Terrible bait.
Terrible bait.
Done.Have you voted?
2013 was far higher as more was riding on it at the time and had more A List celebrities present. It was proper mano e mano that got everyone interested. Under that pressure cooker the quality was better. Another Breadstick interestingly in that matchAggregate level of both finalists with some other factors if you want.
Nadal has really ruined your life. I feel sorry for you.2011 - there was absolutely nothing wrong with (prime) Nadal and he got smoked.
In 2013 Djokovic played like crap + he had a 4h SF against Wawrinka in the SF while Nadal played some Berrrettini type of mug like he always does.
2010 early peak Djoker > mummyAgassiScenes when you realise the 2005 final may just be better than any USO final in the 2010s
Plus Nadal was not full fit in 2011 had a slight ankle issue if i recall. 2013 was as good as it gets. Felt huge at the time. Still doesAggregate level of both finalists with some other factors if you want.
+10000Nadal has really ruined your life. I feel sorry for you.
2013 was far higher as more was riding on it at the time and had more A List celebrities present. It was proper mano e mano that got everyone interested. Under that pressure cooker the quality was better. Another Breadstick interestingly in that match
Nadal in the 2011 final alone got broken more times than he did in 14 matches he played in USO 2010 and 2013 combined. But of course there was nothing wrong with him.+10000
It did. It is my abiding memory that half the match when i saw the TV replay (i was at the match live) it kept cutting to various celebrities like wimbledon always does at royal box
Scenes when you realise the 2005 final may just be better than any USO final in the 2010s
Djokovic was Injured in 2011 USO as well. Retired in the Cincinnati final against Murray week before, retired in the Davis Cup against Delpo the week after, barely survived physically in the earlier rounds against Dolgopolov and Tipsarevic. Bunch of MTOs taken that tournament. It was a real physical struggle for Djokovic in that tournament.Plus Nadal was not full fit in 2011 had a slight ankle issue if i recall. 2013 was as good as it gets. Felt huge at the time. Still does
Yeah. If Nadal loses 6-2 6-1 then he is a beast. If Djokovic loses 6-2 6-1 then he is pathetic.2011. The loser in 2011 was solid, the loser in 2013 was a pathetic excuse for a USO finalist
Nadal has been ***** by Djokovic on HC many times. That's normal. Plus, the 3rd set of that final is one of the best you will ever see.Yeah. If Nadal loses 6-2 6-1 then he is a beast. If Djokovic loses 6-2 6-1 then he is pathetic.
And in general, according to this forum, Djokovic was absolutely terrible in all 27 matches which he lost to Nadal.
2011 Nadal wasn't solid LOL. Couldn't serve to save his life and was breadsticked by an injured Djokovic in the 4th.2011. The loser in 2011 was solid, the loser in 2013 was a pathetic excuse for a USO finalist
No, it's only normal after late 2013.Nadal has been ***** by Djokovic on HC many times. That's normal.
Nadal leads Djokovic 2-1 in USO head to head. He got broken just 5 times during the whole USO 2010 tournament, and just 4 times during the whole USO 2013 tournament. You have to be trolling hard to say him getting broken 11 times in a single match is "normal".Nadal has been ***** by Djokovic on HC many times. That's normal. Plus, the 3rd set of that final is one of the best you will ever see.
Djokovic has to play below his best for Nadal to beat him on HC. He has a better serve and return. Same goes for clay just the other way around.
Scenes when you realise the 2005 final may just be better than any USO final in the 2010s
No, it's only normal after late 2013.
Scenes when you realize that the 1995 final may just be better than any USO final in the 2000s.
@metsman approves. Don't forget Safin somewhere.Probably was on aggregate level. PETE BOAT after all.
Probably was on aggregate level. PETE BOAT after all.
@metsman approves. Don't forget Safin somewhere.
Scenes when you realize that the 1995 final may just be better than any USO final in the 2000s.
Scenes when you realise the 1980 final remains the best in the Open Era.
Does 2013 Nadal beat 2011 Djokovic there? What's your take?Nadal leads Djokovic 2-1 in USO head to head. He got broken just 5 times during the whole USO 2010 tournament, and just 4 times during the whole USO 2013 tournament. You have to be trolling hard to say him getting broken 11 times in a single match is "normal".
No idea. But for sure he would do better than 2011 Nadal did.Does 2013 Nadal beat 2011 Djokovic there? What's your take?
Better.
Not really. Look at some of their HC matches from 2007-2009. A lot of 6-3 6-4 scorelines for DjokovicNo, it's only normal after late 2013.
I'll take him over 2013 Djokovic any day of the week and as Stephen A. Smith would say, twice on Sunday. 2013 Djokovic was horrible. Look it up in the dictionary, the definition for horrible is 2013 Djokovic.2011 Nadal wasn't solid LOL. Couldn't serve to save his life and was breadsticked by an injured Djokovic in the 4th.
It's more normal than Nadal trashing Djokovic on a HCNadal leads Djokovic 2-1 in USO head to head. He got broken just 5 times during the whole USO 2010 tournament, and just 4 times during the whole USO 2013 tournament. You have to be trolling hard to say him getting broken 11 times in a single match is "normal".
Both were horrible.I'll take him over 2013 Djokovic any day of the week and as Stephen A. Smith would say, twice on Sunday. 2013 Djokovic was horrible. Look it up in the dictionary, the definition for horrible is 2013 Djokovic.
Not really. Look at some of their HC matches from 2007-2009. A lot of 6-3 6-4 scorelines for Djokovic
Post-USO 13 Djokovic and Pre-USO Djokovic 13 aren't the same person.At least there were close sets in most of their matches. Post-USO '13 Djokovic won 19 consecutive sets on HC and only two of them were close LEL.
Post-USO 13 Djokovic and Pre-USO Djokovic 13 aren't the same person.
I'm sure a documentary will come out when he is retired about how an imposter kipnapped him and impersonated him for most of the 2013 season.Sounds like a strong era vs weak era dichotomy.
With this I certainly agree. That's the only HC match where Nadal.ever won a 6-2 AND a 6-1 set.It's more normal than Nadal trashing Djokovic on a HC
I mean, 1995 Agassi was surely a whole lot better than 2005 Agassi, and yet he didn't give Sampras all that much harder a time than he gave Federer.
Unless, of course, Agassi also peaked at 35, much like Federer would later do.
Sure. Nadal won 3 titles in 2011, one of which is a 500 tournament, but he had a great year. Djokovic in 2013 won 7 titles, including a slam, 3 masters and WTF, yet he was horrible. So tired of Djokovic fanboys who believe 2015 is the norm.I'll take him over 2013 Djokovic any day of the week and as Stephen A. Smith would say, twice on Sunday. 2013 Djokovic was horrible. Look it up in the dictionary, the definition for horrible is 2013 Djokovic.