eb_tennis_247
Semi-Pro
OK, so I have advanced with my tennis, where I am playing with players that are at least 4.0, and I am also playing in social leagues and free clinics where the players are 3.0 or even below.
I also train with regional Top 20 D1 players/instructors, hitting some high-quality shots.
Here is the issue:
With upper 3.5/4.0 and above players, I have to deal with pace, placement, and weight. It is really helping me advance my tennis, and it requires me to have fitness, reaction time, and technique.
On the positive side, I can hit some good shots back, with heavy topspin and direction, because a heavy pace ball sinks in my string bed, and I can manipulate it.
With low-3.5 and 3.0- players I get swatty, slicey and loopy balls. With lots of concentration, I can place and spin or slice those backs, but it is a day-and-night experience from 3.5+/4.0+.
Two issues I have:
1. My EZONE 98 is perfect for 3.5/4.0 play because it is maneuverable, can generate awesome spin, it has a control, and it can generate controllable power.
When I play with 3.0/3.5- players, the ball does not have a pace, it does not sink in the stringbed so my EZONE 98 is a very different experience. It is hard to control direction and spin unless I am super-ultra dialed in on every shot because EZONE is powerful and has a low SW.
2. It is hard to switch between these play experiences.
Asking for your opinion, if you are at this level (high 3.5/4.0+):
1. Should I or should I not continue to play with low-level players? Some say you should always try to play better players to advance your tennis. On the other hand, one should be able to handle these powder puff shots.
The question is - is it worth playing at a lower level?
2. Should I look for a frame with a heavier SW for 3.0s with more plow? I love EZONE 98, especially against high-level players, but with lower levels, it is a little bit of a liability.
I also train with regional Top 20 D1 players/instructors, hitting some high-quality shots.
Here is the issue:
With upper 3.5/4.0 and above players, I have to deal with pace, placement, and weight. It is really helping me advance my tennis, and it requires me to have fitness, reaction time, and technique.
On the positive side, I can hit some good shots back, with heavy topspin and direction, because a heavy pace ball sinks in my string bed, and I can manipulate it.
With low-3.5 and 3.0- players I get swatty, slicey and loopy balls. With lots of concentration, I can place and spin or slice those backs, but it is a day-and-night experience from 3.5+/4.0+.
Two issues I have:
1. My EZONE 98 is perfect for 3.5/4.0 play because it is maneuverable, can generate awesome spin, it has a control, and it can generate controllable power.
When I play with 3.0/3.5- players, the ball does not have a pace, it does not sink in the stringbed so my EZONE 98 is a very different experience. It is hard to control direction and spin unless I am super-ultra dialed in on every shot because EZONE is powerful and has a low SW.
2. It is hard to switch between these play experiences.
Asking for your opinion, if you are at this level (high 3.5/4.0+):
1. Should I or should I not continue to play with low-level players? Some say you should always try to play better players to advance your tennis. On the other hand, one should be able to handle these powder puff shots.
The question is - is it worth playing at a lower level?
2. Should I look for a frame with a heavier SW for 3.0s with more plow? I love EZONE 98, especially against high-level players, but with lower levels, it is a little bit of a liability.
Last edited: