stronzzi70
Professional
Hello
I have 2 Pro tour 2.0
Great racquet , but just curious about how good is 360 + MP compared with PT 2.0 ?
I have 2 Pro tour 2.0
Great racquet , but just curious about how good is 360 + MP compared with PT 2.0 ?
Head Pro Tour 2.0 vs Prestige 360 + MP ?
- Thread starter stronzzi70
- Start date
Raizu
Semi-Pro
It’s not. The 360+ is a rounder frame. The 360 is closer to the 2.0. I have 5 of them I got directly from Head and then got the new 360+ from them and the frame plays and feels very different. I have TGK238.2’s also and that frame plays a touch softer than the 360. Hopefully they revert back as it was a bad move going away from the traditional boxier frame of the prestige.
Last edited:
Villain
Professional
I played with both for a while but liked the Prestige better. They play really similar; the PT has a little more power but the Prestige feels softer and has better feel IMO.
Raizu
Semi-Pro
The 360+ is probably a bit more forgiving than the 2.0. They could have just kept the mold and changed the RA though ♂️
Starsailor84
Rookie
360+ is more manoeuvrable in a good way, and is easier to play and swing, but is incredibly low powered. I hate to complain about that, since I am not into these Aero's or anything, but even a full swing and natural gut does not help the case (except the serve, where it is not underpowered at all). If somehow 360+ had the power level of PT 2.0 (which is not too powerful as well), I would make a switch to it. Although PT 2.0 is 95 sq.in. it does not have a smaller sweet spot than Prestige 360+ MP, at least I could not tell any difference. And with regards to stiffness, 61 RA to 65 RA, again, you could not tell that. PT 2.0 feels as good and soft, if not better than 360+ MP. PT 2.0 is just a better racket overall, if you can handle that mega twist weight. I could not play the tennis I wanted with it, was really sad to give up on it.
J011yroger
Talk Tennis Guru
The 360+ MP is a dud.
The mid is the star.
J
The mid is the star.
J
Starsailor84
Rookie
May god bless your brave thread on Prestige MID 360+, I use it now and I don't remember being that happy with the racket.
vsbabolat
G.O.A.T.
MP is a good racquet
I totally agree, in fact it is better than good!
Haasquet
Rookie
Agreed. The new MP is a great racquet.
TennisHound
Legend
I prefer the 360+ PMP. It has a slightly larger head but feels faster, yet has stability. Easy to serve with over a long match.
Did you mean the “Touch PMP” had a rounder head? There never was a 360 Prestige. It went from the Touch to the 360+.
Roquestil
Semi-Pro
Yes.
TennisHound
Legend
I do, but there’s a big following of the Pro. If the Pro had the same specs as the Mid, I would like it more.
jugheadfla
Semi-Pro
the Pro is the gem of the line followed closely by the mid. Like someone else said, the MP is a dud. I think if they would have went with a 16x19 pattern in the MP, it may have had a chance.
Haasquet
Rookie
Yup.
vantage boy
Rookie
PMP 360 plus is now my stick of choice and agree it has great feel, control, spin for a 18x20 and love the better grip shape. lead in the handle and at 3/9 turns it into a beast.
Haasquet
Rookie
I feel for the dudes who used previous iterations of the Prestige MP, and now have to look to the used market for replacements (notwithstanding the PT 2.0, for however long it's available), but I think the new shape is much more useful for a wider population. I really hope Head sticks with it.
Roquestil
Semi-Pro
I dont think so, at least in my experience and what I have read would be:
PT 2.0 has an ever so slightly better feel but PMP 360+ has almost the same feel (slightly more flexible) but in a more user friendly package. So 360+ is better in my opinion for most players
Similar threads
