Guga On No. 1: 'Highlight Of My Career By Far'

Mainad

Bionic Poster
The Brazilian is the only South American to finish an ATP Tour season as year-end World No. 1

In the latest profile on the 26 players to rise to No. 1 in the FedEx ATP Rankings, ATPTour.com looks back on the career of Gustavo Kuerten.
First week at No. 1: 4 December 2000
Total weeks at No. 1: 43
Year-End No. 1: 2000

 
The Brazilian is the only South American to finish an ATP Tour season as year-end World No. 1

In the latest profile on the 26 players to rise to No. 1 in the FedEx ATP Rankings, ATPTour.com looks back on the career of Gustavo Kuerten.
First week at No. 1: 4 December 2000
Total weeks at No. 1: 43
Year-End No. 1: 2000

Great player. Even better person.
 
Mods, can anything be do about Mainad spamming the board with atp profile articles, without even any attempt at further analysis?

So you regard articles about former world #1 players as 'spamming' do you? Not everybody on here visits the ATP website which is why I post them here for anybody who may have missed them. If you're not interested in them then don't bother posting in here about it.

Maybe you feel we should have more threads about "Who is the Goat?" or "Is this a weak era or a strong era?".
 
Seems like we hear this from players way more than the fans. As fans we usually lean towards the trophy lifts as the best moments.

But of course I understand it. Winning a tournament could involve some lucky breaks. But to be able to call yourself literally the best tennis player in the world based on your body of work for an entire year must be incredibly fulfilling.
 
To call this spamming is idiotic. And I actually like that not-so-big names have been getting their due, but most posters here are glory-hunting fanboys that couldn't care less if some 154th-ranked schmuck went broke so it's only natural they'd be whining about unobtrusive shout-outs like this rather than the umpteenth GOAT thread.

As to the OP Guga is still the most exciting clay-courter I've seen. Even by today's standards the guy was trigger-happy, always looking to dictate with his serve and groundies which normally isn't a winning recipe on terre battue but he had the firepower and court sense to pull it off. And those long limbs of his gave him more court coverage than meets the eye.

What made Guga such a fan favorite, though, was his infectious love of the game. He really seemed to be in it for nothing but the tennis, unafraid to celebrate his opponent's shots even on crucial points. And by "celebrate" I don't mean the tepid tap on the racquet you usually see, but a full-blown double-fist pump like this:


That lack of cutthroat competitiveness (compare Guga's reaction with Pioline's) and a string of injuries probably kept him from challenging Becker, Edberg and Wilander in the ATG hierarchy or at least nabbing a HC major, especially since he thrived on momentum and shotmaking unlike most dirtballers. Which meant that the AO following a monthslong break was always going to be a tough event for him (it also didn't help that he enjoyed his off-court life as much as his on-court career), or that his form would fluctuate wildly even at RG. But when he was dialed in few if any were more dangerous on clay, and even on HC where, of course, he dispatched both Sampras and Agassi in the '00 YEC SF and F while saving 16 BPs (9 vs. Pete and 7 vs. Dre) in what must be one of the clutchest performances ever:


Speaking of which:

Seems like we hear this from players way more than the fans. As fans we usually lean towards the trophy lifts as the best moments.

But of course I understand it. Winning a tournament could involve some lucky breaks. But to be able to call yourself literally the best tennis player in the world based on your body of work for an entire year must be incredibly fulfilling.

Pretty sure he considers it especially special cuz he got to finish 1st by defeating Sampragassi in a row despite a sore back. That final vs. Agassi in particular was a masterclass on par with virtually anyone's.
 
Must be one of the most popular champions ever. Haven't come across any negative opinions about him from anybody.

Of course he made no impression at Wimbledon because he couldn't adapt his game to grass but I guess nobody's perfect. :cool:

Yeah, those LONG strokes and sometimes far back court positioning, and probably the footing and speed - he wasn't built to do as well on grass as some other players who thrived on clay. He did make that one QF. He only played Wimbledon five times. I forget how short is Slam tenure is - only played 33 slams. His AO record may be even worse considering how the surface would have suited him so much better than grass. Seems like a player who worked himself into the year and definitely wasn't ready to go in January.
 
So you regard articles about former world #1 players as 'spamming' do you? Not everybody on here visits the ATP website which is why I post them here for anybody who may have missed them. If you're not interested in them then don't bother posting in here about it.

Maybe you feel we should have more threads about "Who is the Goat?" or "Is this a weak era or a strong era?".
You’re right, I’m glad that you’re posting this here, otherwise I would’ve missed Safin’s and Kuerten’s article (two of my favorite players ever), since I’m one of those that don’t visit the ATP site very often...please keep it coming!
 
Yeah, those LONG strokes and sometimes far back court positioning, and probably the footing and speed - he wasn't built to do as well on grass as some other players who thrived on clay. He did make that one QF. He only played Wimbledon five times. I forget how short is Slam tenure is - only played 33 slams. His AO record may be even worse considering how the surface would have suited him so much better than grass. Seems like a player who worked himself into the year and definitely wasn't ready to go in January.
It also could be the Australia time zone that is 13 hours ahead of Brazil’s time, the jet lag must be something very hard to manage, even though he won the Auckland ATP in 2003...
 
I like that the ATP is doing these articles, but the actual content leaves a lot to be desired. They are little more than a collection of statistics.

Kuerten has lived a very rich and at times very sad life, which makes his joie de vivre even more impressive. His father died when he was eight, and his youngest brother suffered from severe brain damage at birth. He gave every trophy he won to his brother. He donated a huge portion of his prizemoney to charity and since he retired he has worked extensively with the disabled.
 
I like that the ATP is doing these articles, but the actual content leaves a lot to be desired. They are little more than a collection of statistics.

Kuerten has lived a very rich and at times very sad life, which makes his joie de vivre even more impressive. His father died when he was eight, and his youngest brother suffered from severe brain damage at birth. He gave every trophy he won to his brother. He donated a huge portion of his prizemoney to charity and since he retired he has worked extensively with the disabled.
Not to mention that he was able to reach all of his success coming from a country where tennis is unpopular (it's like the 11th most played sport here in Brazil), with very few public courts and tennis clubs, not to mention the high cost of tennis equipment in the country. Kuerten was a true phenomenon.
 
Great player. Even better person.

Not according to Nelson Monfort.

Such a shame that some of the best players from the New Balls era were ruined by injuries. Kuerten, Safin, Norman, Ferrero, Haas, Hewitt, Gambill... what injury records. Kuerten was only starting to play very well on hardcourt in 2000 and 2001 (just winning Cincinnati) and that was him practically finished.
 
Not according to Nelson Monfort.

Such a shame that some of the best players from the New Balls era were ruined by injuries. Kuerten, Safin, Norman, Ferrero, Haas, Hewitt, Gambill... what injury records. Kuerten was only starting to play very well on hardcourt in 2000 and 2001 (just winning Cincinnati) and that was him practically finished.
You're saying Kuerten was not a good person?
 
Where did I say that? How am I supposed to know? I don't know, or pretend to know any professional players.

I literally said "Not according to Nelson Monfort."
Okay, let me put the right way...you're saying that Nelson Monfort doesn't think Kuerten is a good person? Where did you read that?
 
Okay, let me put the right way...you're saying that Nelson Monfort doesn't think Kuerten is a good person? Where did you read that?

He has mentioned several times over the years and he states in his book that Kuerten was not friendly with minor tournament workers.


He talks about it a bit half way through this.

If you have a problem with Nelson, write to him, no problem.
 
Back
Top