Head Gravity Pro club!

[Anton]

About a month with the GPRO. To me the best feature of the racket is its monster sweet spot which with along with the mass feels like your can plow through anything. I have mixed feelings about the control/power. You can swing to your hearts content and the racket kind of nerfs my power to get the ball. With most control frames I tried (blade 18x20, prostaff, percept 97d, Blade pro) the power scales to my inputs 1 to 1 like if I try to unload 100% of my power I’ll produce all the velocity I’m capable of. But with the GPRO it feels like it’s 90% of what I was expecting. Which is weird because with the mass, my normal rally balls don’t have that problem. I dunno maybe that was just a long winded way of saying the racket lacks power. Which will probably be a big duh! From the community… I guess a better way to put it is it lacks top end power or maybe it provides a feel of a powerful racket but isn’t?

It offers a pretty unique set of features, which is a breath of fresh air. Too many rackets play similar these days. I enjoyed it.

Unfortunately it’s hard to context what you are saying without knowing what swing-weight you are playing.

More weight = more depth and power, assuming you can technically work it.

I have one GPRO that has 323 swing weight and one that’s 337. They are not really comparable on power - the 337 destroys the ball.

 

[ACT]

GPro has probably one of the highest power outputs at max acceleration from any racquet that i've ever used, provided you can swing it at proper speeds / handle the spec you're using

Even with lower swingweight or static weight , due to 100 sq and teardrop shape, it still has good stability, and max forgiveness, even with a 20mm beam, and because of that beam, it has the potential to swing extremely fast - can't say so much for when it's a higher weight range for myself, but if you're physically strong and don't get hampered by the weight, then same principles apply for higher weight and sw ranges

 

[boneth85]

My briffedi had it come in at 332… leaded it up to 341 because that’s around my preferred swingweight on all my rackets. Same string same tension. Due to 10 years of Olympic weightlifting I’ve never really had a problem generating racket head speed. Strictly an anecdotal experience, but it’s one of the few rackets where I felt like i cracked a shot, saw the ball it produced and thought “that’s it?”

 

[gino]

GPro has probably one of the highest power outputs at max acceleration from any racquet that i've ever used, provided you can swing it at proper speeds / handle the spec you're using

Even with lower swingweight or static weight , due to 100 sq and teardrop shape, it still has good stability, and max forgiveness, even with a 20mm beam, and because of that beam, it has the potential to swing extremely fast - can't say so much for when it's a higher weight range for myself, but if you're physically strong and don't get hampered by the weight, then same principles apply for higher weight and sw ranges

It really is wild how you can get such a potent combination of power& forgiveness with the GPro. I was baffled how it’s layup made it feel way more forgiving then my weighted up Youtek Speed IG MPs, which are heavier but not as stable. Weight in the GPro is distributed perfectly

 

[esm]

Very tempted to get my GPros out again. One of them is a big boy at 338 stock unstrung SW… lol

 

[yourtennisfit]

My briffedi had it come in at 332… leaded it up to 341 because that’s around my preferred swingweight on all my rackets. Same string same tension. Due to 10 years of Olympic weightlifting I’ve never really had a problem generating racket head speed. Strictly an anecdotal experience, but it’s one of the few rackets where I felt like i cracked a shot, saw the ball it produced and thought “that’s it?”

What's your string setup like? Similar to ACT I would say the Gravity Pro rather has that extra oomph which other rackets don't have
Hard to tell from a distance, but I hardly ever played a better racquet to put away shots

 

[boneth85]

What's your string setup like? Similar to ACT I would say the Gravity Pro rather has that extra oomph which other rackets don't have
Hard to tell from a distance, but I hardly ever played a better racquet to put away shots

Weiss Cannon ultra cable @ 55lbs… not sure where this racket would find more power then other rackets once swing weight and string are equalized. It’s a flexy thin beamed 18x20.

 

[yourtennisfit]

Weiss Cannon ultra cable @ 55lbs… not sure where this racket would find more power then other rackets once swing weight and string are equalized. It’s a flexy thin beamed 18x20.

Ultra Cable isn't exactely a powerful string - I have the following setups in my 3 Auxetic GPros and all are banging:

1. SW 296 unstrung, Solinco Tour Bite Soft 24/23kgs
2. SW 298 unstrung, Yonex PTP 1,20 25/24kgs
3. SW 299 unstrung, Luxilon Alu Power Vibe 24/23kgs

In the old 360+ I always string Head Lynx Tour 24/23kgs - also powerful.
The thin beam doesn't have to mean there is no power, I don't understand why you would think that. Some rackets just don't produce power from a flick of the wrist, but they still can put away balls at max speed. Up to your setup and arm speed to do that.

 

[Hulger]

About a month with the GPRO. To me the best feature of the racket is its monster sweet spot which with along with the mass feels like your can plow through anything. I have mixed feelings about the control/power. You can swing to your hearts content and the racket kind of nerfs my power to get the ball. With most control frames I tried (blade 18x20, prostaff, percept 97d, Blade pro) the power scales to my inputs 1 to 1 like if I try to unload 100% of my power I’ll produce all the velocity I’m capable of. But with the GPRO it feels like it’s 90% of what I was expecting. Which is weird because with the mass, my normal rally balls don’t have that problem. I dunno maybe that was just a long winded way of saying the racket lacks power. Which will probably be a big duh! From the community… I guess a better way to put it is it lacks top end power or maybe it provides a feel of a powerful racket but isn’t?

It offers a pretty unique set of features, which is a breath of fresh air. Too many rackets play similar these days. I enjoyed it.

Very well said sir

 

[boneth85]

Ultra Cable isn't exactely a powerful string - I have the following setups in my 3 Auxetic GPros and all are banging:

1. SW 296 unstrung, Solinco Tour Bite Soft 24/23kgs
2. SW 298 unstrung, Yonex PTP 1,20 25/24kgs
3. SW 299 unstrung, Luxilon Alu Power Vibe 24/23kgs

In the old 360+ I always string Head Lynx Tour 24/23kgs - also powerful.
The thin beam doesn't have to mean there is no power, I don't understand why you would think that. Some rackets just don't produce power from a flick of the wrist, but they still can put away balls at max speed. Up to your setup and arm speed to do that.

Thin beams having less energy return then thicker beams comes from physics. I’m saying thin flexy 18x20 have no advantages physically in energy return than thicker, stiffer, more open string pattern rackets. Where will it catch up to other rackets that power potential given the mass is equal. The only possible thing would be composition/layup. Or even more possible your interpretation of what a powerful shot is and my interpretation is different.

Also, I can throw a baseball 90mph, I serve 120mph+ heck I can clean and jerk 150kg. Not elite by any means but it’s above average why’s everybody think I’m not swinging hard enough just because I think a racket has 10% less power then other frames?

 

[yourtennisfit]

Thin beams having less energy return then thicker beams comes from physics. I’m saying thin flexy 18x20 have no advantages physically in energy return than thicker, stiffer, more open string pattern rackets. Where will it catch up to other rackets that power potential given the mass is equal. The only possible thing would be composition/layup. Or even more possible your interpretation of what a powerful shot is and my interpretation is different.

Also, I can throw a baseball 90mph, I serve 120mph+ heck I can clean and jerk 150kg. Not elite by any means but it’s above average why’s everybody think I’m not swinging hard enough just because I think a racket has 10% less power then other frames?

I think the GPro really benefits flat hitters, and that's why I said it is hard to tell from afar. Did not want to question your physical abilities, but the reality for me is that this racket has helped me more than most of my rackets.

Sure - the Pure Drive will have a higher average power outcome, but I never had the feeling that the GPro was lacking power. It generates that through plow through and I think it is super important to string a bit looser and hit flat on put away shots

 

[boneth85]

I think the GPro really benefits flat hitters, and that's why I said it is hard to tell from afar. Did not want to question your physical abilities, but the reality for me is that this racket has helped me more than most of my rackets.

Sure - the Pure Drive will have a higher average power outcome, but I never had the feeling that the GPro was lacking power. It generates that through plow through and I think it is super important to string a bit looser and hit flat on put away shots

No worries, like I said I like the racket. Just had a very slight difference in experience at the end of the day.

 

[Hulger]

GPro has probably one of the highest power outputs at max acceleration from any racquet that i've ever used, provided you can swing it at proper speeds / handle the spec you're using

If you can’t understand what the other guy was telling, i guess you are not hitting hard enough or haven’t been comparing racquets under some kind of radar system

 

[Fairhit]

The Gpro has plenty of power but you have to know how to produce it, is not a Pure Strike or Drive, you have to put the mass of the frame behind the ball and if you play with lots of topspin, it will not give that much power, if you hit flatishly, you'll get a deeper heavier ball.

 

[yourtennisfit]

If you can’t understand what the other guy was telling, i guess you are not hitting hard enough or haven’t been comparing racquets under some kind of radar system

Let's put it this way - in stock form, this racket will produce even or higher speeds than a stock form power racket (300gr, 315SW) if you hit flat and use the mass into the ball. A stiffer racket with a thicker beam might be easier to handle, hits harder on spin shots, but it will lack qualities that the GPro can give you.

And if you beef up something like an Aero or Drive to 315gr, you will get both technically - but I guarantee that you will also lack control & maneuverability.
Each racket has its own characteristic and just by adjusting the weights, those won't change. The Gravity Pro frame is a lot powered frame in one way, but also very powerful thanks to its plow through.

 

[Hulger]

Let's put it this way - in stock form, this racket will produce even or higher speeds than a stock form power racket (300gr, 315SW) if you hit flat and use the mass into the ball. A stiffer racket with a thicker beam might be easier to handle, hits harder on spin shots, but it will lack qualities that the GPro can give you.

And if you beef up something like an Aero or Drive to 315gr, you will get both technically - but I guarantee that you will also lack control & maneuverability.
Each racket has its own characteristic and just by adjusting the weights, those won't change. The Gravity Pro frame is a lot powered frame in one way, but also very powerful thanks to its plow through.

Take Gravity Pro and other thin-beamed, dense, similar flex-rating racquet like Ultra Pro 18x20. Try different weight, SW and TW setups, and you might begin to wonder why one consistently hits serves and full groundstrokes 10 km/h faster. Shave the bumper of Gpro to achieve 320 SW and still get the same results. Figure out that this could come down to hoop size, which can affect air resistance, but on the other hand a larger size should also provide more power. In the end, it just feels like the graphite layup is different, with one racquet having more pop.

Yes, I understand that RA doesn't tell the whole truth about stiffness. And I'm not saying Gravity is a bad racquet, but it seems to have pretty limited max power compared to some other sticks.

 

[SupremeCourt]

Just hit the g360 gpro for the first time in over a year. Hitting partner pulled one out of the bag with 2 year old poly. Felt slightly under spec, but I forgot how good this thing is. Every ball was just hit on a rope. You can make your opponent run back and forth just by hitting your targets. Really rivals the ISO 305 in all out power, but in a more fore giving package when you are properly set.

Edit: Mass based power

 

[yourtennisfit]

Take Gravity Pro and other thin-beamed, dense, similar flex-rating racquet like Ultra Pro 18x20. Try different weight, SW and TW setups, and you might begin to wonder why one consistently hits serves and full groundstrokes 10 km/h faster. Shave the bumper of Gpro to achieve 320 SW and still get the same results. Figure out that this could come down to hoop size, which can affect air resistance, but on the other hand a larger size should also provide more power. In the end, it just feels like the graphite layup is different, with one racquet having more pop.

Yes, I understand that RA doesn't tell the whole truth about stiffness. And I'm not saying Gravity is a bad racquet, but it seems to have pretty limited max power compared to some other sticks.

Sorry that is a non-sense take - because that is excately my point. Gravity Pro has nothing to do with something like a Ultra Pro - simply because there is no other racket even remotely close to that headshape with a 100sq inch 20mm 18x20.

I have played both and other ones like the Vcore Pro HD, and the Gravity Pro has about double the amount of power, without having to measure this. Great plus of this stick - it can redirect power extraordinarily well like those mentioned above.

And come on - 10km/h faster?

 

[Gee]

Sorry that is a non-sense take - because that is excately my point. Gravity Pro has nothing to do with something like a Ultra Pro - simply because there is no other racket even remotely close to that headshape with a 100sq inch 20mm 18x20.

I have played both and other ones like the Vcore Pro HD, and the Gravity Pro has about double the amount of power, without having to measure this. Great plus of this stick - it can redirect power extraordinarily well like those mentioned above.

And come on - 10km/h faster?

There is still the Prince Phantom 100x 18x20.

 

[yourtennisfit]

There is still the Prince Phantom 100x 18x20.

Yeah that one is close, but no teardrop shape

 

[Anton]

My briffedi had it come in at 332… leaded it up to 341 because that’s around my preferred swingweight on all my rackets. Same string same tension. Due to 10 years of Olympic weightlifting I’ve never really had a problem generating racket head speed. Strictly an anecdotal experience, but it’s one of the few rackets where I felt like i cracked a shot, saw the ball it produced and thought “that’s it?”

Not sure what weightlifting has to do with generating racket head speed.

For me though GPro has very good put away power but you need to drive the ball. It gives you the solid consistency and depth control to be able to just “go for it”.

Rublev consistently hits some of the hardest, flattest forehands on tour, why? Because he can create that drive and can trust it to stay in with his setup.

If you are trying to play aggressive western spin game this is not really a good frame for that purpose.

Of course there is always the possibility that you got out-of-spec low stiffness.

 

[boneth85]

Not sure what weightlifting has to do with generating racket head speed.

For me though GPro has very good put away power but you need to drive the ball. It gives you the solid consistency and depth control to be able to just “go for it”.

Rublev consistently hits some of the hardest, flattest forehands on tour, why? Because he can create that drive and can trust it to stay in with his setup.

If you are trying to play aggressive western spin game this is not really a good frame for that purpose.

Of course there is always the possibility that you got out-of-spec low stiffness.

Lol, the power clean has been used to develop elite level throwers from Olympic track and field athletes, baseball players, quarterbacks. It’s easily one of the best exercises that work the top end of the force velocity curve. How does moving weight fast not help with racket head speed?

Also rublev is only slightly above tour average in terms of avg forehand speed (77mph)… and he doesn’t hit that flat where he’s also slightly above tour avg in topspin (2700-2900rpm depending on the tournament).

Any other things you just want to make up with out fact checking?

 

[Anton]

Lol, the power clean has been used to develop elite level throwers from Olympic track and field athletes, baseball players, quarterbacks. It’s easily one of the best exercises that work the top end of the force velocity curve. How does moving weight fast not help with racket head speed?

Also rublev is only slightly above tour average in terms of avg forehand speed (77mph)… and he doesn’t hit that flat where he’s also slightly above tour avg in topspin (2700-2900rpm depending on the tournament).

Any other things you just want to make up with out fact checking?

Never seen a power clean at the gym and thought - oh man, this guy must have a blazing forehand.

Yes it helps, but there is a lot more that goes into producing a good stroke.

Bottom line, if you drive the ball GPro has a good mix of power, stability and control to consistently hit a deep ball.

Was your GPro in particular softer than average? Maybe.

I know what you are saying about frame feeling like it’s flex is getting “maxed out” and getting diminished returns on added weight and momentum, but in my experience (with 4 2023GPro frames) this racket has a solid loop and doesn’t suffer from that.

 

[boneth85]

Never seen a power clean at the gym and thought - oh man, this guy must have a blazing forehand.

Yes it helps, but there is a lot more that goes into producing a good stroke.

Bottom line, if you drive the ball GPro has a good mix of power, stability and control to consistently hit a deep ball.

Was your GPro in particular softer than average? Maybe.

I know what you are saying about frame feeling like it’s flex is getting “maxed out” and getting diminished returns on added weight and momentum, but in my experience (with 4 2023GPro frames) this racket has a solid loop and doesn’t suffer from that.

Apparently you do know weightlifting has something to do with racket head speed then.

Better data set.

https://imgur.com/a/4N7RphG

 

[Hulger]

I know what you are saying about frame feeling like it’s flex is getting “maxed out” and getting diminished returns on added weight and momentum, but in my experience (with 4 2023GPro frames) this racket has a solid loop and doesn’t suffer from that.

You just had to pick that only available graph where Rublev is in the lead

... But honestly, it's pretty pointless to use someone like Rublev (or Lehecka) as proof of their racket's inherent put-away power. First off, they use such ridiculous amounts of energy on their shots that their racket pretty much needs to be as low-powered and heavy as possible to maintain control.
Secondly, I wouldn't be too sure if it's the same retail prepreg layup under the glossy paint of Rublev's racket, no matter what Dr. Head claims here on this forum. What we can be sure of, though, is that the racket is heavily leaded up.

It's obvious given the specs that the retail Gravity pro isn't a powerful racket. But you really need to max the flex out to get surprised where the energy was lost. Some other rackets return more power even if their flex has reached the bottom. On the other hand, the Gravity seems to return a decent amount of power when hitting at medium speed.

In the end, it's not about whether this is bad or good. It has an excellent feel and plow, and IMO, Gravity is still the best modern control platform racquet for a certain type of player who tends to stand behind and really go for their shots.

 

[DG21]

Just strung up my new Gravity Pro Auxetic yesterday. Specs are 335g with OG, 32.5cm balance with 5g in the butt cap, and 337sw.

First thing I noticed is how plush and comfortable this racquet is. The feel and stability on contact is addicting. The ball coming off the string bed has a lower launch angle and penetrates through the court more. I did have a difficult time adjusting my prep and timing when striking the ball, as the racquet is not as quick through the air vs the PA98. I will definitely need more time with it but so far loving how plush, controlled, and precise this racquet is. I think I got a pretty beefy one though, didn't expect the SW to be that high.

How would you compare gpro to PA98? Which one did you choose in the end?

 

[ajspurs]

How would you compare gpro to PA98? Which one did you choose in the end?

I of course can't speak for the person you quoted, but I played with the two rackets side by side also. I would say it just really depends on the person and the feeling they prefer from a racket. I prefer more of an energy return from my rackets which the PA98 has a fair amount of and the GPro has extremely little of. I find them to be two very different rackets. I have a lot more pace, energy and movement to my shots with the PA98 and that's without any wild loss to control. I think if you can hit out and generate good pace by yourself with the Gravity, it can be a lovely and deadly racket to use, although I can personally imagine having to hit the ball as hard as you maybe need to with the Gravity for so long could be demanding, unless you're someone who can flatten out your shots really well.

I actually want to have a Gravity again just to keep in my bag though, it's a racket I seem to always be curious about using even though I've had one previously.

 

[DG21]

I of course can't speak for the person you quoted, but I played with the two rackets side by side also. I would say it just really depends on the person and the feeling they prefer from a racket. I prefer more of an energy return from my rackets which the PA98 has a fair amount of and the GPro has extremely little of. I find them to be two very different rackets. I have a lot more pace, energy and movement to my shots with the PA98 and that's without any wild loss to control. I think if you can hit out and generate good pace by yourself with the Gravity, it can be a lovely and deadly racket to use, although I can personally imagine having to hit the ball as hard as you maybe need to with the Gravity for so long could be demanding, unless you're someone who can flatten out your shots really well.

I actually want to have a Gravity again just to keep in my bag though, it's a racket I seem to always be curious about using even though I've had one previously.

Thanks for your feedback. I have been down the racket rabbit whole for quite some time until i demoed PA98! I ended up buying it because it is such a great stick! I think it’s one of the frames that does not compromise on pretty much anything. The only downside for me is that i have some wrist and elbow pain after playing with it even with medium stiff strings (rpm power 1.30) and low tension (21/20kg). I have gtour 2021 in my bag but i did not really jell with it and i always wanted to try gpro, because heard so many good things about it. Tried the 2023 version but did not quite like it. Now, i kind of have to try the 2019/2021 one just to close this chapter. I am same as you, i am not sure gpro could become my main stick and replace my PA98 but i just want to have one in my bag, especially when i have some elbow issues which i never had when using the tour 2021 (beefed up to gpro specs!) for example.

 

[Anton]

Zverev not lacking power from his GPro against Nadal right now

 

[GAS]

GPro is a great racquet but definitely for more advanced players. If you think that it's too heavy/too much swingweight then there are plenty of racquets that will fit your game/strokes.

 

[johnmccabe]

I of course can't speak for the person you quoted, but I played with the two rackets side by side also. I would say it just really depends on the person and the feeling they prefer from a racket. I prefer more of an energy return from my rackets which the PA98 has a fair amount of and the GPro has extremely little of. I find them to be two very different rackets. I have a lot more pace, energy and movement to my shots with the PA98 and that's without any wild loss to control. I think if you can hit out and generate good pace by yourself with the Gravity, it can be a lovely and deadly racket to use, although I can personally imagine having to hit the ball as hard as you maybe need to with the Gravity for so long could be demanding, unless you're someone who can flatten out your shots really well.

I actually want to have a Gravity again just to keep in my bag though, it's a racket I seem to always be curious about using even though I've had one previously.

I got 4 Gpro. Playing with PA98 for only a few days. Agree with your assessment. Strange enough, I can switch between a weighted Gpro and stock PA98 without changing much how I hit. Haven't played any matches with PA98 yet.

 

[Yiuh]

I don’t have anything scientific to add to the power discussion but anecdotally I’m hitting way more clean winners with this stick (2021 GPro) than I ever have before. Part of that is the precision and the confidence it gives me to go for lines, but a lot of it is undeniably heavier balls and exceptional depth from the way this thing makes contact and comes through the zone.

I also, fwiw, am not some Adonis - mid 30s dad of toddlers - and have never had an issue swinging/maneuvering/handling the weight. Maybe I got lucky with the SW lottery (haven’t measured) but it feels like a Goldilocks stick to me. It’s even comfortable on my arm!

 

[esm]

Finally setup the GPro again….. have been putting it off until a certain FO match last night.
So here it is, it is ready for the comp matches this week. Will see how it goes with the new specs.

It is faster through the air compared to my “current” main sticks and gotta love the thin beam!

 

[ajspurs]

Thanks for your feedback. I have been down the racket rabbit whole for quite some time until i demoed PA98! I ended up buying it because it is such a great stick! I think it’s one of the frames that does not compromise on pretty much anything. The only downside for me is that i have some wrist and elbow pain after playing with it even with medium stiff strings (rpm power 1.30) and low tension (21/20kg). I have gtour 2021 in my bag but i did not really jell with it and i always wanted to try gpro, because heard so many good things about it. Tried the 2023 version but did not quite like it. Now, i kind of have to try the 2019/2021 one just to close this chapter. I am same as you, i am not sure gpro could become my main stick and replace my PA98 but i just want to have one in my bag, especially when i have some elbow issues which i never had when using the tour 2021 (beefed up to gpro specs!) for example.

I am the same mate. Used the PA98 and loved it, was good for everything and I never looked to my racket if things weren't going well. I too developed wrist and elbow pain but I'd used it for months without anything, so I'm thinking it also may have been due to having my strings in for too long and making a technical tweak that ultimately had me arming the ball too much. I have demoed other rackets since but have become fed up with not being able to focus on just my tennis so recently bought a PA98 again, in the hope that I'll be OK with it this time around.

UPDATE: Ok sorry, I'd typed that out before but forgot to send it. I have the PA98 again, hit with it and was absolutely delighted, it just does everything I want it to, BUT, my arm flared up afterwards worse than I thought it would Am pretty bummed to be honest! I now think I'll purchase a Gpro sooner rather than later. My only dilemma is whether to get the latest one or the first gen one.

I got 4 Gpro. Playing with PA98 for only a few days. Agree with your assessment. Strange enough, I can switch between a weighted Gpro and stock PA98 without changing much how I hit. Haven't played any matches with PA98 yet.

Yeah I can believe that to be honest. How have you weighted up your Gravity? I used to have one that was like 354g and it was pretty nice, never had a problem swinging it or anything.

 

[dl32]

Zverev not lacking power from his GPro against Nadal right now

Crushing liners and inside out on clay is impressive. I also like that zverev’s rpm’s are not far off from Sinner and Alcaraz, which is still crazy for an 18x20.

 

[dl32]

I’ve been toying with frames all too long but am slowly dialing in. The frame that was closest to getting me to settle was a Wilson h22, flexier and I tested blade pros as well. Also, dealt with a golfer elbow issue, so part of my search and technique improvement focus was to ensure I protect my arm while playing hard.

Most recent frame that had me hitting for at least two weeks was the 2022 speed mp. Good frame but any imperfections when redirecting cross court rally’s down the line, I had a tendency to fly long.

Had a TGT344.4 sitting around that originally came in at higher spec, when I liked a 340 swing weight, but my preference changed and at the time, my technique lacked a bit (ultimately corrected) and I muscled the frame too much instead of being fluid; it got me too tired. Fast forward 3 months and still testing frames:

1. TGT 344.4 Updated Specs with dampener and overgrip
Static 340
Bal 31.6
SW 332

2. String - reverse Zverev setup
VS Touch 1.25 mains @ 47.5
Restring Sync 1.25 @ 45.5

Comments:

1.My biggest gripe with the frame in the past, ignoring specs, was feeling slow at net. 31,6 balance cured all this and stability was not impacted at 332 SW.

2. Grounfstrokes are 2nd to none. Most of the benefits of open pattern but all the benefits of a thin beam 18x20. Redirecting is video game like.
I play 90% on the rise, frame was made for it!

3. I achieved spin in a similar manner to a Federer forehand. Closed face, straight arm, through the ball and cross the chest post contact. Less windshield wiper style, more driving through semi south/north and it creates a heavy ball.

4. OHBH may be bigger than the forehand. Solid slice.

5. Serves are solid on everything especially with lower balance. Just easier for wrist control and I didn’t lose power with a 340 static and 332 swing weight.

Overall, I’m happy I dug this frame back out. It’s definitely a high octane tool that needs to be driven hard.

 

[HeavyHitter]

Try natural gut 1.30mm in the mains and 4G 1.25mm in the cross. You can string from 22kg~25kg (48~55lbs). You'll get way more power, spin and a higher launch angle. If you're not a string breaker, this combo will hold tension for a long time and will be worth the investment. I've tested many strings and tensions, and nothing comes close in this frame.

 

[dl32]

Will definitely try, frame plays well but tension dropped fast after 2days. I think spacing will handle 1.30 well

 

[HeavyHitter]

Will definitely try, frame plays well but tension dropped fast after 2days. I think spacing will handle 1.30 well

Honestly with gut, the trade-offs from 1.25mm to 1.30mm is negligible IMO. I tried alu power and hawk touch in the crosses and they both fell off after 2 sessions. With 4G you can play until the gut breaks and you don't have to string it too tight either as 4G gives plenty of control. My frames are higher swingweight than yours and I'm at 24kg in the summer so you can def try it at lower tension.

 

[dl32]

A little more tension than what I have now I believe will make sense.

Would you mind sharing your specs?

 

[HeavyHitter]

A little more tension than what I have now I believe will make sense.

Would you mind sharing your specs?

I'm stringing the 4G .5kg lower than the gut, so 24kg/23.5kg. My current specs are around 342gr,32.5cm ,345sw~.

 

[sicknote]

Just played the first time with the gravity pro. Came from head Speed pro and artengo tr960 control tour. I always said i wanna have a frame with the feeling of my old Prestiges or the artengos with a bigter sweetspot and 100sqi. I finally found it. It seems to be made for me. I instantly fell in love with this racquet

 

[DG21]

I’ve officially joined the club! And i must say FINALLY! I wanted to buy Gpro for almost one year but always hesitated and thought that i was not good enough to use such a racket. But i gave up and got myself 2021 Gpro (i demoed 2023 version and i did not like it at all!)

What a racquet! After demoing 20+ different racquets for 1-2 weeks each, my racquet journey is finally over. I just love this stick! Gpro 2021 allows you to play a very versatile tennis. Compared to my Pure Aero98 i feel that it is faster through the air because of 20mm beam, it slices much better than Aero once again due to the thickness of the beam, it is much easier to serve with and it packs a very big punch with very descent spin! I really struggle to understand why many people call it underpowered. You can hit flat bombs with it but you can also use spin and hit loopy balls. Subject to your specs and technique. My racquet was right on spec with 315g unstrung. I dont know the SW but i feel it is around 330-332 so pretty much on spec too. I started with my standard step 1 - took off the replacement grip and put three OGs to lower the static weight and make it a bit more whippy (i often do this). My strung specs are: 331g static with 3OGs and dampener, 32.4cm balance. Now i am experimenting with even lower static weight - i took off my three OGs, put Babolat Syntec Team replacement grip that weights only 12g and now my static weight is 329g. Both set ups feel great. I personally really like the combination of low static weight and decent SW.

Regarding strings, i use the “factory strings” Head Sonic Pro at 24kg. I was shocked how much i liked and still like these cheap strings. Great energy output, great control, good spin and very very comfortable. This string is a truly hidden gem

 

[esm]

I’ve officially joined the club! And i must say FINALLY! I wanted to buy Gpro for almost one year but always hesitated and thought that i was not good enough to use such a racket. But i gave up and got myself 2021 Gpro (i demoed 2023 version and i did not like it at all!)

What a racquet! My racket journey is officially over. Gpro 2021 allows you to play a very versatile tennis. Compared to my Pure Aero98 i feel that it is faster through the air because of 20mm beam, it slices much better than Aero once again due to the thickness of the beam, it is much easier to serve with and it packs a very big punch with very descent spin! I really struggle to understand why many people call it underpowered. You can hit flat bombs with it but you can also use spin and hit loopy balls. Subject to your specs and technique. My racquet was right on spec with 315g unstrung. I dont know the SW but i feel it is around 330-332 so pretty much on spec too. I started with my standard step 1 - took off the replacement grip and put three OGs to lower the static weight and make it a bit more whippy (i often do this). My strung specs are: 331g static with 3OGs and dampener, 32.4cm balance. Now i am experimenting with even lower static weight - i took off my three OGs, put Babolat Syntec Team replacement grip that weights only 12g and now my static weight is 329g. Both set ups feel great. I personally really like the combination of low static weight and decent SW.

Regarding strings, i use the “factory strings” Head Sonic Pro at 24kg. I was shocked how much i liked and still like these cheap strings. Great energy output, great control, good spin and very very comfortable. This string is a truly hidden gem

If you want to further reduce the weight… change the pallet one size up and use Wilson FeatherThin replacement grip… or just replace with FeatherThin to start with.

 

[DG21]

If you want to further reduce the weight… change the pallet one size up and use Wilson FeatherThin replacement grip… or just replace with FeatherThin to start with.

Thank you! Good timing. I am actually on a “grip size journey” now. I have started to notice that i not only play better tennis with a lower static weight/medium-high SW (so to say “sinnerish spec) but also with a smaller grip size. My Gpro is L4 but it still feels a bit small, so i experimented and added some OGs on top of the Hydrosorb Pro replacement grip. The thicker grip felt like home but i noticed that my shots became a tiny bit faster and harder but flatter and with less spin. Bigger grip does not allow me to use my wrist when hitting forehand. Now i am experimenting with 1.50mm Babolat Syntec Team and no OGs and though it feels small, i am able to use my wrist much more and play a much more spinny game which gives lots of versatility to my shots. We play on clay here, so spin is crucial.

 

[DG21]

I have two specs that work well at the moment, one i use for a bit more plowthrough and the other i use for a bit more manoeuvrability / wrist freedom

Can't exactly remember my balance points exactly, but these are the rough specs (balance point wise), the rest are measured properly

Spec 1) 2019 - 323g strung, 33.3cm balance, 338 SW (currently using Tru Pro 1.18mm Durafluxx) - or if i use Tour Bite 1.15mm it will be 331 SW (but i would increase the static back up by 5g)
Spec 2) 2021 - 327g strung, 32.8cm balance, 330 SW (currently using Volkl V-Square 1.20mm & Tru Pro Ghostwire 1.23mm) - secondary set up is Tru Pro Firewire Boost Hybrid

My original 2019 one is not really underspec, my 2021 one is - but with Tour Bite 1.15mm it gets it into my original favoured spec

But now that i've been messing around a little bit more, I also play very well with lighter static, head heavier balance and higher SW to compensate the lower static weight, because the static weight reduction allows me to swing just as fast, despite the higher SW, and doesn't tire me as fast, and i also find it more manoevurable overall compared to a typically heavier spec, for a better headlight balance

It's a very Sinnerish spec, but works well due to 20mm beam (i can't use Sinners Speed because of the 22mm beam) - but essentially i'm not truly gunning for a pro player spec, i'm just playing with what suits me, I think for example if you ratio'd Sinner's specs into a lighter set up, you could find just as many benefits and ease of use but at our levels

Exactly what i mentioned above. I think “sinnerish spec” compliments Gpro 2019/2021 very well!

 

[Jono123]

The Gpro is a great racquet and quite unique. Its easy to play due to the 100 inch and a generous sweetspot. Its the ultimate doubles frame as its weakness is when you're stretched.

For me its Gpro Dubs and Pro Staff singles.

 

[JFrijhoff]

Agree. I've tried a bunch of rackets (and still am), but when I'm training against heavy hitters I more often pick up the GPro Auxetic than not, because it's so darn stable and easy to return balls deep on the court when on a stretch. Still trying to find the best string though. Leaning towards thinner gauge strings (also to decrease weight and swingweight), 1.15 tourbite soft plays quite nice. But also plan to try Volkl Cyclone in 1.10 gauge.

 

[Jono123]

I use a thin multi string, which gives it even more power.

Tecnifibre X-One Biphase 17/1.24 String | Tennis Warehouse

www.tennis-warehouse.com

https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Tecnifibre_X-One_Biphase_15L_135_String_/descpageACTFUSA-X115L.html

 

[Anton]

Been loving K-Pro hybrid in my GPro23 - right gauge, good feel/touch, very consistent response and depth control aggressive ball drivers will appreciate.

Hyper G was more spin and may suit more western loop players…but feel/control went out the window and if you are playing this style GPro is probably not the right choice of racket anyway.

Karue Sells (the K in this string’s name) hits kinda flat and K-Pro or K-Pop is great for this style.

I string it at ~48lb constant pull.