Nalbandian was a great player to watch. A top class BH with ridiculous angles (some people on TW say he has a better BH than Djokovic as pure shotmaking), a good forehand, a elite ROS, a superb touch (his dropshot was one of the best). He only maybe lacked a serve to win free points. But he was a complete player who was one of the very rare players to outplay Prime Federer at his own game with Del Potro (Nadal and Djokovic are different. They activate the full push mode against him in the tight moments)
Only a GS final lost tamely against Hewitt. And a few GS semi-finals. He won the WTF and a few Master 1000
Should he have accomplished more ? Or he maximised his talent ?
Nalbandian is the only one who defeated Fedalovic in the same tournament.
He could have beaten Federer in the AO 2006 Final if he didn't choke against Baghdatis.
I think that Nalbandian would feast on the current generation. I don't think that Thiem or Zverev have a higher peak than him (maybe Thiem on clay).
Only a GS final lost tamely against Hewitt. And a few GS semi-finals. He won the WTF and a few Master 1000
Should he have accomplished more ? Or he maximised his talent ?
Nalbandian is the only one who defeated Fedalovic in the same tournament.
He could have beaten Federer in the AO 2006 Final if he didn't choke against Baghdatis.
I think that Nalbandian would feast on the current generation. I don't think that Thiem or Zverev have a higher peak than him (maybe Thiem on clay).