Head Gravity 98 16x19 (Coming in 2025!)

Tmano said:
What kind of answer is that? especially not knowing my level. But besides that i really meant is it were arm friendly, that is all!
Click to expand...
Maybe it didn't come across the way I intended. The whole gravity line is arm friendly compared to the individual equivalent from other brands. Within the gravity line, picking a model that's too heavy can still cause arm issue, which of course can also become another debate.
 
johnmccabe said:
Maybe it didn't come across the way I intended. The whole gravity line is arm friendly compared to the individual equivalent from other brands. Within the gravity line, picking a model that's too heavy can still cause arm issue, which of course can also become another debate.
Click to expand...
Thank you!
 
@ACT , just wanted to give you props on an excellent review of the new Gravity 98. How would you compare the Gravity 98 to the 7th Gen and 8th Gen EZone 98?
 
JK208 said:
@ACT , just wanted to give you props on an excellent review of the new Gravity 98. How would you compare the Gravity 98 to the 7th Gen and 8th Gen EZone 98?
Click to expand...
Act also said the SW should be around 320 strung. This is already the second time over the past few months that I got really excited about the racquet then confused by the different specs reported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACT
johnmccabe said:
Act also said the SW should be around 320 strung. This is already the second time over the past few months that I got really excited about the racquet then confused by the different specs reported.
Click to expand...

I saw him say 330 strung SW in the video that came out today.
 
JK208 said:
@ACT , just wanted to give you props on an excellent review of the new Gravity 98. How would you compare the Gravity 98 to the 7th Gen and 8th Gen EZone 98?
Click to expand...
It has more top end power on full swing, and more spin, it's faster and easier to swing because I'm used to these specs, but i rate EZ manoeuvrability higher because i think it suits more people and is not a head heav(ier) frame like GT98

More intuitive control goes to EZ, it feels more natural and you can go as slow or fast as you like, whilst GT98 needs alot more hammering down to pin point a shot

GT98 is better for OHBH i feel, EZ throat is too thin and it kind of takes away from the plowthrough

johnmccabe said:
That's his preferred spec after mod
Click to expand...
My stock spec was 330 (slightly overspec, not so much weight but it was a bit more head heavier than what the spec lists on the throat), so yeah it was my stock but preferred spec
 
Last edited:
ACT said:
It has more top end power on full swing, and more spin, it's faster and easier to swing because I'm used to these specs, but i rate EZ manoeuvrability higher because i think it suits more people and is not a head heav(ier) frame like GT98

More intuitive control goes to EZ, it feels more natural and you can go as slow or fast as you like, whilst GT98 needs alot more hammering down to pin point a shot

GT98 is better for OHBH i feel, EZ throat is too thin and hit of takes away from the plowthrough


My stock spec was 330 (slightly overspec, not so much weight but it was a bit more head heavier than what the spec lists on the throat), so yeah it was my stock but preferred spec
Click to expand...

Thank you! I appreciate it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACT
The GOD of racquet video reviews is back, with another definitive masterpiece. At this point, IMHO, @ACT should just be getting frames in the mail from all OEMs, non-stop.


​
ChatGPT synopsis, primed for explicit, non-ambiguous opinion. I think it did a pretty decent job:

Control:
The Gravity 98 offers excellent directional and depth control when the player is fully committed to strokes. Its open 16x19 string pattern may initially seem launchy to some, but with proper technique, it delivers impressive precision for both spin-heavy and flat shots. It demands advanced-level technique to manage the power and control balance effectively, making it more challenging but rewarding for aggressive playmakers. Compared to the Gravity Pro, control is slightly less consistent due to reduced plow-through and the smaller sweet spot, but it is more precise than the MP and more forgiving than extreme "player's frames" like the RF97.

Precision:
Directional control is one area where the Gravity 98 requires extra effort. While it excels in straight-line drives and controlled spin shots, sudden changes in shot direction demand impeccable timing, positioning, and clean contact. Its crisp feel and throat flex create a more responsive experience compared to the original Gravity line. In comparison to other frames, it rivals the Blade 98 in precision but offers a different balance of spin and power.

Power:
Power is accessible but player-generated, rewarding those with full swings and excellent kinetic chain utilization. It has slightly less plow-through and weight behind shots than the Gravity Pro due to its flexier throat, but the open string pattern and 98-square-inch head size deliver easier access to power compared to traditional player's frames. While not as inherently powerful as racquets like the Pure Strike 98 or Ezone 98, it delivers controlled, precise power for advanced players.

Feel:
The Gravity 98 achieves a unique blend of crispness and flex. The throat flex absorbs impact, providing excellent comfort and a soft feel, while the string bed is more responsive than traditional Gravity models. Compared to the Auxetic 1.0 Gravity 100's, the GT98 offers superior feedback and feel, reminiscent of older, pocketing-heavy frames but with modern crispness. It’s softer than competitors like the Aero 98 and Blade 98, making it more arm-friendly, without excessive dampening.

Spin:
Spin potential is pretty high, thanks to the open 16x19 and responsive string bed, making it easy to generate topspin and high bounce trajectories. While it doesn't surpass the Extreme Pro or Solinco Whiteout 16x19, it balances spin with precision, making it versatile for players who mix spin with flat shots. The Gravity 98 offers better spin accessibility than the Blade 98 but slightly less than the Aero 98.

Comfort:
With its low 58 RA stiffness and throat flex, the Gravity 98 is one of the most arm-friendly racquets in the 98-square-inch market. Even at higher tensions or with stiff strings, it absorbs shock effectively, minimizing harsh vibrations. It provides more comfort than most modern frames, including the Ezone 98 and Blade 98, while retaining enough feedback to avoid feeling overly muted.

Overall Playability:
The Gravity 98 is a modern player's frame designed for aggressive, versatile playmakers with advanced technique. It offers a balanced blend of control, power, and spin, excelling in adaptability for all stroke types and grips. While its smaller sweet spot and demanding nature may intimidate recreational players, it rewards those who can commit to their strokes. It bridges the gap between the Gravity Pro’s stability and plow-through and the MP’s spin and maneuverability. Compared to competitors, it outshines the Blade 98 in versatility and comfort but falls slightly behind in raw precision. It’s a well-rounded frame for advanced players seeking a mix of modern performance and traditional feel.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Additional tips I picked up (from actually watching):
- Stringing: Consider stringing 5-7% higher in tension, then playing down into your ideal string bed stiffness
- Maneuverability: Better than the GPro, even the GT100
- Grips: works equally well with Eastern, Semi-Western even Western grips
 
Last edited:
Dragy said:
@dr325i mate have you played with Prestige MP 2023 (99 sq.in) - how it compares to Gravity Tour 98?
Click to expand...
Very different frames.
The Prestige MP feels firmer/crisper. Definitely lower power and much lower launch angle and less spin.
Both felt about same maneuverability, and control.

I will be getting another GT98 shortly and will customize it to my liking so have more of apples to apples comparison
 
Last edited:
dr325i said:
Very different frames.
The Prestige MP feels firmer/crisper. Definitely lower power and much lower launch angle and less spin.
Both felt about same maneuverability, and control.

I will be getting another GT98 shortly ad wil customize it to my liking so have more of apples to apples comparison
Click to expand...
What is your current frame?
 
I'm considering switching from the 2023 Prestige Pro 16x19 to this for lighter static weight and comparable RA and SW.

On paper, the specs look comparable. Does anyone have an anecdotal comparison between the two?

My only gripe with the Prestige Pro is that the SW came in way lower than the advertised 325 (318 on my Briffidi), and I need to add a good chunk of lead to get to 325 and which adds to the static weight.
 
A-Style said:
Would you say it sits between Pro Tour 2.0 and Prestige Pro (2023) in terms of feel and playability?
Click to expand...
That is a tough one. The feel…somewhere in there. The PT2.0 is crisp layup, the TGK345.3 is a very soft layup. I’d say closer to the Prestige Pro.
But the playability is very different. 22 vs 20 mm, more power, larger sweet spot, more forgiveness and definitely higher launch angle and more spin.
When I tested one of the first PP prototypes (it was called Prestige MP back then), my feedback to ahead was that the launch angle was very low. I assume others feedback was similar because the first release (360+?) had a better launch angle but still low. On contrary, when we tested the GT98 back in December 23, my feedback was that the launch angle is very high.
 
dr325i said:
That is a tough one. The feel…somewhere in there. The PT2.0 is crisp layup, the TGK345.3 is a very soft layup. I’d say closer to the Prestige Pro.
But the playability is very different. 22 vs 20 mm, more power, larger sweet spot, more forgiveness and definitely higher launch angle and more spin.
When I tested one of the first PP prototypes (it was called Prestige MP back then), my feedback to ahead was that the launch angle was very low. I assume others feedback was similar because the first release (360+?) had a better launch angle but still low. On contrary, when we tested the GT98 back in December 23, my feedback was that the launch angle is very high.
Click to expand...
Thanks.

You think maybe it's like a more playable Pro Tour 630 just updated for 2024? Thicker beam, not full CAP, tear drop, 16x19, less static weight etc.
 
Trip said:
The GOD of racquet video reviews is back, with another definitive masterpiece. At this point, IMHO, @ACT should just be getting frames in the mail from all OEMs, non-stop.


​
ChatGPT synopsis, primed for explicit, non-ambiguous opinion. I think it did a pretty decent job:

Control:
The Gravity 98 offers excellent directional and depth control when the player is fully committed to strokes. Its open 16x19 string pattern may initially seem launchy to some, but with proper technique, it delivers impressive precision for both spin-heavy and flat shots. It demands advanced-level technique to manage the power and control balance effectively, making it more challenging but rewarding for aggressive playmakers. Compared to the Gravity Pro, control is slightly less consistent due to reduced plow-through and the smaller sweet spot, but it is more precise than the MP and more forgiving than extreme "player's frames" like the RF97.

Precision:
Directional control is one area where the Gravity 98 requires extra effort. While it excels in straight-line drives and controlled spin shots, sudden changes in shot direction demand impeccable timing, positioning, and clean contact. Its crisp feel and throat flex create a more responsive experience compared to the original Gravity line. In comparison to other frames, it rivals the Blade 98 in precision but offers a different balance of spin and power.

Power:
Power is accessible but player-generated, rewarding those with full swings and excellent kinetic chain utilization. It has slightly less plow-through and weight behind shots than the Gravity Pro due to its flexier throat, but the open string pattern and 98-square-inch head size deliver easier access to power compared to traditional player's frames. While not as inherently powerful as racquets like the Pure Strike 98 or Ezone 98, it delivers controlled, precise power for advanced players.

Feel:
The Gravity 98 achieves a unique blend of crispness and flex. The throat flex absorbs impact, providing excellent comfort and a soft feel, while the string bed is more responsive than traditional Gravity models. Compared to the Auxetic 1.0 Gravity 100's, the GT98 offers superior feedback and feel, reminiscent of older, pocketing-heavy frames but with modern crispness. It’s softer than competitors like the Aero 98 and Blade 98, making it more arm-friendly, without excessive dampening.

Spin:
Spin potential is pretty high, thanks to the open 16x19 and responsive string bed, making it easy to generate topspin and high bounce trajectories. While it doesn't surpass the Extreme Pro or Solinco Whiteout 16x19, it balances spin with precision, making it versatile for players who mix spin with flat shots. The Gravity 98 offers better spin accessibility than the Blade 98 but slightly less than the Aero 98.

Comfort:
With its low 58 RA stiffness and throat flex, the Gravity 98 is one of the most arm-friendly racquets in the 98-square-inch market. Even at higher tensions or with stiff strings, it absorbs shock effectively, minimizing harsh vibrations. It provides more comfort than most modern frames, including the Ezone 98 and Blade 98, while retaining enough feedback to avoid feeling overly muted.

Overall Playability:
The Gravity 98 is a modern player's frame designed for aggressive, versatile playmakers with advanced technique. It offers a balanced blend of control, power, and spin, excelling in adaptability for all stroke types and grips. While its smaller sweet spot and demanding nature may intimidate recreational players, it rewards those who can commit to their strokes. It bridges the gap between the Gravity Pro’s stability and plow-through and the MP’s spin and maneuverability. Compared to competitors, it outshines the Blade 98 in versatility and comfort but falls slightly behind in raw precision. It’s a well-rounded frame for advanced players seeking a mix of modern performance and traditional feel.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Additional tips I picked up (from actually watching):
- Stringing: Consider stringing 5-7% higher in tension, then playing down into your ideal string bed stiffness
- Maneuverability: Better than the GPro, even the GT100
- Grips: works equally well with Eastern, Semi-Western even Western grips
Click to expand...
Don't typically like to comment on my own stuff but i always felt ChatGPT did a much better job lol
 
dr325i said:
Softer layup, more spin, about the same power. Felt like better control
Click to expand...
What’s your opinion on counterbalancing it to like 32cm balance vs playing more or less stock?

Do players really prefer 33cm balance, or is it more of “add whatever you need to the handle” type of approach, I wonder?
 
Dragy said:
What’s your opinion on counterbalancing it to like 32cm balance vs playing more or less stock?

Do players really prefer 33cm balance, or is it more of “add whatever you need to the handle” type of approach, I wonder?
Click to expand...
It’s better for baseliners to have less HL balance. And since 99% of people trade groundstrokes only I think that’s why.
 
dr325i said:
Well, as you described it, the only commonality with the PT630 is -- it has the hoop, throat and handle, and soft layup...
Click to expand...
I should give more context.

Whatever racquet I chose to purchase is usually based loosely on the Pro Tour 630.

I would love to still use them but it's contingent on me playing more frequently than I can or would like. Alas, I choose frames which I deem to be "characteristically" similar although knowing full well they won't totally be the same.

The layup for starters no manufacturer is using today. Nothing also can replicate the thud ("sound") from the string bed or that solid, flex you get off the string bed when you're middling them.

The Prestige Pro 2023 went some way for me in replicating this but I currently use a Blade 16x19 which whilst flexy, is rather souless comparatively and definitely not the same.
 
Dragy said:
What’s your opinion on counterbalancing it to like 32cm balance vs playing more or less stock?

Do players really prefer 33cm balance, or is it more of “add whatever you need to the handle” type of approach, I wonder?
Click to expand...
I am the base liner and prefer 30-30.5cm strung balance. So, I’ll see how HL can I get it and still maintain the weight and SW. most likely not going to happen so, hopefully I get a TGT version.
 
Trip said:
The GOD of racquet video reviews is back, with another definitive masterpiece. At this point, IMHO, @ACT should just be getting frames in the mail from all OEMs, non-stop.


​
ChatGPT synopsis, primed for explicit, non-ambiguous opinion. I think it did a pretty decent job:

Control:
The Gravity 98 offers excellent directional and depth control when the player is fully committed to strokes. Its open 16x19 string pattern may initially seem launchy to some, but with proper technique, it delivers impressive precision for both spin-heavy and flat shots. It demands advanced-level technique to manage the power and control balance effectively, making it more challenging but rewarding for aggressive playmakers. Compared to the Gravity Pro, control is slightly less consistent due to reduced plow-through and the smaller sweet spot, but it is more precise than the MP and more forgiving than extreme "player's frames" like the RF97.

Precision:
Directional control is one area where the Gravity 98 requires extra effort. While it excels in straight-line drives and controlled spin shots, sudden changes in shot direction demand impeccable timing, positioning, and clean contact. Its crisp feel and throat flex create a more responsive experience compared to the original Gravity line. In comparison to other frames, it rivals the Blade 98 in precision but offers a different balance of spin and power.

Power:
Power is accessible but player-generated, rewarding those with full swings and excellent kinetic chain utilization. It has slightly less plow-through and weight behind shots than the Gravity Pro due to its flexier throat, but the open string pattern and 98-square-inch head size deliver easier access to power compared to traditional player's frames. While not as inherently powerful as racquets like the Pure Strike 98 or Ezone 98, it delivers controlled, precise power for advanced players.

Feel:
The Gravity 98 achieves a unique blend of crispness and flex. The throat flex absorbs impact, providing excellent comfort and a soft feel, while the string bed is more responsive than traditional Gravity models. Compared to the Auxetic 1.0 Gravity 100's, the GT98 offers superior feedback and feel, reminiscent of older, pocketing-heavy frames but with modern crispness. It’s softer than competitors like the Aero 98 and Blade 98, making it more arm-friendly, without excessive dampening.

Spin:
Spin potential is pretty high, thanks to the open 16x19 and responsive string bed, making it easy to generate topspin and high bounce trajectories. While it doesn't surpass the Extreme Pro or Solinco Whiteout 16x19, it balances spin with precision, making it versatile for players who mix spin with flat shots. The Gravity 98 offers better spin accessibility than the Blade 98 but slightly less than the Aero 98.

Comfort:
With its low 58 RA stiffness and throat flex, the Gravity 98 is one of the most arm-friendly racquets in the 98-square-inch market. Even at higher tensions or with stiff strings, it absorbs shock effectively, minimizing harsh vibrations. It provides more comfort than most modern frames, including the Ezone 98 and Blade 98, while retaining enough feedback to avoid feeling overly muted.

Overall Playability:
The Gravity 98 is a modern player's frame designed for aggressive, versatile playmakers with advanced technique. It offers a balanced blend of control, power, and spin, excelling in adaptability for all stroke types and grips. While its smaller sweet spot and demanding nature may intimidate recreational players, it rewards those who can commit to their strokes. It bridges the gap between the Gravity Pro’s stability and plow-through and the MP’s spin and maneuverability. Compared to competitors, it outshines the Blade 98 in versatility and comfort but falls slightly behind in raw precision. It’s a well-rounded frame for advanced players seeking a mix of modern performance and traditional feel.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Additional tips I picked up (from actually watching):
- Stringing: Consider stringing 5-7% higher in tension, then playing down into your ideal string bed stiffness
- Maneuverability: Better than the GPro, even the GT100
- Grips: works equally well with Eastern, Semi-Western even Western grips
Click to expand...
Beautiful video and very informative.
I could really tell that when you were hitting morally your balls were landing short by the service line box, and mostly were the forehand while the back hands were landing deeper. Any time you tried to get the ball deeper with your forehand the trajectory of your balls changed drastically becoming very looping., while your back hand balls were more linear. However, the eye opener for me was when you were hitting bigger around the 8th to 10:30 minute. I really had the confirmation that this GT 98 is not a power racquet like a lot of people were saying or anticipating. When you were hitting full swing full power your opponent, who is probably a good tennis player had no issue hitting back.
Thank you for your review which seems spot on!
You have a really nice one hand back hand!
 
Tmano said:
Beautiful video and very informative.
I could really tell that when you were hitting morally your balls were landing short by the service line box, and mostly were the forehand while the back hands were landing deeper. Any time you tried to get the ball deeper with your forehand the trajectory of your balls changed drastically becoming very looping., while your back hand balls were more linear. However, the eye opener for me was when you were hitting bigger around the 8th to 10:30 minute. I really had the confirmation that this GT 98 is not a power racquet like a lot of people were saying or anticipating. When you were hitting full swing full power your opponent, who is probably a good tennis player had no issue hitting back.
Thank you for your review which seems spot on!
You have a really nice one hand back hand!
Click to expand...
-i got to test it today, the head.g.TOUR.98
-as you stated, it is not a "power racquet" per say,,
-this racquet WANTS speed!,
- its been mentioned/touched on in several videos, the sound!
-the grommets at top, have a "whisthel" to it, meaning if you swing fast enough, youll hear it
-it is not a loud sound, nor annoying, its actually like a extra notable sound to try to achieve proper head speed, IMO anyway
-i found the racquet a tad bit heavy, ill need to try again and see if that was me (energy level today) and or if it hurts the racquet performance
-i do like easy swing on the 1HBH! ,(compared to the old gravity.pro 100" ive tried before)
-i also liked the sweet spot, plenty big and/or non notable

-BTW, the racquet is not a toy!, it's a solid racquet for serious hitting
-you also touched on ball depth, and i also found it interesting how i would need to modify my swing to get it deep
-i think it needs some getting used to!

-i was not completely sold on this racquet today, could be the strings!
-i always hated head.hawk/power!? and today was no different
-i strung this racquet with the supplied strings, @47lbs
-the new string (coming soon) head.hawk.TOUR would have been a better option IMO
-i think 4me head.lynx, lux.element, yonex.pt.pro would be better
-more testing to follow
 
Tmano said:
Beautiful video and very informative.
I could really tell that when you were hitting morally your balls were landing short by the service line box, and mostly were the forehand while the back hands were landing deeper. Any time you tried to get the ball deeper with your forehand the trajectory of your balls changed drastically becoming very looping., while your back hand balls were more linear. However, the eye opener for me was when you were hitting bigger around the 8th to 10:30 minute. I really had the confirmation that this GT 98 is not a power racquet like a lot of people were saying or anticipating. When you were hitting full swing full power your opponent, who is probably a good tennis player had no issue hitting back.
Thank you for your review which seems spot on!
You have a really nice one hand back hand!
Click to expand...
Thanks a lot, appreciate it

I would like to note that I was using Slazenger Wimbledon balls through the all the video footage, they are about one of the slowest ball you could possibly play with from any of the premiums.

If i use any regular ball, spin and power and depth would be heavily enhanced, the effort required to continually swing out on those balls is another 20% effort to result in 20% less output, those would not be coming back trust me lol
 
ACT said:
Thanks a lot, appreciate it

I would like to note that I was using Slazenger Wimbledon balls through the all the video footage, they are about one of the slowest ball you could possibly play with from any of the premiums.

If i use any regular ball, spin and power and depth would be heavily enhanced, the effort required to continually swing out on those balls is another 20% effort to result in 20% less output, those would not be coming back trust me lol
Click to expand...
I did not know those balls could affect so greatly the shots!
The GT98 is going to be on my top list for the 2025 demo along with the Ezone
Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACT
Dragy said:
Why you think so? What’s an advantage of having less HL balance for baseliners?
Click to expand...
Speaking for myself, I found that the racket head comes around quicker when the swing is whippy with a good racket lag.
I thought this is subjective feel and in peoples head, but recently bought two tfight iso 300 (one overspec, one underspec) and at a certain swing speed the grommets start to whistle.
This was the case with the less HL setup (tried various). But I think it isn't less HL setup alone, weight shifted to 12 o'clock supports this motion.
 
_FrankTheTank_ said:
Speaking for myself, I found that the racket head comes around quicker when the swing is whippy with a good racket lag.
I thought this is subjective feel and in peoples head, but recently bought two tfight iso 300 (one overspec, one underspec) and at a certain swing speed the grommets start to whistle.
This was the case with the less HL setup (tried various). But I think it isn't less HL setup alone, weight shifted to 12 o'clock supports this motion.
Click to expand...
I feel faster whip with less polarization, personally, be it less or more HL balance. More polarized frame with same SW tends to recover from lag slower to me.

About baselines, think Rublev with his GPro heavily handle-weighted.
 
Last edited:
PH tennis just released PA98 comparison, and they say PA has both higher power and spin, that GT98 has low launch angle and suitable for flat hitters :unsure:

But they also list 320 SW for GT98 vs 327 for PA98…

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Head Gravity Tour 2023 vs 2025
Replies
14
Views
3K
ozbikebuddy
O
Templium
Head Gravity Tour 98 vs Head Extreme Pro
Replies
9
Views
2K
lazywombat
L
Templium
Head Gravity Tour 2025
Replies
14
Views
2K
gutfeeling
G
Z
Wilson Blade 100 V9 vs Head Gravity MP 2025
Replies
23
Views
5K
LoanStar
L
Z
Head Gravity MP 2025 magic stick?
2 3
Replies
103
Views
17K
yoka37
yoka37
Back
Top