Head Pro Tour 2.0 - Ask Us All Your Questions! (podcast now here!)

uk_skippy said:
Further to my post above, I have just started to work on the lower SW rqt I received, and 1st job is to replace the grip with a leather grip.

I ordered L4 gripsize, and when I held them I thought they felt bigger than they should. I have L4 TK82 pallets on my Prestige 360+ MP with Head Tour leather grip, and they felt smaller then the PT2.0 L4's.

So I removed a grip and found this

2020-05-19-19-43-22.jpg


2020-05-19-19-45-05.jpg


2020-05-19-19-45-41.jpg


I measure it as a 2mm gap. Considering they should be flush in their alignment, this is very poor QC. I'm not going to take the grip off the other one until I hear back from TWE. I will send them an email tomorrow.
Click to expand...
so... TK 57(what) under the pallets?
 
uk_skippy said:
I don't know as I've not removed the pallets. I'm keeping every as is so I can return it back to TWE for a refund, and I dont want them to refuse it on the grounds that I messed around with it.
Click to expand...

OMG! Noobs!

You were crying for years that you want Head to bring back the classic racquets, and now that they did, you complain about a 2mm gap in a pallet! lol

You probably should focus more on your game.

If a gap in the pallet is that important to you, this means your game is perfect and the only thing you can improve is the equipment.

I could even play with a wooden racquet and complain less about it, than you guys do about about a very cool, and cheap racquet.

Wonder how many [emoji1360] or [emoji1361] I get for this message [emoji1]
 
Last edited:
I’m interested in buying a pro tour 2.0 but want to know how it compares to the new head 360+ Prestige mp. I’m not a fan of the feel of the new head 360+ Prestige mp so please reply if you’ve hit with both of these racquets. Thanks!
 
kevo82 said:
OMG! Noobs!

You were crying for years that you want Head to bring back the classic racquets, and now that they did, you complain about a 2mm gap in a pallet! lol

You probably should focus more on your game.

If a gap in the pallet is that important to you, this means your game is perfect and the only thing you can improve is the equipment.

I could even play with a wooden racquet and complain less about it, than you guys do about about a very cool, and cheap racquet.

Wonder how many [emoji1360] or [emoji1361] I get for this message [emoji1]
Click to expand...

Is a (n) from me.

1. I have not been crying out for Head to bring back this frame. Plenty of others have though.
2. A 2mm gap is a lack of quality control. No other Head frame I have checked has anything near this type of gap. Given how the specs are all over the place for this frame, having this issue is not a surprise.
3. I have not hit with this frame so I can't comment on whether I can or can't use this frame. I'm currently using the Prestige 360+MP and can focus on my game enough, so it shouldnt be too much of a step.
4. The gap is important as its a QC issue. You cant say that you've never bought anything that has failed QC, and been deemed faulty.
5. If you can beat me with a wooden racquet, then well done. I don't know your skill level and you don't know mine; but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and agree that you can beat me.
 
First impressions on the pt 2.0 8-B
Just put on a leather grip and overgrip.
I kept the original strings. Always play with full poly but with 1.15 or max 1.20.
So wanted to see how it played. It's actualy a nice string to start with.
But i will return to my favorite ones later :cool:
Nice choice from Head.

Is it like the original: No. Definitely not.
But, from the start, it felt like "coming home".
And that is something i didnt have with previous HEAD racquets (prestige mp versions) that followed the original PT.
So, they did a great job!

It sure is stiffer and has more power than the original.
But the feel and touch is right!
I see it more as an evolution of the original. And it's a good one.
And for that price!! Just crazy.

And off course, timing and position has to be right. But that was also with the original.
When tired and bad timing,.... :X3:
I dont see why some people wont use it in a match....
I always played the original in a match.
And for that one also, you need the take care of timing and foot work etc...
So i dont see any difference there...

I will test it later with a little heavier setup, closer to my old PT.
But for now, just enjoy it like it is.

Since there is almost no marketing around it, i dont think we will see it a lot.
Only some "older" HEAD adepts will use it:-D:-D
 
uk_skippy said:
Is a (n) from me.

1. I have not been crying out for Head to bring back this frame. Plenty of others have though.
2. A 2mm gap is a lack of quality control. No other Head frame I have checked has anything near this type of gap. Given how the specs are all over the place for this frame, having this issue is not a surprise.
3. I have not hit with this frame so I can't comment on whether I can or can't use this frame. I'm currently using the Prestige 360+MP and can focus on my game enough, so it shouldnt be too much of a step.
4. The gap is important as its a QC issue. You cant say that you've never bought anything that has failed QC, and been deemed faulty.
5. If you can beat me with a wooden racquet, then well done. I don't know your skill level and you don't know mine; but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and agree that you can beat me.
Click to expand...

I was just saying that you are focusing on the wrong things.

If you don’t like how the racquet feels, I can understand that, but it’s definietely NOT because of a poor QC.
I mean, if the same issue would also be on the pallets of your preferate racquet, you wouldn’t even notice that.

I wasn’t implying that I would beat you with a wooden racquet, because I don’t know your level, but if you can feel a 2mm gap in the pallets, I assume you also played ATP, because I know players from tour that are less picky with their equipment, than you are with yours :)
 
kevo82 said:
I was just saying that you are focusing on the wrong things.

If you don’t like how the racquet feels, I can understand that, but it’s definietely NOT because of a poor QC.
I mean, if the same issue would also be on the pallets of your preferate racquet, you wouldn’t even notice that.

I wasn’t implying that I would beat you with a wooden racquet, because I don’t know your level, but if you can feel a 2mm gap in the pallets, I assume you also played ATP, because I know players from tour that are less picky with their equipment, than you are with yours :)
Click to expand...

I dont know how it feels as I have yet to use it. Before I use it I want to set it up how I have my other racquets, and that means stringing with a string I know how it performs and with my favoured grip.
When any player, no matter their ability, changes racquet the best thing to do is to set it up with the same string/grip and if possible weighting (unless they are clearly moving away from something that doesnt work). This will allow the player to determine what if anything is feeling right. Change 1 thing at a time otherwise you may not know what isn't working.
I may try the PT2.0 with same grip/string and find it doesnt respond how I'd like. So then I changed what isn't working; which would likely be the string, and adjust either tension or a different string.

If the same thing re: pallets had occured on my prestige 360+ I'd be sending them back to Head as faulty. If someone wanted to use this racquet in its current form I would say its akin to an L5 not L4. I dont want to use a grip that big. Its not that I cant feel the gap, because I cant, its because its 1. bad QC, and 2. bigger size than it should be.

I've never played ATP; I only string for ATP/WTA/ITF Players. I also customise for those types of players so I know how picky they can be. When I customise a batch the player expects each one to be the same. Why should I not do the same level for my own sticks.

But this is not about feel or ability or pickiness. It's about QC that has failed.

And amazingly, some of the Head experts on here haven't answered my Q about whether this is an acceptable tolerance. Clearly the gap makes the grip bigger than it should be. But no-one is willing to concede that this is a QC issue, and not a slight on how well this racquet can play.
 
uk_skippy said:
I dont know how it feels as I have yet to use it. Before I use it I want to set it up how I have my other racquets, and that means stringing with a string I know how it performs and with my favoured grip.
When any player, no matter their ability, changes racquet the best thing to do is to set it up with the same string/grip and if possible weighting (unless they are clearly moving away from something that doesnt work). This will allow the player to determine what if anything is feeling right. Change 1 thing at a time otherwise you may not know what isn't working.
I may try the PT2.0 with same grip/string and find it doesnt respond how I'd like. So then I changed what isn't working; which would likely be the string, and adjust either tension or a different string.

If the same thing re: pallets had occured on my prestige 360+ I'd be sending them back to Head as faulty. If someone wanted to use this racquet in its current form I would say its akin to an L5 not L4. I dont want to use a grip that big. Its not that I cant feel the gap, because I cant, its because its 1. bad QC, and 2. bigger size than it should be.

I've never played ATP; I only string for ATP/WTA/ITF Players. I also customise for those types of players so I know how picky they can be. When I customise a batch the player expects each one to be the same. Why should I not do the same level for my own sticks.

But this is not about feel or ability or pickiness. It's about QC that has failed.

And amazingly, some of the Head experts on here haven't answered my Q about whether this is an acceptable tolerance. Clearly the gap makes the grip bigger than it should be. But no-one is willing to concede that this is a QC issue, and not a slight on how well this racquet can play.
Click to expand...

I can see a few potential causes, 1 the hairpin is too big which would be worst case, 2 the mold for the pallet has the tolerance issue and replacement is the solve, 3 the issue lies between: adhesive paper or other semi-permanent materials.

really the best case senario is one or both somehow was molded to not have the proper depth which is a failure, the rest abject failure.
 
uk_skippy said:
I dont know how it feels as I have yet to use it. Before I use it I want to set it up how I have my other racquets, and that means stringing with a string I know how it performs and with my favoured grip.
When any player, no matter their ability, changes racquet the best thing to do is to set it up with the same string/grip and if possible weighting (unless they are clearly moving away from something that doesnt work). This will allow the player to determine what if anything is feeling right. Change 1 thing at a time otherwise you may not know what isn't working.
I may try the PT2.0 with same grip/string and find it doesnt respond how I'd like. So then I changed what isn't working; which would likely be the string, and adjust either tension or a different string.

If the same thing re: pallets had occured on my prestige 360+ I'd be sending them back to Head as faulty. If someone wanted to use this racquet in its current form I would say its akin to an L5 not L4. I dont want to use a grip that big. Its not that I cant feel the gap, because I cant, its because its 1. bad QC, and 2. bigger size than it should be.

I've never played ATP; I only string for ATP/WTA/ITF Players. I also customise for those types of players so I know how picky they can be. When I customise a batch the player expects each one to be the same. Why should I not do the same level for my own sticks.

But this is not about feel or ability or pickiness. It's about QC that has failed.

And amazingly, some of the Head experts on here haven't answered my Q about whether this is an acceptable tolerance. Clearly the gap makes the grip bigger than it should be. But no-one is willing to concede that this is a QC issue, and not a slight on how well this racquet can play.
Click to expand...

I understand.

It’s quite simple: set up the racquet with your preferred strings, and if the grip is too big, you can always install smaller pallets (a stringer/customizer always has pallets in stock), or simply send it back and buy a thinner one.

I hope Head will sell all the stock, and hopefully this will be just one of the first edition of re-issued racquets.

I would buy more iPrestiges and Radical Tour if they would make them exactly like they used to.

Didn’t wanted the A.A. Radical Tour Bumblebee re-issued edition, because I hate OS racquets, but I would definitely buy the MP.
 
jmysun said:
Seems like the new normal.

Click to expand...

It could be on some frames. I know someon else here in the UK who dealt with 4 frames and said there were no issues with pallet gaps. But as there seems to be specs all over the place, it doesn't mean that QC has been high on the frames.
moon shot said:
I can see a few potential causes, 1 the hairpin is too big which would be worst case, 2 the mold for the pallet has the tolerance issue and replacement is the solve, 3 the issue lies between: adhesive paper or other semi-permanent materials.

really the best case scenario is one or both somehow was molded to not have the proper depth which is a failure, the rest abject failure.
Click to expand...

Agree with all those points. The least likely is 3 unless someone has been over generous with the adhesive tape since one would need to use a lot to make a gap of 2mm.

kevo82 said:
I understand.

It’s quite simple: set up the racquet with your preferred strings, and if the grip is too big, you can always install smaller pallets (a stringer/customizer always has pallets in stock), or simply send it back and buy a thinner one.

I hope Head will sell all the stock, and hopefully this will be just one of the first edition of re-issued racquets.

I would buy more iPrestiges and Radical Tour if they would make them exactly like they used to.

Didn’t wanted the A.A. Radical Tour Bumblebee re-issued edition, because I hate OS racquets, but I would definitely buy the MP.
Click to expand...

If working with this frame, then I'd have to replace the current L4 pallet with L3, which I have. But as said before, it is a problem that I should not have to address myself.

I'm with you on iPrestiges; but I'll stay away from any Radicals. Thats just me though
 
Last question, I promise. I am a 4.5-5.0 serve and volleyer but have some shoulder issues. Would the pro tour 2.0 be easier on my shoulder than the old youtek prestige mp? I string all mine at 47 lbs.
 
vonkresse said:
Last question, I promise. I am a 4.5-5.0 serve and volleyer but have some shoulder issues. Would the pro tour 2.0 be easier on my shoulder than the old youtek prestige mp? I string all mine at 47 lbs.
Click to expand...
I’d think the Pro Tour 2.0 would be easier on the shoulder
 
uk_skippy said:
I dont know how it feels as I have yet to use it. Before I use it I want to set it up how I have my other racquets, and that means stringing with a string I know how it performs and with my favoured grip.
When any player, no matter their ability, changes racquet the best thing to do is to set it up with the same string/grip and if possible weighting (unless they are clearly moving away from something that doesnt work). This will allow the player to determine what if anything is feeling right. Change 1 thing at a time otherwise you may not know what isn't working.
I may try the PT2.0 with same grip/string and find it doesnt respond how I'd like. So then I changed what isn't working; which would likely be the string, and adjust either tension or a different string.

If the same thing re: pallets had occured on my prestige 360+ I'd be sending them back to Head as faulty. If someone wanted to use this racquet in its current form I would say its akin to an L5 not L4. I dont want to use a grip that big. Its not that I cant feel the gap, because I cant, its because its 1. bad QC, and 2. bigger size than it should be.

I've never played ATP; I only string for ATP/WTA/ITF Players. I also customise for those types of players so I know how picky they can be. When I customise a batch the player expects each one to be the same. Why should I not do the same level for my own sticks.

But this is not about feel or ability or pickiness. It's about QC that has failed.

And amazingly, some of the Head experts on here haven't answered my Q about whether this is an acceptable tolerance. Clearly the gap makes the grip bigger than it should be. But no-one is willing to concede that this is a QC issue, and not a slight on how well this racquet can play.
Click to expand...
If you think it is an QC issue send it back or talk to your trusted rep. As far as I know you are even a Tour stringer for the brand you are constantly criticizing now for this 1 mm pallet gap for the last couple of days (weeks?). So help yourself and talk to the guys at HEAD you know instead moaning around here.
 
Last edited:
uk_skippy said:
It could be on some frames. I know someon else here in the UK who dealt with 4 frames and said there were no issues with pallet gaps. But as there seems to be specs all over the place, it doesn't mean that QC has been high on the frames.


Agree with all those points. The least likely is 3 unless someone has been over generous with the adhesive tape since one would need to use a lot to make a gap of 2mm.



If working with this frame, then I'd have to replace the current L4 pallet with L3, which I have. But as said before, it is a problem that I should not have to address myself.

I'm with you on iPrestiges; but I'll stay away from any Radicals. Thats just me though
Click to expand...

If you go L3 then the other axis of the grip that isn’t currently the wrong size will be smaller than L4
 
uk_skippy said:
It could be on some frames. I know someon else here in the UK who dealt with 4 frames and said there were no issues with pallet gaps. But as there seems to be specs all over the place, it doesn't mean that QC has been high on the frames.


Agree with all those points. The least likely is 3 unless someone has been over generous with the adhesive tape since one would need to use a lot to make a gap of 2mm.



If working with this frame, then I'd have to replace the current L4 pallet with L3, which I have. But as said before, it is a problem that I should not have to address myself.

I'm with you on iPrestiges; but I'll stay away from any Radicals. Thats just me though
Click to expand...

Why? What’s wrong with Radical Tours?

Love all of them.

The original ProTour 630 wasn’t my kind of racquet, or maybe the string setup was a bad one.
 
raguhtheman said:
Bit demanding, but really really solid racquet! Glad, I got two of these closely matched bad boys from Tennis Warehouse. I see people complaining about stiffness. But, for me, that's the best part about it.

Over time, following this forum, especially @vsbabolat, I have collected many classic Austria made Head Racquets. All these sticks are very nice, but PT2.0 takes the cake for me. Hits better than all these racquets. Hits closer to i.Prestige MP, but in a lighter, more manageable weight.

Silver/Green Prestige Classic 600 Mid
TXP Professional
Head Edge
Trisys 660
IG Prestige Mid
LM Prestige MP
FXP Prestige MP
i.Prestige MP
FXP Radical Tour
LM Radical
Ti Radical

Guys do yourself a favor. Get one (preferably two, closely matched for $10 extra) before TW runs out of these sticks. They are not crazy expensive like Ultra Tours ($250) when they came out.
Click to expand...

That's very strange for me to hear. I have been playing a lot lately with old head classic rackets from Elite pro, Prestige Classic 600 to I.Prestige mid and I.Prestige MP with basically the same strings and tension. I lreally ike I.Prestige MP, but not in a million years i could compare them. They have similar weight and head size (my I.Prestige is even a bit heavier and more HH), but they play absolutely different. I can swing right and left with I.prestige MP, serve missiles like there is no tomorrow, my only worry is to keep the ball in court. With PT 2.0 I get insane stability, which I.prestige MP lacks a bit (even mid seems to be more stable), but RHS is so much slower. It's like comparing aircraft turbine to windmill.

It makes me wonder how much more dense in layup is PT 2.0 at the bottom of the head or at the shaft.
 
vonkresse said:
I’m interested in buying a pro tour 2.0 but want to know how it compares to the new head 360+ Prestige mp. I’m not a fan of the feel of the new head 360+ Prestige mp so please reply if you’ve hit with both of these racquets. Thanks!
Click to expand...
buy it. They are different feel. I actually like how both feel, however, the 360+ MP is plush and 2.0 is crisp. Both layups are well balanced
 
moon shot said:
I can see a few potential causes, 1 the hairpin is too big which would be worst case, 2 the mold for the pallet has the tolerance issue and replacement is the solve, 3 the issue lies between: adhesive paper or other semi-permanent materials.

really the best case senario is one or both somehow was molded to not have the proper depth which is a failure, the rest abject failure.
Click to expand...
It also looks like there is something under the pallet that accidentally may have bunched up - tape, marking sheet...
 
moon shot said:
If you go L3 then the other axis of the grip that isn’t currently the wrong size will be smaller than L4
Click to expand...

Exactly
kevo82 said:
Why? What’s wrong with Radical Tours?

Love all of them.

The original ProTour 630 wasn’t my kind of racquet, or maybe the string setup was a bad one.
Click to expand...

I didnt like the Radical Tours feel. I preferred PC600. I did like the Ti. Radical once I put caps on them. Didnt like the iRadical as I found it too powerful, so moved the iPrestige which I was surprised with, but prob played my best with them. Should never have changed/sold them.
 
Howard H said:
If you think it is an QC issue send it back or talk to your trusted rep. As far as I know you are even a Tour stringer for the brand you are constantly criticizing now for this 1 mm pallet gap for the last couple of days (weeks?). So help yourself and talk to the guys at HEAD you know instead moaning around here.
Click to expand...

I am send it back. I've already said that's what I'll do. Again, read my posts, 2mm. 1mm may have been acceptable. This is not.

Since I posted the original photos I have only answered what someone else has asked. If no-one had asked anything further on it, I would not have made any further comments.

Also, it has nothing to do with people at Head that I may know; plus I don't feel that I should try and pull strings to get a favourable outcome. This is not for them to sort of for me, whether as a favour or not. I don't do that for any brand that I may have an association with. It is down to the retailer to deal with it.

And yet you still didn't answer may question I original posed. Why is that? Can you not been seen as agreeing with a QC issue??
 
uk_skippy said:
I am send it back. I've already said that's what I'll do. Again, read my posts, 2mm. 1mm may have been acceptable. This is not.

Since I posted the original photos I have only answered what someone else has asked. If no-one had asked anything further on it, I would not have made any further comments.

Also, it has nothing to do with people at Head that I may know; plus I don't feel that I should try and pull strings to get a favourable outcome. This is not for them to sort of for me, whether as a favour or not. I don't do that for any brand that I may have an association with. It is down to the retailer to deal with it.

And yet you still didn't answer may question I original posed. Why is that? Can you not been seen as agreeing with a QC issue??
Click to expand...

If @Howard H is correct and you are "a Tour stringer for the brand you are constantly criticizing" that's just a behavior that shouldn't be tolerated by the brand.
I don't tolerate such behavior in my field of activity, and I don't understand people that make their living or part of their income related to certain brand, and instead of sending the feedback via internal channels, take the stuff our to internet. That's like cutting the branch of the tree on which you are sitting, but you cut it between the tree and yourself, which is not very smart way of doing business.

I could find an excuse if every other manufacturer would have had few level higher QC.
But, Babolat and Wilson have their specs for frames at +7/-7 g, isn't it?
so what makes you believe that everything else is being manufactured within 99.99999999% accuracy?
 
blablavla said:
If @Howard H is correct and you are "a Tour stringer for the brand you are constantly criticizing" that's just a behavior that shouldn't be tolerated by the brand.
I don't tolerate such behavior in my field of activity, and I don't understand people that make their living or part of their income related to certain brand, and instead of sending the feedback via internal channels, take the stuff our to internet. That's like cutting the branch of the tree on which you are sitting, but you cut it between the tree and yourself, which is not very smart way of doing business.

I could find an excuse if every other manufacturer would have had few level higher QC.
But, Babolat and Wilson have their specs for frames at +7/-7 g, isn't it?
so what makes you believe that everything else is being manufactured within 99.99999999% accuracy?
Click to expand...
Come on you dont think Head can deal with beeing criticised for something as minor as that? On the contrary i think it honours Skippy as he speeks up and gives criticism to a brand that hes affiliated with. We need more people like that everywhere...
 
Arvid said:
Come on you dont think Head can deal with beeing criticised for something as minor as that? On the contrary i think it honours Skippy as he speeks up and gives criticism to a brand that hes affiliated with. We need more people like that everywhere...
Click to expand...

Do you think that for example "Apple" products are flawless?
Do you see many posts like that about their products? Ask yourself why
That is part of the brand polishing activities.
If you need more people like that, you should be ready to support them financially in real life, and be ready that they will post about your imperfections one sunny day.
 
blablavla said:
Do you think that for example "Apple" products are flawless?
Do you see many posts like that about their products? Ask yourself why
That is part of the brand polishing activities.
If you need more people like that, you should be ready to support them financially in real life, and be ready that they will post about your imperfections one sunny day.
Click to expand...
If i would run a company i would hope that i could cope with criticism where criticism is due and true. If not you could always attemp to run a company like North Korea where everything is always wonderful! Of course theres a point with not making all criticism public but seriously if you cant even mention something like this its really bad....
 
Arvid said:
If i would run a company i would hope that i could cope with criticism where criticism is due and true. If not you could always attemp to run a company like North Korea where everything is always wonderful! Of course theres a point with not making all criticism public but seriously if you cant even mention something like this its really bad....
Click to expand...

I guess you would prefer that people on your pay-roll use internal channels as opposed to public platforms.
 
sanister said:
Wow haven't ever seen one like that.My iPrestiges are pretty well used & have seen their fair share of play but still hold paint very well.



Click to expand...

I took the paint off as it was fairly bad when I bought it. I don’t know if it was kept in a hot garage or what but it felt gross to touch.
 
vsbabolat said:
You don’t have the rubber paint. First year of the i.Prestige had the rubber paint. You have the very nice hard matte black paint.
Click to expand...
Thanks, was a little confused in the beginning myself till I learned this a few years back.Never realised rubber paint was so bad though.Also from what little I know, there is a third kind of release too, like mine.They have hard matt paint but don't say made in Austria on side whereas an old buddy of mine who has paint like mine, his racquets says made in Austria under Head on the sides.
 
sanister said:
Thanks, was a little confused in the beginning myself till I learned this a few years back.Never realised rubber paint was so bad though.Also from what little I know, there is a third kind of release too, like mine.They have hard matt paint but don't say made in Austria on side whereas an old buddy of mine who has paint like mine, his racquets says made in Austria under Head on the sides.
Click to expand...
The production went rubber paint, hard matte paint with made in Austria on the side and then hard matte paint without made in Austria on the side and a little sticker on the butt-cap with made in Austria. Very nice playing racquets.
 
vsbabolat said:
The production went rubber paint, hard matte paint with made in Austria on the side and then hard matte paint without made in Austria on the side and a little sticker on the butt-cap with made in Austria. Very nice playing racquets.
Click to expand...
Yes, that is exactly it.Any idea of production date for mine? Just curious.My stickers on butt cap are long gone but racquets have great paint quality still.They made those pretty robust I would say. And very nice racquets indeed.
 
sanister said:
Yes, that is exactly it.Any idea of production date for mine? Just curious.My stickers on butt cap are long gone but racquets have great paint quality still.They made those pretty robust I would say. And very nice racquets indeed.
Click to expand...
Matte paint with made in Austria on the frame was 2002. Matte paint with just made in Austria sticker on the butt-cap was 2003
 
sanister said:
lol,interesting question.What was the science behind those intelligence fibers?
Click to expand...

"What makes Intelligence Technology possible in racquets is HEAD's breakthrough intellifiber which is a new fiber created from piezoelectric material. HEAD's intellifiber transforms the mechanical energy from ball impact into an electrical response that stiffens the racquet for ultimate power."

Here is a video related to its use in skis
 
moon shot said:
"What makes Intelligence Technology possible in racquets is HEAD's breakthrough intellifiber which is a new fiber created from piezoelectric material. HEAD's intellifiber transforms the mechanical energy from ball impact into an electrical response that stiffens the racquet for ultimate power."

Here is a video related to its use in skis
Click to expand...
Thanks.Smelling a lot of marketing baloney here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TW Staff
Beyond the Playtest: Head Pro Tour 2.0 Tennis Racquet Review
Replies
0
Views
1K
TW Staff
TW Staff
TW Staff
Hydration Specialist - Ask Us ANYTHING! (episode available now!)
Replies
38
Views
3K
Big Ed
B
TW Staff
YOUR QUESTIONS WANTED for Wilson racquet podcast!
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
TennisHound
TennisHound
TW Staff
The Best Off Court Workouts to Improve your Tennis (at any level!) (Talk Tennis Podcast)
Replies
0
Views
649
TW Staff
TW Staff
TW Staff
Official Q&A Thread: New Prince Tour Racquets
Replies
33
Views
2K
TW Staff
TW Staff
Back
Top