AGREE. I seen this 4.0 guy in top gun serve speed tournament. they used the same radar gun that is used in the ATP tournaments. and this guy clocked 123 MPH I believe. that was his fastest. but didn't win the tournament. Another guy that was 4.5 level hit one at 126 MPH. LOL and he won the tournament.
Now, don't get excited. This is ONE out of 20-30 serves, I believe.
Fastest serve means nothing in winning, unless it's supersonic like Milos, Groth, or Roddick.
It's all the other things that count.
And yes, a 4.0 can hit into the mid 120's. Not me, not at 64.
BS detector showing extremely high reading
Didn't know there are speed limits for a 4.0 serve.
An athletic 4.0, someone tall and strong, and not geeky growing kid, can easily hit over 130. He's a 4.0 not because of his serve, but because of the other parts of his game.
Couple of locals come into in mind, they USED to be 4.5. 6'5" and 220, former CalPoly player, but hasn't touched a racket in close to 3 years, choosing work and basketball instead. Local realtor, wire rim glasses, 6'4" and about the same overweight, hasn't played a tourney in 5 years now, once a 4.5, named TimCANNON! really.
About half of us can bring more raw power than Gilles Simon. But he's made $7 Million on the tour. Accuracy + variety is the ticket, although a little extra MPH can help.
A 4.0 serving mid 120's?
We are talking about with Pure drive plus strung with natty Gut at 45 lbs. and this guy hits in low 90's anyway. and he hit ONE serve out of like 30 serves he tried that was in 120's. We are taking about flat serve, swinging as hard as he can. Yes, he is 4.0 player. and serve is his best shot and he has Good mechanics.
Your radar gun is probably measuring the average speed from racket to the net. Pros are measuring the peak speed, so their numbers are higher.
I think most players with good form can hit 100+ mphs for their fastest serves.
Didn't know there are speed limits for a 4.0 serve.
An athletic 4.0, someone tall and strong, and not geeky growing kid, can easily hit over 130. He's a 4.0 not because of his serve, but because of the other parts of his game.
Couple of locals come into in mind, they USED to be 4.5. 6'5" and 220, former CalPoly player, but hasn't touched a racket in close to 3 years, choosing work and basketball instead. Local realtor, wire rim glasses, 6'4" and about the same overweight, hasn't played a tourney in 5 years now, once a 4.5, named TimCANNON! really.
BS detector readout says: "Overflow error: consult manual"
I just got the blue screen of death.
I suspect TTMR is a geek who plays tennis, serves in the 70's, and hits shots like a 9 year old girl.
NOBODY said a 130 serve is easy to return. And it only counts if the serve goes IN.
I like how this thread has descended into chaos; TalkTennis never lets me down. Instead of accepting the notion that you may not serve as big as you would like to think, we talk about things like how the radar gun/methodology isn't accurate, equipment or conditions weren't ideal, and how we swear there are rec players out there who have a flamethrower of an arm.
I suspect TTMR is a geek who plays tennis, serves in the 70's, and hits shots like a 9 year old girl.
NOBODY said a 130 serve is easy to return. And it only counts if the serve goes IN.
Ad hominem.
Even if I can't hit a serve into the box lobbing it underhanded, my point is not undermined. Would the fact that you can serve faster than a double amputee, for example, prove how much more awesome you are?
Some bodybuilding strongman cannot just pick up a racquet with no prior training and hit 130 mph. Excellent technique is required. A person who has the technique and racquet skill to hit 130 MPH would not lose at the 4.0 level. Most "big hitters" at the rec level who can't keep their "huge" serves and groundstrokes from going over the fence don't hit anywhere near 130 MPH--even on the shots that go over the fence.
LeeD may be the only person here that has actually posted a video of himself serving.
And we saw how that looked
I like how this thread has descended into chaos; TalkTennis never lets me down. Instead of accepting the notion that you may not serve as big as you would like to think, we talk about things like how the radar gun/methodology isn't accurate, equipment or conditions weren't ideal, and how we swear there are rec players out there who have a flamethrower of an arm.
LeeD may be the only person here that has actually posted a video of himself serving.
he's about forty years past his prime
Who knows what kind of career LeeD would have had if he had access to today's strings and racquet technology during his vaunted prime?
The tragedy of the LeeD legacy is ultimately that he was a victim of his era.
A trained eye can clearly see the faint glimmer of a once Pancho Gonzalez-like first serve that would be hit well into the 120s with a wood racquet, and a proto-Rafterian American twist second serve that bounces to an apex of 10'. Who knows what kind of career LeeD would have had if he had access to today's strings and racquet technology during his vaunted prime? The tragedy of the LeeD legacy is ultimately that he was a victim of his era.
Aren't we all LeeDs in some shape or form?
Amusing. 100+ of the world's best men average 113.Average serve speeds for US Open (2011?)for ATP players in certain tracked matches -
Not familiar with this site
http://heavytopspin.com/2011/10/13/us-open-serve-speed-by-player/#comments
Average of tracked matches
1st 113 MPH , 2nd 90 MPH
Are the two above posters brain dead? Smugly, they say pros serve first serves at "113" mph ......
Don't they play tennis?
The AVERAGE speed includes slice first serves, some kicks, some twists, so they bring DOWN the average.
The amateurs are talking their FASTEST first serves. Mine around 100. If I added in my slices, some twists, and some body shot top/slices, that average goes down to 85mph.
Almost every ATP pro, from 1,000 down, can hit 130mph first flat serves.
Amusing. 100+ of the world's best men average 113.
...........................
GraniteChief can hit 125 when he's warm, as are conditions.
He's a fricken tower. When he posted his vid couple years past, I said he hit some 3.5 shots (tentative and missing), and had a BIG serve, so could be 4.5. You guys all took that to mean I rated him 3.5 overall.
HunterST, do you have the fastest serve in the courts you play at? I do, and that includes 5.5 winning players, but not the Cal team, which plays at HellmanCourts.
TTMR, I claim 100 for the past 2 years.
And CeciMartinez asked me to hit when I was playing tennis for TWO total years!
Marcie's and Pea's MOM asked me to serve practice with her daughters during my third year of tennis.
I think that's the key, sobering phrase.ball measuring system
Nice solid serve; no where remotely close to 100 mph.
About half of us can bring more raw power than Gilles Simon. But he's made $7 Million on the tour. Accuracy + variety is the ticket, although a little extra MPH can help.
100mph is really no big deal. Only a low level player will think it is.
I can serve high 90's. But I believe there is something to be said about hitting a serve during match play and hitting practice serves. I think my match play serves are bigger.
I see that you're in SB! That's my hometown. I hear that the city courts have gotten awful with public use.
Seems like the city courts are still in decent shape. 6 courts at muni are getting resurfaced this summer. Las Positas courts got taken over by a for profit entity and they jacked up the price 5x, so no one goes there any more.
Oh yeah, BOOM! SET POINT!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHyc...tailpage&list=UUb-29fIS3FXMUqSmSiG307w#t=374s