I'd like to get some feedback on the pros and cons of these 3 racquets (did also have the PS85 in mind but that can wait for another question), the Wilson ProStaff 6.0 95, Dunlop HM 200G and Wilson PS Tour 95. I know they're all quite different but Im running out of sensible alternatives to my old Head Prestige frames so trying to think a bit laterally. I dont want to go any bigger than a 95sq frame as Ive found it plays havok with my backhand but want just a slightly larger margin for error and if there's a slight boost in power that would be fine as well. Ive read the reviews on the different frames and searched for opinions on each one individually so I know that the PS95 has the most fans. But, a comparison of them side to side would round things off for me. None are super expensive but it makes sense to me to get some opinions before buying. BreakPoint, I know you're devoted to your PS95s so your input would be greatly appreciated. Anyone else that can offer some objective info please feel free to respond. Also, does anyone know the exact specs of the PS95? I've got what TennisWarehouse lists but have also just read specifications from the USRSA that puts it at 349grams in total weight, 71 for stiffness and 310 for swingweight which is totally different to the TW specs. Thanks very much.