Thanks for your reply. It's funny because I just did a session in Mach10 and I find it a bit uncontrollable. Next time, I'll try it in Razor-soft 1.30. Otherwise, I already tested it in Head Hawk Touch 1.30 and it was really good.J’étais sur le test de jeu et je joue toujours avec. Je n’arrête pas d’y revenir. J’adore le rapport puissance/contrôle. Ne me donne pas de problèmes de bras même avec des cordes poly complètes. En ce moment, j’ai fait Mach10 dans les deux mains et les croisements à 45 livres. Pas de poids supplémentaire autre que j’ai remplacé la poignée par une poignée en cuir de TW et ajouté une surgrippe.
I did a session with Head Touch as well and really enjoyed how that string worked with the frame as well. I think mine was 17g.Thanks for your reply. It's funny because I just did a session in Mach10 and I find it a bit uncontrollable. Next time, I'll try it in Razor-soft 1.30. Otherwise, I already tested it in Head Hawk Touch 1.30 and it was really good.
Since the gut went crazy on pricing, I switched to full Hawk Touch or Hawk Touch Rough (the play very much the same to me) and I find it to be a great setup at around 50lbs (I do 50/48 with 5% pre-stretched) full bed.I did a session with Head Touch as well and really enjoyed how that string worked with the frame as well. I think mine was 17g.
Interesting thanksSince the gut went crazy on pricing, I switched to full Hawk Touch or Hawk Touch Rough (the play very much the same to me) and I find it to be a great setup at around 50lbs (I do 50/48 with 5% pre-stretched) full bed.
As mentioned, I see no differenceInteresting thanksDoes the Hawk Touch Rough grip the ball more? More spin or no more than the normal Hawk Touch? Thanks
![]()