Do you hit from high to low exactly underneath the on coming ball or the part of the ball that is facing you as the ball is aproaching you.
Do you hit from high to low exactly underneath the on coming ball or the part of the ball that is facing you as the ball is aproaching you.
For the slice, I aim for the outside of the ball in the middle. Not underneath. Go through the ball.
If you hit the outside of the ball you could only go cross-court though, right?
Not exactly. Here is what I mean:
http://passionfortennis.com/2008/04/19/how-to-hit-an-effective-backhand-slice/
For my preference, I aim for the outside part but also aim more in the middle of the ball. The picture shows slightly under which could work depending on the angle of the racquet face.
BB : interesting site, i can forsee myself spending much time there
Yes, it is a good site. Sort of fun moving about in the weeds of tennis instruction. Never know what nugget of information you might find to accelerate the learning curve.
That outside thingy is a good tip. I tested it out on the court and I can support it. Many times people say things here and they have never tried it themselves or use it for that matter. Everything I support and stand for, I have done. I dont support anything that seems amiss or I haven't been able to do on a consistent basis.
BB - do you aim for the outside of the ball to get side spin?
I know this has been debated to death, but I sometimes see "slice" used to refer to a shot having both under and side spin
Am I the only one that doesn't aim for a part of the ball? I think perhaps more than any other shot in tennis, the backhand slice is the easiest and most instinctive shot. It seems pretty natural to me. Does anyone else feel this way?
Am I the only one that doesn't aim for a part of the ball? I think perhaps more than any other shot in tennis, the backhand slice is the easiest and most instinctive shot. It seems pretty natural to me. Does anyone else feel this way?