Had Murray really lost FIVE Australian Open finals?

killerboi2

Hall of Fame
Yep. Must be embarassing as hell. Today he just took it to new levels in blowing it in big games. I heard that he yelled "this is the worst tennis i've ever played in my life" during the 1st set. Damn right it is. I don't know what he has to do to get back in the slams, but I do know that Mauresmo is not the answer.
 
J

JRAJ1988

Guest
If he didn't face Novak in 4 of those finals how many would Andy have won?

I reckon at least 1 or 2. Every time he does something awesome like win the Davis Cup or finish number two, or Clay titles I always get expectations that he can win that 3rd major but let's face it he just isn't good enough to beat Djokovic in Slams or Federer in BO3's.

I know people on this site really love to stick the knife in when it comes to Murray because people love some pantomime loser but throughout his career 3 of the greatest players to play tennis period..stand in his way and have done since 2008. He just isn't good enough.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

West Coast Ace

G.O.A.T.
Even his mom was smart enough to get out of town before the expected result (Fed Cup excuse - LOL!)

I just don't understand the senselessness to keep playing the same game every time. Serve 2 1st serves. Hit FH and BH slices short forcing Djokovic to come to net; rip more balls down the line; even if you lose 2, 2, and 2 it's better than getting ground down. The old saying "always change a losing strategy; never change a winning one" comes to mind.
 
N

nowhereman

Guest
What's more disappointing is the fact that he's had the game to win some of those finals. 2013 and 2015 especially, it felt like he had a real shot at winning , but ended up collapsing mentally.
 

ScentOfDefeat

G.O.A.T.
Yep. Must be embarassing as hell. Today he just took it to new levels in blowing it in big games. I heard that he yelled "this is the worst tennis i've ever played in my life" during the 1st set. Damn right it is. I don't know what he has to do to get back in the slams, but I do know that Mauresmo is not the answer.

How does the worst tennis he's ever played in his life allow him to only lose 7-5 7-6 in the last two sets against the world number 1? Does that mean his best tennis would give him 11 majors to Djokovic's 2?
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
Most players don't even reach five GS finals throughout their entire career, let alone at the same tournament. What Murray has achieved(and yes, his impressive consistency IS an achievement) is something that should really be given a lot of credit and not laughed at because he hasn't won one - reaching a final is always better than going out in an earlier round. I think it would perhaps look worse for him if he'd lost to a different player in each final but for God's sake, he's had to face peak Djokovic in four of them and prime Federer in the other. Give the guy a break!
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Probably.. I don't know how appearing in 5 finals and never sealing the deal even once doesn't completely destroy you mentally.
Someone recently said that Murray has actually done very well with his opportunities to win slams. The reality is he is a notch below the rest of the big 4 and the wins he has were well played. With Fed and Rafa degrading a bit soon Andy will have more and more opportunities; just hopefully some don't involve Djokovic.
 

killerboi2

Hall of Fame
Most players don't even reach five GS finals throughout their entire career, let alone at the same tournament. What Murray has achieved(and yes, his impressive consistency IS an achievement) is something that should really be given a lot of credit and not laughed at because he hasn't won one - reaching a final is always better than going out in an earlier round. I think it would perhaps look worse for him if he'd lost to a different player in each final but for God's sake, he's had to face peak Djokovic in four of them and prime Federer in the other. Give the guy a break!

Lmao yeah i'm sure you'd be delighted if Djokovic was stuck on two slams and constantly mugging it up in slam finals. Considering he used to have a pretty close head to head against Djokovic, even winning slams against him, the last thing this MUG deserves is credit.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
You know who the all-time winningest player at Roland Garros is, behind Rafa?

Roger Federer, the guy who had lost, what, 4 finals to 1 win? I'm sure he will take that 'subpar' record over the accomplishments of someone like Sampras.
Fed was a great clay court player and perhaps his new style of game is not as suited to the clay, so only the French Open is on his schedule.

Murray is going to need help like Fed had to win Australia. Being #2 that may happen for him in a few slams.
 

moonballs

Hall of Fame
Would it have been better for his CV if he had lost in the 1st round of some of those? Does getting to a final not count unless you win it?
Yes it has been like that for the Nadal fans for a few years. That how "the H2h in slams " goat standard works.
 

killerboi2

Hall of Fame
Yeah some really poor, apologists excuses for Murray going round in this thread. Some people pointing out failures of Nadal, Djokovic and Federer. Those guys are all into double figures in slams and have all pretty much fulfilled their potential now. Murray is stuck on 2 slams and has the worst slam ratio in open era history. Mugged it up one too many times this time.
 

Doflamingo

Professional
Well you gotta reach the finals first to win it and it's been unfortunate for him to keep reaching Novak all the time, Novak's just a better player than Murray.

As the one true King (@StannisTheMannis) said above, each of these players have had multiple slam final losses at a specific event. Still better than crashing out in the early rounds.
 

90's Clay

Banned
Yeah some really poor, apologists excuses for Murray going round in this thread. Some people pointing out failures of Nadal, Djokovic and Federer. Those guys are all into double figures in slams and have all pretty much fulfilled their potential now. Murray is stuck on 2 slams and has the worst slam ratio in open era history. Mugged it up one too many times this time.

Boy I'll say.. How can Nole have 11 slams and Murray only has 2? We all know Murray isn't as good but a 9 slam differential? Thats horrible
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
Yeah some really poor, apologists excuses for Murray going round in this thread. Some people pointing out failures of Nadal, Djokovic and Federer. Those guys are all into double figures in slams and have all pretty much fulfilled their potential now. Murray is stuck on 2 slams and has the worst slam ratio in open era history. Mugged it up one too many times this time.

So the moral of the story is: Don't dare reach a Slam final unless you win it? Much better to lose in a semi?
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
You know who the all-time winningest player at Roland Garros is, behind Rafa?

Roger Federer, the guy who had lost, what, 4 finals to 1 win? I'm sure he will take that 'subpar' record over the accomplishments of someone like Sampras.

Yes but he has that FO title under his belt, doesn't he? It affected him mentally in 2009 when he was also playing under huge pressure to pull of the career Slam.

1-4 is a lot more than 0-5 and I'm saying this as someone who pities Murray.
 
How does the worst tennis he's ever played in his life allow him to only lose 7-5 7-6 in the last two sets against the world number 1? Does that mean his best tennis would give him 11 majors to Djokovic's 2?

Murray's mental fitness was the worst I've ever seen from him. Very poor shot selection throughout the match at key moments. And yes, despite it, he made the 2nd and 3rd set close.
When Murray zones with his flat strokes and court penetration, he's tough to handle. there's a reason he's been to 9 slam finals.
He had no business losing the 2nd set, and had plenty of opportunity to take the 3rd. Straight set loss is tough, but I still have belief he can gain control of his mental faculties and bring it.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
Well you gotta reach the finals first to win it and it's been unfortunate for him to keep reaching Novak all the time, Novak's just a better player than Murray.

As the one true King (@StannisTheMannis) said above, each of these players have had multiple slam final losses at a specific event. Still better than crashing out in the early rounds.

But they all won it at least once at least. I don't recall anyone reaching 4 or more Slam finals in one particular Slam and never winning it. Other than Murray of course.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
Murray's mental fitness was the worst I've ever seen from him. Very poor shot selection throughout the match at key moments. And yes, despite it, he made the 2nd and 3rd set close.
When Murray zones with his flat strokes and court penetration, he's tough to handle. there's a reason he's been to 9 slam finals.
He had no business losing the 2nd set, and had plenty of opportunity to take the 3rd. Straight set loss is tough, but I still have belief he can gain control of his mental faculties and bring it.

He's running out of time. He should sack Mauresmo, FAST.
 

killerboi2

Hall of Fame
Because Nole is that much better.

That much better than this mug version of Murray yeah, not that much better than Lendl version of Murray who used to beat Djokovic and Federer multiple times back then. There were actually times where it was actually hard to call who was going to win.
 

Flint

Hall of Fame
That means he did better than every player bar 1 5 times. Pretty damm good.

He did better than Nadal for instance.
 

Red Rick

Bionic Poster
Yeah some really poor, apologists excuses for Murray going round in this thread. Some people pointing out failures of Nadal, Djokovic and Federer. Those guys are all into double figures in slams and have all pretty much fulfilled their potential now. Murray is stuck on 2 slams and has the worst slam ratio in open era history. Mugged it up one too many times this time.
Lol, too busy whining about a player to think this one through for 5 seconds I guess. Roddick's was actually worse and I don't see anyone hating on his slam conversion rate all the time.
 

Slice'n'dice

Hall of Fame
That much better than this mug version of Murray yeah, not that much better than Lendl version of Murray who used to beat Djokovic and Federer multiple times back then. There were actually times where it was actually hard to call who was going to win.

How many slams have you won again?

He'll have more opportunities and he will win a slam or two more most likely Mauresmo or not. With the pressure that'll be building on Novack at the French this year who knows, it could be that one. His clay form was pretty excellent last year. Far better than it ever was under Lendl and that's a fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gn

duaneeo

Legend
The game's #2 player and 4-time AO finalist was up 40-love while serving at 5-5 in the 2nd set, only to lose the game and eventually the set. Yes, good Lord.
 

Slice'n'dice

Hall of Fame
The game's #2 player and 4-time AO finalist was up 40-love while serving at 5-5 in the 2nd set, only to lose the game and eventually the set. Yes, good Lord.

Almost as bad as being 40-15 up serving for the match and losing the game and eventually the match.

Wonder if that's happened to anyone who's any good?


Good Lord!

And that's from a 5 time US Open Champion!
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Would it have been better for his CV if he had lost in the 1st round of some of those? Does getting to a final not count unless you win it?
I suppose it would be more respectable if he collected several first week losses and had a SF as his best result
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
Murray got robbed! On two separate break points in the 2nd set, Djokovic's serves were well long but were not overruled by the umpire. Had Murray broken in either or both of those times, he could have won the 2nd set and then it would have been a completely different match from then on.
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Seriously???
This looks like a pretty enviable record to me:

WCnKQo6.png
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
Murray got robbed! On two separate break points in the 2nd set, Djokovic's serves were well long but were not overruled by the umpire. Had Murray broken in either or both of those times, he could have won the 2nd set and then it would have been a completely different match from then on.

Shame he didn't challenge.
 
Top