Has anyone hit with the Dunlop M-Fil 200+ STANDARD?

KFwinds

Professional
I play with the M-Fil 300, and the specs on the M-Fil 200 plus standard look interesting...especially with the lower swingweight, thinner beam, and being more headlight. And again, I'm referring to the standard length model sold here at TW.
 
I've hit a few ground strokes with the M-Fil 200 Plus 2006 and I found it to be very light, too light for my liking I play with the HPS 6.1 so it was a big change. I liked the mix of power and control it had and it felt pretty solid for a racquet that light. The open pattern gave me lots of spin and I'm guessing it was strung around the mid 60's so there was lots of bite to the ball. The only thing I had to complain about was the weight, but overall it was a nice hit. I'm guessing for serves it would add some pop and probably great at the net, but I didn't really get to try those out. I think going from the 300 to the 200 wouldn't be too much of a drastic change the lower swingweight may be good or bad depending on your game. I prefer the 300 to the 200 due to the weight and the 300 seemed more solid. Hopefully this helps good luck!
________
MOTORCYCLE TIRES
 
Last edited:
trueplaya89 said:
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/descpageRCDUNLOP-D200.html

You mean this one right, cause if it was the plus, how could it be standard? I enjoyed hitting with it, but i did find it to be not as headlight as i prefer, but of course lead can save the day. You can really generate some outrageously heavy balls with this tight string pattern tho, i thought it was a fun racket to hit with, i prefer prostaffs tho.
I think he means this one http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/descpageRCDUNLOP-200P06.html
________
Fisting Wife
 
Last edited:
Back
Top