Maybe they wanted to prepare their customers for the coming change from "Made in Austria" to "Made in Czech Republic" (and eventually leading to "Made in China").None, both were made in Austria. The one without made in Austria is just earlier production and had a small sticker on the butt-cap that said made in Austria. Why HEAD made this change mid production is a mystery to me
That seems logicalMaybe they wanted to prepare their customers for the coming change from "Made in Austria" to "Made in Czech Republic" (and eventually leading to "Made in China").
So as to point out that "we haven't been printing it ON the racquets for some time already before we made the move east".
Well, I wrote i.Prestige Mid (not MP), and the reason I included this iteration of the Mid is its mold is slightly different from the original (PT10).
So I meant to say I think there are basically two racquets which make sense to consider classics worthy of a release as a "retro" stick (Prestige Mid and Radical Tour Oversize) - but what do I know (when it comes to Head's business decisions)?
BTW: Neither a 16x19 PT630/2.0, nor any racquet Djokovic uses would qualify as "retro"...
Well, which "classic" Head frames are there that would demand similar attention as the PT630/2.0?
I can only identify two, maybe three if you want to be generous with regard to differences in mold:
- Prestige 600/Mid - either with the "original" PT10 mold or with the i.Prestige Mid mold
- Radical Tour Oversize - this should be the Bumblebee, no? But with the correct (original) mold and specs.
Apart from that, I see no frames which could be relevant today, have a cult following, and are dissimilar enough to Head's current offerings. So a Radical Tour MP would not make sense.
I’d be very happy with TGK292.1 with new cosmeticsI agree with this, though yet another Bumblebee would be odd to me. Even if they brought back the OG mold, it’s still the third re-release of the cosmetic. I’d still welcome it, I’m just not sure I’d HEAD will go that route.
My money is on the Prestige mid, either PT10 or something close.
What is the layup of this one? I was interested in getting an IG prestige mid. Are they stiff frames? I have the IG MP prestige which are pretty soft but I tried a IG Pro prestige and didn't like it, it had a firmer feel which I wasn't a fan of. Its personal taste I guess. Loads I see have been enjoying the gravity frames but they are in big head sizes. It would be nice to an update of a classic with a true 98 head and soft frame but the mid is something I would like to try. I don't think there's many around 2nd hand, I've seen a lot of the standard youtek but not the IG version.I’d be very happy with TGK292.1 with new cosmetics
1- I hope not again, they’ve done this too many times.So, I guess it's the Bumblebee Oversize to celebrate Agassi then...
PT 2.0 16x19 in honour of Andy Murray
I guess the word retro depends on what they call the racquet... Being that specific then the Pro Tour 2.0 is not retro as it's not a racquet they released before as it wasn't 58RA, it didn't have Twaron, it wasn't made in Austria... but it was based on a racquet that was released before... so, therefore, a 16x19 version would be retro in the same way...
Ultimately, I don't know what they will do, I don't have a vested interest in a particular model, and I understand what you were trying to say and point out.
When it comes to Head, who knows what they will do... we just have to wait and see. All the best @Alex78 ... and may we all get what we dream about![]()
I'll buy a retro Prestige Mid IF it's labelled as either "600" or "Pro 600"I agree with this, though yet another Bumblebee would be odd to me. Even if they brought back the OG mold, it’s still the third re-release of the cosmetic. I’d still welcome it, I’m just not sure I’d HEAD will go that route.
My money is on the Prestige mid, either PT10 or something close.
292.1 is the IG Prestige Mid. It’s soft to modern standards. IG Prestige Mid is a great frame.What is the layup of this one? I was interested in getting an IG prestige mid. Are they stiff frames? I have the IG MP prestige which are pretty soft but I tried a IG Pro prestige and didn't like it, it had a firmer feel which I wasn't a fan of. Its personal taste I guess. Loads I see have been enjoying the gravity frames but they are in big head sizes. It would be nice to an update of a classic with a true 98 head and soft frame but the mid is something I would like to try. I don't think there's many around 2nd hand, I've seen a lot of the standard youtek but not the IG version.
No, however definitely not re-releasing the PT630 16x19. It was never released as the retail stick.So are you saying that they are re-releasing the iPrestige?
You may be onto something although the PT113B was discontinued 2 years ago...I understand... but many have compared the PT 2.0 to an iPrestige MP because of the higher RA of the 2.0 in comparison to the original PT630... so an iPrestige MP may not make any sense on that reasoning either. I guess that leaves the other two according to you... and since Head just had such huge success with the Graphene 360+ Prestige Mid with an actual 93 sq. in. head, I don't see them releasing a 90 sq. in. version... but they might. So, I guess it's the Bumblebee Oversize to celebrate Agassi then...
Or... they've seen how well Wilson's release of the Pro Series racquets has gone, and their PT 2.0 has been successful... so they may expand the range themselves and put out a PT 2.0 16x19 in honour of Andy Murray or maybe even a Djokovic Signature racquet (a retail version of the PT131B)... which would compete with the Blade Pro and Ultra Pro offerings of Wilson.
Ultimately... only time will tell... Whatever it is... I hope it's great.
No, however definitely not re-releasing the PT630 16x19. It was never released as the retail stick.
Could be the iPrestige (TGK57.5 layup is very similar to the PT57E2).
Could also be something never released but interesting to many...
You may be onto something although the PT113B was discontinued 2 years ago...
There is a BIG difference between where Wilson makes their H22s and where and how Head makes their PT frames.If Head were smart, what I think they could do is create a spin-off line as Wilson did with their "Pro Labs" racquets.
They could easily call it the Pro-Line (or something) and then release all these special racquets under that Line. So, what I mean is they released the Pro Tour 2.0 (which was the PT630), they could then release a Pro Radical 2.0 (which could be the RT630), and a Pro Speed (which could be the PT113B), and a Pro Prestige (which could be a PC 600 or PT10), etc.
Then they can release different string patterns within those lines... and Bob's your uncle... a whole new revenue stream.
Just thoughts.
The PT113B was discontinued 2 years ago, FYI.I understand that the PT630 16x19 was never released... but since the PT 2.0 went so well, and Wilson has had great success with their Pro Labs racquets, maybe Head will release a PT 2.0 16x19... and your last sentence was "something never released before but interesting to many..." which would include both a PT 2.0 16x19 and a retail version of the PT113B, which they could call some "retro" name or just "Speed Pro 98 SE".
Isn't speculation fun...
There is a BIG difference between where Wilson makes their H22s and where and how Head makes their PT frames.
We have already discussed the details, however, Wilson manufactures all of their frames (that we are discussing here, retail, H19, H22, Pro Labs...) in China. The manufacturing cost is similar across the lines.Could you elaborate a bit? And by H22 are you talking the pro stock frames or the Pro Lab frames? Or, are they manufactured the same?
There are things about head frames that make me want to try them out. Pallets, cap grommets and it seems quality. Mainly a prestige Pro or MP back in the 95” days
Interesting thoughts and I agree with what you are saying. We have to remember that production did move out to China so the intelligence line was the last series to be made in Austria is that right? With the pro stock series are there some made still at Head HQ but the majority made in China with the TGK serial which as discussed are pretty much just lighter versions generally of the retail versions ready for the user to customise to suit their taste.We have already discussed the details, however, Wilson manufactures all of their frames (that we are discussing here, retail, H19, H22, Pro Labs...) in China. The manufacturing cost is similar across the lines.
Head, on the other hand, manufactures their retail and pro stock versions of the retail frames (TGK and TGT) in China too. However, the frames people are talking about, PT57A, PT346, other PT layups are manufactured in Austria. The manufacturing cost is significantly higher and racket manufacturing is labor intensive. It would make no sense for head to offer the PT frame as retail or to offer it at 2x the price of other frames.
I for one would be ecstatic with them doing a similar process as they did with the pro tour 2.0 (i.e adding a 16x19 for that and making a respective djokovic frame as well). Even though not an official pro stock or Austrian PT frame, they really got the feel of that right. Lighter weight would be preferable too as no one will be buying them in local stores expecting to play straight out of the box without customizing. Disclaimer: I have no experience in marketing or running a massive retail company so I don’t assume to know what makes the most business sense.We have already discussed the details, however, Wilson manufactures all of their frames (that we are discussing here, retail, H19, H22, Pro Labs...) in China. The manufacturing cost is similar across the lines.
Head, on the other hand, manufactures their retail and pro stock versions of the retail frames (TGK and TGT) in China too. However, the frames people are talking about, PT57A, PT346, other PT layups are manufactured in Austria. The manufacturing cost is significantly higher and racket manufacturing is labor intensive. It would make no sense for head to offer the PT frame as retail or to offer it at 2x the price of other frames.
People are too obsessed with the whole made in China thing. Quality control? High grade materials? China can provide all of that if you're willing to pay for it.Int
Interesting thoughts and I agree with what you are saying. We have to remember that production did move out to China so the intelligence line was the last series to be made in Austria is that right? With the pro stock series are there some made still at Head HQ but the majority made in China with the TGK serial which as discussed are pretty much just lighter versions generally of the retail versions ready for the user to customise to suit their taste.
They did so the head room option for a period didn't they which allowed a few changes to be made just on the Head Speed frames as I remember? As was discussed with the pro tour 2 reissue it was a celebration and played similar to the original but was not an attempt at the identical version just an update. I think if for example they did do an iprestige it would be similar to the original but would not be the same as it would be produced in China now where they would be looking to make it play with the same characteristics as the original and therefore a version 2.0
There is a BIG difference between where Wilson makes their H22s and where and how Head makes their PT frames.
It is not about being attractive to a 1000 users on this board and suffer profitability and back up the production line, but about maximizing it and maximum efficiency.
Offering TGT (pro stock frames) would not be super cool as those are just lighter versions of the Retail.
Offering the PT frames at $500 each would also not sell tons. Racket selling (consumer markets) is all about quantities and largest possible margins.
The PT113B was discontinued 2 years ago, FYI.
It was replaced by the PT346.1. The TGK346.1 would be an interesting option
I for one would be ecstatic with them doing a similar process as they did with the pro tour 2.0 (i.e adding a 16x19 for that and making a respective djokovic frame as well). Even though not an official pro stock or Austrian PT frame, they really got the feel of that right. Lighter weight would be preferable too as no one will be buying them in local stores expecting to play straight out of the box without customizing. Disclaimer: I have no experience in marketing or running a massive retail company so I don’t assume to know what makes the most business sense.
I really don’t want HEAD to adopt Wilson’s Pro Lab idea. I’m quite happy with the $160 price tag on the PT2.0.
Wilson out here charging $250 for a 6.1 18x20 - the same racquet that was $130 new in 2017.
I agree with that... that's why I didn't buy the 6.1... but the BP 16x19, BP 18x20 and UP 16x19 are all new and welcome additions... but yes, if the price was lower it would have been even better. Can't have it all though (unless you're Djokovic or Rafa, etc).
Fair point. $250 is a fair price for Blade Pros and Ultra Pros.
Good point on the amount of people willing to jump on the back of getting a racket as it's the same as Roger/Rafa/Novak uses. I would like the one Murray uses I've seen many players getting an RF97 which is laughable considering what it weighs in at and how it plays. For many that is a good 30-40 grams too heavy. I think the Wilson ultra tour was seen as a one of the better examples of a platform stick where it came in at low weight and could be taken in the direction the user wanted to. Far too often all frames are set up head heavy limiting the options available and forcing things. That leads back to the head pro room choice where you select the weight, balance, grip shape, stiffness string pattern etc but I bet you will be looking at £399ish for that in the future no doubt. I would rather stay with the Head Pro tour version as discussed at the £150 Mark. It would have been nicer if it was slightly lighter but I guess at the weight it comes in at its good to go without mods.I know it was discontinued, and yes the TGK 346.1 would be interesting but I doubt it would happen. Novak needs to feel special and if everyone had his racquet that would not be possible (unless they gave him a huge cut of the money... haha).
As I said before, I have no vested interest in any particular model being offered, at the end of the day we'll just have to wait and see, and I don't really care much if they do or do not offer any of these racquets. If they do... great... and if they are at a price I'm willing to pay, I will. If they are some ridiculous price, I won't buy them.
I've never had the desire to have any of these racquets because Novak, or Rafa, or Federer play with them. I would only want to have these racquets if they are great feeling racquets that I play well with (at a price I'm willing to pay). If they were great, then, of course, it would be cool (and an added bonus) that Novak, or Rafa, or Federer play with the exact same racquet. If they aren't, then I would not want to have them. The PS97 RFA being a case-in-point, it's too stiff for my liking and I will never play with it. I don't care if it's the exact racquet Federer has or not... it's not for me.
I wish you all the best though. This was just a trip down Speculation Lane and I'm not looking to have detailed debates like my life depends on it. At the end of the day, I know you are much more of an expert on Head Pro Stock racquets than I, so your guess will be much better than mine.
Cheers
Considering everything else is $230-$240, $250 is a bargain, especially if bought at the end of the year.
Good point on the amount of people willing to jump on the back of getting a racket as it's the same as Roger/Rafa/Novak uses. I would like the one Murray uses I've seen many players getting an RF97 which is laughable considering what it weighs in at and how it plays. For many that is a good 30-40 grams too heavy. I think the Wilson ultra tour was seen as a one of the better examples of a platform stick where it came in at low weight and could be taken in the direction the user wanted to. Far too often all frames are set up head heavy limiting the options available and forcing things. That leads back to the head pro room choice where you select the weight, balance, grip shape, stiffness string pattern etc but I bet you will be looking at £399ish for that in the future no doubt. I would rather stay with the Head Pro tour version as discussed at the £150 Mark. It would have been nicer if it was slightly lighter but I guess at the weight it comes in at its good to go without mods.
I’m using the PT2.0 in stick form and very surprised at how much power it has. I think it has more power than my Pro Tour 280 that customized.Agreed... and if you look at the TW Head graph (the one with all the dots on a graph) of where the racquets sit within the range, the PT 2.0 is the second-highest on the Power % and the highest on SW (from what I could see of the current range). I know it's not compared to some of the older versions (RT630, the extended versions of Prestige MPs, etc). Not bad...
I hope they keep producing it and expand it to a 16x19 version as well.
On a separate note, I would probably love the RF97A if it had an RA in the very low 60s (like the current Blade). But that's just me.
I’m using the PT2.0 in stick form and very surprised at how much power it has. I think it has more power than my Pro Tour 280 that customized.
I’m using the PT2.0 in stick form and very surprised at how much power it has. I think it has more power than my Pro Tour 280 that customized.
Retail ("N") PT10, Light ("L") version?@vsbabolat It arrived! I put the pallet and butt cap on, Kimony leather grip. Now weighs 336.32 grams with overgrip. Bringing it to the stringer tonight.
Now that I have more (self made) clear pictures, could you please verify the specific version?
That’s 2003 or 2006 as there wasn’t any labels like that in the 90’s. Manufactured in Austria finished in Czech Republic.@vsbabolat It arrived! I put the pallet and butt cap on, Kimony leather grip. Now weighs 336.32 grams with overgrip. Bringing it to the stringer tonight.
Now that I have more (self made) clear pictures, could you please verify the specific version?
Thank you, so 100% confirmed now!That’s 2003 or 2006 as there wasn’t any labels like that in the 90’s. Manufactured in Austria finished in Czech Republic.
1987 that Sergio lineThank you, very nice picture!
According to Sergio Tacchini outfit, it is '86 or '87. The same model was wearing Pat Cash when won Wimbledon in '86. I saw Casal was wearing the same outfit at '87 European Community Championship in Antwerpen (full-size gold-diamond racquet trophy). He played against Cash who was wearing newest ST outfit and played with Yonex RQ-180 instead of his winning Prince Magnesium Pro 90. Cash won.
The HEAD Classic Mid is the Prestige Classic. In 1999 and 2000 HEAD didn’t use the Prestige name and rebranded the Prestige Classic as the Classic Mid in the USA.@vsbabolat @dr325i - can either of you tell me where the HEAD Classic Mid fits into the Prestige timeline?