Sorry to resurrect such an old thread but I wondered if you (or anyone else) could offer some thoughts on the Ti.Fire Pro Edition vs the i.Prestige MP?In 2000 I started to play Ti Fire Pro edt instead of the PT630 and i noticed that i approciated the stiffer feel in the Pro Edt. It helped my game a fair bit and it actually felt like i had better control in the pro edt.
Then in 2002 i changed to i.Prestige MP and it was a mile better then pro edt
7 months ago I purchased 2 i.Prestige MP but liked more i.Prestige Mid for its power and stability. Ti.Fire Pro S.E.2 (TK57A-2) reminds me of i.Prestige Mid. Pure joy.Sorry to resurrect such an old thread but I wondered if you (or anyone else) could offer some thoughts on the Ti.Fire Pro Edition vs the i.Prestige MP?
On paper they look very similar, does that translate on court too?
There are two versions of the Ti.Fire Pro... one that uses the PT57 mold with a crossbar added, and one that come from basically the same mold as the Ti.Radical, but with a crossbar. I always assumed he used the PT57 version, as the CAPs fit so seamlessly, and have we ever seen a pro that has CAPs use a racquet other than a PT57 or PT10 (Prestige mid)? Funny, if you zoom in on the pic where he’s preparing to serve, the paint job say Ti.Fire Tour Edition. Did his racquets ever say Pro Edition?I thought it was established that the Ti. Fire Pro has a PT57C code and is a layup variation of the PT630 mold. Are the comments above saying that he's not using a Ti. Fire Pro or that he's using a Ti. Fire Pro that deviates from the PT57C layup?