At the olympics Andy Murray said in an interview, that his fastest 400m is 57 seconds
I happens when people get corrected by facts and they have a hard time admitting itWinning the French under-14 national championships would be the definition of world-class talent (for his age).
If he'd stuck with track, he probably would have ended up a 400m guy given his height. No telling whether he would have been great at track or not in the end, but he was on the right path. Don't know why that would induce mocking.
At the olympics Andy Murray said in an interview, that his fastest 400m is 57 seconds
Um. I highly doubt it. probably runs like a 45 second 400m at he slowest.
I always thought a 400m runner makes a better tennis player than a100m sprinter.
Tennis players as a whole don't seem particularly quick.
Winning the French under-14 national championships would be the definition of world-class talent (for his age).
If he'd stuck with track, he probably would have ended up a 400m guy given his height. No telling whether he would have been great at track or not in the end, but he was on the right path. Don't know why that would induce mocking.
I happens when people get corrected by facts and they have a hard time admitting it![]()
The world record for under 18 is 10.19 and the medium for top sprinters at that age in finals around 10.4. Similarly, the fastest 16 year old result I can see is from the 2011 USATF National Championship by Khalfani Muhammad who ran a 10.55.
So, you're basically claiming your friend is amongst the top in the world of runners aged 2+ years older than him.
I call horse excrement on your claim.
Tennis players are lightning quick at what they need to do which is explode sideways for 2-5m the change directions and do it again, and again, and again. No track and field athlete could transfer over to tennis style movement and be as quick as any of the top players. The movement in tennis is too sport specific for linear runners to excel at just because they're super quick. Bolt for example never needs to slow down abruptly in any of his races but tennis players have to do it all day long.
Well, firstly - being able to run a fast 100m doesn't really matter. Change of direction, explosive burst over 5-10 yds, flexibility are all far more relevant.
I would also suggest that your friend starts preparing for the Olympics - your 15 yr old pal is already as fast as the quickest college wide receivers....and faster than carl Lewis was at the age of 15.
Haven't seen a monfils reference once.
It may be just me but I'm surprised Rafa can go under 11 secs. I'd have thought possibly Monfils would be the only sub 11 second tennis player. Sub 11 seconds is phenomenally quick for anyone in my opinion. Rafa doesn't seem built to sprint, his legs are extremely strong but seem big and heavy.
Where did this info come from?
Just watch Monfils right now and see how fast tennis players are.
I heard nadal, one of the fastest on tour can run only a 10.95. I thought players on tour condition really well. A 10.95 is really slow, I have a 15 or 16 year old friend who plays running back for football and can run a 10.4 or 10.5. Are tennis players this slow because they need to do a lot of running so they require a different type of muscle for all that running?
The world record for under 18 is 10.19 and the medium for top sprinters at that age in finals around 10.4. Similarly, the fastest 16 year old result I can see is from the 2011 USATF National Championship by Khalfani Muhammad who ran a 10.55.
I gotta call BS on this.Djokovic recorded faster speeds than most soccer players, only maybe Arjen Robben being faster and they get a much longer distance to reach peak speeds.
Murray up there aswell. Nice to see because their athleticism is massively underrated by the average person.