: 13 19.4%

  • Total voters
    67

Cabeza del Demonio

Professional
3 unforgettable Australian Open matches between the dominant World #1 at the peak of his career and a talented shotmaker playing the match of his life.

Federer vs Safin 2005 - Only one man could match the great Roger Federer for talent, and that was the mercurial Russian, Marat Safin. A few months on from playing one of history's greatest tiebreaks, Federer and Safin produced a match of stratospheric quality, an exhibition of powerful, aggressive tennis. Both players found them staring down the barrel numerous times near the end, raising their level with fearless shotmaking to heighten the drama and keep the capacity crowd on the edge of their seats, until Safin sent Federer to the ground one last time to hand him his only Slam loss off clay between 2003 and 2008.

Nadal vs Verdasco 2009 - The result of an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object. Nadal was in the form of his life, having finally taken Wimbledon from Federer in a drama-filled marathon final and standing atop the rankings for the first time in his career. But he faced his sternest test yet against his countryman who had already defeated Andy Murray and didn't look to stop there. Verdasco burst out of the blocks with a brilliant display of baseline aggression to take the first set. But Nadal raised his level, defending like a rock wall and denying Verdasco any cheap points. The ultimate battle of attack vs defense seemed interminable, lasting 5 hr 14 min - the longest match in AO history - but Nadal hung on just long enough for Verdasco to crumble in the end.

Djokovic vs Wawrinka 2013 - "We expected the routine. We got the extraordinary." The commentator's words perfectly summed up one of the greatest and most unexpected matches of all time. The Serb superstar was chasing a 3rd consecutive AO title and a spot in the history books, but Wawrinka made sure he would have to earn it the hard way. The Stanimal came out guns blazing, producing his best tennis yet to put Djokovic on the back foot. But the champion dug deep, defending against Wawrinka's haymakers like his life depended on it, to level the match. The quality did not let up one bit, both players playing at their very highest level and giving the crowd a treat. As the match entered its 6th hour, not a single spectator had left - they were seeing something like a movie play out before them in real time. The match hit its climax in the last game, with both players producing scintillating winners out of nowhere, bringing the crowd to their feet every point. The match seemed all but lost for the young champion, but Djokovic showed the world one more time why he was the world's best player, scrambling for one last epic backhand pass to come out victorious.
 
Last edited:
Right, the actual golden trio. The three top matches of the AO (this century for sure). Still can't choose. Nadasco had the highest average level but the least exciting fifth set, whereas the other two had epic fifth sets. Djokorinka started slow but reached the highest level in the fifth set. Saferer was the only one that did end in an upset after displays of great clutchness from both sides in the fifth set. Honestly I think trying to arrange them in order does more harm than good as that would make one match look better at the expense of the other two when all of them were absolute legendary tussles, the height of tennis.
 
Right, the actual golden trio. The three top matches of the AO (this century for sure). Still can't choose. Nadasco had the highest average level but the least exciting fifth set, whereas the other two had epic fifth sets. Djokorinka started slow but reached the highest level in the fifth set. Saferer was the only one that did end in an upset after displays of great clutchness from both sides in the fifth set. Honestly I think trying to arrange them in order does more harm than good as that would make one match look better at the expense of the other two when all of them were absolute legendary tussles, the height of tennis.
Agreed. Each match deserves to be GOAT itself.
I don't think any of the 3 were quite like the 2012 final though.
 
Good thread this and a nice change up. I agree they were all excellent matches. I think in the next few weeks I will try to rewach at least a few sets of each of these matches.
 
3 unforgettable Australian Open matches between the dominant World #1 at the peak of his career and a talented shotmaker playing the match of his life.

Federer vs Safin 2005 - Only one man could match the great Roger Federer for talent, and that was the mercurial Russian, Marat Safin. A few months on from playing one of history's greatest tiebreaks, Federer and Safin produced a match of stratospheric quality, an exhibition of powerful, aggressive tennis. Both players found them staring down the barrel numerous times near the end, raising their level with fearless shotmaking to heighten the drama and keep the capacity crowd on the edge of their seats, until Safin sent Federer to the ground one last time to hand him his only Slam loss off clay between 2003 and 2008.

Nadal vs Verdasco 2009 - The result of an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object. Nadal was in the form of his life, having finally taken Wimbledon from Federer in a drama-filled marathon final and standing atop the rankings for the first time in his career. But he faced his sternest test yet against his countryman who had already defeated Andy Murray and didn't look to stop there. Verdasco burst out of the blocks with a brilliant display of baseline aggression to take the first set. But Nadal raised his level, defending like a rock wall and denying Verdasco any cheap points. The ultimate battle of attack vs defense seemed interminable, lasting 5 hr 14 min - the longest match in AO history - but Nadal hung on just long enough for Verdasco to crumble in the end.

Djokovic vs Wawrinka 2013 - "We expected the routine. We got the extraordinary." The commentator's words perfectly summed up one of the greatest and most unexpected matches of all time. The Serb superstar was chasing a 3rd consecutive AO title and a spot in the history books, but Wawrinka made sure he would have to earn it the hard way. The Stanimal came out guns blazing, producing his best tennis yet to put Djokovic on the back foot. But the champion dug deep, defending against Wawrinka's haymakers like his life depended on it, to level the match. The quality did not let up one bit, both players playing at their very highest level and giving the crowd a treat. As the match entered its 6th hour, not a single spectator had left - they were seeing something like a movie play out before them in real time. The match hit its climax in the last game, with both players producing scintillating winners out of nowhere, bringing the crowd to their feet every point. The match seemed all but lost for the Serbian superstar, but Djokovic showed the world one more time why he was the world's best player, scrambling for one last epic backhand pass to come out victorious.
@Cabeza del Demonio -- great thread! A cut above the tiresome GOAT threads.
 
Now this is an actual impossible question to answer! The only acceptable answer really is why pick between them when all 3 are on YouTube in all their glory. As a new year and new Aussie Open approaches I may watch them all over the Christmas period to just get hyped and completely ruin next years tournament for myself.
 
Now this is an actual impossible question to answer! The only acceptable answer really is why pick between them when all 3 are on YouTube in all their glory. As a new year and new Aussie Open approaches I may watch them all over the Christmas period to just get hyped and completely ruin next years tournament for myself.
Relatable. I rewatch the best of the best matches off-season and then inevitably get disappointed next season.
 
Nadal vs Verdasco in 2009. This was something like the highest quality ever. That were 5 hours of unreal tennis and Nadal somehow hit only 25 unforced errors. Now THAT was peak Nadal. I can't stop laughing at all these "experts" who claim 2019 Nadal was anywhere near his peak level.
 
Nadal vs Verdasco in 2009. This was something like the highest quality ever. That were 5 hours of unreal tennis and Nadal somehow hit only 25 unforced errors. Now THAT is what peak Nadal was. I can't stop laughing at all these "experts" who claim 2019 Nadal was anywhere near his peak level.

It's 2 different gamestyles though. Nadal's level was unreal sometimes this year tbh, let's celebrate it instead of making excuses, he's #1 at 33 for a reason, and it's not bc he's playing tennis THAT far from his peak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH
It's 2 different gamestyles though. Nadal's level was unreal sometimes this year tbh, let's celebrate it instead of making excuses, he's #1 at 33 for a reason, and it's not bc he's playing tennis THAT far from his peak.
When was Nadal's level unreal this year though?
 
Grass and HC tbh. Look at how he's hitting the ball f.r :) Aggressive as hell

Not when it matters though. He looked in good form in Wimbledon, but then played a very disappointing semifinal against a very average Federer. That wouldn't have happened to prime Nadal who actually beat a much better Federer in Wimbledon 2008. (and pushed an even better one to five sets in 2007)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH
Not when it matters though. He looked in good form in Wimbledon, but then played a very disappointing semifinal against a very average Federer. That wouldn't have happened to prime Nadal who actually beat a much better Federer in Wimbledon 2008. (and pushed an even better one to five sets in 2007)

Even in 2006 he missed the opportunity to take the second set and tie the match. Of course he lost that tiebreaker.
The Spaniard got tired of losing tie breaks with Federer in Wimbledon in his career: 6 to 1.
 
Last edited:
In terms of pure level, it may possibly be the Nadal/Verdasco match. Difficult to say for sure. But we're basically splitting hairs with level of play in that all were at a supremely high level.

If you factor in significance, I'd have to go with Federer/Safin. Federer had completely dominated the tour in 2004. 0 losses to top 10 players and the first 3 slam season since Wilander 1988. He had won his most recent slam final 6-0 7-6 6-0. He was an unstoppable force. And although their most recent match was closer, last time they played at the AO, Federer had beaten a tired Safin without much difficulty. But this wasn't the Safin that Federer faced in 2004. This was the Safin who shocked Sampras at the USO in 2000.

And Federer actually lost. The other 2 matches ended up with the expected outcome, but in 2005 the underdog won the match and then the tournament. Add to that the added drama of Federer also having match point and yet Safin still managed to win, and I have to give it to the Federer/Safin match. But all 3 were classics and some of the best matches of the past 20 years, so any one of them could be legitimately seen as the greatest
 
Grass? Where he lost to his pigeon? ROFLMAO

Ok, "Nadal played terribly this year getting to his second straight Wimbledon semi" yall are insane. No he didn't play great against Federer, but overall, hell yes he did. How dumb do you have to be to say the #1 tennis player in the world isn't playing great tennis? Some of you must be 10 I swear :D That "pigeon" had the championship on his racquet in the next match.
 
In terms of pure level, it may possibly be the Nadal/Verdasco match. Difficult to say for sure. But we're basically splitting hairs with level of play in that all were at a supremely high level.

If you factor in significance, I'd have to go with Federer/Safin. Federer had completely dominated the tour in 2004. 0 losses to top 10 players and the first 3 slam season since Wilander 1988. He had won his most recent slam final 6-0 7-6 6-0. He was an unstoppable force. And although their most recent match was closer, last time they played at the AO, Federer had beaten a tired Safin without much difficulty. But this wasn't the Safin that Federer faced in 2004. This was the Safin who shocked Sampras at the USO in 2000.

And Federer actually lost. The other 2 matches ended up with the expected outcome, but in 2005 the underdog won the match and then the tournament. Add to that the added drama of Federer also having match point and yet Safin still managed to win, and I have to give it to the Federer/Safin match. But all 3 were classics and some of the best matches of the past 20 years, so any one of them could be legitimately seen as the greatest


Do not forget this underrated match between these two legends:
 
Fed/Safin and I don't think it's all that close. Safin at this best was a complete beast. I never saw anybody return Sampras' serves as well as Safin returned Sampras' serves in the 2000 USO final. That match was a complete demolition of an ATG, albeit past his prime.

Safin was bombing serves up to 138 mph against Fed. His return was spot-on and his backhand wing was pure destruction. Fed's peak return and peak speed and agility made this an even match.
 
Last edited:
Ok, "Nadal played terribly this year getting to his second straight Wimbledon semi" yall are insane. No he didn't play great against Federer, but overall, hell yes he did. How dumb do you have to be to say the #1 tennis player in the world isn't playing great tennis? Some of you must be 10 I swear :D That "pigeon" had the championship on his racquet in the next match.
I swear, even the Nadal fans make him out to be some grass mug. He's won 2 Wimbledons and made 5 straight finals. If the standard for peak form is "made a semi and lost to a 37-year-old he should've routined for the 25th time," then you'd have to assume Nadal is just a mug on grass (he actually was one from 2013-17) which he shouldn't be with his revamped aggressive, big-serving 2018-19 game.

Nadal played well on grass this year, scary good in patches. But he certainly did not play his best level.
 
Do not forget this underrated match between these two legends:
I should be annoyed by the commentators, but they just sound so enthusiastic and into it that I can't. That's how me and my tennis-aficionado friends would talk during big matches.
 
I slightly prefer 2009 and 2005 over 2013
Can’t choose between 2009 and 2005 it depends on the day
But all 3 are incredible
 
Interesting. Got me thinking. All 3 were classics in their own right.

Just gave Nadal Verdasco the nudge as I think quality wise that was unbelievable.
 
images
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH
Ok, "Nadal played terribly this year getting to his second straight Wimbledon semi" yall are insane. No he didn't play great against Federer, but overall, hell yes he did. How dumb do you have to be to say the #1 tennis player in the world isn't playing great tennis? Some of you must be 10 I swear :D That "pigeon" had the championship on his racquet in the next match.
Nadal was close to his best this year, but certainly didn't display quite the level we saw during his winning days. This year Nadal's game was based on big serves, aggressive shotmaking, and set plays. A complete reversal of his old game. It's certainly more entertaining than his old wait-for-the-error play style, but why did he have to change? It's because he can't play like that anymore. El Matador is 33 years old, and he has put his body through the grinder over the last 16 years fighting for every point. He can't win through sheer consistency and defensive baseline play, which is the way he dominated Federer and Djokovic in his prime. His new aggressive serve-oriented grass game is much more similar to how Federer and Djokovic themselves play, and isn't as unique and effective against them. Nadal of 2010 would've eaten Federer and Djokovic alive this year.
 
3 unforgettable Australian Open matches between the dominant World #1 at the peak of his career and a talented shotmaker playing the match of his life.

Federer vs Safin 2005 - Only one man could match the great Roger Federer for talent, and that was the mercurial Russian, Marat Safin. A few months on from playing one of history's greatest tiebreaks, Federer and Safin produced a match of stratospheric quality, an exhibition of powerful, aggressive tennis. Both players found them staring down the barrel numerous times near the end, raising their level with fearless shotmaking to heighten the drama and keep the capacity crowd on the edge of their seats, until Safin sent Federer to the ground one last time to hand him his only Slam loss off clay between 2003 and 2008.

Nadal vs Verdasco 2009 - The result of an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object. Nadal was in the form of his life, having finally taken Wimbledon from Federer in a drama-filled marathon final and standing atop the rankings for the first time in his career. But he faced his sternest test yet against his countryman who had already defeated Andy Murray and didn't look to stop there. Verdasco burst out of the blocks with a brilliant display of baseline aggression to take the first set. But Nadal raised his level, defending like a rock wall and denying Verdasco any cheap points. The ultimate battle of attack vs defense seemed interminable, lasting 5 hr 14 min - the longest match in AO history - but Nadal hung on just long enough for Verdasco to crumble in the end.

Djokovic vs Wawrinka 2013 - "We expected the routine. We got the extraordinary." The commentator's words perfectly summed up one of the greatest and most unexpected matches of all time. The Serb superstar was chasing a 3rd consecutive AO title and a spot in the history books, but Wawrinka made sure he would have to earn it the hard way. The Stanimal came out guns blazing, producing his best tennis yet to put Djokovic on the back foot. But the champion dug deep, defending against Wawrinka's haymakers like his life depended on it, to level the match. The quality did not let up one bit, both players playing at their very highest level and giving the crowd a treat. As the match entered its 6th hour, not a single spectator had left - they were seeing something like a movie play out before them in real time. The match hit its climax in the last game, with both players producing scintillating winners out of nowhere, bringing the crowd to their feet every point. The match seemed all but lost for the young champion, but Djokovic showed the world one more time why he was the world's best player, scrambling for one last epic backhand pass to come out victorious.

Thanks for reminding me. I forgot about this jewel.

Also, the Roddick vs El Aynoui match, with its drama needs a mention. The older matches of Agassi et al, I'm not too familiar with
 
How did I not poast this GIF in this thread?

cmZpIG.gif


For shame :X3:

If I had to rank them then it go: 09 > 05 > 13. But all of them are amazing matches and are hands down are 3 of the best AO matches.
 
Not when it matters though. He looked in good form in Wimbledon, but then played a very disappointing semifinal against a very average Federer. That wouldn't have happened to prime Nadal who actually beat a much better Federer in Wimbledon 2008. (and pushed an even better one to five sets in 2007)
Nadal played well at Wimbledon 2019 but clearly inferior to his performance in 2018, not to mention his wonderful years there.
:D
 
I still think Federer Vs Safin.
I think Nadal Verdasco was great, but it always seemed like one of those matches in which an underdog gives the elite player a hard time before dutifully going home.
Federer and Safin was the real final.
 
Back
Top