Can anyone tell me the difference between the Head Prestige Classic 600, the Head Liquidmetal Prestige and the Head Microgel Prestige Mid Tennis Racquet. Obviously Head claims the technology to be different in each, and obviously the paintjobs are diffferent, but could anyone tell me what the difference in performance is in each and how the specifcations differ?
Head Prestige Classic 600 to the Head Microgel Prestige Mid Tennis Racquet
- Thread starter riggy 69
- Start date
Kirko
Hall of Fame
I've played with both the prestige from 1988, I couldn't do n wrong withat frame. the new version micro-gel is the is so close and maybe better. lively that was the 1st sensation withe the 1988 prestige. the prestige that TW sold were a shadow of the version I "lucked into". the closest and prbably the best is the KBT. you can drive balls without even really thinking eg. flat, top, inside-out. serve is similar.
willgonase10
Banned
-_- You need to fix your grammar and spelling...
This thread is in the wrong forum. Should be in Racquets forum.
As for the Prestige, I thought the LM Prestige Mid was the best after the PC600. The new Flexpoints and Microgels are too artificial for me. I didn't like the iPrestige that much either.
The LM Prestige had this solid feel that made me kill the ball everytime I hit it. I absolutely loved it.
Blade0324
Hall of Fame
yep needs to be moved. that said I didn't really care for the PC600 feel. I'm not a fan of a mid size and it felt too mushy to me. I like the LM version in the MP really well until the new MGPP came out and that is now my racquet of choice. The feel and control of it is much better than the PC600 to me. Not to mention the spin potential is better.
kabob
Hall of Fame
Providing you have good soft string for it, I completely agree with your assessment of the K-Blade Tour.
