TW declare EP strung SW at 322. I have Speed MP 2022 and TW declares it 323 SW. I got 290 SW unstrung one and with heavy string i still put 1gr at 12. I'm actually thinking about buying EP, but seeing your results im worried about low SW. I would love to get racquet which i don't need to put lead tape at all.I am pretty sure thats what the sw is on all the EPs. You cant tell me i got 6 bad ones.
AT least they dont feel different to the test racket from TW.
It was measured on a Babolat Diagnostic Center btw.
Now the lead modding starts, then matching and i am pretty sure i have to find a new string, since the Black Knight will break fast in that one.
Those SWs also slightly worry me. I Have one at 288SW and it needs (a small amount of) lead at 9/10 and 2/10 since it came polarized. Was planning to get a secend or third one via matching service where no customisation is needed, which seemed possible after the fist SSs posted in july/august, but those "Ezone" batches won't work.
Actually not bad:
W - - B - - SW
306,93 - - 311 - - 278
307,56 - - 313,5 - - 281
307,88 - - 313 - - 283
305,75 - - 313 - - 278
306,45 - - 310 - - 276
305,90 - - 312 - - 278
Thats with the plastic around the grip but without the paper string replacement.
I am going to keep 3 of them.
was this by matching service or by a fluke?I measured my 3 new Extremes Pros:
1) SW 291,5
2) SW 292,1
3) SW 291,6
Strange that I got much higher SW on my racquets.
Just from one online shop.was this by matching service or by a fluke?
Lucky youJust from one online shop.
What balance of all of those racquets?I measured my 3 new Extremes Pros:
1) SW 291,5
2) SW 292,1
3) SW 291,6
Strange that I got much higher SW on my racquets.
I'd try Lynx Tour at a lower tension, and if that is too low powered then I'd give Gamma AMP Moto or AMP Jet a try, potentially also Tru Pro Pure Rush.¿Qué poliéster potente y vivaz me pueden recomendar para el profesional extremo? He utilizado el Head Kawk y a veces noto una falta de potencia, especialmente con el revés a una mano.
How is the comfort with Boom Pro?Today I tried Extreme Pro from a colleague, I played one set with EP. My usual racket is the Boom Pro 2024. The Auxetic 2.0 on the EP has a totally different feel compared to the BP. It is interesting that most people complain that it is very soft compared to the ET Aux. 1.0. I have the exact opposite feeling, EP seems stiffer and more stable compared to ET. The pop on the serve is brutal and the racket is one of the best I've served with lately, the power and spin are also at an enviable level, it's very easy to keep the opponent behind at a distance and it's easy to change the direction of the ball, a very stable racket (my colleague has a total 2g at 10 and 2 o'clock). It's not difficult to play at all, in fact it's much more concrete for me compared to blade 98 v9. It's easy to hit a flat winner as well as a deep top spin shot. OHB should take some getting used to. Compared to the Boom Pro, the BP is the racquet that currently has the best feel compared to all the racquets I've tried in the last 4 years (Prince TT 310, PA 100, PA98, Ezone 100/98, vcore pro HD, vcore 95, Prestige MP-L, ET Aux.1, Percept 97, Blade 98 v9y PS 97 v14....RF..). It is noticeably softer and yet easier to play, with less effort it is easier to hit better shots, and the enjoyment of tennis is at a very high level. At the moment, I don't have a single racket that could dethrone him. And the most important thing, after a month of not playing tennis, I can play a quality offense with very few unforced errors, which has not been the case with any other racket so far.
The comfort is much better, and I believe that this is due to the shape of the frame, which is wider compared to the Extreme Pro and other rackets. Both rackets have Tour Sniper 1.25How is the comfort with Boom Pro?
It has shape like Gravity's?The comfort is much better, and I believe that this is due to the shape of the frame, which is wider compared to the Extreme Pro and other rackets. Both rackets have Tour Sniper 1.25
BP is something between gravity and yonex shape, but leaning more towards yonex head shape.It has shape like Gravity's?
Please report results!I love my extreme pros.
But tomorrow I am cheating. I want to try a PA98. Same string, Pure Rush. But I screwed up and forgot to lower tension for the crosses.
My Extremes are at 51/49
The PA98 is 51/51.
These two frames seem pretty close on paper.
I play 4.0/4.5 doubles. Pretty good pace and action. Should be fun. I hear it’s super stable.
We shall see.
First hit with a Babolat in ages.
Usually too stiff for me.
I’ve been testing the ET lately and I must say it feels very comfortable and enjoyable. It flexes in a certain way which almost seems “wobbly” but could that be the racquet tech at play.Today I tried Extreme Pro from a colleague, I played one set with EP. My usual racket is the Boom Pro 2024. The Auxetic 2.0 on the EP has a totally different feel compared to the BP. It is interesting that most people complain that it is very soft compared to the ET Aux. 1.0. I have the exact opposite feeling, EP seems stiffer and more stable compared to ET. The pop on the serve is brutal and the racket is one of the best I've served with lately, the power and spin are also at an enviable level, it's very easy to keep the opponent behind at a distance and it's easy to change the direction of the ball, a very stable racket (my colleague has a total 2g at 10 and 2 o'clock). It's not difficult to play at all, in fact it's much more concrete for me compared to blade 98 v9. It's easy to hit a flat winner as well as a deep top spin shot. OHB should take some getting used to. Compared to the Boom Pro, the BP is the racquet that currently has the best feel compared to all the racquets I've tried in the last 4 years (Prince TT 310, PA 100, PA98, Ezone 100/98, vcore pro HD, vcore 95, Prestige MP-L, ET Aux.1, Percept 97, Blade 98 v9y PS 97 v14....RF..). It is noticeably softer and yet easier to play, with less effort it is easier to hit better shots, and the enjoyment of tennis is at a very high level. At the moment, I don't have a single racket that could dethrone him. And the most important thing, after a month of not playing tennis, I can play a quality offense with very few unforced errors, which has not been the case with any other racket so far.
The PA 98 in comparison felt like a brick house and there was no doubt of its power output.
Please report results!
I love my extreme pros.
But tomorrow I am cheating. I want to try a PA98. Same string, Pure Rush. But I screwed up and forgot to lower tension for the crosses.
My Extremes are at 51/49
The PA98 is 51/51.
These two frames seem pretty close on paper.
I play 4.0/4.5 doubles. Pretty good pace and action. Should be fun. I hear it’s super stable.
We shall see.
First hit with a Babolat in ages.
Usually too stiff for me.
I got a boom pro matched to the extreme pro spec, and it plays like a spin machine with that spec. I think this racket is amazing but for me it should come in at a lower spec so that I have the room to customize it to the balance and swing weight I like. That being said, I totally agree with what you've said. I've tried to fashion it like a vcore with good feelToday I tried Extreme Pro from a colleague, I played one set with EP. My usual racket is the Boom Pro 2024. The Auxetic 2.0 on the EP has a totally different feel compared to the BP. It is interesting that most people complain that it is very soft compared to the ET Aux. 1.0. I have the exact opposite feeling, EP seems stiffer and more stable compared to ET. The pop on the serve is brutal and the racket is one of the best I've served with lately, the power and spin are also at an enviable level, it's very easy to keep the opponent behind at a distance and it's easy to change the direction of the ball, a very stable racket (my colleague has a total 2g at 10 and 2 o'clock). It's not difficult to play at all, in fact it's much more concrete for me compared to blade 98 v9. It's easy to hit a flat winner as well as a deep top spin shot. OHB should take some getting used to. Compared to the Boom Pro, the BP is the racquet that currently has the best feel compared to all the racquets I've tried in the last 4 years (Prince TT 310, PA 100, PA98, Ezone 100/98, vcore pro HD, vcore 95, Prestige MP-L, ET Aux.1, Percept 97, Blade 98 v9y PS 97 v14....RF..). It is noticeably softer and yet easier to play, with less effort it is easier to hit better shots, and the enjoyment of tennis is at a very high level. At the moment, I don't have a single racket that could dethrone him. And the most important thing, after a month of not playing tennis, I can play a quality offense with very few unforced errors, which has not been the case with any other racket so far.
PA98 is not comparable. Its Spin/Control vs Spin/Power. The EP is easier to play, nicer to your arm and wrist and feels a lot crispier. PA has way more power, especially in the sweet spot.
it's a pillow!As somebody with a pretty sensitive elbow, I can also attest that the EP is super comfortable to me, even with relatively stiff poly strings.
I agree the feel between EP and PA98 is miles apart.I played three sets with the PA98
51/51
my main is the Extreme Pro
51/49
I'm tempted to restring the PA98 tonight!
and go 51/48 or 51/49
B/C it went well.
Regardless of which of these you currently use, you can pick up the other and just play.
But the flexibility differential is STRIKING
- same exact string
- same stringer on the same machine
- just the different of 2lbs on the crosses, as discussed above
- same overgrip
- same indoor courts, same opponents I play every Monday
I played three sets, then switched back to my EP for a moment, and BAM
it hits you hard.
The EP is SOOOO much more comfortable, soft, flexible, muted,
you want to use the word cushioned, b/c it feels like you're hitting a ball wrapped in air bubbles, lol
compared with the PA98
The EP for me:
the one with 322 SW (lottery winner) and the one that was 316 SW (bumped up to 322 with 2 grams of weight at 12):
serves great
volleys great
awesome 2hbh
LOVE my forehands, usually can smash the ball repeatedly, until I make a mistake (usually wrong grip or bad technique).
The PA98
serves even better
volleys great, too. accidentally hit a perfect block volley. it's just super stable, it's amazing at net.
2hbh is good, maybe not as good as the EP for me.
forehands, I feel it's VERY similar.
aside from hitting a crazy angle with a 2hbh, my FH is my shot to hit winners with.
with the PA98, I think it's very close to the EP
perhaps a little more velocity. you may have to cover the ball slightly more with the PA98.
my PA98 demo came in at 306 / 31cm.
strung and overgrip: 326 / 31.75
my EP is 307 / 31.75cm.
strung and overgrip: 329 / 32.10
this is the one that came in with the right SW. no weight needed.
so this PA98 is super whippy.
comfort wise, you feel the communication from the PA98
there is none from the EP. I can still hit touch shots with the EP. and I've been playing GREAT tennis with them for months now.
so I'm not complaining about the EP.
The PA98 just has that crisp tone, you feel some vibrations.
with the EP, you don't feel anything.
so if you're a tennis elbow guy, then skip the PA98
if you can take a chance, then it's worth a demo.
On defense, the PA98 and it's more rigid frame, helps you block and deflect a little better.
I am not a fan of the cosmetic at all. It's super dated at this point. And it looks like so many other Pure Aeros, from the last several years, so it's a meh, from me.
I do like the EP cosmetic.
The PA98 is 16x20
does it feel like one, not really. I don't really notice it.
That last cross, isn't doing much. I'm curious if omitting it, would make the stick more comfy?!
It does feel powerful, but controllable. It feels like a weapon in my hand. Almost unfair.
I will play with it again Wednesday. It's not a sure switch at this point.
but I'm intrigued.
I do want to try lower tension in my cross by 2-3 lbs, to see if I can get some more dwell time and more comfort.
And I'm seriously considering skipping the last cross.
I have to say EP is one of the most comfortable frames I’ve tried in a long time. Wouldn’t have seen this coming especially for a spin line. Big props to Head on thisThe PA98 has a very hot (although very small) sweetspot to me. Outside of that sweetspot I felt that it was noticeably uncomfortable. Uncomfortable enough for me to give up on it after about a week; it was destroying my wrist. The EP is one of the most comfy frames I've ever used. It has a large, but more controllable sweetspot imo.
I have to say EP is one of the most comfortable frames I’ve tried in a long time. Wouldn’t have seen this coming especially for a spin line. Big props to Head on this
Definitely one of the more comfortable frames I’ve used outside of classic control frames, especially considering the power and spin it provides. I didn’t feel any difference between the tour and the pro in this regard.The Extreme Tour was very comfortable… but I never saw this many people saying that. Is the EP even more comfy than the ET was? Or is it the same and just more people are using this generation than the past version?
ET bothered me. Small sweet spot.The Extreme Tour was very comfortable… but I never saw this many people saying that. Is the EP even more comfy than the ET was? Or is it the same and just more people are using this generation than the past version?
Dennis Fabian (as far as I recall) pointed out the reengineering of the Grommets, it's not just an optical update. So you should be right, they targeted impact, feel and sound.This may sound crazy. But the clear grommets may be contributing to the plush feeling a smidge. They seem like a new material. More rubbery than plasticy.
Head has been playing around with grommets of late as they reengineered the grommets for the Extreme line and it appears they may have done something to the grommets on the Gravity Tour 98 that supposedly makes a great sound when hitting the ball.Dennis Fabian (as far as I recall) pointed out the reengineering of the Grommets, it's not just an optical update. So you should be right, they targeted impact, feel and sound.
The calibration could be off. Check the SW on some other racquets to see if the numbers are consistently lower than expected.It was measured on a Babolat Diagnostic Center btw.
that's awesome, I missed that note, thank you for sharing!Dennis Fabian (as far as I recall) pointed out the reengineering of the Grommets, it's not just an optical update. So you should be right, they targeted impact, feel and sound.
I don't think any of auxetic 2.0 sticks are in there. it's weird.Why Extreme Pro still isn't in tennis wearehouse university database?
My experiment is over!
I'm a fit, hard/fast swinging 4.0, playing doubles with 4.0-4.5 players, really nice pace and action.
I'm probably a yonex guy, if anything. but not a brand loyalist.
Pure Aero 98 16x20
vs
Extreme Pro (98) 16x19
weight and balance, they seem quite close, both very whippy.
both have nice plow and pop.
both have luxurious sweet spots, not just for a 98! they feel like a 100 in that regard.
but precision, swinging through the air, feel... they are not a 100, they are both excellent 98's!
once you find an EP that has a SW that is up to spec (322 ish), great at net.
PA is great at net.
I played four days with the PA. 2-3 sets each day.
Today, after my 2nd set, I went back to the EP, so I could make a decision and write a final summary.
The serve/volley/fh,2hbh,overheads..... both sticks are excellent for me. Simply amazing.
Perhaps a little more pop on my serve with the PA. Perhaps more thump on the 2hbh, with the EP. So they are even.
Both sticks, absolutely SUBLIME on my primary weapon, the forehand.
The Extreme will be the stick that remains in my bag for a couple of reasons.
1. I was originally enjoying that extra half gear of pace/power I can generate with the PA.
my opponents could tell. more pop. more power (but controllable still, for me).
But in the end, I prefer having a half gear LESS, and more margin.
I will make less errors with the EP.
2. The EP is such a treat, in that it's a 98, it has precision, it has put away power (for a control frame), it serves bombs, it's amazing at net... but it's COMFY like a BLADE! So it's future proof. I have heard from a few of you that after a month, the PA98 will start to show it's true colors, and my wrist/arm may hurt. I'm not 25 anymore. So since these two are so close, I may as well be safe and stay away from the Babolat, which I know. I've been avoiding them since I knew any better. This is BETTER though, the PA98, I give them credit. They are moving in the right direction, perhaps!?
that's it!
less errors, more comfort.
it's that simple.
oh, and the cosmetic, I prefer the pj of the EP.
Cheers all
Hi, can you compare Extreme Pro comfort to Speed Pro/Mp 2022?My experiment is over!
I'm a fit, hard/fast swinging 4.0, playing doubles with 4.0-4.5 players, really nice pace and action.
I'm probably a yonex guy, if anything. but not a brand loyalist.
Pure Aero 98 16x20
vs
Extreme Pro (98) 16x19
weight and balance, they seem quite close, both very whippy.
both have nice plow and pop.
both have luxurious sweet spots, not just for a 98! they feel like a 100 in that regard.
but precision, swinging through the air, feel... they are not a 100, they are both excellent 98's!
once you find an EP that has a SW that is up to spec (322 ish), great at net.
PA is great at net.
I played four days with the PA. 2-3 sets each day.
Today, after my 2nd set, I went back to the EP, so I could make a decision and write a final summary.
The serve/volley/fh,2hbh,overheads..... both sticks are excellent for me. Simply amazing.
Perhaps a little more pop on my serve with the PA. Perhaps more thump on the 2hbh, with the EP. So they are even.
Both sticks, absolutely SUBLIME on my primary weapon, the forehand.
The Extreme will be the stick that remains in my bag for a couple of reasons.
1. I was originally enjoying that extra half gear of pace/power I can generate with the PA.
my opponents could tell. more pop. more power (but controllable still, for me).
But in the end, I prefer having a half gear LESS, and more margin.
I will make less errors with the EP.
2. The EP is such a treat, in that it's a 98, it has precision, it has put away power (for a control frame), it serves bombs, it's amazing at net... but it's COMFY like a BLADE! So it's future proof. I have heard from a few of you that after a month, the PA98 will start to show it's true colors, and my wrist/arm may hurt. I'm not 25 anymore. So since these two are so close, I may as well be safe and stay away from the Babolat, which I know. I've been avoiding them since I knew any better. This is BETTER though, the PA98, I give them credit. They are moving in the right direction, perhaps!?
The PA feels like a weapon.
The EP closer to an extensive of my arm. A player’s frame.
that's it!
less errors, more comfort.
it's that simple.
oh, and the cosmetic, I prefer the pj of the EP.
Cheers all
Hi, can you compare Extreme Pro comfort to Speed Pro/Mp 2022?
Never played Speed Pro but EP for me feels more comfortable than Speed MP, mostly because it doesn't vibrate as much on offcenter shots and the impact on the ball feels a bit less "raw" and more dampend.Hi, can you compare Extreme Pro comfort to Speed Pro/Mp 2022?
I played Speed Pro and now play Speed MP. Now i can control ball with the spin, but i can't place the ball like i used to with Speed Pro and my serve is not accurate.speed mp, would prob be the easiest to play with, for most 3.0-4.0 players
but it's not for everyone. speed is loved by many, and it frustrates others.
more power, more spin, lighter.
packs more swing weight than the extremes, but is not difficult to swing.
extreme mp, similar power to above, but easier to swing, more spin
extreme tour, less power by a lot! more control, more precision, little less spin - but it's no spin slouch! easy to swing still (even tho 5 more grams), better at net/serve
speed pro, more control, more boardy/less spin, heavier than the rest, on paper better at net-with it's 10 more grams than the speed mp, but this can be subjective. more precision.
the speed pro is an 18x20
it's supposed to be a lot harder to generate power. you need to bring your own.
I string for my friends and a local club.
I can say that the speed pro is truly setup for a 4.5-5.0 player.
does that mean 3.0-4.0 players can't use it? no, I'm not saying that.
I know plenty of flat 3.5 players who ended up liking this frame, b/c it helps keep the ball from going long,
they are basically cheating, b/c they can't figure out how to apply more spin to keep the ball in.
18x20 helps flatter hitters, b/c it generates less lift, less shape, it keeps the ball lower (launch angle)
good luck
so many good options right now.
would like to hear more about your game before helping to suggest a frame!