Djokovicfan
Professional
I kinda want to demo one just to see what its like
How can the wilson clash have enough power when it is so flexible and so light?
- Thread starter Djokovicfan
- Start date
Roads_to_tennis
Rookie
due to the arrangement of the fibers in it. That's the technology. But i never liked that racquet, its not much suitable if you want your racquet to be little powerless
Roads_to_tennis
Rookie
fibers can be arranged in many countless ways and also there exist many materials to do so
Rosstour
G.O.A.T.
go for it. They are so cool.
Dartagnan64
G.O.A.T.
It's all about where you put the flex and where you put the stiffness and how those things react to swing speed.
Personally I can play with it and it's comfortable but it's a numb feeling and I don't really like the control. I have to really go for large targets.
Personally I can play with it and it's comfortable but it's a numb feeling and I don't really like the control. I have to really go for large targets.
TennisHound
Legend
It has about the same feel/ power as the Wilson Envy and Wilson Bold
Last edited:
It is about where and how it flexes. Imagine a flexible rod how the snapback can be used for extra power. One of the things I like about some racquets, is how one can leverage the flex. Clash is not my favorite, but flexy sticks can be fun.
Last edited:
TazerTotts
New User
I imagine its something like how a fishing rod can be flexible yet strong enough to yank a 200lb fish out of the ocean.
Djokovicfan
Professional
Are you saying it doesnt have much power?
The Clash is very headlight which allows for excellent racquet head speed for power and spin (not including the oversize version). It's also got a thick beam frame to enhance stability despite its low flex. Personally, I prefer flexible racquets and their arm-friendly qualities.
What did you like about the 98 over the 100 specifically?
